Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

L. A. DuBois's page

Pathfinder Society Member. 43 posts (340 including aliases). 1 review. 1 list. 2 wishlists. 3 Pathfinder Society characters.

Sign in to create or edit a product review.

Add Hardcover $44.99

Add PDF $9.99

Well, it's finally happened

****( )

Nicheless creatures have started to creep into the Bestiaries. Shortly after Bestiary 5 was released, I went back and took a look through WotC's Monster Manuals to compare the two lines, and I noticed that the Monster Manuals were filled with completely original creatures that were essentially just "a strange/giant monster" without much to really set them apart from existing strange/giant monsters and give them an easily identifiable role in a setting. Most of the demons and devils from MM4 and MM5 overlapped with previous more iconic ones, and what was the point of the garngrath and malastor?

That in mind, it's impressive how Paizo's Bestiaries have been able to get out five whole Bestiaries where only one or two monsters apiece could be said to have this same "where does it fit in the world, and why wouldn't something else work just as well if not better?" problem. But with Bestiary 6, it seems the well is starting to run dry. Now, don't get me wrong, there are still TONS of excellent creatures here - the vast majority, in fact, and even if there were more filler monsters, the good ones we do have are excellent enough to make up for it. More clockworks, several new undead for a variety of CRs that all remain distinct from existing undead, planar dragons, entothropes (basically lycanthropes but for insects to which I give particular congratulations for being a set of monsters that I've never come across before but the concept of which is still immediately graspable), and of course what is probably the selling point: empyreal lords, archdevils, great old ones, and the like. All of which are excellent. However, given the number of creatures that are just too weird or too dull to fit into a campaign without a hefty amount of contrivance, I'm not looking forward to Bestiary 7. Unless...

Some of my surprise favourites in this book were creatures that were, like the entothropes, unique but identifiable twists on established monsters, or the weirder and more obscure creatures from real world mythology like the kamaitachi. Given that plenty of cultures could fill an entire Bestiary with just their own mythical creatures, I'm sure that there's at least one Bestiary that could be made focusing on real world mythical creatures, even with the healthy amount of tapping into that pool Paizo's already done. Sure, a lot of the iconics have been covered, but the kamaitachi, llorona, euryale, and hupia show that there's still plenty left to draw from, and put Paizo's unique twist on.

P.S. I'd also like to give a quick shoutout to the likes of the danthienne and elder wyrm for being creatures that suggest potential for less combat-focused encounters. I would love to see more like them, too.

©2002-2017 Paizo Inc.® | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours, Monday through Friday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM Pacific time.

Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, Starfinder, the Starfinder logo, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc. The Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Legends, Pathfinder Online, Starfinder Adventure Path, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.