|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
James Jacobs wrote:
Interesting... the Demonomicon articles are some of my favorites from DRAGON. Still, I'm importing a few of the Pathfinder deities into my own campaign world, which means they'll get the deity/divine rank treatment... at some point. Thanks for the information. James Jacobs wrote:
So, only the Demigods will use the deity/divine rank rules from the SRD? Or will the Demigods be statted using the Epic rules? Erik Mona wrote:
Tome of Horrors, Pathfinder Edition I'd like to see two versions of a revised City of Brass. The first version only revises the game statistics as presented in the original boxed set, which will allow those that already have the 3.5 version to use it for Pathfinder without too much difficulty. The second version would be a full Pathfinder Edition that uses the production value of Paizo's product line including full color artwork and glossy paper. It would be the "cat's meow" version. This version would be retrofitted to fit into The Great Beyond (expanded details, new NPCs, additional races, etc.) As for other things from Necromancer Games, I can't think of anything else right now but I would seriously consider anything the make for Pathfinder. memorax wrote: If they do do either something similiar to either Dragon or Dungeon it will probalby be only availiable in PDF format. That would be to bad because not everyone is into buying PDF books/magazines. I think that once the final version of the Pathfinder RPG gets released that there will be more than enough support for a Pathfinder Magazine. I know I'd be interested in such a magazine. I'd also want it to be generic enough to use without having to know Golarion inside and out. The Pathfinder Chronicles is an interesting campaign setting, but I'm more interested in using the Pathfinder RPG as the basis for a new homebrewed campaign world of my own. Lisa Stevens wrote:
I don't mind this idea at all as long as you can do it either way. Adding new options are good as long as they don't take away from the standard options. Savage_ScreenMonkey wrote:
I'm pretty sure we can expect to see a Pathfinder version of Tome of Horrors but it won't likely come out until next year when the final release of the PFRPG comes out. I doubt we'll see a Pathfinder version of the MM as the "Revisited" series will redo those creatures. However, I could see a monster book with some classic OGL creatures and some new ones. After all, not every OGL monster can make it into a "Revisited" book. (That would be way too many books, IMO.) Savage_ScreenMonkey wrote:
I'm not conflicted about the idea at all. The gurus at Paizo have likely thought of it already, and there seems to be a demand for a compiled Pathfinder AP monster book. It becomes a question of when (or if) they decide to do it. It would be very convenient to have the monsters compiled into one source. They could also do a format similar to the map folios where each monster is on its own glossy page, which could be stored in a stylized Pathfinder binder (sold separately). You'd add each "Monster Folio" to the binder. Of course, you wouldn't have to buy the binder (a regular one would work just as well) but it would come with an extra cool features such as combat tables, and blank index cards for monsters, traps, magical items, and the like as well as a Pathfinder GM's Screen. Just a thought, KF72 Okay, so I know that each book of the Pathfinder Adventure Path has a monster section, but I'm hoping that at some point these monsters along with some new monsters are compiled into a Pathfinder Bestiary hardcover. Yes, I liked the "Revisited" book (looking forward to the dragons book), but I'm hoping that Paizo goes a bit further and "Pathfinders" more classic OGL creatures into one core book. Saurstalk wrote: The subject says it all. How about Paizo making free downloads of all iconic characters from low to high level with Pathfinder Beta rules included. Might give playtesting more of a push. Might just be cool to see them re-imagined. This is an excellent idea; however, I'd pay for an Pathfinder Iconics sourcebook if it was detailed with background information for the charcters and showed the characters progressions from low to mid to high-level. James Jacobs wrote: There will be a little bit about the solar system and the universe in the Material Plane section... but not much. You'll want to check out Pathfinder #14 for the info on the 11 planets and other neat stuff associated with them... Interesting... Any chance that the solar system might get its own book in the future? James Jacobs wrote: That book already exists. Green Ronin published it already. sigh Yes, I know you're referring to the d20 Freeport Companion but that book is sold out and they don't plan to reprint it as it stands now. (I asked.) Now, perhaps they'll reprint it without the d20 logo, but thay haven't said one way or the other. I was just making a suggestion that if they do reprint it in a different form, then it might be a good idea to connect the reprinted version with Pathfinder. Anyway, just an idea. seekerofshadowlight wrote:
Well, I'm not the sort to bash a game system. I don't like 4e at all, but I'm not going to shout it from the mountaintop. I don't poke my head into the 4e forums on EN World because I'm just not interested in 4e. EN World will likely always have a place for 3e and older editions but, right now, the forum seems to cater to the 4e crowd. It's understandable since 4e is the "big, new dog," but it can be a little annoying. Darrin Drader wrote: A lot of people have abandoned ENWorld. I recently came back after not posting there for a couple years. I'm thinking about mostly leaving again. It seems that anyone who says anything other than wonderful things about 4E is going to be attacked by somebody and the mods aren't doing much to stop it. I am somewhat encouraged by the fact that Eric Noah and some of the other pillars of the community openly support 3.5. I've noticed this as well, which kind of annoys me. I keep hoping that the "edition war" thing is a temporary problem because 4th edition is so new. I guess we'll have to wait and see. And I can honestly say I support 3.5 and the OGL. I even have my own forums dedicated to 3rd edition and OGL gaming. bugleyman wrote: Is it me, or, speed issues aside, is ENWorld 2.0 *less* usable than the old page? I hate the "WOTC-style" categorization of updates. I only started to notice severe problems, regarding EN World 2 usablity, after the Wiki was added. When that went online, the performance dropped significantly for me. Darrin Drader wrote:
Yeah, MM's been pushing the server really hard trying to fix it. ;-) JoelF847 wrote: While EN World hasn't been working all morning, I've noticed that in the past few weeks it's VEERRRY slow. Not sure if they're related, but it's made the site practically unusable for me. Yeah, the reason it's been slow is a MySQL issue. Micheal Morris has been trying to fix it but hasn't had much luck. He even asked for help from other EN World members. Regardless, it appears that it's completely offline right now. Oh well. D&D
And I must add that I really liked the pre-3rd edition of the Forgotten Realms. The third edition version of the Realms felt too "uber" to me. I'm not sure what to make of the fourth edition version. Other
While my forum isn't dedicated to being anti-4e, it is dedicated to being pro-3e. I'm a big fan of 3rd Edition and the OGL. Mainly, my forum is dedicated to my own campaign concepts, but it does have a 3rd Edition Forum, which is really a general forum. Knightfall's Gaming & Writing Forum
Note that not only do I have sections for D&D v.3.5 and OGL 3.5 but also I have sections for Dragonstar, Pathfinder, d20 Modern, and Mutants & Masterminds. Also, note that I spend a lot of time on EN World, so I don't usually update my forum as often as I'd like. (If I had more members, then I probably would.) New accounts must be activated by me, so you'll have to wait until I get the e-mail notice in my inbox regarding account activation. Since I read my e-mail almost every day, you won't have to wait long. So, if you feel like discussing 3rd Edition or OGL games on a pro-3e forum, then I invite you to "Walk the Road." Just be careful to watch out for the dweller at the Crossroads. Cheers! Knightfall1972 Vic Wertz wrote: You've got it. The section on Osirion in the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting will be four pages long. While the Pathfinder Companion will have a small amount of information overlap with that, we'll nonetheless be able to provide a lot more flavor and crunch since it runs to 32 pages. Okay, this one I definitely want. DiegoV wrote: Id looooove to see some races books or even one big one! Someone earlier mentioned a 'Planetouched of Pathfinder', I cant think of anything I would want more, especially if it covered Tieflings and Cansin (I know, just a Dragon magazine race but one of my favorites). Now, you see, personally I'd prefer that the "planetouched" be done in the style of Classic Monsters Revisted, but I'd be fine with such a book have sidebars for the racial traits of the more playable "planetouched." Whatever works I guess. Remember that Paizo can only use material that is OGL; therefore, they would not be able to use these Cansin from DRAGON Magazine. James Jacobs wrote:
Personally, I'd like a "Races of Pathfinder" book as long as it doesn't try to pack too much information into it. My suggestion, stick to the core races for such a book. I don't think I'd want to buy a separate book for each race. And provide options for each race that can be used in any setting. Try to make it generic enough to be useful over a wider audience; do for the classic races what you did for the classic monsters with the "Revisited" book. Just my opinion, Knightfall1972
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
