Here's the last of them.
Whispering Way Curate:
Female human cleric of Urgathoa 7
NG Medium humanoid (human)
Init: +1; Senses: Perception: +3
Death’s Kiss (Su): You can cause a creature to take on some of the traits of the undead with a melee touch attack. Touched creatures are treated as undead for the purposes of effects that heal or cause damage based on positive and negative energy. This effect lasts for a number of rounds equal to 1/2 your cleric level (minimum 1). It does not apply to the Turn Undead or Command Undead feats. You can use this ability a number of times per day equal to 3 + your Wisdom modifier.
Adimarus Ionacu:I'm going to use these tomorrow. I'll post the results.
Male Fiendish human natural werewolf fighter 4/antipaladin of Jezelda 3
CE Medium humanoid (human, shapeshifter)
Init: +2; Senses: darkvision 60ft., low-light vision, scent, Perception: +6
I decided to keep the class levels the same for the Demon Wolf Marauder. Here it is.
Demon Wolf Marauder:
Fiendish human natural werewolf fighter 4/ranger 1
CE Medium humanoid (human, shapeshifter)
Init: +2; Senses: darkvision 60ft., low-light vision, scent, Perception: +6
After last session and several rather disappointing combats. I've redesigned the NPCs. I'm using the exact same class levels as before (with the exception of the demon wolf maurauders). Instead I'm simply changing stats, archetypes and feats.
Below are two of the stat blocks (still working on them)
Female human dread wight flowing monk 6
LE Medium undead (augmented humanoid)
Init: +3; Senses: blindsense 60 ft., darkvision 60 ft., Perception: +12
Flowing Dodge: +1 dodge bonus to AC for every adjacent enemy (maximum of +3 dodge bonus)
Command Wights (Su): A dread wight can automatical-ly command all normal wights within 30 feet as a free action. Normal wights never attack a dread wight un-less compelled.
Create Spawn (Su) Any creature killed by a dread wight’s energy drain ability rises as a dread wight in 1d4 rounds. A dread wight created in this manner is under the command of its creator and remains so until either it or the creator is destroyed.
Whispering Way Cultist:
Male Human Rogue (spy) 3, Necromancer 3
CE Medium humanoid (human)
Init: +2; Senses: Perception: +0, low-light vision
Banned Schools: Divination, Evocation
Combat Gear: wand of command undead (6 charges), bloodroot poison (4 doses);
Other Gear: mwk heavy mace, mwk light crossbow with 20 bolts, backpack, cloak of resistance +1, ring of protection +1. spellbook (all prepared spells as well as blur, command undead, 1 random spell of level 1), spell component pouch, backup spell component pouch, thieves’ tools, whispering way amulet, 43gp
Are these guys amazing? Not really. It's a CR -1 for the monk and a CR -3 for the cultist. However they at least have a fighting chance at challenging the party now.
Not only do I consider most '+X' items boring, I believe them mostly unnecessary. Most PCs' attack bonuses and saves scale far faster than opponents AC and save DCs. Beyond the first few levels, it is common to see PCs who rarely miss opponents of equal CR, and can only fail saves vs their abilities on a natural 1. Yet the players still insist on boosting these areas, then crashing into a dead-end of their own making, for lack of basic utility items (like being unable to climb/fly/swim/etc).
I'm not so sure that this is accurate. Here's a build of a character I have on file. Now I admit it's not an optimised build but it's the only one I had handy. It's an Elven Oracle.
Spoiler:A summary of the vital stats are as follows:
Elven Oracle (Seeker) (Dual Cursed Oracle) 12
STR 16 (10)
DEX 10+2 (0)
CON 15-2 (7)
INT 10+2 (0)
WIS 7 (-4)
CHA 15 (7)
Mathematical Prodigy (Magic): +1 trait bonus to Knowledge (Arcana) and Knowledge (Engineering). Knowledge (Engineering) is always a class skill.
Observant (Grand Lodge): +1 trait bonus to Perception and it’s always a class skill.
Haunted (doesn’t improve)
Lame (does improve)
4 (base) + 1 (Int mod) + 1 (Favoured Class) = 6
2. Knowledge (History)/Knowledge (Planes)/Spellcraft/Knowledge (Arcana)/Knowledge (Geography)/Craft (woodwork)
3. Knowledge (Engineering)
4. Knowledge (Religion)
6. Disable Device
1. Elven (free)
2. Taldane (free)
3. Thassilon (int mod)
Level 1) Extra Revelation (Weapon Focus)
Level 3) Power Attack
Level 5) Combat Casting
Level 7) Extra Revelation (Improved Trip)
Revelation 8) Improved Critical
Level 9) Extra Revelation
Level 11) Divine Interference
Revelation 11) Greater Trip
Level 1) Skill at Arms
Feat 1) Weapon Mastery
Level 3) Seeker Lore (mandatory)
Level 5) Misfortune
Level 7) Battlefield Clarity
Feat 7) Manoeuvre Mastery
Feat 9) Combat Healing
Level 11) Iron Skin
Now at level 11 vs a CR 11 creature:
For an at CR creature these numbers seem fairly reasonable. I hit and save about 50% of the time, but I also get hit 50% of the time. Higher CR opponents are going to prove more difficult, as they should.
Here's a rebuild of that using the inherent system above
STR 16 (10)
DEX 10+2 (0)
CON 14-2 (5)
INT 12+2 (2)
WIS 8 (-2)
CHA 14 (5)
Attack: +18/+18/+13 = +3 (starting strength) + 1 (lvl 3) + 1 (lvl 6) + 1 (lvl 8) + 1 (lvl 9) + 1 (lvl 11) + 8 (BAB) + 1 (morale) + 1 (size) + 1 (weapon focus) - 3 (power attack) + 2 (strength enhancement)
AC: 21 = 10 (base) + 1 (starting dex) + 1 (dex lvl 2) + 1 (lvl 3) + 1 (dex lvl 5) + 1 (lvl 6) + 1 (dex lvl 8) + 1 ( dexlvl 11) + 3 (studded leather armour) + 2 (deflection) - 1 (size)
Reflex: +11 = +3 (base) + 1 (starting dex) + 1 (dex lvl 2) + 1 (dex lvl 5) + 1 (dex lvl 8) + 1 ( dexlvl 11) + 3 (level enhancement)
Charisma: 19 = 15 (base) + 2 (lvl 5) + 2 (lvl 9)
I hit on a 7/7/12 (target AC: 25)
I save on a 9/11/12 (target DC is 20)
I get hit on a 2 (target attack bonus is +19)
Overall I don't think this character is overpowered.
Or are you playing a high magic game, where the PCs are even more powerful than they ever were, because what they used to spend gold on have been made slotless items, that have melded with their flesh, and can never be disarmed/stolen/sundered/etc?
I've never seen an item sundered. I've seen a weapon stolen once when that person fell unconscious and the DM started softballing the fight. The only times I've seen PCs without equipment is when they're sleeping for the night. And in those cases the second PCs get access to extradimensional spaces, they start sleeping in those.
For me the PCs "always having their equipment" isn't too much of a power issue because 99% of the time, they'll have their equipment anyway.
Overall there's clearly some flaws in the system. I dislike how dramatically his AC decreased. Largely because he was in full plate. The above system has the flaw where stat bumps into dex are actually useless because they don't achieve anything. I'm better off keeping full plate and putting those stat bumps into charisma and constitution, meaning I can keep more of the stat bumps for strength meaning my to hit gets even higher. Introducing: The glass canon.
I'd like to see this system used for a few more traditional character builds and see how it compares to see where tweaks might be required.
Or is it that you want to run a setting where players budget their gold toward kingdom-building, where traditional elements like castles are still relevant?.
This. Also I don't want to have to worry about putting enough gold ahead of the PCs. I don't want them to have to greyhawk every single combat/dungeon because they're chasing that elusive WBL because I haven't put enough gold ahead of them.
I want them to be able to take that flavourful cloak without going "well if I keep this highly situational but very flavourful cloak, my saves are going to decrease by 3. Also I'm really struggling to hit anyone because my sword is only +1. Selling this cloak increases my to hit by a fair chunk and increases my saves due to the fact that I'll be keeping my cloak of resistance."
I'd rather they just say "I'm going to keep this cloak because I've never seen it used and it sounds like fun."
It also helps you sell the idea to your players, set the tone of the genre and setting, so they make PCs that are relevant and appropriate.
Well yes, I definitely would. But having a working system would help considerably in swaying them to try something a bit different.
So the Wealth by Level was first introduced to D&D by Wizards of the Coast with 3rd edition. It was pretty much baked into the math and they only exacerbated the issue with 4th ed where it was much more stringently baked into the math. That said, WotC finally addressed the issue in 2009 with their "inherent bonuses" system in the 4th ed DMG2. It's where some of the wealth was removed in favour of just giving PCs a flat bonus.
Pathfinder, in seeking to remain compatible with 3.5e as much as possible, inherited this problem. I'm looking at mechanics in order to get rid of it, much like 4th ed did with just handing out bonuses at the appropriate level. The reason for this is I quite like the idea of running a low magic campaign. Which RAW isn't possible for Pathfinder without a lot of changes on the GM side of the screen.
As such, here is my effort at addressing the math.
How many bonuses do PCs normally get?
Trying to map all of these effects is impossible. As such I made a generic fighter's worth of equipment to determine how big those pluses get. No fancy boots of speed or horseshoes of the zephyr, just flat out mundane equipment that has no thought put into it whatsoever. If you think the assumptions I've made in that thread are wrong, head on over there and let me know why.
Here's a summary of those bonuses:
Weapon attack bonus: +5
Level 2: +2 to two different stats;
In comparison to the generic equipment I listed above here's how this implementation pans out.
Weapon attack bonus: Matches
ClarificatioN: The math above assumes that the "other bonus"es are supplied by putting the two stat boosts into your offense and defense stats. You could of course not do this.
IMO this system would allow Fighters to be built well. Clerics to be built well. Even MAD monks would probably cope alright using this system. Sorcerers would be able to be built fairly well. The attack bonus would benefit their touch attacks while the bonus to AC appears to stack with mage armour (RAW at least. I believe I've worded it in such a way as to ensure that it does). This gives them some perks they normally can't attain as some compensation for not getting extend rods, energy type changing rods or circlets of persuasion). The only classes that appear unplayable are wizards and witches.
By 12th level you can overcome adamantine DR without an adamntine weapon and by 15th level you can overcome alignment based DR.
Of course, there's also some flex room for throwing consumables at the PCs (see this thread to see how much they should get in consumables per level per player by the WBL table).
You can also throw more flavourful and hilarious items at your players. They can now finally wear a Cloak of the Manta Ray (an item I've yet to see used in a game because everyone instead gets their damn cloak of resistances). You can give your players a Lyre of the Building. You'll want to keep an eye out for giving them too powerful items. But using the system above, you'll at least know they're AC, saves and to hit are at the correct amount for their level.
Oooh! You could use the above chart in a normal home game for the player who builds a "Vow of Poverty" monk while allowing the rest of the party to use the standard WBL chart.
What do you think? I started playing WotC D&D in 2008 with 4th ed. So for me it's taken quite a while to adjust to the WBL way of thinking (where the game assumes you have X amount of gold and thus increases the defense and offense abilities of monsters to compensate). I'm still not entirely happy with that style of game. So I've decided to try my hand at modifying the system so that I could game with a different style. I'd like to hear feedback so I can improve the math utilized in the above chart.
So with 3.5e and 4th ed it is assumed by the game's math that each level you gain X amount of gold which increases your to hit, spell DC, AC, saves, etc by Y amount. 4th ed later came out with "inherent bonuses" that allowed DMs to remove some of the assumed wealth. I'm looking to recreate that for Pathfinder.
However to do that I need to work out what the assumed math is for each level. I've done this using a generic "fighter type" that only buys items that add to their saves, to hit and AC. Realistically a fighter type would probably purchase things like boots of speed, etc. But for simplicity's sake, I'm just using generic items to work out the math.
Could people take a look at the items I buy at each level and let me know if they think these items look reasonable for the level they're obtained at.
Level 2 (1,000 gp):
Level 3 (2,000):
Level 4 (3,000):
Level 5 (4,500):
Level 6 (5,500):
Level 7 (7,500):
Level 8 (9,500):
Level 9 (13,000):
Level 10 (16,000):
Level 11 (20,000):
Level 12 (26,000):
Level 13 (32,000):
Level 14 (45,000):
Level 15 (55,000):
I have a character who is nominally factionless. He played a whole heap of adaptables (then had GM certs applied). Being factionless was an unintended consequence of playing adaptables, but I'm running sith it.
He's rather confused by this faction business, but the person who keeps writing him letters these days did help bring him back to life that one time, so he is willing to help them (although when playing an early scenario he got a letter from someone he'd never heard of before so he refused to do the mission).
Unless it's one of those couple of mods I ask my players what they do after the briefing. Some of them go to their faction leader and inform them what's going on. Most of the time a random person passes them the note. A regular standby is a pickpocket to slip them the note (often helping himself to a couple of coppers) and opposed stealth/perception checks.it's always fun when they fail their perception check (never had someone fail their mission as a result of this).
At cons players are surprised when I don't just hand them over. But I've never had someone complain about my style
Hey Jim. I just finished a con and somehow I ended up running this adventure three different times with 5 hour sessions in the space of 16 hours. Unfortunately due to the short amount of time before it's release and running I wasn't able to spend as much time prepping it as I would have liked. But the areas I didn't know about the rules I quickly made an adjudication and eventually found out most of my rulings were correct.
To begin with, this was an absolute blast to run. I'll admit by the start of the third session my enthusiasm had taken a significant hit (I was also running on 3.5 hours sleep yesterday), but I was fortunate enough to have a table of roleplayers who were simply a blast to play with. After the first 15 minutes my enthusiasm was renewed and I was back into the swing of running this adventure for them.
To start with the opening box text. I didn't like the "you harken back to a briefing you received from Venture Captain Amara-Li." I don't know if this was done as a tongue in cheek reference to many of the early modules, but I personally have grown a bit tired of that trope (personal pet peeve). I would instead have recommended you do something like "You are gathered into the Heidmarch Lodge for a briefing from Amara-Li who is on her way back to Absalom and can only stay for a quick thirty minutes before she needs to return to her ship." It gives the sense that this mission is actually somewhat important and also that the briefing can't go on for too long (helpful in a convention scenario). That said, there may be meta-plot reasons why that wouldn't be appropriate.
Next onto the faction missions, these were finally a breath of fresh air. With 12 factions I am simply unable to do any prep work for faction missions because I have no way of remembering them. As such, I was discovering each new faction mission as I ran the session and encountered new factions on my table.
The faction missions show a lot of depth and thought put into them. For 3 years I've heard about how wonderful the Cheliax faction missions were in season 0 (a season I missed out on), because I just have not seen that in recent times. Instead I see collect the macguffin faction missions and often that macguffin is an infernal sex toy. The faction mission for this one however actually has motivation behind it relating to the political landscape. THIS is what Cheliax faction missions should be. Here's how it went
We easily spent 20 minutes the PCs roleplaying their conversation with the undersecretary. Alas, they could not meet the DC listed in the module. During this time the Aspis consortium spoke to Zeeva Foxglove and were escorting her away from the marketplace to threaten her somewhere private.
I gave all my PCs 1 perception check to overhear the Aspis threatening Zeeva, one of the PCs got the DC. I then gave 1 PC a second perception check to simply spot her walking past (he failed). The PC who made the initial perception check pointed the group out to his fellow PCs and so I gave the PC who failed his second perception check a third perception check. He failed so he got told "she looks familiar, but you just don't know how you know this person" (he had met Sendeli her sister).
The PCs decided to follow the group and I made a mistake here. I had the Aspis lead her to a nearby alleyway. Realising the rest of the module wouldn't happen, I had to backtrack and say they simply corner her at the edge of the battlemat. This was the third time I had run this module and I'd only had 3.5 hours sleep the night before so my PCs forgave me and we moved on.
The fight broke out between the Aspis and the PCs and so the undersecretary hid among the food stalls. After this fight the leader of Aspis consortium member is unconscious along with one of his goons while the other 2 had been permitted to flee.
Suddenly fight 2 breaks out. During this fight the undersecretary and the crowd flee the marketplace. As the undersecretary is fleeing the PCs call out to him "we're going to hunt you down."
During the fight Kira is chanelling energy and not deselecting the Aspis member and so he wakes up and runs away during the heat of battle. Fortunately the hired thug was out of the channel energy radius.
They question him, he gives up his boss and here is where I had to improvise. I said the thug didn't know where the Aspis member lived. His group of thugs would meet the Aspis member at 9am sharp every morning at the Dancing Pony five streets away. One member had turned up 10 minutes late and had his pay docked.
The PCs asked this thug's permission to impersonate him. He said yes, as long as the Aspis member didn't survive so there was no retaliation on the thug or his family. They asked for more information on the Aspis Consortium's dealings so I ad libbed a bit about how the City Watch is hopelessly corrupt, they would do protection rackets, loan sharking. That sort of thing.
The PCs go disguised as the thug they captured. The alchemist uses ALL of his spells for the day as disguise self. I give them a bluff check vs sense motive with a +8 bonus to the thug's sense motive because they were close friends. The Aspis member got a sense motive of +4 because he was an associate. The player beat the sense motive check both times and so their plan unfurled perfectly.
The Aspis consortium were convinced that Cheliax was involved because the PCs consisted of 1 Chelish nobleman with two of his servants+Kira. They need to get Cheliax to move off the Green Market and take their shambling mounds and constructs with them. As such the Aspis Consortium has arranged a meeting at 11am with the Undersecretary.
The PCs got their second chance at defeating the Aspis Consortium (and thus winning half the module) and also got another chance at the Undersecretary. I was going to give the PCs a rather big bonus to their intimidate check but they beat the DC without it.
The Szcarni faction mission I got to roleplay handing this out in two different sessions. Because the players were leaving from Magnimar I didn't hand out this faction mission. I gave them one full day before they needed to leave to make any preparations they wanted (had they wanted more I'd of course have found ways for that, but they were surprised to have the one day prep time and were unsure how to use it). During their activities in this day the faction leader met them in person and we roleplayed them getting the faction mission over a meal/drinks. They needed to write down the pertinent information and rely on their notes. This surprised people, but they seemed to enjoy it (I know I did).
Finally I truly enjoyed the Silver Crusade faction mission. In one session the PCs didn't make the DC in their first attempt. I personally don't like "you get one attempt at this and then it is impossible to do" faction missions. So I allowed them a second chance at the end of the module.
In another session again the PC didn't make the DC at first. So another party member tried it and they did beat the DC. Now because of this faction mission I was able to react in an extremely interesting manner.
First of all both times I had a blast roleplaying the Shaman saying "you're certainly quite knowledgable and you show promise. Come to me again some time in the future after you have grown and matured in your understanding of your faith and perhaps then we can discuss the matter."
In the other session when a second PC (non Silver Crusade PC) beat the DC I was able to respond with "I will quite happily tell you of the information you seek. But as I said, it is not for those who have a less mature understanding of their faith. I will discuss this with you and you alone." The other PCs had to leave and only then did I give the second PC all of the information. They had to make notes and then returned to the Silver Crusade PC and convey the information they had learned.
Finally I loved this mission because it tied in with the apparent meta-plot of season 4 and it just gave a CRAPLOAD of flavour. I have never seen a faction mission chocked with so much flavour before. Kudos to you Jim Grove. Kudos.
Furthermore the plot itself was extremely freeform. I loved the amount of freedom it offered the PCs in completing this mission. In theory it could have gone on for in game days, if not weeks. That was an extremely nice change to have.
Roleplaying the main NPC was a blast and I loved how she played off the different players at my table. She was a DMPC, but not a single player complained about her and everyone loved her. It really allowed me to get involved in the roleplaying for this module. As someone whose style of play is typically roleplay heavy, combat light this module was exactly what I want.
That said, these fights were brutal. I've been growing and complacent with PFS scenarios. Overall season 4 has amped up the brutality. The first time I ran this there was a PC in the final combat who spent the entire fight 1 round from dead. She was going from 1 round from dead to "breathing and on 3 HP" back down to 1 round from dead, etc, etc. They loved it. Everyone was fighting for their lives. And the listed tactics were very, very effective. In one session...
I was able to wall of fire the cleric and isolate her from the rest of the party. When I created the wall of fire I placed it behind all the party and facing away from them and facing towards the cleric.
I had one PC say "clearly John isn't trying to kill us with this fight because that was the least optimal choice he could have made" but I did what I felt the listed tactics told me to. It was that session where the PC was constantly in threat of being dead and at the end the cleric player said "what really contributed to the lethality of this fight was that wall of fire. It hampered my ability to support my party for 1 round, after which they were really brutalised and in a bad way." That cleric spent the rest of the fight keeping everyone alive.
In the second session we had a party of 3 (plus Kira the pregen). This party used three dimensional combat (the first session didn't because no-one made their "Knowledge (planes) check" to know the no gravity rule on the Ethereal Plane. Also I was becoming more familiar with the rules of the mod by this point ;)
In this I had a tiefling alchemist, aasimar paladin and human witch. They played down due to being APL of level 6. The tiefling solo'd the fire elemental. The tiefling negated a crapload of damage thanks to his fire resistance. HOWEVER midway through the fight he got on the defensive and started 5 foot stepping back and healing himself. Despite his fire resistance, I was giving him a challenge and making him sweat.
The paladin drunk a potion of fly because without gravity every action has an equal and opposite reaction (people walking didn't suffer from this and people with magical flying also didn't suffer from this. I don't know if that's RAW, but it seemed like a fair ruling to me). He solo'd the ghost and was only dealing half damage to the ghost (RAW ghosts appear to keep their incorporeal status in the Ethereal Plane in this edition. I understand it was different in 3.5e). He smote the ghost and was surprised when I said the ghost was not evil. Every single round he was swift action healing himself to stop himself from falling unconscious. Alas I only realised too late that the optimal tactic was to use searing light. Had I known it could have been a TPK. I got 1 searing light though which was fun.
The witch finally was forced to spend a good portion of the combat flying off the battlegrid to heal herself. Now thanks to the Oracle curse, my ghost couldn't see her and so she was safe from attack. She then cast bestow curse (I believe this is the spell) onto her familiar. Then she flew into range and as a standard action tossed her familiar at the ghost. Because there was no gravity I had the witch make a ranged attack roll of DC 10 to get the correct square. She beat the DC and so then I had my attack of opportunity on the familiar, the PC rolled her melee touch attack through the familiar and got it off. But what to do with the familiar? Well there is no gravity. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The ghost had a stabbing weapon so I ruled the familiar bounced off the ghost and headed straight back to the witch. So the familiar essentially got a pounce. That really set the tone for this combat.
With this, I then rolled poorly on my "50% chance of doing nothing" and they won the fight.
That said, I really enjoyed roleplaying the monsters in the second fight as well
My first table played up and so they got the Quickwood and 2 Shambling Mounds. They made knowledge nature checks. When I saw "Quickwood Bestiary 2" I rolled my eyes going "oh great. Another splatbook monster. Here we go with some bizarro monster.
I then read out the flavour to my players of both creatures. I had seasoned 3.5e veterans as well as new players and both alike were surprised and shocked when I read out that both creatures crave human and elven flesh in particular. That right there set the mood for this fight.
I had a blast roleplaying the shambling mound. It taunted the PCs and was generally just creepy. I did "rend" on a poor villager with a Shambling Mound and simply ate the villager and then said "Hmmmm. That was delicious" in a deep voice and all my players screamed out "WHAT!?" They didn't seem to know Shambling Mounds could talk.
Finally the Quickwood was a blast because of the root attacks. I had 60 ft reach. Now RAW I should probably have been taking AoOs anytime someone moved. But I made a flavourful ruling which might get me in trouble. I ruled that the roots were underground and as such everyone had cover from them. Then when Quickwoods turn came up I had a PC that was flying above the ground. I ruled that the tentacles travelled underground to the square she was flying above and then broke through the ground in a spray of dust and reached up into the air to attack her. When her turn came around again she was now able to get targeted by Attacks of Opportunity because the roots were still in the square below her. As a consequence she was able to attack those roots.
She flew away so I had the roots attack a different PC. This PC I was able to pull along the ground. I described how the marketplace stones were getting breaches as the root pulled the PC towards the Quickwood.
All in all a very flavourful and memorable combat.
The lower tiers had 1 shambling mound (again, creeped them out) plus a scarecrow. I loved roleplaying these creatures getting formed/coming to life and it freaked my players right out.
That said I did skip the optional fight all 3 times I ran this mod. As I said, I emphasise roleplaying over combat and I felt the sessions were better for that extra time being spent on conveying the flavour and allowing the PCs to roleplay with each other than having that extra combat.
Finally as to the mistake with the map, I turned up to the CON and hand drew my map before the first session (something that a couple of GMs commented on favourably as most of the people were simply printing off maps). I drew the top half of the map as that's where most of the action was and it did not impact the fights at all. Width wise I had a bit of trouble with the office on the rightmost portion of the map, but that was the only noticeable quirk in the map. I liked how, given it was such a big map and such a complex map, I got a lot of mileage from it as every single fight occurs on this one map. Of course, there was one exception. It was the tavern fight that the Cheliax members had.
I wouldn't stress the size too much. Live and learn after all ;)
If my enthusiasm isn't obvious, I really enjoyed running this mod. Running this mod 3 times in 1 day was the highlight of my Con. I've already had one player ask me to run this for them at some point in the future (and I've said yes).
So well done. A++++ module. Would run more modules from this author again ;)
Jeffrey Fox wrote:
Seriously though I do find it funny that it seems you subconsciously blame WotC for this.
Sorry, I first started playing organised play with LFR. Much of my growing issues with Pathfinder Society were issues I had with LFR and so it was just a slip of the tongue. I've had these discussions all before.
Jeffrey Fox wrote:
And goblins aren't much more odd than people walking around with pet lions or dinosaurs in a city.
And here lies my problem with animal companions 9 out of 10 times.
Corax the honest thief wrote:
If everything was SO sterotypical than why play??
You don't need to be a special snowflake in order to be interesting. There are a wide swathe of intriguing and fun characters you can make while still remaining true to the racial roleplay and campaign setting.
Corax the honest thief wrote:
Why cant a Goblin be better than the norm??
I'm not saying you can't have non-evil goblins. But if you remove their superstitious fear of writing, their hatred for dogs and horses are you really playing a goblin? What part of the character says "this is a goblin"?
Corax the honest thief wrote:
Why cant a half-giant be cunning and manipulative??? How do you get warriors and leaders then??
I could go on specifically about this example and explain how they're a magically created race from the dawn of time that had a magickal fusion between true giants and humans and how they're entirely dependent on human society.
But that's not what you're asking. You're asking (and correct me if I'm wrong): Why should we adhere to the racial roleplay?
If you play a Dark Sun elf who doesn't like stealing, trusts everyone and also rides around on mounts everywhere, are you actually playing a Dark Sun elf? Or are you playing a human that doesn't get the usual racial traits humans get?
I am of the opinion that by not adhering to the racial roleplay, you're not playing that race. Now there's a lot of variation you can explore while adhering to that racial roleplay.
Corax the honest thief wrote:
A poorly played character is doomed any how. Be it human, half-orc or Goblin.
True. And I have seen cases where people aren't roleplaying the core races according to the documentation available for the campaign setting. It can be hard to work out how to play an elf, dwarf, half-orc, halfling, gnome or half-elf. Heck, it can even be difficult to work out how to a play an ordinary human sometimes. By Paizo allowing this flood of races to be playable, we're increasing the burden on the player and the GM to ensure they adhere to the campaign setting.
I've seen characters that are basically humans with different racial traits. When I've seen half-orcs my characters treat them like the dirty half-breeds they are. And everyone is shocked at me when I do this. That tells me (1) the player themself isn't familiar with the place their own character is meant to occupy in the game setting (2) no-one else has treated them as the game setting says they should be treated. When someone saw me doing this with more than one character they said "oh, made another racist character there John?" As if my character is the one that's out of the ordinary. Now I can continue adhering to the campaign setting and encourage those players to read up on their race and roleplay their characters appropriately. However with Paizo allowing more and more non-core races in PFS, it becomes harder and harder. I personally don't even know what the appropriate roleplay is for a vishkanya (what the heck is that even suppose to be? Oh wait. It's in yet another splat book. That explains why I have no idea what this race is) or an udine. So they're making my job harder as now I need to buy more books for races I have no plan on playing just so I can roleplay with players that do play them.
And this is a great model for selling books. WotC did it with LFR and their "everything's core" model. It certainly sold a lot of books, but it killed any interest I had in the Forgotten Realms setting for 3 years. Only now am I starting to explore the setting once more (of course, avoiding anything resembles 4th ed Forgotten Realms). And while Paizo thankfully haven't taken the "everything's core" route, they are allowing more and more material to become legal which effectively ends up with there not being much difference.
Anywho, some characters are likely to balk at seeing goblins in their team, just as some characters will at seeing fetchlings, tieflings, or half-orcs.
THis is exactly the problem. We are seeing the return of team monster. There'll be parties composed entirely of Tieflings, Dhampyrs, Udines, Nagaji, Tengu and Fetchlings. The setting will play less and less of a role in the game as DMs have to ignore the flavour more and more just to let people play their exotic races. Meanwhile people are forced to ignore how their character should react and eventually it all devolves into no-one actually playing characters and simply building stat blocks that have the two correct ability boosts and we get 3 combats and a skill challenge and that's all people remember from the mods because we've seen the flavour sucked out simply to allow tables to play the game.
Now are we there yet? God no. But that is the direction we seem to be headed. The more splat books Paizo produces and the more races we see become legal (through boons or just open access) the closer we get to this situation. It happened with LFR and can easily happen with PFS if Paizo continues in the direction they seem to be headed.
As such I want to voice my concerns in the hope that those who feel the same also do and if enough of us feel this way, perhaps Paizo will reconsider.
Corax the honest thief wrote:
Who says the hatred and fear of Horses and reading needs to be removed in order to make them playable??
I can't kill animal companions.
Kain The Seeker wrote:
With the details changing every time because I'd be playing lying goblin rogue.
Sense motive. The second a city watch captain succeeds on his sense motive you're placed in jail for being a goblin. Which of course isn't legal.
But again the purpose of my posts isn't to personally critique every single goblin character people have. People have them, I hope they enjoy them, but I'm concerned about the trend they are a part of. I came to these forums to see what people thought of tieflings aasimars becoming open access (the two races that are now optimal for every class ever except alchemist. For alchemists we have humans with +2 STR, +2 INT thanks to Advanced Race Guide). I found this thread on goblins purely by accident.
Scott Young wrote:
Scribbleface from "We Be Goblins" could write; so could Vorka the cannibal (who also kept dogs, *and a horse*!). There, canon supports it! ('Course, it didn't end too well for either of them...)
I don't understand the appeal to playing a goblin if you're not going to adhere to all of the wonderful flavour Paizo has produced about goblins.
Black Powder Chocobo wrote:
There's still the possibility it may be opened up later down the road anyway (higher than a Paladin of Asmodeus at least!).
I'm fully aware of this and am quite concerned by this possibility.
I will quote what an organiser of PFS once said on this very issue:
Joshua J. Frost wrote:
I really want to draw people's attention to one part: "to show off our world and capture the flavor of our world, we stick to the core races only"
I feel this new approach is not showcasing the world nor capturing it's flavour.
Eric Clingenpeel wrote:
Yeah, your average goblin hates writing, but this is 30 some goblins in all of Golarion.
Unfairly stereotyping would be saying all goblins are evil.
Fearing the written word is part of the racial roleplay and is an intrinsic part of being a goblin. But let's say you overlook that aspect. For playability reasons you're also going to need to remove the hatred for dogs and horses (otherwise animal companions are going to get slaughtered which is against the rules). Furthermore DMs are now going to have to work extra hard to explain why this goblin is permitted in the area that the adventure module takes place in. Sometimes this just won't make sense and so we'll have DMs saying "you're not allowed to play that character in this game" or "the town guard imprisons you until the Pathfinder Society pulls enough strings at the end of the mod to allow you to go free, escorting you to the border to ensure no further confusion occurs."
AFAIK DMs aren't allowed to categorically say "you fail the mod because you're playing a freak" (trust me, I would have loved to do so on a number of occassions). So instead what will actually happen is DMs will gloss over the flavour of goblins in order to adhere to the rules of PFS and players will gloss over the flavour in order to be able to partake in the Pathfinder Society.
The end result is we either receive flavourless characters that have lost (due to the rules) all of the wonderful flavour that makes up goblins. Or we see players playing special snowflakes.
In my view this is no different to having an elf that rides a kank in Dark Sun or a Half-Giant that's cunning and manipulative. If you want to be cunning and manipulative, you don't play a half-giant, you play a race that can be manipulative and cunning.
Eric Clingenpeel wrote:
How often do you really see stereotypical PC's?
There's a difference between playing "a stereotypical member of a race" and "adhering to the racial roleplay." I always adhere to the racial roleplay.
My Taldanes? Manipulative and cunning. Their motives are different (one of them has the motive of trying to stay alive. Another's motive was to serve his noble family to the upmost of his ability).
My Andoran? A Chelish halfling that was freed from slavery who became a squire of a knight in the Pathfinder Society and now carries on the virtues that knight lived by as a fully fledged agent of the Pathfinder Society.
That isn't a stereotypical halfling. But it does adhere to the flavour of Cheliax, Andoran and halflings.
Eric Clingenpeel wrote:
If everyone was able to play Goblins, then I could see that as a problem, but these are maybe 37 people at max out of 50,000+ players with who knows how many characters each. It is not the end of the world.
And thankfully I live in Australia so I won't have to jump through these hoops to permit goblins at my table. And I want to make it clear, I have no issue with those who gained these boons to use these boons. If I had survived insurmountable odds I would also want to benefit from the reward I had received.
My issue is entirely with WotC for handing out this reward in the first place. I am disappointed they did this and I think it cheapens the world setting they have worked so hard to establish.
Chris Kenney wrote:
You don't. You had to complete the Part 2 of the "Race for the Runecarved Key" Special at GenCon this year. This was a run-once event that will not be repeated, and the Goblin boon is unlikely to be awarded again. If it is, it will probably be for another one-shot event at GenCon (Maybe Paizocon.)
I am disheartened to hear this. Verisimilitude-wise, it makes 0 sense for PFS characters to be goblins. Goblins hate words and think they steal the thoughts from your brain. Therefore logically they can't receive faction missions unless someone reads it to them. That's not very practical.
So either those 37 people will have characters quickly falling behind the prestige award curve. They'll not get to play the goblins. Or they'll have to sacrifice part of the flavour that makes goblins unique and fun in order to simply play these characters.
I am disappointed that Paizo chose to go down that road.
David Montgomery wrote:
I will note, even though this gets covered to no end in countless other threads, Infernal Healing is a spell with the [Evil] descriptor. In Gods And Magic, it also has the requirement that you be a worshipper of Asmodeus. Your GM may not like your use of spells with the [Evil] descriptor if they feel the spell is not necessary or for good reason. That is a whole different pot all together though.
It is available in Inner Sea World Guide which has no such qualification. And that qualification is from a 3.5e book. There are Pathfinder specific spells that are only accessible to worshipers of a particular deity. Infernal Healing as presented in the Inner Sea World Guide is not marked specifically for that deity.
Also it's a wizard spell so it's simple to get a wizard to make the wand of Infernal healing (given that wands aren't specific to particular types of magic, AFAIK).
So unfortunately rules as written there is no way a PFS DM can say 'that's not allowed.'
All that said....
Some players are willing to restrict themselves from taking things that are clearly too good. In this case, wands of infernal healing are 200% better then a cure light wounds wand and is ideal for out of combat healing. You effectively save 75gp per wand when you use a wand of infernal healing.
To me that is an example of splat book creep and is something I would advocate other players to willingly refrain from using such items.
Also don't confuse this with me having an issue with the spell. I think it's an awesome spell and I have a non-Society Wizard who happily casts it whenever he can. But I'm using spell splots to use it in those cases, rather than simply saving 75gp per wand of CLW.
We went around the back during the night and triggered the shrieking zombies. The Enchanter cast sleep on the lone guard who was watching our direction, but not before the guard called out to his friend. The Druid than ran up and hid flush against the wall while her tiger killed the zombies. The Battle Oracle and Cleric beat at the zombies while the Wizard used Fire Breath twice before falling unconscious. The Druid cast warp wood on the palisade.
A guard came to see what was going on and saw his comrade asleep. He woke his comrade up, watched the fight for a bit (they briefly saw a mountain lion but the night sky was keeping the rest of us hidden). I cast sleep on the same guard and then we all ran up to the wall.
We broke in and the Cleric and Oracle went to go fight the two guards on watch. The Enchanter Wizard peered through an open gate and saw a big bad guy and a few other people. Not wanting to get attacked from the rear he cast web into the complex, isolating the Staglord (by accident) and entangling a big guy. The Staglord got up, got his bow and then tried to hit the Enchanter's flat-footed AC. He missed.
We fought off the mooks while the Staglord slowly made his way out of the webbing. The other guy near the Staglord came out and suddenly Akiros turned on the bandits and started fighting the big guy. We quickly dispatched the rest (enchanter throwing putting hideous laughter on the mentally handicapped fighter, glitterdusting Dovan).
Before Dovan was glitterdusted he released the Owlbear just in time for the Staglord to get out of the webbing. The Owlbear fought the Staglord until the Staglord retreated (having burnt away a substantial portion of the webbing), so we killed the owlbear rather quickly. We then killed the Staglord with the NPC barbarian helping us quite a bit. We wanted to keep the Staglord alive so it was quite difficult for us to achieve this. Thankfully we managed, but only by the person dealing the final blow getting an assist from the Enchanter who had a longspear (-6 to the attack roll due to cover) and a guidance from the Druid.
At this point the Evoker Wizard's player turned up. We got to Nestle's Crossing and hand over the Staglord, alive. The zombie eviscerates the staglord's body. The Enchanter felt himself move a step away from NG and felt a bit bad over the whole ordeal.
Alexander Kilcoyne wrote:
Well unless your GM made some modifications to make it tougher, your party was one level too high for the fight...
Unfortunately so was ours. That said, we initiated every single combat at once (with the exception of the zombies). Thus far team caster has done rather well (everyone wanted to play a caster once we learned the AP goes to level 17).
The Stag Lord's first move should be to use his insightful shot, against the party's healer if he can see him.
Pfft. That insightful shot ability is completely overrated. He missed a Wizard with Dex 12 (but Charisma 14 :D) who only had mage armour running (no shield due to banning abjuration). If he can't get a Wizard with that shot, he's got no hope on anyone else!
(FYI: He missed by 1 point! And only because the webbing provided me with cover! And the GM rolled a 3! I was on 10 HP, I would have just died if he hit)
You could go Transmuter, grab the Disguise skill and use that Diplomacy/Bluff/Intimidate as a master of disguises.
Already got a transmutation specialist.
Also, I notice you don't have Sense Motive, which is a real handicap for a socially based character.
That was quite deliberate. I have the best chance of making any knowledge roll (I tried to not do it, but I just have so many skill points), I want to need to rely on the other characters. Fortunately 9 times out of 10 I'll have the other PCs with me so I can rely on their ability to sense motive and somehow signal that to me. Once we get high enough level it will be telepathic bond in such scenarios.
I wanted to give myself a weakness, so not having sense motive seemed a pretty big one.
So I made a Charisma 5 dwarf. My very next character was suddenly an Enchanter Wizard. This has got to be my favourite character I've built thus far. I am optimised not for combat. Everyone does that, it's boring. I'm optimised for Roleplaying! Here it is.
Human Wizard 17
Human Racial Traits
STR 10 0
Under a standard 20 point buy my starting stats would differ as Strength 7, Int 20, Con would be 14, Charisma 12 and Dex 10.
So he forced me to decrease by Int but increase every other ability score except wisdom.
Headband Skills are:
Bonus Int Skills (51 points total):
My skill ranks give me 17 languages:
I don't have any archetypes or focused schools. I'm simply a straight Wizard. I had to take the extra HP per level because I ran out of skills to put ranks in!
Some fun facts about this Wizard at level 17:
I would like to think this is the first time someone has built a character like this in quite this manner.
So in a nutshell you play a strong/tough dwarf with a personality akin to a piece of sandpaper and the appearance of a walrus cadaver.
Wow. I've never had someone actually attack my ability to roleplay correctly before. I'd like to think you would have taken more then just 2 stats to condemn the character though.
Does your GM have the NPCs who meet your "dwarf" recoil in utter horror or do they get a chance to run away in terror beforehand?
He has a very patchy beard (it's just abysmal really, but he does do his best to grow it because damnit dwarves are suppose to have beards). He also smells a bit, and so he does his best to cover it up with cologne. He either puts too much on or not enough so that after an hour's work he's not the most pleasant person to smell (he does do his best to fix that before dinner).
I'm going to be honest, he can be a real so and so at times. But he makes a concerted effort to be nice to people, and while it doesn't always work, once people get to know him they eventually warm up to him (playing in Jade Regent where I have a -3 to my starting relationship score with every single NPC).
I view that by his nature he can a really horrible person. But over the years he's done his best to be nicer to people (+4 to diplomacy) and so when he does make an effort he's not outright rude to them.
The idea that stats and stats only determine your character's nature is a false one IMO. My dwarf will succeed on more diplomacy rolls then you're average fighter (CHA 10 and has no ranks in it because he only gets 2+Int mod and it's not even a class skill). He's easily overlooked at first (or otherwise stands out for the wrong reasons) but given half a chance and you'll discover he's not a complete jerk.
That's what I was thinking as well, just a bummer to limit it that much when giving up Chanel Energy is already a huge drawback IMO.
Pfft. I've got a strength based Charisma 5 dwarf (with max ranks in bluff and diplomacy). Does this ONLY replace Channel Energy? Because if so I might need to hassle my GM into letting me get it (it's flavourful!). At the moment that's just a dead class feature for me.
Those who will have problems are groups that try to play with less then 6 players or/and groups that decide not to do their own investigation.
Our group did do a fair bit of investigation and got the
site of the temple information. We didn't get the knowledge of a demon on our gather information so we weren't able to prep for it. None of us had the appropriate knowledges to face a demon so we didn't have the appropriate gear
I think my biggest problem with the scenario was there was way too many stat block errors in it
Out of interest can you detail what the errors were? We TPK'd which is alright. I've yet to die in PFS before so I'm more than happy. But I'm curious as to how much contributed to the TPK.
The Tengu, not the claws, are considered to have Improved Unarmed Strike regarding prerequisites, I see. That makes more sense and makes the claw option even more interesting. I rescind my "boring".
This seems a bit too good. I'm dealing 150 DPR at level 11 (assuming all 3 attacks hit and I have a flank. I have a +18/+18/+17 to hit). I don't like too good options because I feel guilty using them :(
I'm willing to rescind this once because I just absolutely love the flavour of tengu.
Do my claws count as unarmed strike (because otherwise most unarmed strike feats are useless)? Also does my beak count as unarmed strike?
[EDIT]: I'm hoping it's not my claws counting for unarmed strike (I don't think it is). There is a feat called Feral Combat Training which allows me to use stylistic feats for it.
Shuriken Nekogami wrote:
i need suggestions for a character to play.
I'm serious. This is the pirate campaign. Definitely play a pirate.
That said, my understanding of party roles are thus:
Wow, 8 players. That's a lot of players. You'll have 3-4 frontline fighters, 1 arcanist 3 healers and 1-2 faces (a 3rd one if Rogue takes diplomacy and bluff).
You're pretty much welcome to play whatever you feel like. Pirate themed characters:
These are my recommendations.
Oh wait, you could totally be a tengu. They're used by Shackles pirates to soak up bad luck so it doesn't afflict the ship. You could totally have deliberately not soaked up the bad luck on your last ship because they mistreated you causing them to sink and for you to manage to escape.
You can then spend the entire campaign saying "you'd better be nice to me. The last ship just totally sunk." As a tengu I'd recommend a TWF ranger/fighter build or a rogue.
I recommend the tengu option. But any of the ones above are definitely fun classes as well if you don't feel like being a non-human or don't feel like being a fighter/rogue type.
I am a player of this campaign. I have read nothing in this thread, nor will be visiting this thread again. I have an in character journal here should anyone wish to read it.
If you would like to make any comments that I can view feel free to reply in the campaign journal thread.
This is the in character journal for Rogar, son of Odol of the Ghalkin Clan. More details on this character are available here. At the bottom there is an OoC area where I talk about notable events.
7th of Calistril, 4712
8th of Calistril, 4712
Afterwards Niska pulled me aside and asked me to look after little Koya after she passes away. I hope this does not come to pass anytime soon, but I fear it will become a reality all too soon. It seems Koya hasn’t matured very much as Niska insisted that I accompany young Koya should she ever go on a long journey. While I would not begrudge someone for travelling abroad, Koya’s health doesn’t seem to be anywhere near strong enough to cope on such an expedition.
10th of Calistril, 4712
10th of Pharast, 4712
As such we had the funeral on the 5th of Calistril. Since then I’ve been helping Koya out. Doing my best to ensure she eats properly and takes care of herself.
9th of Gozran, 4712
I’ve been butting heads with the man whose stolen my usual room at the Rusty Dragon. He’s actually been throwing me out of the tavern on a regular basis for being “too noisy.” Who ever heard of a tavern that was being too noisy! It’s outrageous and I’m starting to consider having serious words with Ameiko over this young man.
10th of Gozran, 4712
I tried to tell him that it could not possibly be Thassilonian as the construction is clearly 600 years old at the absolute latest. But he would not listen.
More importantly the Sheriff came around and told us that the bounty on goblins has been re-enacted. The wizard was surprisingly keen on aiding me in collecting this bounty (proving he isn’t too bad of a wizard). Surprisingly Mr. Hirato requested he join our expedition. Afterwards he immediately insulted my honour and so I had to show him just how strong my honour is.
He’s actually got a mean right hook. He kept trying to kick me which was rather underhanded of him. But he does land a solid punch and can take something of a beating himself. Perhaps I have been maligning his character for the past two months. Perhaps he really isn’t that bad of a person.
Koya told me that there is a Halfling they call the Warden of the Marsh. She believes his shack is along the old fishing trail and that he might be able to tell us where the goblin camp is.
11th of Gozran, 4712
Hirato and Teotos were rather insistent that we go along the new fishing trail. I think it is a mistake, but they are insisting upon it. It was an arduous affair with poorly constructed bridges allowing us to cross the rivers. Give me a good old fashioned dwarven bridge any day of the week. I do not trust these haphazard constructs.
12th of Gozran, 4712
The true Warden of the Marsh was upstairs. I am currently tending to his wounds and will continue to do so for another two days. I did not bring enough rations or waterskins, thankfully he is well stocked on his supplies.
For saving his life he gifted us a lucky cloak. Mr. Hirato insisted on taking it and I have begrudged him this with Teotos’s blessing. He did fell the beast and help save my life.
13th of Gozran, 4712
14th of Gozran, 4712
16th of Gozran, 4712
We did collect 12 goblin ears for which the Sheriff was very grateful. As was Ameiko strangely enough. We were able to negotiate 300gp for the camps leader, however we are unable to procure crucial supplies that we need. Although I was able to buy myself a new shield.
On the morrow we journey to Old Megas the Marsh Witch’s house to see if we can either pay her for some potions or find some potions in the ruins of her home. I get the impression from Koya that she was old a long time ago.
It seems she was run out of town for creating alchemical potions. I argued with Koya about this as it is wrong for this town to run her out simply for being interested in alchemy. Koya still has a lot of growing up to do, perhaps her travelling abroad wouldn’t be such a bad idea after all.
18th of Gozran, 4712
We got to Old Megas’s home today, and as I feared she is dead. We were attacked by some strange manner of creature. I believe it may have been a direrat. Mr. Hirato conducted himself in a fairly peculiar manner. He was afraid of this direrat. We did find a map with two shipwrecks clearly marked on it.
We argued about if we should go to the goblins first or if we should check out the shipwrecks. Hirato is interested in naught but looting these relics. He is ignoring the fact that we need to wipe out this vermin before it launches a retaliatory strike against the people of Sandpoint. We will discuss it in the morning.
19th of Gozran, 4712
I can sympathise with him and I feel bad for being happy that his weapon was stolen by the goblins. However it has forced him to rearrange his priorities. First we return to Sandpoint where I can revive the wizard. Then we slay that vermin.
20th of Gozran, 4712
We leave tomorrow for the goblins.
22nd of Gozran, 4712
We were also able to reclaim Mitsuhirato’s ancestral weapon. I feel the debt I owed him is now repaid. I will need to send word back home to ensure these deeds are recorded in the Book of Grudges.
24th of Gozran, 4712
I am going to relax for the next few days and also purchase a new greataxe.
26th of Gozran, 4712
30th of Gozran, 4712
1st of Desnus, 4712
Tomorrow we start heading out to the other ship.
2nd of Desnus, 4712
I have been seeing The Bog Marsh Monster chasing us since our first day in the marsh. However he has not attacked and we have certainly had times when were extremely vulnerable. I suspect he is a friendly hermit. I think he might be looking for company, but I cannot take that risk at this stage.
3rd of Desnus, 4712
We are now on our way back to Sandpoint.
6th of Desnus, 4712
We will be leaving for Brinewall soon. I fear that Koya will want to come along. Normally I wouldn't begrudge her this, but I am fearful of us needing to flee as we're chased out of town. I will try to convince her to stay, but I may need to enlist Hirato's and Teotos' help in guarding her during the trip.
Out of Character:
So our GM had us rolling reflex saves at each bridge because I was approaching them with particular fear given their poorly made construction and that they were wooden. So we would spend half an hour on each bridge just to get across.
When we got the Walthus's home we all failed to spot that he wasn't Walthus. But he was wounded, so as a cleric I offered to heal him. I hadn't brought enough waterskins with me so I was dehydrated. In order to ascertain how safe his water was to drink I needed to get water to clean his wound.
The GM had him take a minute to get it for me (as he was unfamiliar with the kitchen). During this time I was carefully laying out my healer's kit when Hirato asked if I was getting warm water. I said good point and when he returned with a bucket of water I informed Walthus I needed a kettle to boil it in (at this point completely unaware of anything suspicious).
I resumed getting out my supplies and Walthus took another minute to find a kettle, during which time Hirato got suspicious. When Walthus returned Hirato declared this wasn't Walthus's home and that he was a squatter. At which point we rolled initiative.
I was flat-footed and closest to Walthus. I went down to sneak before I got to even act (10 HP). The others were able to kill him though. If it wasn't for the fact I was tracking food and water that I was consuming, I would have healed the creature and then left. Hooray for accidentally ruining the GMs plans!
In the goblin village we were planning on just rampaging around and triggering all the encounters at once (we didn't see any other way). I was going to get super buffed at the gates. However my dwarf immediately became suspicious as there were no goblin children in the yard. We slowly started making our way through the huts. We finally found them, they got a surprise round on me. They then went first in initiative. I went down into negatives once more. The others had to kill the goblins (with Walthus's help) before we retreated, having only searched half the town.
Thankfully I stopped dropping every single fight after that and started contributing.
Our GM was impressed that I was able to work out how to boost my relationship with Koya however I feel he telegraphed it quite a bit. I went to her, was telling her about what I've been doing. The exact manner in which I gave her a map of Brinestump Marsh is unclear, but I think the GM gave me a pretty solid hint. But perhaps I'm just more intuitive then I thought.
Funnily enough a quirk of my character given he's a trader is that he is interested in maps. The OoC reason for this is that I know we're going to Tian and it makes sense for my trader to want to document how to get there. I have no ranks in knowledge (geography) or survival so I will be forced to ask NPCs to help me with this endeavour so I can give it to my family so we can start trading in weapons to and from Tian. I love that this just so happens to be a common interest with Koya.
We finished at 2 in the morning so we handwaved the return to town. As such the final two entries are going to be expanded after next session when we actually roleplay returning to town.
All in all, fun was had by all. My current relationship scores are:
I started building my character 3 days ago and started playing it yesterday. It was very impromptu decision to run this campaign right now.
I am playing Rogar, son of Odol of the Ghalkin Clan (dwarf cleric 15. No archetypes or prestige classes planned at this stage).
In Pathfinder I have 10 characters, 8 of which are human. The reasons are three fold:
So playing a dwarf is out of my comfort zone. Playing a Charisma 5 character is well and truly out of my comfort zone. This is the first time a Charisma 5 character has actually been legal. I cannot bluff, I have 0 ranks in it and a -3 modifier. I do have max ranks in Diplomacy, netting me a +2 in it at level 2.
I've started to become concerned that I'm relying too much on humans +2 to any stat and bonus feat. So I'm trying to force myself to play different races more (it doesn't help there's only 7 races legal for PFS play and 3 of them have the +2 to any stat of your choice boost).
I am enjoying being 107 years old. I am enjoying having bonuses in very specific circumstances.
I am 107 years of age and my family has been trading through Sandpoint for quite some time. I have the "friend of the family" trait with Koya. Initially I was going to be a best friend to Ameiko but one of my players who has the potential to romance her requested I pick a different NPC as that was the NPC he chose. Not wanting us to all have the same NPC as our "significant other" I chose Koya for three reasons:
Given I had a starting relationship score with Koya of 1 I decided that I was very good friends with her mother. I first met Niska when I was 13 years old. I was friendly with Koya but I always considered myself an unofficial "Uncle Rogar" to young Koya. After all, I was 47 for her very first birthday. An adult by that point. For the past 20 years I've been studying to become an ordained priest of Angradd and so the last time I saw Koya was when she was 40 years old. I have corresponded quite a bit during the last 20 years with Niska.
Upon becoming ordained I immediately travelled to Sandpoint as I was concerned for Niska's health based on how she had been talking in our letters back and forth. I arrived a few days before she died and have been keeping an eye on Koya to make sure she is handling her grief well and is taking care of herself.
Rogar's Catch Phrases
1) "Have a sandwich! You look like you're about to faint." "Have a sandwich! I could snap you in two without even trying." - This is one of the ways in which I am playing out my Charisma 5. I am genuinely concerned for all of these frail humans. Especially Koya. They look like they're about to pass out and waste away to nothing."
2) "I bloody hate goblins!" - It's true because I have a hatred for goblins. Especially the goblins that blinded me, forced me to fall off my horse and then have it bolt away with them chasing it. (I didn't have enough starting coin to buy one).
3) "Now look here, young lady..." - Whenever Koya and I disagree on something.
Rogar's Memorable Moments
The Rest of the Party
We have a Tian Fighter 1/Sorcerer 4/Dragon Disciple X/Something else Y called Mitsuhirato Yaramoto. He has either a "childhood crush" or "hero worship" of Ameiko.
Given we only have 3 characters we have filled these party roles thusly:
Here is my take on the Eberron races. I found it interesting how my thinking differed from John Templeton's and would appreciate any feedback (I was less willing to tweak the rules as John did).
Changeling Racial Traits
Changeling Creation Costs:
Type: Humanoid (0 RP)
Size: Medium (0 RP)
Base Speed: Normal (0 RP)
Ability Score: Flexible Modifiers (2 RP)
Language Trait: Standard Array (1 RP)
Magical Racial Abilities: Change Shape (6 RP)
Skill and Feat Abilities: Integrated (1 RP)
Total: 10 RP
Kalashtar Racial Traits
Kalashtar Creation Costs:
Type: Humanoid (quori, human) (0 RP)
Size: Medium (0 RP)
Base Speed: Normal (0 RP)
Ability Score: Flexible Modifiers (2 RP)
Language Trait: Linguist Array (2 RP)
Defense Racial Abilities: Dual Minded (1 RP)
Magical Racial Abilities: Dreamspeaker (2 RP)
Skill and Feat Abilities: Adaptability (1 RP)
Skill and Feat Abilities: Integrated (1 RP)
Skill and Feat Abilities: Sociable (1 RP)
Total Cost: 10 RP
Shifter Racial Traits
Shifter Creation Cost:
Type: Humanoid (shifter) (0 RP)
Size: Medium (0 RP)
Base Speed: Normal (0 RP)
Ability Score: Paragon Modifiers (-2 RP)
Ability Score: Advanced Wisdom (4 RP)
Language Trait: Standard Array (1 RP)
Senses: Low-light Vision (1 RP)
Skill and Feat: Skill Bonus (2 RP)
Skill and Feat: Skill Bonus (2 RP)
Shifter Bloodline (2 RP)
Total Cost: 10 RP
Warforged Racial Traits
Warforged Creation Cost:
Type: Half-Construct (7 RP)
Size: Medium (0 RP)
Base Speed: Normal (0 RP)
Ability Score: Standard (0 RP)
Language Trait: Linguist Array (2 RP)
Offense: Natural Attack (1 RP)
Total Cost: 10 RP
I realise there's quite a few threads about artificer archetypes, but they all seem dedicated to one specific way of doing it. This approach is rather different than all the others and I'd be interested in hearing what people think.
Artificer (Alchemist Archetype)
Alchemy (Su): This behaves like the alchemy class feature except for extracts. Extracts are like spells but in potion form which allows their effects to be dispelled by effects like dispel magic using the artificer’s level as the caster level. Unlike potions, an artificer’s extracts can only affect constructs, although they can have powerful effects and duplicate spells that a potion normally could not.
An artificer can create only a certain number of extracts of each level per day. His base daily allotment of extracts is given on Table 2–1 from the Advanced Player’s Guide. In addition, he receives bonus extracts per day if he has a high Intelligence score, in the same way a wizard receives bonus spells per day.
When an artificer mixes an extract, he infuses the chemicals and reagents in the extract with magic siphoned from his own magical aura. An artificer’s extracts can normally only affect constructs. An extract, once created, remains potent for 1 day before becoming inert, so an artificer must re-prepare his extracts every day. Mixing an extract takes 1 minute of work—most artificers prepare many extracts at the start of the day or just before going on an adventure, but it’s not uncommon for an artificer to keep some (or even all) of his daily extract slots open so that he can prepare extracts in the field as needed.
Although the artificer doesn’t actually cast spells, he does have a formulae list that determines what extracts he can create. An alchemist can utilize spell-trigger items if the spell appears on his formulae list, but not spell-completion items (unless he uses Use Magic Device to do so). An extract is “cast” by applying it, as if applying an oil — the effects of an extract exactly duplicate the spell upon which its formula is based, save that the spell always affects only the construct that has had the oil applied to. The artificer uses his level as the caster level to determine any effect based on caster level.
Creating extracts consumes raw materials, but the cost of these materials is insignificant—comparable to the valueless material components of most spells. If a spell normally has a costly material component, that component is expended during the application of that particular extract. Extracts cannot be made from spells that have focus requirements (artificer extracts that duplicate divine spells never have a divine focus requirement).
An artificer can prepare an extract of any formula he knows. To learn or use an extract, an alchemist must have an Intelligence score equal to at least 10 + the extract’s level. The Difficulty Class for a saving throw against an artificer’s extract is 10 + the extract level + the artificer’s Intelligence modifier.
An artificer may know any number of formulae. He stores his formulae in a special tome called a formula book. He must refer to this book whenever he prepares an extract but not when he consumes it. An alchemist begins play with two 1stlevel formulae of his choice, plus a number of additional formulae equal to his Intelligence modifier. At each new artificer level, he gains one new formula of any level that he can create. An artificer can also add formulae to his book just like a wizard adds spells to his spellbook, using the same costs and time requirements. An artificer can study a wizard’s spellbook to learn any formula that is equivalent to a spell the spellbook contains. A wizard, however, cannot learn spells from a formula book. An artificer does not need to decipher arcane writings before copying them.
Trapfinding (Ex): An artificer adds 1/2 his level to Perception checks to locate traps and Disable Device checks (minimum +1). An artificer can use Disable Device to disarm magical traps. When determining the ability of an artificer to deal with locks or traps, treat his alchemist levels as rogue levels. This ability replaces the Brew Potion bonus feat.
Mutagen (Su): This functions exactly as the mutagen ability except it only works on constructs.
Discoveries: An artificer may take the following rogue talents as discoveries: quick disable, trap sense and trap spotter. Treat the artificer’s alchemist level as his rogue level for these talents.
Self-Forged (Ex): The artificer starts experimenting on himself, replacing parts of his body with artificial analogues. The artificer counts as a construct for the purposes of his class features. Furthermore when a critical hit or sneak attack is scored on the alchemist, there is a 25% chance that the critical hit or sneak attack is negated and damage is instead rolled normally. This does not stack with similar abilities that negate critical hits and sneak attacks (such as fortification armor). An alchemist can take this discovery up to three times; the effects stack, increasing this chance to 50% and then 75%.
Warforged (Ex): The artificer has mastered his self experimentation and can finally replace his final organs with artificial counterparts, turning himself into a living construct. After learning this discovery, the artificer must spend 30-days constructing the final organs to place into his own body. At the end of this time he falls undergoes a painful surgery to put into place these final components at which time he falls unconscious for 24 hours. Upon awakening he is a living construct. The artificer’s type does not change, but he becomes immune to fatigue, exhaustion, nausea, paralysis, and sleep effects. An alchemist must be at least 10th level and must have the self-forged discovery before selecting this discovery.
Discussion of Archetype
What do people think? This is a rather minimalist approach and you might not see much of what the Artificer had in 3.5e (my archetype does get trapfinding!) I tried to keep to the spirit of the class.
I wanted my players' journey from Ravengro to Lepidstadt to actually be exciting. As such I've reworked the encounters in both Trial of the Beast and Broken Moon to allow my PCs to encounter an issue. And thus that brings us to, Clover's Crossing.
Here's some notes/backstory I've created on the town.
What happened at Clover's Crossing
What actually happened was:
The cavern is filled with Lazurite. Here is the information on Lazurite in my campaign:
History (possibly only after determining its name)
Religion (possible only after determining its name)
CR 4: Dogs and children (1,200 XP)
This should be an easy combat for them. It's largely atmospheric and to compel the PCs further on into the chasm.
CR 6: Patrol of Ghouls (2,400 XP)
This should make the PCs take notice and realise this isn't going to just be all dogs and children. That some of the ghouls down here represent a very real threat.
CR 6: The Cleric's laboratory (1,600 XP)
Human slaves are kept in cages. The expert was once an academic at Lepidstadt university. He turned to religion and became a cleric of pharasma before coming to Clover's Crossing. Now that he's a ghoul Pharasma has forsaken him and he's lost his levels in cleric.
He is seeking a cure to being a ghoul and believes it lies in the properties of Lazurite. He feasts on the brains of his fellow villagers to help him in his research. He's gone completely insane, but still wears his cleric's vestments and holy symbol.
CR 7: Kellid Ruins Research (3,200 XP)
Any suggestions on possible changes?
I did 1 round of by the book tactics which caused my PCs to disregard him as a threat. I then took down the healer with an AoO with my corrupting touch. I then almost took down the sorcerer with all my magic missiles aimed squarely at him (darn sorcerer was quite hardy). That's when they took the fight seriously.
I gave my PCs a chance to work out Splatterman's fears and tactics by using sense motive. I felt this was fair, and it tipped them off on how to defeat him (rip the pages from the book). Also the PC who had the spellbook also had shield running. I wanted to give them a chance to work out what was going on, rather than assume the GM was being a jerk and refusing to aim magic missiles at the one PC that was shielded.
After they passed their sense motive and started taking him seriously, they proceeded to rip ALL the pages from the book dealing quite a bit of damage. They were surprised after the game when I mentioned how many hit points he had.
Mort the Cleverly Named wrote:
Frankly, given the way Pathfinder works, a Rogue is never vital like 2e Thieves, or even 3e Rogues were. Anyone can find any trap, and disable any mechanical one. Rogues just get a small (and not unique) bonus to it.
The traps are going to pose a problem, but anyone can find them and your party should be able to move around most of them (with some resources expended and clever thinking).
If you feel uncomfortable with that (and with possibly toning down or removing some of the traps) have your fighter go Ranger (Trapfinder) 1 / Fighter 13. He'll have full BAB progression, get trapfinding as well as a couple of weird Ranger class features.
Thanks in advance (this is as close to my submission as possible. I think I made a couple of minor changes just before I hit submit).
Dead Man's Mirror
Crimson Sword wrote:
And the flesh golem that's being lend around the house, all the doors are one tile large! I suppose the gate house could be larger but the house proper, the golem might have to be shrunk to a really big medium creature or the house might have a love of double doors....
that's a great point and all the justification I need to increase the size as I see fit.
NOTE: This contains spoilers for my campaign. If you're one of my players please don't continue reading.
So I'm running my very first Pathfinder Adventure Path and my players are 4th level and traveling from one location to another. While I could just roll on a random encounter table a few times, I hate doing that. While once or twice it helps serve a purpose for the story, ultimately it comes off as very unsatisfying for me.
So I wanted to throw some orcs at them, specifically a Belkzen raiding party. Thing is, I've never made NPCs under a 3.5e system before, so I've got some questions about ability scores.
If I was making a human NPC would I just create it as I would a PC (with the option to use NPC class levels) when it comes to ability scores? Would I employ a 15 point buy and create the NPC like that? Or should I use a stat array?
Second question is: If I'm making orc NPCs, should I just advance the Orc Warrior 1 from the Bestiary? Or would it not be unusual to instead make my own Orc Warriors using my own ability scores?
I'm just looking at the stats and I can't work out how these stats were generated.
Rob McCreary wrote:
The adventure is designed so that the trial can take up as much space and time as your group would like. It is mandatory in that it is the background for the entire adventure, but it can be reduced to just a few skill rolls each day in between investigating and fighting. OTOH, if your group wants to roleplay out the trial, it can be expanded to allow that too.
I will be expanding it as this is similar to a scene in another campaign which half my players were there for and enjoyed.
As such I will be having the PCs acting as barristers and investigators. Although first
They’ll have to convince the Beast to accept them as his solicitors and to put in a plea of not guilty. This will be one of the greatest challenges they face in this case. The Beast has been reading the Bone Lands in a Spiral and believes he is an abomination. One of our players is an Oracle of Pharasma so he may be inclined to agree at first, but will eventually be the key to convincing the Beast to accept life and embrace it.
Otherwise if they fail to do this before the court case, they can act as his solicitors and stall for time as they try to convince him to change his plea.
When they make their motion in court to become the Beast's barristers, they will make the current lawyer quite angry. He remains on counsel and getting paid, but only if the PCs forfeit their court appointed pay. Otherwise he'll object strenuously to getting thrown off and have the support of the prosecutor.
After they're hired on a solicitor will approach them and ask the players if they truly believe their client is innocent. When they say yes, he will chuckle and offer them some advice:
At that last point he smiles at them and then simply walks off. The PCs will have the opportunity to engage in his services.
The Barrister will offer the following suggestions:
The purpose of the friendly barrister is to give the PCs the chance to ask any questions about court proceedings that they might have. The PCs may also fall into a few traps where they think they need to prove the beast is innocent, get caught up only making knowledge checks and generally not treat this like a courtroom, instead treating it like a 4th ed skill challenge.
I also plan on having the prosecutor basically testify via questions. Stuff like "Now Mr. Prosecutors Witness. Is it not true that you're sole old grandma saw the defendent carrying some corpses from the local graveyard? And upon seeing this she clutched her chest falling to the ground crying out in pain and you rant to her side to hear her dying decleration of The Beast. The Beast is back?"
I don't want the PCs complaining about the prosecutor leading the witness because I don't want to have to do a back and forth with witnesses and the prosecution, doing different funny voices each time. If the PCs don't object then he gets to do a narrative with his questions. However this does allow the PCs to do the exact same thing when they question a witness.
I'm basing the courtroom off Australia's legal system and courtroom setup due to the fact that the Palatinates are still loyal to the crown despite being democracies (much like Canada and Australia).
Is there any other advice or possible actions the PCs could make that I've failed to take into consideration?
Also, what are some delaying motions they could make? I want the PCs to have as much time as they feel they need to do the investigation portion of the mod. They can delay:
to get caught up on the case. But what's some more motions they could put forth? I'm thinking:
I can also use the barrister to suggest some of these if they're really struggling. As in the case is about to start and they've done NO investigation.
A clue/evidence based adventure where the real "fun" of the adventure is figuring out how the clues all fit to reveal the truth is seriously undermined by DCs for finding the clues which are much too high to be practically accessible to a 4th level party at anything approaching a reliably good chance.
That's another reason for me to change the adventure to emphasise the trial. It gives the PCs alternate avenues. If they don't meet the DCs, they still stand a good chance at winning the trial.
Ooooh! This gives me an idea
Adivion Adrissant is a member of the Esoteric Order of the Palantine Eye.
He has an Exhibition doing the rounds of Osirion Goods. He funded an expedition into Northern Garund and now these goods are travelling throughout the major cities of Ustalav and was planning on being shown throughout the entire Inner Sea. Adrissant is rather busy so he isn't personally overseeing the exhibition. But instead has a curator overseeing it with Adrissant's name prominantly mentioned.
Unfortunately my PCs didn't get to meet Adrissant in Haunting of Harrowstone because they didn't attend the service after the funeral very much. So this would be a great way to have him mentioned, if not seen.
Alright, here are all 3 of my maps. I had to alter the design considerably, due to the size of the basement. My players got a real kick out of them so I hope someone here might find them useful in their own campaigns. They are formatted for an A4 piece of paper.
Remember: These are the original floor plans (with a couple of slight alterations from what's in the book)
Toadkiller Dog wrote:
That doesn't have to do much with Haunting of Harrowstone, really, since neither the setting nor rules support it.
Hence why I didn't make the thread here but instead in the Advice sub forum. The feedback has helped change my thinking as to the consequences for partaking in the ritual.
I'm surprised at some of the animosity I'm getting for handing out a +1 sword in return for non-monetary bargaining.
]I hear what everyone's saying. Selling your soul should have negative consequences.
I fear that detecting as evil simply isn't going to pop up and will become an excuse for the character to just act like a jerk.
I was thinking perhaps remove the +4 he receives to handle animal checks for his animal companion as it senses there isn't something quite right with him? It will hurt at low levels but he'll eventually be able to overcome it. What do people think?
Kydeem de'Morcaine wrote:
I've never seen a published adventure since clear back to 1st Ed that the victims you are trying to save were such a collection of misogynistic, prejudiced, hateful, neo-natzis wannabes
Your DM has to be careful in RPing the locals. I've got NPCs that clearly hate certain players (my Father Grimburrow absolutely despises our PC Dr. Volokhov who performs autopsies on the dead) while he absolutely loves the PC Priest of Pharasma. Other townsfolk are all smiles and hugs to to the PCs one day. Then a week or so later the NPC is looking at the PCs as if they kicked her dog.
There are reasons why the NPCs hate the PCs so much. My PCs have gotten off lucky in that they've ensured the population is fairly neutral towards them. They've had brief moments where they were Liked. They've also had brief moments where they were disliked. Overall they've stayed within Neutral.
Most of my PCs took my warnings to heart and have made a purely human party :D Things would have been worse had they played some of the more exotic races like "elves" ;)
Fubbles the Baby Cow wrote:
I think the problem is the Trust mechanic that's listed in the adventure. If things go the way they would be expected to go in the adventure (using average rolls, anticipating playere's reactions, etc.), the group quickly falls behind the curve in trust points, the town becomes an unpleasant group of ingrates, and the party starts to wonder why they are making any effort to save them.
I added in extra ways for the PCs to gain trust points. I also added in extra ways for the PCs to lose trust points. My PCs have made an effort to act well towards the PCs and have for the most part benefited from this.
If you're one of my players, do not read any further.
Alright, so last session one of my players agreed to take part in a dark ritual in return for getting a +1 weapon for free. Here's some background information
How witch's work in my version of Golarion:
In my world of Golarion witch's go out into the wilderness and partake in a ritual where they swear allegiance to a supernatural entity. In return the spirit gives them a servant. People call these servants familiars.
These servants have a tiny portion of the entity's power. Through studying and speaking with the servant the Witch can slowly gain access to more and more spells. The witch can also cast arcane rituals that allows her to teach the servant spells from a scroll or a wizard's spellbook.
These servants aren't loyal to the witch, but are instead agents of the entity. If the witch were to stray too far from her master's goals, the servant would report back to it's master who would send other agents to punish the witch.
All of the Witch's hexes come from the entity. As they serve and please their master, it grants them more and more powers.
These supernatural entities are poorly understood by all mortals. All that is known is that some are benign, while others are malignant
Background Information on Ravengro and my Campaign:
In Haunting of Harrowstone the players spend their entire time in a small town called Ravengro. This town is suppose to have a Magic Shop where the PCs can buy all of their magical items they might need.
I said bugger that and took it out of the game. There is no way my superstitious, backwater town is going to have a magic shop!
In it's place I put into town a Ranger hermit who if befriended can create magic items. I also created a crazy old witch who lives nearby and creates any magic items the PCs might need (that she meets the pre-reqs for).
The PCs scared off the hermit, but made friendly contact with the Witch. She had already given them a 10% reduction in return for investigating the current crimes underway in Ravengro for any evidence that Elkarid could be involved (the Elkarid family were responsible for her getting thrown out of town and driven off into the wilderness).
Despite this, they went to the Witch once more and asked for a free +1 weapon. She said she would, if they gave her Elkarid's head. They did a group huddle and briefly discussed the idea before saying no. She thought about it, and said fine. If one of them would partake in a ritual in the next full moon she would give enchant one of their weapons. One of the PCs put up his hand said yes he would partake in this ritual.
The ritual will involve having the PC make an arcane bond with the Witch's Patron. Unfortunately for the PC, this Patron is a malignant one. On the other hand, the PC will now be eligible to take levels in Witch if he so chooses.
Normally undergoing this ritual would cause the player to gain a level of Witch and a familiar. Now I don't want to force the PC to take a level of Witch, so I'm looking for a smaller boon to give them in return for swearing to serve this entity.
I was thinking of giving them a supernatural ability that is based on a hex. The player is not an optimised character and the player normally makes highly optimal characters. So I want to give reward him by giving him an ability that will be useful throughout the entire game. But I don't want to give him an ability that can be abused.
He's an int-based human cross-blooded sorcerer that has an animal companion and that's about it so far.
The boon I was thinking of giving him was "Misfortune (Su): Once a day you cause a creature within 30 feet to suffer grave misfortune for 1 round. Anytime that creature makes an ability check, attack roll, saving throw or skill check, it must roll twice and take the worse roll. A will save negates this ability, with the DC based on 10 + 1/2 character level + Int mod."
Does anyone see anything absolutely overpowering of this ability? The DC scales, so it's actually useful for this character despite having no levels in witch. However unlike the normal hex, he can only do it once a day and there is still a will save involved.
I would be interested in hearing people's thoughts.
Well here is the ground level. This was the one that required the most work, as I had to create not only the floor plans, but the template for the Plans itself (the footer).
It's important to note that this is the floor plans that was used to construct the prison, so it doesn't match the map in the book exactly. I've also removed the waiting rooms in the front foyer, because it felt like it had two foyers and that seemed silly. It was also difficult to draw those curved walls, so I just gor rid of it.
The features of the map are:
I'll post the basement and top level sometime later today. I'd be interested in feedback and thoughts about the plan.
You don't need a player handout for this, I don't think. Just say, "OK, you find a copy of the floor plans."
Pfft. They spent an entire session doing little but combing through those town hall records. I want to reward that by giving them a handout.
As it is, it isn't as time consuming as I thought it would be (I'm doing a bare-bones layout that shows walls, windows, which way the doors open along with labels for each room). I've almost got the ground level done. All I need to do is add windows and labels for each room.
If anyone's interested I'll upload the final copy.