Kaelaru |
Xaaon of Korvosa wrote:
DeciusBrutus wrote:Therein lies the flaw....if item x is horrible but slightly better than y...and get seen 150 times more than item z...which is amazing....will item x make it to top 64...while item z never gets seen by the actual judges....?You aren't voting for 'this item should advance/that item should not advance'.
You are voting for 'this item should be judged before that item.'
The final result isn't a score, just a ranking.
So what happens with rock-paper-scissors?
I really wish there was an option for "both are great" and another for "both are terrible." Every person should have their own lists, so the same combination could appear to 100 people. If I am a terrible judge of items, does someone else get to also vote on whether "paper" really does beat to "scissors"?