Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Kobold

Jiggy's page

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32. RPG Superstar 2013 Marathon Voter, 2014 Dedicated Voter, 2015 Dedicated Voter. FullStarFullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 18,935 posts (21,378 including aliases). 17 reviews. 4 lists. 1 wishlist. 13 Pathfinder Society characters. 23 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 18,935 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

New FAQ wrote:

Dragon Disciple and Bloodrager: The dragon disciple’s blood of dragons ability increases draconic sorcerer bloodline powers. What about draconic bloodragers?

Yes, dragon disciple's blood of dragons ability should also increase draconic bloodragers’ bloodline powers.

"Also"? In addition to what? In addition to initiating/advancing the sorcerer abilities? Meaning that a Bloodrager5/DragonDiscipleX is advancing his bloodrager abilities while also gaining the (delayed) abilities of the sorcerer bloodline?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

DM_Blake wrote:
If you have those two levels of ninja and use a swift action to vanish, there could be an argument about whether you can do that in the middle of your Spring Attack...
Core Rulebook, Combat chapter, Actions in Combat, Swift Actions wrote:
You can take a swift action anytime you would normally be allowed to take a free action.
Core Rulebook, Combat chapter, Actions in Combat, Action Types, Free Action wrote:
You can perform one or more free actions while taking another action normally.

You can take free actions while taking other actions, and you can take swift actions any time you can take free actions. Ergo, you can take your swift action while taking another action.

Therefore, by definition, you can use Vanishing Trick (swift action) while using Spring Attack (full-round action). There is no argument that it works differently than what it plainly says (at least, no argument that's appropriate for the Rules Questions forum, if we have any respect for how Paizo organizes their messageboards).

Even so, as you mention, the disappearance would have to be either before the Steal (which is pointless, because you're already Stealthed and it'll break when you Steal anyway) or after the Steal (in which case they see you in between Stealing and disappearing, if only for a moment).

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

20 people marked this as a favorite.
Grond wrote:
The newish player, Theresa, is not actually complaining about it.

If you came to my home to play some game you'd never tried before with a group of total strangers, and my old friend of 20 years was kind of annoying you but everybody else took the behavior as normal, would YOU speak up right away?

A lot of people would feel like they were the troublemaker if they said something in a group like that, and so instead they'll either just stop showing up, or suffer in silence for a while in hopes it goes away and THEN just stop showing up.

Remember, every time Josh does something and you don't intervene, you are announcing to everyone (including both Josh and Theresa) that the behavior is normal and acceptable. Speaking out to say that you're bothered by behavior that the group you're in is labeling as normal and acceptable is not something most people will do.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

25 people marked this as a favorite.

Never ever ever try to solve out-of-character problems through in-character means.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

11 people marked this as a favorite.

No matter what words you say, if there are no repercussions when he does unacceptable things, you are telling him that his behavior is fine. It's called being an enabler.

If you're not enforcing, you're endorsing.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

I'm not sure I'm quite following what the question is. What sorts of differences are you thinking of? Also, is your question specific to Pathfinder, or do other roleplaying systems count?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Bandw2 wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:
I recall the rules on touch spells and held charges being in the book, not the FAQ.
choosing when to full attack and when to standard attack is a FAQ i believe.
Core Rulebook, Combat chapter, Actions in Combat, Full-Round Actions, Full Attack wrote:
Deciding between an Attack or a Full Attack: After your first attack, you can decide to take a move action instead of making your remaining attacks, depending on how the first attack turns out and assuming you have not already taken a move action this round. If you've already taken a 5-foot step, you can't use your move action to move any distance, but you could still use a different kind of move action.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
I'm Hiding In Your Closet wrote:
Is Chris Lambertz's presence ever not foreboding?

Given that "foreboding" refers to a fear of what's going to happen in the future, and Chris' posts always show up after something has happened, her presence is actually never foreboding.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

A sufficiently well-roleplayed succubus can TPK any party.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Two 3rd-level evil clerics, each with Selective Channel, spamming negative channels. That is a CR 4 encounter. Against APL 1, it should be "epic", but it's more like "everyone's dead in round 1". Against APL 2, it should be "hard", but it's still very deadly.

-------------------------------

A single wight is CR 3, which should be "hard" for 1st-level PCs, but any attack it lands will auto-kill a PC. (Remember, the listed Fort save on energy drain is to keep the negative level from becoming permanent the next day, not to keep you from getting it in the first place.)

-------------------------------

A Cleric3 and a Ninja3 is a CR 4 encounter. The ninja goes invisible as a swift action, then gets into position. Then, the cleric casts hold person at DC 17 (with Spell Focus and Greater). They coordinate their actions via Delay/Ready so that the ninja acts before the affected PC gets another save, and uses CdG. Dead PC. Then, the ninja goes invisible again as a swift, and takes a 5ft step. Repeat this process twice.

-------------------------------

Two 4th-level alchemists: a CR 5 encounter. They both use DEX-mutagen and drink up some levitate and blur. They stand in the air above the PCs, dropping bombs down on them (penalty to hit from levitate, but they're touch attacks and still splash on a miss). Direct hit damage is 2d6+3, and the PCs can't get into melee and face 20% concealment for their ranged options.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Partizanski wrote:
Unless I misunderstood, if you move past someone, as long as you start and end with cover or conealment, you get a stealth check to not get notcied. That being said, in this case there would be no penalty for distance to notice it coming.

Using the Stealth skill can help, but be aware that Combat Maneuver checks are explicitly a type of attack roll, and making an attack roll auto-breaks your Stealth.

EDIT: Though if memory serves, a mere two levels of ninja would let him go invisible as a swift action afterwards...

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Bandw2 wrote:
Jiggy wrote:
Daring Dodo wrote:

Yeah it appears to be a left over from 3.5 then. I can't find many of the definitions from that table in the books I have, though they match up with the d20srd almost exactly.

So they would apply to attribute checks. Shenanigans. Thank you.

Yeah, d20pfsrd.com is a third-party site that's good at aggregating resources, but has a tendency to be a little loose with the rules: I've seen them rewrite abilities to favor a given interpretation of how they work, chop up a sentence into half a dozen pieces and reassemble the pieces in a different order to produce two different sentences so that they could label pieces of the text as "flavor text" even though they were originally printed all mixed-in with the rest of it, and I've even seen them write entire paragraphs of "rules" out of their own heads and then present it as being part of the CRB.

Use d20pfsrd.com to find cool stuff and see what book it's in. Don't use d20pfsrd.com to look up rules.

i've seen this once, and it was due to poor formatting in the book, and was actually word for word written correctly.

I'm sure that happens too but, well, my examples were not hypothetical. :/

But anyway, still a useful site for other purposes than referencing rules. :)

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Yep, Quick Steal combos with Spring Attack just fine.

Just remember with Greater Steal that the only thing they don't notice is that you nabbed an item; they'll still see you dart up to them and away (and probably wonder what you're doing).

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Daring Dodo wrote:

Yeah it appears to be a left over from 3.5 then. I can't find many of the definitions from that table in the books I have, though they match up with the d20srd almost exactly.

So they would apply to attribute checks. Shenanigans. Thank you.

Yeah, d20pfsrd.com is a third-party site that's good at aggregating resources, but has a tendency to be a little loose with the rules: I've seen them rewrite abilities to favor a given interpretation of how they work, chop up a sentence into half a dozen pieces and reassemble the pieces in a different order to produce two different sentences so that they could label pieces of the text as "flavor text" even though they were originally printed all mixed-in with the rest of it, and I've even seen them write entire paragraphs of "rules" out of their own heads and then present it as being part of the CRB.

Use d20pfsrd.com to find cool stuff and see what book it's in. Don't use d20pfsrd.com to look up rules.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

And holy symbols.

And reach weapons.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Alternatively, what about this? You could alter the concept to say that your character desperately WANTS to be a Red Mantis Assassin, and has all the aptitude and skill for it, but suffers from a handicap: one of her arms/hands bears a permanent injury or birth defect, such that she can't get any combat-grade mobility out of it. Now, she's desperately trying to prove her worth in spite of her disadvantage, by becoming the best sawtooth-duelist in town.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Matthew Downie wrote:
Yes, but if it's possible to do these things without magic, using magic is just showing off / wasting spells per day / skipping adventure content.

Well, that's often a pretty big "if", which is the problem that I tried to demonstrate in my post. Obstacles other than a locked door, willing-but-hesitant NPC or a ledge within throwing distance of a grappling hook tend to be (nearly, or sometimes literally) impossible to engage nonmagically. Other times it's doable nonmagically, but it's so much more dangerous or otherwise impractical that the caster would get dirty looks for NOT bypassing it with a scroll of obstacle removal.

Should I start listing all the real-actual-gameplay examples I've seen of obstacles that were unable or infeasible to engage nonmagically, where using magic was very far from "showing off" or "skipping adventure content"?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

MechE_ wrote:
Personally, I've just houseruled the detect magic spell to be Touch range. I find that it puts a bit of the mystery and danger back into basic exploration and interaction with the world. It also has the side effect of making illusions and traps more difficult to deal with, which sort of multiplies the additional mystery and danger. This may not be for every group of players, but I like it a lot.

I like how 5E handled this and other similar "utility" spells: it's a 1st-level spell, but has the "ritual" tag, which lets a caster with the "Ritual Caster" class feature extend the casting time by 10 minutes in order to make it not cost a slot.

Spend a slot to find out now? Spend some time to save your resources? Decision! Depth! I like it! :D

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Dave Justus wrote:
I would expect anyone who goes to the expense of a serious magical trap (permanent, self resetting etc.) would make sure to cover it with a thin sheet of lead.

More likely, magic aura; a sheet of lead could potentially interfere with the trap itself.

In fact, in my own lair, I'd probably scatter trapless magic aura effects all over the place, with false auras of evocation and necromancy and all sorts of fun stuff. Then the actual traps would be magic aura'd into auralessness or, just to screw with intruders, weird crap like divination or conjuration (healing).

But I'm evil like that. >:D

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

If you knew that was how it worked, why did you ask how the rules defined a barrier? Could've saved us both some time if you'd been a little clearer about what you acknowledged to be a houserule and what you thought was an interpretation of the published version. :/

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
shadowkras wrote:
The text says that it can penetrate barriers, but what defines a barrier in the rules?
The same freaking sentence that says it penetrates barriers wrote:
The spell can penetrate barriers, but 1 foot of stone, 1 inch of common metal, a thin sheet of lead, or 3 feet of wood or dirt blocks it.

The spell can detect magical auras in the next damn room.

Also:

Detect Magic wrote:
3rd Round: The strength and location of each aura. If the items or creatures bearing the auras are in line of sight, you can make Knowledge (arcana) skill checks to determine the school of magic involved in each.

The only thing that's contingent on line of sight is ID'ing the school. But you've already determined the strength and location, even without line of sight.

You can literally walk up to the outside of a brick house and, after three rounds, know how many magical auras are in the living room, where they are, and how strong they each are.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Matthew Downie wrote:

I find a lot of adventures consist of:

Go to place.
Talk to some people.
Go to other place.
Kill a series of enemies.
Collect loot.

In these situations, out-of-combat options don't seem to matter that much unless the caster is going out of his way to short-circuit the story with planar shenanigans.

Well, let's take a look (using actual play experience, as the OP requested):

• Go to place.
My fighter could walk. My cleric could walk on air. (And my sorceress, whose story I didn't tell earlier because it was getting late, could fly and/or teleport.)

• Talk to some people.
My fighter could try a social skill, with CHAmod+skill ranks. My cleric could do the same, but also add his level on top of it through a domain power. Or, when we had someone at the table who wanted to do the talking, I could add my level to their social skills instead, while my fighter could just Aid Another for +2.
Oh, and if "talk to some people" included any degree of investigation or figuring things out, my cleric could literally just ask his goddess what's up.

• Go to other place.
See above about walking versus air walking, flying, teleporting, etc. Additionally, if "other place" is on the other side of any obstacles, my fighter could see if it's an obstacle that can be beaten into submission, but if it's not, then he has to do something horrible like make a Climb check for every 15ft he climbs and then start over (possibly with injury) when he fails even one of them. Meanwhile, the cleric just air walks past the obstacle, or stone shapes open the wall, or heals himself after the trap goes off, or whatever. My sorceress can just say "POOF! I'm at my destination!" (or fly there, if teleporting is too risky due to unfamiliarity).

• Kill a series of enemies.
Yay! Fighter can finally do something! Except my cleric is better at it. Oh, and if something's so tough that the fighter's method isn't gonna work (like the aforementioned fiendish Titan Centipede that takes the entire party under half health with a single trample, or the aforementioned CON-drain-when-you-hit ooze, or something spamming deeper darkness, or whatever else—and those are real examples, and I have more), then my fighter was left near-useless, while my cleric could just send the target to hell, or cast a spell/use a domain power that negates the unhelpful condition and go back to stabbing.

• Collect loot.
And even here my cleric has the advantage over my fighter, because my cleric's +2 cold iron longsword only cost him 20gp.

What part of that involved "going out of my way to short-circuit the story with planar shenanigans"?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

DrDeth wrote:

Let us not attack the other side...

...

One reason I have seen is that those who dont think there's much of a disparity look upon PF/D&D as a TEAM game, and if the martial is super at dealing DPR- and the player playing that PC is happy doing that- then there's no disparity. The TEAM is strong, all the players are happy.

In other cases, the disparity doesnt happen much as the players are friends, and try to get along and "play happy".

...

Car we keep the discussion on a friendly level, please, less antagonistic posts? More helpful discussion. Please.

Um...

...okay.

So, anyway, there's a reason I was careful to point out the happiness and camraderie surrounding my cleric: he was played as a team member, and I treated my tablemates as friends. Like I said (did you read the whole post?) people were HAPPY to have me at the table with that character. Yet, the disparity was still there.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

8 people marked this as a favorite.

Let's see...

My first Pathfinder character to get as high as 9th level was a fighter. And not even the basic 2HPA guy, but an intelligent fighter who could trip and disarm very well, and therefore had more options than is standard for a fighter. Once he got Greater Trip and Combat Reflexes, he could declare a full-attack, replace the first with a trip, then do a disarm on the AoO, and then spend his iterative whacking the prone guy. Then if he stands up or grabs his weapon, I whack him with another AoO. If he does both, then the first AoO whacks him and the second undoes whatever he did with the first action. (That is, if he grabs his weapon then stands up, I go whack/disarm. If he stands up then grabs his weapon, I go whack/trip.)

Unfortunately, more and more enemies either weren't affected by trip/disarm (such as monsters) or didn't care about being tripped/disarmed (casters don't have a weapon, don't care about the AC penalty because it doesn't affect mirror image/displacement, and don't care about the attack penalty because magic), so I was still usually relegated to session after session of "I full attack it; is it dead yet?" Meanwhile, I was surrounded by casters who could do entirely different tactics every fight if they wanted.

And that's just combat. Out of combat, I had all these extra skill ranks (at least, compared to the INT-dump stereotype) and couldn't accomplish a damn thing with them. If there was an obstacle, there was usually a (fairly high) DC to overcome it. If I didn't have the skill, or if I did but didn't roll high enough, then a caster just goes "I pull out my 25gp scroll of bypass obstacle" and that's that, typically auto-succeeding.

So my intelligent and talented fighter with a nice backstory and everything was irrelevant out of combat and boring in combat. It got so frustrating that I quit playing him at 9th and decided my next character would have magic.

----------------------------------

Then there was my cleric. I didn't even focus on his spellcasting that much: he was a melee cleric. He typically (this was in PFS) had the highest AC at the table, the highest attack bonus at the table, enough damage per hit that you couldn't just ignore him, and could do things in combat besides full-attack. Oh, too dangerous to go toe-to-toe with (like a fiendish Titan Centipede, or an ooze that deals CON drain when you hit it)? I can literally just send you to hell. Oh, the guy's in the air? I can just walk up the air to hit you. Oh, you're trying to spam deeper darkness? I can completely negate it (Sun domain). Oh, somebody took a nasty poison/disease/affliction? I can just tell it to go away. Oh, there's harpies? Silence. Oh, someone got trapped behind a wall of stone? Good thing I have stone shape prepped. And that's before we even get to my scrolls. Seriously, I had such an easy time being as good a fighter as a fighter, that I had spell slots left over to carry answers to all kinds of nasty situations we might encounter.

Meanwhile, I could buff any of my or a teammate's social skills through the roof via a domain power, I could ask Iomedae what's coming up today and actually get an answer, I could bypass all those obstacles that made my fighter feel silly. I got to do all the fighting my fighter did without ever being sidelined like I was with the fighter. There was no challenge my cleric couldn't face. (And before you ask, no, I wasn't being a dick and deliberately trying to sideline other people's characters. I always made sure to give other people the chance to do stuff first, then stepped up if they couldn't do it. People liked, requested, and cheered for having this character at the table.)

I could list off more stories of real, actual gameplay, but what's the point? Everyone who says that a caster/martial disparity exists has played and/or GM'd Pathfinder. We're not talking about a group of people who read the CRB but haven't played, and declared that they know what's up better than the actual players. Those who acknowledge the disparity ARE actual players, whether others can accept it or not.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

I think the answer depends a lot on what sort of career/role the person has.

It also depends a lot on whether the people recognize these descriptions of themselves as being true.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Dragon78 wrote:
I have heard the rumors about Cadence and Shining Armor.

Rumors? What did I miss?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Just a Guess wrote:
Jiggy wrote:
Ironically, the clearest examples of this tend to get deleted by the mods.
But sometimes there is a visible discrepancy about when they start modding. Its usually slower when the "there is no problem" fanboys start becoming insulting.

...Who? Are we still talking in the context of the whole experience-as-credibility thing? Or did you jump tracks over onto the recent surge in caster/martial disparity discussion? Or am I just derping really hard?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
knightnday wrote:
My wife disagrees with me all the time and I don't lose sleep over that.

There's a dirty joke to be had here somewhere, I just know it.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

The Green Tea Gamer wrote:
Old gamers can bring a lot of experience to the table with stuff that is non-system specific, however. Knowledge of how to run a cohesive table, tell a story that will engage a group, dissolve tension, making NPCs people care about, etc. These things transcend systems, so in those instances and others like them, old gamers with experience from other systems absolutely can soapbox about how long they've been playing (although just for courtesy they probably shouldn't, but at least if they do it has some meaning).

Anecdotally, I've found that those types of situations where decades of experience is relevant tend to be the minority of cases where posters actually do "play the age card".

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Ironically, the clearest examples of this tend to get deleted by the mods.

That's always the issue with showing examples of someone being a jerk on the boards: anything that's still there to link to is probably something that doesn't seem all that bad, which of course makes it look like the person must be overreacting.

That's why I usually try to point out when an example I cite in a post is real rather than hypothetical (I've done so in at least two posts in this thread, if I'm not mistaken).

For more examples, I've also had someone flat-out tell me "If you think X, you're obviously under 30" (ironically, I'm not), and I've seen someone respond to a complaint about the ruleset by saying "If you see that problem, but I've been playing since the beginning and I didn't have that problem, and [oldschoolnamedrops] that I played with didn't have that problem, then have you considered that what's actually wrong could be how YOU play?"

Not sure I could find links, though.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Diced chicken, bacon crumbles, diced bell peppers, shredded romaine, diced grape tomatoes, and shredded mozzarella all wrapped up in a veggie tortilla.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

kyrt-ryder wrote:
On the plus side, this argument is usually a gigantic flashing neon sign that the poster in question doesn't play the game exactly as written is playing AD&D with LotR-based houserules while a row of Pathfinder books gather dust on a shelf.

Fixed that for you.

I kid, of course. ;)

Well, for some posters...

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

My "Adventure Ensues!" homebrew (5E) has been at 3rd level for a while now, and is at 576 posts. That pace is unlikely to continue, because 5E's XP schedule gets you through your first couple of levels pretty quickly, then suddenly slows dramatically. Which I think I kind of like.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

4 people marked this as a favorite.
GreyWolfLord wrote:

NO, I'm not accusing anyone of lying.

I'm just saying, when I look at who was originally playing, and all those who CLAIM it, the numbers don't add up.

Seriously? You're not accusing anybody of lying, you're just saying that people's claims don't match reality? I'm pretty sure that qualifies as accusing people of lying.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Charon's Little Helper wrote:
Jiggy wrote:

Meanwhile, your soul-less body is an object unless it gets animated as an undead. Objects, unless they get animated, don't get to take actions.

;)

And if it becomes undead - it's no longer immune to crits!

Death is a total trap option! ;D

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

KenderKin wrote:

Nah! what really happens is the young knows-it-alls want to play the game and the only people willing to run the game are the old-forget-it-all codgers!!!!

To the young know-it-all please run a game I will be happy to play in it!

If only you knew how much of my GMing style is heavily influenced by trying to NOT do what I've seen some of the elitists do...

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Jacob Saltband wrote:

So is this an offensive comment on play style?

Jacob Saltband wrote:


You know I have no problem with the way you guys like to play but personally I dont think of my characters as superheroic lava swimmers so I PREFER my games to be more realistic. Doesnt mean your way wouldnt be fun, but just like playing any mmo, I'd probably get bored eventually.

All by itself, no.

However, if it was within the context of a dialogue in which MMOs have been belittled as though they were a lesser game compared to the higher art form that is tabletop roleplaying (as often happens on these forums), then it becomes offensive because you've tagged the other person's playstyle with a term that you've previously established as being in some way inferior.

There might be other contexts that would reveal a negative mindset as well.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Tormsskull wrote:
Its difficult to say "I don't like the way you play the game, I think it is silly and I have no interest in playing it that way," without coming across with a negative tone.

Well, that's because the part where the speaker says "the way you play the game is silly" is a negative statement. A listener would be quite reasonable to take offense at that.

Now, if you just removed that part about their way being silly, and the speaker just said "I don't like the way you play the game, and I have no interest in playing it that way," then it becomes a little more ambiguous. It could come across as a bit condescending, or not. That's the limitations of text.

But your original version, where the speaker literally name-calls the listener's playstyle? Yeah, that speaker's being a jerk. Nothing to do with misunderstanding text.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
GM_Beernorg wrote:
...and tried having a civil discussion that centred around facts and game rules rather than defaulting to the ever so human desire to always be right.

Unfortunately, trying to do this is often what triggers an elitist's rant, as they very often are against giving any significant weight to "facts and game rules".

Let me attempt an analogy:

Suppose you were at some kind of hobby store and found a product that said it contained multiple sheets of clear plastic (like the trasparencies for those old overhead projectors) and instructions for painting blotches of different colors on different sheets. Then you would stack the sheets on top of each other in a certain order to discover a picture that you had just painted all by yourself.

Neat! It sounds fun, so you buy it and try it out. You follow the instructions, paint the blotches, stack the sheets, and voila! You have a painting of a jockey riding his horse, jumping it over a hedge. Cool!

So you go and show your friend. You tell him what you bought, and he excitedly exclaims, "Oh yeah! They make those every year or so, they're super fun!"

So you say "Nice! Here's the one I made; I don't have a very steady hand, but I think you can still tell it's a horseman jumping a hedge."

Then your friend replies, "No no no, these things are jungle pictures. Always have been. Started with a tiger in 1985, sometimes the general pose or the exact animal changes, but it's always been a big cat in the jungle."

"Really?" you ask, confused. "I thought I followed the instructions pretty close..."

"Well, that's the problem," your friend says. "Quit being such a rules-lawyer. This is a TOY made to have FUN. Quit trying to 'win' by sticking rigidly to the written instructions. Just because you can do something within the rules, doesn't mean you should."

Bewildered, you stammer, "But it's a horse, the package even said it would be a horse, I—"

Your friend cuts you off: "Sometimes the package and the instructions are ambiguous, and you have to apply common sense. That's why the painting is left for a human to do, instead of having a computer just print the picture for you. Trust me, I've been painting these since they started in 1985, and they were always meant to be jungle animals. I know this probably goes against the MMO mindset, but try not to forget what the point of this is. It's time to grow out of this juvenile 'rules' phase you're in so that animal-painting can finally mature as a hobby."

A week later, you find out that your friend has been using you and this incident as an example of how petulant children can act so entitled these days.

----------------------------------

Now, to be clear, not everyone who's been playing a long time is like this. There's some pretty cool folks among the veterans' ranks. Unfortunately, every terrible line in the above story is taken from real experiences, both in person and here on the forums.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
KenderKin wrote:

Usually the annoyance comes about when some young boy-wonder (girl-wonder)comes up with a RAW rules interpretation that allows for broken chicanery and the wise old DM uses a variation of the anti-drug campaign and just says no.

So my question is "Is the petulant neebie argument any better than the original gamer argument?"

I've seen this clash happen a great many times, but the vast majority of the time, the thing being labeled as "RAW rules interpretation that allows for broken chicanery" is just someone reading in good faith and doing what the game plainly tells them they can do (sometimes even backed up with the author and/or Design Team reaffirming that that's exactly what they meant), and the "wise old DM" can't tell the difference between "broken chicanery" and "has a result that doesn't feel like what I played 30 years ago".

For every "smite says all attack rolls so it buffs everyone in the world," there's half a dozen "My player's being cheesy by having a hands-free light source"/"Not wanting to take TWF penalties on iteratives made with different weapons is munchkin nonsense"/"When the rules say that ability damage doesn't actually reduce your score like drain does it really means that it DOES reduce your score and you're a language-twisting rules lawyer for thinking it means what it says"/"If you try to Take 10 at my table I'm going to watch you like a hawk to see what you're trying to get away with"/"The FAQ is wrong, it actually works like this".

(All of the above are real examples, BTW.)

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Do you know how many people would click that whenever they see a new thread on a topic they don't like?

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm not sure I'd turn down any of them, aside from whatever unrelated logistical concerns might get in the way, plus the fact that Pathfinder really isn't my system of choice anymore. That said, I'm curious about good ol' Rise of the Runelords, as that one seems to be "The One" among the Paizo community, so I'd like to see what it's like if I had the chance. With a sufficiently good GM/group/schedule, I might even play it under Pathfinder rules.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

*sigh*

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

For what it's worth, one of my brothers met his wife through online dating.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Lathiira wrote:
Jiggy wrote:

Die.

Now you're an object, and thus immune to crits.

The drawbacks are nasty, though. ;)

Now now...nothing in the rules says anything about how being dead impairs your actions. It's not that bad, really! :)

On the contrary, it's noted in more than one place in the Core Rulebook that death means your soul leaves your body. Your soul is welcome to take actions, but might have difficulty having any meaningful impact on the campaign unless there's a lot of planar travel going on. Meanwhile, your soul-less body is an object unless it gets animated as an undead. Objects, unless they get animated, don't get to take actions.

;)

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

You might also check out the Play by Post forums and look for a recruitment thread for a 5E campaign.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Haven't looked too closely at most of the replies, but I've often wondered what it would be like to reflect some male/female differences mechanically. For instance, females have a higher pain tolerance, so maybe a bonus to saves against pain effects? Like, guy and gal both get impaled, the dude goes "BLAAARRGH!!!" while the chick goes "F*** YOU I MAKE BABIES" and pulls the weapon out and kills the enemy with it.

On the other hand, I could see some members of both sexes getting up in arms about the other sex's benefits, so maybe that's too risky of a move? I dunno. Intriguing question though.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, there's not much gear-assumption in 5E's math or structure (which I personally like, as I was very tired of Pathfinder's "christmas tree effect" and "treadmill").

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Die.

Now you're an object, and thus immune to crits.

The drawbacks are nasty, though. ;)

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

redcelt32 wrote:
He cannot cast 2nd level spells, can he still move the sphere? Does it drop?
Core Rulebook, Classes chapter, Wizard, Spells wrote:
To learn, prepare, or cast a spell, the wizard must have an Intelligence score equal to at least 10 + the spell level.

--------------------------------

redcelt32 wrote:
Is it still effective with the DCs of a 22?
Core Rulebook, Ability Score Damage, Penalty and Drain wrote:

For every 2 points of damage you take to a single ability, apply a –1 penalty to skills and statistics listed with the relevant ability.

...
Some spells and abilities cause you to take an ability penalty for a limited amount of time. While in effect, these penalties function just like ability damage...
...
Intelligence: Damage to your Intelligence score causes you to take penalties on Intelligence-based skill checks. This penalty also applies to any spell DCs based on Intelligence.

--------------------------------

redcelt32 wrote:
In the above scenario, this ability damage doesn't interfere with his ability to cast with a wand.. would casting from a staff be impacted by his current ability score (10 INT) or would it use the minimum required to cast the spell like a wand?
Core Rulebook, Magic Items chapter, Staves wrote:
Staves use the wielder's ability score and relevant feats to set the DC for saves against their spells.

1 to 50 of 18,935 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.