Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

Kalridian's page

325 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


1 to 50 of 325 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Steal/sunder his holy symbol in the surprise round and get rid of any spares he might have beforehand.

Another intersting questin that will probably come up in my game:

Is Line of sight (through a closed window for example) enough to summon the eidolon to a place or is line of effect needed?

My players will come up on a cave where the back part is collapsed but they can look through tiny spaces in the rubble to the other side. Could the summoner dismiss her eidolon and re-summon it on the other side for scouting purposes?

Look at drow fleshcrafting and especially the feat "brew fleshcrafting poison"

This seems to be more or less what you want.

Masterwork trident would get +1 to hit, but if it's a +1 masterwork trident, which your wording seems to imply, it would actually have a +1 enhancement bonus which applies to damage and to hit, but replaces the +1 to hit from the basic masterwork (every item with magical enhancements needs to be masterwork before)

Mastwerork armor gets -1 armor check penalty to a minimum of 0, yes.

A magical piece of armor gets an enhancement bonus to AC only, but since it needs to be masterwork before, it also has a -1 check penalty.

I'm pretty certain there has been an FAQ that for larger creatures, the field extends 10 ft from all sides of their body.

You should pay special attention to the SLAs of all the creatures, maybe even write up a list of alll of them, because your summon monster effectively becomes a HUGE goldmine for ulitity spells from outsiders.

A list of what you get out of only the cr2 cratures:
know direction
speak with animals
dancing lights
detect evil
cure light wounds
protection from evil
detect chaos
make whole
protection from chaos
detect magic
feather fall
locate object
spider climb
hide from animals
purify food and drink
commune with nature
mage hand
inflict light wounds
heat metal
shocking grasp
detect law
obscuring mist
charm person

This is INSANE for a single spell and it gets even worse on higher CRs.

On top of that you get to summon undead and constructs, who have situationally extremely useful immunities.

Beware of save or suck spells like hold person or even dominate, in such a small party they make a huge difference, because 1 failed save halves the power of the party.
Also, how does the rogue intend to get flanking?

What is your problem with leadership? If you play it like any sane GM should and build the cohort yourself, it's just a permanent hireling that does not have to be paid with actual party funds...

Another thing: Whatever powers you give to the artifact, make them addicting. Players tend to metagame dangerous temptations and turn their characters into the most strongwilled, levelheaded types, who would never fall prey to them. After they use the powers, just use the addiction rules for drugs, so the character has actually fight the impulse to use it again and again in increasingly trivial situations.

According to these people on reddit, who actually did the math, it's less than 400 people...

But then again, they based their calculation on the complete amount of iron in the body, not only in the blood. Wouldn't know, how much of those 4 grams are to be found where...

If you are going with the sword or something similar, you could use an idea that i have wanted to use for a long time:

The sword (or other weapon) has been forged from the iron in the blood of a thousand righteous heroes/innocent children/virgins/whatever you want.

Somehow I just find the idea of a badguy burning away everything but the iron in the blood and collecting it to forge a blade very fitting for an evil artifact.

Edit: a friend just told me that apparently lord vetinari from the discworld series wields a blade that is said to be made in this fashion. Don't know if I read the book at some point or if I came up with it on my own, but beware, if one of your players is a Discworld nerd, he might accuse you of stealing the idea.

As far as artists go, I can recommend Ari Baker (scroll down a bit for some character designs)

Her work is great and her prices are very reasonable (between 20 and 35€, depending on size, coloring, inclusion of animal companions, background etc.)

That is not a Pseudo-Nerf, it makes Composite Bows nearly completely useless. After a certein level, NOBODY will give up their additional attacks, just for the measly +4 or something damage on their one hit...

I know, archery can be powerful, sometimes seeming overpowered. But that is only if the GM uses no cover and no obstacles and no wind wall and no sight inhibiting conditions like fog and none of the other multiple ways to make an archers life hell.

With your Rules, archery would pretty much suck...

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Sorry for the broken link earlier, even though it would not have been impossible to look at the adress bar and remove the part that obviously does not belong into the URL.

Here is the working link.

There is a 3rd party class for that.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I have a houserule that every magical weapon, shield or armor has some kind of "focus" (a gem, a bone, a holy symbol) in which the actual magic resides.
Those can be separated from the weapon and attached to another one in a process that takes one hour per +1 enchantment, costs 100 gp per +1 and needs a spellcraft-check with a DC of 15+ enchantment bonus.
Every item can have only one focus attached and must be masterwork.
Foci can be merged in a process that takes 1 hour for every +1 of the end product, has a spellcraft DC of 15+1 per enchantment of the end product and needs magical materials worth the difference between the combined worth of the original foci and the end product.
While combining or transfering foci, the crafter can decide to keep the original magical effect or turn it into a flat enhancement of appropriate strengt (so a +1 flaming focus could be made a +2 focus). None of these rules can be used to exceed the usual limitations on item enchantment.
If the spellcraft check fails by 5 or more, the foci are imbalanced by the process and are inert for 24 hours.

This solves the problem of believability, lets the players keep their "ancient familiy heirloom sword TM" and even gives them the option of switching a focus between weapons if they have a lot of time to prepare for a fight and know about a certain DR or somwthing but also carries the risk that they botch the roll and are completely bereft of their magical weapon for a day.

Also it adds cool details to the weapons, because every Focus is unique and you might end up with a fighter in shiny armor who has a focus made from a human fingerbone attached to his weapon, because he took it from a goblin chieftain.

That would be a Point Buy way over 100. How in the world did that happen?

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Just because he charges the illusion does not mean he rugby-tackles it. He just uses the momentum of his run for his swing.

There is neither a RAW nor a "common sense" reason for him to fall over.

There is a feat in 3.5 called subduing strike that just flatout removes the penalty for all melee weapons. I as a gm wouldn't see any problem with allowing it at my table, there are way more powerful options to spend a feat on.

You could try the Lyrakien. While it's not technically a fairy, you could easily give it a bow and some more castings per day for the CLW spell.

RAI it's probably not supposed to provoke, but RAW the clause that says it doesn't (like for example in Hydraulic push) is missing.

My Paladin of Cayden has a tankard that, every time you set it down, refills with ale. He plays his character as constantly in different shades of drunkenness. The ale can not be put into other containers, you can only drink it.

Hm, can't find the rules I had in my head either, I guess that's what you get for GMing in 3 different systems...

Afaik, taking the aoo against the wizard would "discharge" your readied action, since you can't do anything else while having an action readied, so Cyrads idea wouldn't work.

Since when is being able to voluntarily fail saves a houserule? If I don't jump to the side, when the big boulder falls, i get hit and if i don't resist the mind control, it succeds. It can get a little hard to explain with Fort saves, but as far as I know you can voluntarily fail a save, at least as long as you know you have to make it, the same way that you can voluntarily miss on an attack...

Ah, thx. DR stacking hadn't really come up in my games yet.

Are you sure it becomes DR5 /cold iron and silver?

I would have said it becomes DR5/cold iron and DR5/Silver, meaning:

DR0 against a weapon that is both,
DR5 against a weapon that is one of them,
DR10 against a weapon that is neither.

Since you all seem to agree, could you point me to the relevant rules text?

First level is always full HP

Thanks for all the suggestions, I'll run the ideas for modifications by the players.
If I would want to allow them to "buy" him a "con score" for HP purposes, how would you price the increases?

I think it should be reduced in price compared to a con belt, because it doesn't affect fort saves, but increased since it wouldn't take up a magic item slot. What do you think about letting those two cancel each other out and give them the modification for the price of a con belt? (+1hp/hd for 4k, +2 for 16k.)

Since my party lacked a proper Tank, I gave them an NPC construct with the lifespark subtype (he and his awakening are tied into the story of the campaign) and it worked quite well, they started teaching him about the world, about his newly found emotions and the magus started giving him melee training which resulted in the construct gaining levels of fighter. This started at level 4, now they have reached level 8 and have grown very attached to their metal friend. The problem is, without a CON score, his HP are advancing very slowly, a problem I hadn't considered in the beginning. Even with generously rounded 6 hp for each fighter level, the PCs are overtaking him one by one and there have been some very tight situations for him on the frontlines.
Now my players are searching for ways to buff him, so he survives, but since the normal +CON items don't work, I'm rather short on ideas.

They are willing to spend a considerable amount of money on their friend, so I would like to give them the option of actually succeeding.

How could this be done RAW and if there's no way, which houserules would you propose?

tl;dr: Need a way to raise the HP of a lifespark construct with fighter levels.

Nothing in the rules that I am aware of says that a small character can't ride a large horse. There's only the rule tat says the mount must be one size larger than the rider. So just ride a combat trained Horse or use the mount spell.

It helps to clarify what you are talking about. What is a shadowkhan?
And depending on your gm, you could just refluff one of the already existing summoning spells.


I sometimes use this page here, but their stats tend to be a bit wonky, so be careful with it. (The page doesn't work in some browsers, so try another if it doesn't)

There is some kind of spidery undead demon or daemon creature whos entry mentions a connection to the negative energy plane in the heart of the plane of shadow. I searched for it, but I can't find it right now.

Sadly the Fortress is not extradimensional. The only extradimensional solution that comes to mind is the Rod of Security.

Or a custom item of rope trick.

That is mainly, because truly considering the implications of magic on everyday life leads to the tippyverse and most people don't want to play in that world.

Other than that, check adventures and regional books for flavourful magical items for everyday use. (The taldor book has some great luxury items for the bearded of oppara)

Sadly it's very high level, but with scrolls, Spellbane could work. Set the contingency and spellbane to Mages disjunction and you're good to go. Sadly, since Spellbane is to high level for you, it requires the expense of 3825 gp every (CL of the contingency) days, since that is the cost of the Spellbane scroll

I don't know about the price, but the "usable x times per day" seems weird to me. Just make them use up some kind of fuel that needs to be refilled after x uses.

If it isn't mentioned, it isn't changed, simple as that.

Yea, you are right. It's actually weaker than the vampire template. I Just took a quick look at it without comparing them and thought "put this on a pair of goblins and they'll slaughter an APL approppriate party, that can't be right." But it's the same with them vampire template, it's just very powerful.

Just shows again how using templates is not an exact science but rather an artform.

The missing CL on the scorching ray is still a thing 'though.

Just a spontaneous reaction, but this should be worth way more than CR+2...

And there is no CL for the scorching ray ability.

That would be Blightburn radiation from Blightburn Paste and the resulting Blightburn Sickness, I guess.

Depends on how the GM rules carrying. I usually handwave it, as long as it doesn't get absurd, but 10 suits of armor would fall into that category...

Rules wise, there is nothing against it 'though.

(It's funny how bags of holding and the like have weight and space limitations, but a high str character can RAW carry an elephant on his back...)

Some things come to mind.

First: One cubic foot of material is not much to encase the feet of the giant with. The resulting construction would probably be pretty thin, considering how big the feet of the giant probably are. The ginat should be easily able to sunder the "shackles" in one round. Or he could just remain stationary if that is not a problem for him. The player essentially used up a 5th level slot for a one target, one round (assuming sunder) entangle with no save. That seems by no means overpowered to me.
If you compare it to stone shape, it could have been worse.

Second: The spell allows the player to fabricate an item, but how does he attach it to the ground below? The Item must be physically seperated from everything else, otherwise it would not be an item but a part of the bigger structure.

Third: Nowhere in the text of fabricate does it say that he can choose to move the location of the final product relative to the position of the raw materials. Therefor one could argue that the stone shackles are created where the stone was beforehand, UNDER the feet of the giant, not around them.

Fourth: The Spell has no SR or save, because it's not used on creatures or magic items. The giant isn't hit by the spell but by it's consequnces. Arguing that the giant doesn't get a save based on the fabricate spell is like arguing that you don't get to avoid a stone dropped on your head via mage hand because the spell doesn't have SR or a save.
Therefor it's your job to rule on the outcome. I'd give the giant a reflex save to step aside. Considering how you get a reflex save when a substantial part of the floor below your feet suddenly vanishes (see pit spell line) you should definitely get a save to avoid stone shoes being put on your feet.

rich parents trait + muleback cords would solve the problem. Wouldn't leave an awful lot of money for the actual gear 'though.

If 3rd Party is allowed, a scroll or wand of Reverse Gender would do the trick.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The System has Craft(Basketweaving)... NOT everything in it exists for powergaming purposes. Maybe somebody wants to make an NPC Gunsmith-Expert?

Somebody on these boards made an posted a melee and a ranged orc troop before. I copied them for later use, but sadly forgot who made them, so sorry for not being able to give due credit.

You can just use multiple of those until the CR is high enough.



XP 1600
NE Medium humanoids (Orc, troop)
Init +0; Senses Perception +0
AC 19, touch 10, flat-footed 19 (+3 Armor,+6 natural)
hp 6d10+18
Fort +6, Ref +2, Will +3
Defensive Abilities troop traits
Speed 30 ft.
Melee - troop (2d4+6)
Space 20 ft.; Reach 5 ft.
Special Attacks - Brutal charge (Ex)
Str 17, Dex 11, Con 12, Int 7, Wis 8, Cha 6
CMB +20; CMD 34
Feats - Toughness, Iron will
Skills …..
Languages - Orc
Equipment - St.Leather and falchions
Brutal charge (Ex) orcs troop collides with the enemy in a brutal onslaught. The troop makes a charge attack as per charge rules, only instead of getting +2 to attack they double their STR bonus to damage in the resulting automatic attack (Reflex DC 15 for half).


XP 800
NE Medium humanoids (Orc, troop)
Init +4; Senses Perception +0
AC 17, touch 10, flat-footed 17 (+3 Armor, +4 natural)
hp 4d10+8
Fort +5, Ref +1, Will +0
Defensive Abilities - troop traits
Speed 30 ft.
Melee troop (1d6+3)
Space 20 ft.; Reach 5 ft.
Special Attacks arrow volley (DC 14)
Str 17, Dex 11, Con 12, Int 7, Wis 8, Cha 6
CMB +20; CMD 34
Feats –Improved initiative
Skills ….
Languages - Orc
Equipment - St.Leather, Longbows, shortswords
Arrow Volley (Ex) As a full round action the troop can launch a volley of arrows at a distance up to 100ft, this volley covers a 30-foot-radius area, anyone caught in that area takes 2d8 piercing damage (Reflex DC 13 for half). This ability takes 1d2 rounds to recharge. The save DC is Dexterity-based.

I get that you're saying that, I understood that from your first post. But I still don't see which rules you're using as a basis. You read the description and decide that it's a new limb that replaces normal reach, but it does not say so in any part of the description of the Tanglevine Power.

As far as I see it, it can be interpreted in both ways and RAW determining which interpretation is right, is yet to be presented.

Also, I don't know where you get the idea that a reach weapon doubles your reach and therefor gives you 20 reach if you have 10 natural reach. Afaik reach weapons add a flat 5ft (or whatever they are granting, whip for example)to the normal reach of a character.

Edit for spelling

1 to 50 of 325 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.