|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Inner Sea Faiths presented 15 different lesser-known deities for the Inner Seas region.
Tian Xia has a total of 14 exclusive deities :P While Adabbar, Desna, Irori, Lamashtu, Pharasma and Shelyn have been presented in Inner Seas Gods, the rest of the Tian Xian pantheon hasn't.
So, how about a booklet presenting the Tian Xian deities, similar to Inner Seas Faiths, with obediences, boons, items... and FINALLY a clear depiction of the deities?
So far, the ONLY time that was possible was in Drow of the Underdark, from WotC, as a Cavestalker (PrC).
Using any of the Pathfinder rules, is there a way to wield a spiked chain one-handed... in a reasonably adequate manner?
Long story short, I plan to have a NPC being a vigilante of the Serial Killer archetype... who also happens to own a Hooked Massacre (a magic spiked chain which lets use it a Reach weapon in addition of granting you a free attack if you Drag the target.) Combined this with a second weapon, this could be a good combo.
At the very best, I use an overweight chain-wielding gunslinger known as the "Road Hog" XD
There's the paladin archetype known as the Silver Champion, presented in Legacy of Dragons; there's also the drake companion presneted in that same exact section; the drake's alignment is "any nongood"; the paladin's alignment is Lawful Good; "While she may adventure with good or neutral allies, a paladin avoids working with evil characters or with anyone who consistently offends her moral code."
So... does the drake's alignment change to LG if it's a drake mount for a Silver Champion?
Seems weird that a drake's alignment wouldn't change since it literally states that it CANNOT be of a good alignment...
Any character can just put on a disguise and bring "justice", but what would bring a player to pick the Vigilante instead of another class?
I remember reading an example, back in Examplars of Evil, about a princess (aristocrat/rogue) acting normally by day and murdering people by night as the White Lady, mostly because her younger brother accessed to the throne before her. So the concept of the Vigilante went from purely flavorful to an actual game mecanic.
In the end though, what makes the vigilante what it is? Its Social or its Vigilante identity?
Yes, it is an alternate feature for the druid back in Ultimate Magic, but come on, why not simply add vermin companion stats from Bestiaries 3, 4 and 5, as well as other sources?
I get that at its core, the druid picks animals, but these days, even in late game for D&D 3.5, vermins have become a viable option.
I get that the paladin, antipaladin, cavalier and samurai provide the character with a mount, but only for Small and Medium riders... which is understandable since, well, the 7 standard classes are either Small or Medium, and that goes as well for the uncommon and featured races.
Then there's the Trox, which is large...
Huh... how does the mount feature work now?
While they say that it works like the animal companion, NONE of them gets Huge. So how does it work?
Arcadia, Azlant, Southern Garund, Casmaron, the Crown of the World, Sarusan and Tian Xia are all continents surrounding Avistan and of course, can be explored by the PCs at their leisure. However, aside from Tian Xia, the other continents barely have information on WHAT to expect. Are there civilized lands or are they barren?
Furthermore, what's the actual political relationship between them? For instance, Tian Xia is the continent that got so far the most lore, thanks to the Dragon Empire booklets. The problem is that aside from common deities in their pantheon, nothing is explained much about the relationship between them and the Inner Seas. Are we talking about peaceful, strained or hostile relationships?
Just for fun ;)
Can you pick VERY simple ones such as "Obey [the item's] owner"???
Sounds like a bypassing option to get at-will 4th, 5th, 6th or 7th spells...
You can create your own intelligent items, as they don't always have to be rewards, so... could you create an intelligent item which sole purpose is to obey your commands, thus use its dedictaed power(s) without any restriction?
Disarm, Trip, Grapple, Monk... all of these are weapon special features. What new weapon special feature(s) would you like to see?
Disclaimer: That MIGHT be considered a topic for House Rules, but I post it here so people can talk about that. Feel free to change the category if needed.
Paired: When you use this weapon in each hand, you treat the weapon as if it were a light weapon for the purpose of two-weapon fighting.
The Sawtooth Saber currently has this as a special exclusive feature, but I'd like to see this for other new one-handed weapons.
Feint/Drag/Reposition/Dirty Trick: When you use this weapon, you get a +2 bonus on combat maneuver checks to [Feint/Drag/Reposition/Dirty Trick].
We have Disarm and Trip, so the new tactics could be added as well.
Mounted: When you use this weapon while mounted, you can use it with one hand.
I have lost count on how many times I've seen warriors wielding a non-lance weapon in one hand while riding a mount. Maybe they could extend it to weapons from the polearms and spears weapon groups.
Fearsome: When wielding this weapon, if you are entitled to an Intimidate check, you gain a +2 bonus on that check.
This seems like a good addition, especially when displaying feats have been expanded.
At 20th level:
So... 10 shuriken attacks? Each potentially dealing Sneak Attack damage if all conditions are met?
Granted I need:
Advanced Race Guide, Featured Races, Catfolk, Equipment wrote:
Claw Blades: These subtle blades can only be used by catfolk with the cat's claws racial trait. Bought in a set of five, they fit over the wearer's claws on one hand. The blades grant the wearer a +1 enhancement bonus on claw attack rolls with that hand and change the weapon type from a natural weapon to a light slashing weapon. Catfolk with the cat's claws racial trait are proficient with this weapon. The claw blades can be enhanced like a masterwork weapon for the normal costs. The listed cost of the item is for one set of five claws for one hand.
I know that as a GM myself I could allow it, but realistically, would claw blades work with other creatures other than catfolks?
It's a set of claws that converts natural claw attacks into iterative light slashing attacks... and catfolks aren't the only creatures with claw attacks, even as an alternate racial trait. Humanoid half-dragons and half-fiends could wear these, weretigers and werebears could wear these, Ursine Wildsoul vigilantes could wear these, babaus, hezrous, nabasus, succubi and other demons could wear these, gargoyles could wear these, etc.
See what I mean? It doesn't seem like a game-breaking rule to allow other creatures to wear and utilize claw blades.
Cursed items are annoying... but that's by design. That got me thinking about which cursed item... technically caused the least amount of troubles for characters.
After some reading, the Ring of Truth doesn't seem that bad.
2) It's a Will DC 20 save to refuse answering. We're not talking about such a big deal here.
3) Questions HAVE to be directed at you. You don't start answering every question you hear whether or not you get asked.
Oh yeah, one more thing, the Vow of Truth is now "justified" when you wear this ring :P
Another example is the Girdle of Opposite Gender... which seems more like a prank-like item than anything else. You changed gender, so what? Mecanically, there's almost nothing related to gender. I haven't specific spells, ietms, feats, prestige classes, archetypes and whatnot where being male or female is required. In fact, there's a little loophole here: what if the target DOESN'T have gender? A male changeling doesn't exist, so how does the cursed belt work on her?
So yeah, the gender-switching belt doesn't seem that harmful, compared to other items. Changing alignment can screw your character up, but gender? I doubt it.
This is a project I had in mind for quite some time now... so might as well pitch the idea right now.
This is a topic to pitch ideas on how to make seafaring characters, especially pirate characters ;)
I'd like to take the opportunity to take that first post to highlight the basics, before you and I dive deeper into actual class builds and ideas :P
P.S. Before you bring it up, yes, you can suggest stuff for the ninja :P
I can suggest really quick a few archetype ideas:
Ok, the rules are simple:
Two-Weapon Warrior (Fighter) (Advanced Player's Guide)
Improved Balance (Ex): At 11th level, the attack penalties for fighting with two weapons are reduced by –1 for a two-weapon warrior. The penalties are reduced by an additional –1 for every four levels after 11th. This ability replaces armor training 3.
The wording was awkward to the point that wielding 2 one-handed weapons was... pointless, because this ability and Prefect Balance do the exact same thing without reducing the penalty. With this, you get up to a -2 reduction to attack rolls when TWF, regardless of what kind of weapon you have.
Perfect Training (Ex): At 15th, a two-weapon warrior can apply any weapon specific feat for its primary weapon to its off-hand weapon, such as Weapon Focus and Weapon Specialization. This ability replaces armor training 4.
This is to replace Perfect Balance that got merged with Improved Balance. Also, this is an ability I've seen a few times, so...
Ok, what archetype(s) can YOU fix ;) ?
Just like that, throw one idea (per post) for an AP, feel free to give details about locations, premises, NPCs, plot twists, etc.
[Tentative] Title: Nocturnal Alibis
- (Second AP) Another murder scene is discovered. However, the PCs run into a Vigilante, or perhaps a GROUP of Vigilantes, while investigating.
- (Third AP) Yet another murder scene has to be investigated, the victim being a NPC from the first AP. This time around, the PCs get to meet the Vigilante's social identity to their ignorance (or the Vigilante's group leader). The group... kinda gets into a fight with the Viligante.
- (Fourth AP) The PCs either assist to a trial from one of the culprits... or end up BEING the culprits due to the Vigilante's actions. They have to defend themselves or might have to speak as witnesses.
- (Fifth AP) The PCs and Vigilante(s) have to team up to solve yet another mystery, but this time, the stakes are higher. NPCs can't be trusted anymore, the PCs' reputation take a hit and only the Vigilante can help them out, as he does need their help as well.
- (Sixth AP) The PCs and Vigilante arrive in time and save the next victim. They do investigate on their own to trace the assassin back to his lair.
Yeah... guess which Pathfinder book I got my inspiration from :P
But, yeah, a mix between a d20 adventure and a modern mystery comic book series, it could be a nice run ^_^
Anyway, I've pitched my idea, what about yours?
Ok, the vigilante gets an archetype called the Brute, which is basically a reference to the Hulk. You get a transformation into a larger creature and deals tons of raw damage, except that you're a little... frenzied...
Yeah, that's my major issue here: the Brute is VERY similar to a PrC back in D&D 3.5 known as the Frenzied Berserker. The Frenzied Berserker was a Barbarian PrC which you received a Frenzy. Frenzy was an upgrade to your Barbarian Rage, except that after each fight you had to roll in order to calm down or else you could end up killing your own allies.
I see similarities to the Brute as of now, so I was wondering if there was something to prevent that. I'm a little surprised that the Brute doesn't get a Talent related to that, like a high-level talent which he learned how to control his Brute Form, only saving to avoid hurting others if he unwillingly transformed.
I'm looking at the Vigilante's civilian identity and a LOT of social talents refer to renown, celebrity, network and such, similar to how an aristocrat is more of a social-based class.
The Vigilante, however, offers an alter ego with combat abilities, something the aristocrast doesn't normally have.
That got me thinking: is the Vigilante an answer to have a playable Aristocrat? I'm not saying that every noble is a Vigilante (that would be scary :P ) or that an Aristocrat NPC can't fight... but the parallels between a Vigilante's social identity and an aristocrat are similar.
Bestiary 5, Tsukumogami, p. 253:
Ability Scores: A tsukumogami has a 15 Intelligence, 17 Wisdom, and 14 Charisma. A Medium tsukumogami receives a +4 bonus to Strength, a +4 bonus to Dexterity, and a Constitution score of 19. These ability scores are adjusted for size.
Emphasis mine... How does it works???
An Animated Object already gets adjusted scores depending on its size, so... what about here? I can understand that the Constitution score decreases or increases depending on size, but I don't get it for the Strength and Dexterity modifiers. Do both stay fixed or do they decrease or increase again with size?
Ok, little confession here, I'm a sucker for podcasts, which I listen while working, web-surfing and/or driving (not all at once though XD).
So... I was wondering if Paizo hosts a podcast about Pathfinder/D20, be weekly, bi-weekly or monthly. I remember seeing an interview on YouTube... once... on YouTube... and then I have seen nothing after :P
I'd like to bring you this little tidbit from the Technology Guide, pg. 61, at the end of the Powered Armor description:
Technology Guide, pg. 61 wrote:
Rumors persist of variant forms of powered armor, including suits sized for giants or that can function as vehicles for multiple creatures.
So yeah, after seeing Colossi, Kaiju and one too many Giant Robot-focused video games and animes, I'd like to build a mech as a lost treasure in Numeria... or a super-weapon being developped by a cabal of AI-corrupted androids as part of a mass production for war. The question is that: Do I make it a vehicle or do I make it a creature?
Vehicle: A character could pilot it. However, Vehicle rules don't cover mechs... yet... so it would need a set of custom rules, such as STR and DEX scores, how the pilot's stats affect the mech (mental scores, skills, feats), damage thresholds and attack actions. The upside is that it fits well as an artifact... or a very expensive vehicle and can be fully-customizable. (I know that DragonMech has rules, but man, these are complex as heck)
Creature: As a creature, the mech is a Construct (Robot), thus a sentient being. A character cannot control it unless that is a pilot compartment and that the pilot succeeds a skill check against the robot. Furthermore, AIs can be inserted and can take control over it. Then again, how many times have we seen machine AIs in fiction :P ? Piloting/controlling it would require rules... although it could work like Possession (rule-wise), except that the pilot can utilize the robot's special abilities, regardless of their nature (Ex, Sp or Su). Finally, the CR would be... rather high, considering the size and technology added on top.
So yeah... which option to pick ^_^ ?
Ok, I was checking the Swordtrained racial trait in the Race Builder... and I noticed that something was eeriely missing: a list of swords. They do list some, but not all.
That got me thinking: could we get a Sword weapon group? Right now, swords are spreaded across the Light Blades, Heavy Blades and Monk groups, if not more.
Axes, bows, spears, hammers and flails got their own, so why not swords? Sure, Light and Heavy Blades are there, but... why only put the greatsword in the same group as the scythe, or only put the rapier in the same group as the sickle?
So yeah, would it be okay to have a new weapon group dedicated to swordlike weapons?
Beside, Swordtrained would now be "automatically proficient with weapons from the Sword weapon group". That would be much easier to understand.
Ok, I'm aware that PLAYING a race has guidelines, such as adjustments to your starting level if you have a more powerful race, but what about ENCOUNTERING a race member?
Let's say that I (as a GM) want to have my party encountering a squadron made of humanoid creatures that are actually "super-soldiers". According to the Builder, my homebrewed race would have 40 rps. As a Playable Race, a super-soldier would have to be 3 levels lower for up 5th level, 2 for up to 10th, 1 for up to 15th and none for up to 20th.
But what about CR? Is it +1 CR for 10 rps above 10 rp (+1 CR for 20 rps, +2 CR for 30 rps, +3 for 40 rps)? Is there no adjustment to CR afterall, since it's built as a PC race?
I am talking about a 0HD race here. Think of humans genetically engineered/bred for war, with enhanced abilities and such.
Can you apply more than one? Can you have the monster take class levels (be in another class that isn't a template) as well?
Say I have a Stone Giant (12 HD, CR 8). Can I apply BOTH the Ranger and the Rogue templates (both at +2 CR, be a 10+HD creature)? If so, I'm at CR 12 (8 + 2 + 2). On top of that, could I have it take class levels in another class normally, like Druid or Barbarian? I'd take it that the class templates wouldn't become stronger since they depend on racial HD, but still... by CR 20, this stone giant is gonna be Barbarian 9th-level with the equivalent of also being 12th-level in both Ranger and Rogue.
Ok, I got an idea for an encounter: a construct (type to be determined later) ends up being possessed by an incorporeal creature. Here's the problem: constructs are immune to mind-affecting effects AND necromancy effects, meaning by stuff like magic jar and possession don't work >:(
You can have a robot being overtaken by an AI, but you cannot have a golem being overtaken by a ghost or shadow demon...
Here's my inquiry: is there any way to "possess" a construct? To me, that sounds like a no-brainer, considering that most of them are mindless and wouldn't put much of a fight against outside control... except that they are immune instead of being vulnerable...
"Lance: A lance deals double damage when used from the back of a charging mount. While mounted, you can wield a lance with one hand."
If you can wield a lance with ONE hand, you could wield ANOTHER lance in your OTHER hand, all while mounted... right?
Yeah, yeah, totally not practical for 2 copper due to action limits with charges, but still... can it be legally done?
Have you ever crack open a book, be Bestiary or not, and witness a template that can become deadly when applied to the right creature?Or even better: have you seen a template that looks "harmless enough" at first, but became deadly as you found a base creature that could easily break the rules?
I'm so sorry, but... I keep finding that the Undead Lord template from Tome of Horrors can cook up some of the most ridiculous combinations ever made.
Basically, an Undead Lord makes any undead creature more powerful... with the ability to create spawns. At first, you tell yourself that applying it to a skeleton, a zombie, a ghost, a ghoul or a wight isn't too bad...
Try applying it to a Bone Ship (Bestiary 5)... or just about any giant-sized undead there is.
A Bone Ship is basially a sailing ship made of undead remains, totally eligible for the Undead Lord template. Here's the joke: Create Spawn will create MORE Bone Ships from any creature slain by the Undead Lord Bone Ship.
A sailing ship can contain 20 sailors and up to 200 passengers; a warship can contain 60 sailors with 160 soldiers... possibly more if 80 rowers are added in.
Congratulations! A single Undead Lord Bone Ship can kill off up to 220 or 300 creatures... and have its own fleet at its command in matter of minutes... because the create spawn ability doesn't state that the victim has to be of the same size, type or whatnot to become the same undead type of the Undead Lord.
Ok, while it's debatable whether or not the Undead Lord has to kill the creature itself, because a Bone Ship can aim at the hull, hit a powder keg and make the ship explode... but are creatures on board killed by the explosion or the Bone Ship that caused the explosion?
Still, so far, it's probably the template can be make things ugly in a matter of minutes.
Weapon Focus (Ex): At 1st level, the elemental marshal gains Weapon Focus for a weapon of his choice. Furthermore, his elemental marshal level counts as fighter levels for the purposes of feats and other prerequisites. The elemental marshal does not gain his selected element’s basic utility wild talent, although he still selects a primary element. This ability replaces elemental focus.
Kinetic Weapon Channelling (Su): At 1st level, the elemental marshal gains the kinetic blade form infusion and it costs 0 points of burn instead of 1 point of burn. However, the infusion works differently, as the elemental matter does not form a blade, but instead surrounds a weapon. The elemental marshal can only use the infusion while wielding a weapon with the Weapon Focus feat, be a melee or a ranged weapon. Also, any attack delivered with the weapon is considered a regular melee or ranged attack, regardless if the element would make it a standard or touch attack. Finally, the attack benefits from the wielded weapon’s properties, such as reach, bonuses to maneuvers, range (if it’s a ranged weapon), materials and enhancements. Each attack that connects discharges the energy as per the regular Kinetic Blast, it behaves similarly to enhancements such as flaming. He can’t use his kinetic blast without a form infusion, nor can he ever use his kinetic blast with the chain, extended range, extreme range, foe throw, flurry of blasts, many throw, or snake form infusions, or with any other form infusion that requires a ranged attack roll or ranged touch attack roll. This ability alters kinetic blast and the 1st-level infusion.
If the elemental marshal learns the kinetic whip infusion, it follows the same rules as kinetic blade, with the exception of the extended reach. If the weapon already has reach, the reach extended by 5 feet when using this infusion.
Armed Gather Power (Su): The elemental marshal can gather energy when wielding a weapon with the Weapon Focus feat, regardless if it is a light, one-handed or two handed weapon. This ability alters gather power.
Infusion trade-off (Ex): At 3rd level and every level which the elemental marshal can learn an infusion, he may select either an infusion or a combat feat. Once the decision is made, it cannot be changed. This ability alters infusions.
Weapon Specialization (Ex): At 5th level, the elemental marshal gains Weapon Specialization as a bonus feat. At 11th level, he gains Greater Weapon Focus. At 17th level, he gains Greater Weapon Specialization. He must meet the requirements for all feats. This ability replaces infusion specialization.
Armor Infusion (Su): At 6th level, as a full-round action, the elemental marshal can accept 1 point of burn to infuse an armor or a shield, to a maximum of 1 point total per item. This maximum increases to 2 points per item at 11th level and to 3 points per item at 16th level. Each point grants the elemental marshal energy resistance 10 to the marshal’s primary element. These don’t stack if the marshal infuses both an armor and shield, but if the marshal has access to another element, he may select that element for a resistance. This resistance lasts for 24 hours, after which it fades away. This ability replaces internal buffer.
Infusion Specialization (Ex): At 8th level, the elemental marshal gains infusion specialization, and he reduces the burn cost by 1 additional point at 14th and 20th levels. This ability alters infusion specialization.
Basically, what if the Kineticist was a soldier with elemental affinity? Critiques are welcomed ^_^
Considering the success of the Advanced Bestiary, now converted to Pathfinder, are there plans to make a sequel to it, with new templates?
I understand that there is no small feat to create template, there are a few more that could be added. Here are a few suggestions.
As a topic for Halloween night, I alays wonder this: should undead creatures be made as templates instead of unique monsters?
Yes, we do have vampires, ghosts, zombies, skeletons and liches, (just to name a few), but most of the time, an undead creature is "simply" a reanimated corspe or a restless spirit... of a humanoid character. Many undead look like human and/or has a human-like structure... when you could clearly get a dragon wight, a hill giant shadow or a worg wraith.
Yes, the Advanced Bestiary has a ton of "dread" undead templates to apply for living creatures, but at its core, an undead creature is often a "fixed" unique creature. This does anwser my question "what if the undead creature isn't humanoid?", but it does beg the other question about whether or not undead creatures should have been templates in the first place.
Number of pages and flavor text aside, what could be keeping them to have templates for custom banshees, dullahans and dybbuks?
On a sidenote, I do exclude obvious examples of undead creatures. When your monster is essentially a pile of bones shaped into a snake (Boneyard; Libris Mortis) or a pile of corpses like Legion, you kinda don't need a template for that.
Just let me go in, point by point:
Occult Adventures, Wild Talents, Flurry of Blasts, p.19 wrote:
Instead of a single kinetic blast, you shoot two kinetic blasts at targets within 120 feet that each deal damage as if your kineticist level were 1st (effects or abilities that increase your kinetic blast’s damage don’t apply).
So, the blast's damage is equal to 1d6 with whatever modifier that goes with it, and any composite blast, which IS an effect that increases damage), does NOT apply?
At 10th level, you can shoot three blasts with flurry of blasts; this increases to four blasts at 16th level and to five blasts at 20th level. If you are under the effect of haste or similar magic that increases your number of attacks in a full attack action, the number of kinetic blasts in your flurry of blasts increases by 1.
O...k... so even if a spell grants you more than 1 extra attack (like haste 2.0), you STILL only get ONE extra blast while flurrying, regardless of how many extra attacks the spell would grant you?
No two targets can be more than 30 feet apart. You must assign the targets of all your blasts before rolling any of the attacks.
That's... the only part that I understand, and yes, I know that you can also target the same... target multiple times.
Any blast beyond the first that hits the same target adds 1d6 points of damage; bonuses and penalties to damage don’t apply.
Oh boy... Is it this scalable, like first hit (1d6), second (2d6), third hit (3d6) and so forth, or is it only 2d6 points of extra damage, even at the 3rd hit? Pretty sure that this extra damage is base only, but still... If it's a composite blast, how does it work?
Pretty straightforward, becasue it's just one save or check, but the target gets penalized according to how many blasts it gets hit by.
That has to be the most complicated talent I've read. Couldn't they just make it that you could make a blast according to your base attack bonus, with whatever extra attack you could do, such as Two-Weapon Fighting and Haste, at the cost of 1 Burn point per attack? Sounds much less complicated than this...
Ok, 3 primary attacks + 3 off-hand attacks + Rapid Shot + Haste = 8 Blasts in a round, for 8 Burn points, but... SIMPLICITY!
Or is it a spin-off set of rules?
What I'm trying to say is that I want to know if Occult materials will be presented in future books, like having Occult monsters in Bestiary 5, feats/archetypes/items in Ultimate Intrigue, Occult NPCs in future APs such. I just don't want Occult rules to be relegated to "spin-off rules" like psionics were in D&D 3.5.
For instance, does Paizo consider the 6 Occult classes as "core classes", alongside its rules?
How about it?
2) New gear... that I have no idea where to begin with. I think that might not be necessary, but reprints (again) would be useful.
3) New magic arms and armors: NOW we're talking! Go nuts. Maybe some weapons and armors to enhance classes from both the Advanced Class Guide and Occult Adventures.
4) Rings, Rods, and Staves: Same as above.
5) Wondrous Items: Same as above.
6) Artifacts and Other Items: How about more intelligent items, but with a longer backstory? How about making an intelligent item the catalyst of a campaign or adventure? Artifacts are pretty straightforward, but if it's intelligent, it basically becomes an NPC.
Ok, basically, an elemental ascetic is a monk-like kineticist who doesn't learn Kinetic Blast and cannot learn any talent that requires a ranged attack.
Here's the source of several problems I have: the archetype doesn't replace some class features that are linked to the Kinetic Blast, which leads to several questions about how do these even work with the ascetic's features.
1) Kinetic Fist: The damage seems to be fixed to 1d6 points of [energy] damage per 3 levels. Am I to understand that you cannot alter/increase the damage? For instance, you can make a fire fist, but can you make a plasma/blue flame/steam/magma fist, thus dealing double damage (since that's what most composite blasts do)?
*) Kinetic Blade/Whip: Oddly enough, these two are straight-forward, as they replace the ranged attack roll by a melee attack roll.
2) Metakinesis: Can it be applied to Kinetic Fist?
3) Expanded Element: The ascetic cannot learn blasts... at all. In fact, that doesn't even ALLOW him to learn the regular blast. So what does he gain if he can't? Does he learn composite blasts that can be applied to Blade and Fist?
I need some answers here...
I haven't seen one, so here it is!
THERE WILL BE SPOILERS FROM THIS BOOK; READ AT YOUR OWN CONVENIENCE
What do you think of Occult Bestiary?
Could have been better
- Alter Ego as a construct; not feeling that one, as an alter ego is often a carbon copy of yourself, alive and kicking, not built. Outsider, maybe, but construct is just a little weird.
- The Lightning Gun is one OP item; it's not a firearm nor a standard ranged weapon with unlimited ammo, so everyone can use it... because there are no penalty for non-yithian users. This item is gonna get ugly very quick... Hope you like ray guns...
- The Xill Matriarch has... no connection to Psychic Magic whatsoever, as she doesn't have psychic spells. The rest is already though, I just think that it is missing a few psychic abilities.
- It could have used more "specific" monsters:
- Little grammatical errors (with fixes):
(I thought it was the norm to have a coma AND to list creatures according to their group.)
Aside from that... All good. There are returning creatures, but tehy're either templated or as a new subtype.
What are your thoughts (no pun intended) on this book?
Ok, sonic damage has been a little... puzzling lately, because I have no clue where to classify it.
When I looked in some sources about Sonic, even the system itself doesn't know where to put it.
Sonic is often a separate energy source, so far that's good. However, if I take the Elementalist Wizard spell list, here's what I found:
Here's something else I found:
Sound is a vibration in air, but some are linking sound to resonating crystals, yet even in some points, it's own thing...
If I were to homebrew a Sonic Blast for the Kineticist (yeah, obvious omittion there Paizo :P; same goes with acid, but that's beside the point), would I place it in Air, even if they have 2 blasts already, or Earth, since they could use one more blast and that the Crystal Dragon has a sonic breath?
Sonic is a spell type, without being combined with another one, but even then, it's still confusing.
The Medium gains power with spirits of the dead based on key areas; the Mesmerist uses a powerful gaze; the Occultist channel power through ancient relics; the Psychic has... psychic powers, which are different from regular magical spells; the Spiritualist can conjure a Phantom.
(We're talking about some pretty weird and obscure abilities here.)
And then you have the Kineticist, who can manifest elemental energy in various ways... like just about any spellcaster with a knack for evocation spells.
Seriously, of all Occult classes, the Kineticist comes out as the least alienating/unnerving class. You can EASILY pass as a monk-like warrior (insert Avatar: the Last Airbender reference here) or as a specialized spellcaster... until people realize that they can't counterspell you :P
Is it in the name, because "Kineticist" refers to mind powers? Would the name "elemancer" (pyromancer, hydromancer, aeromancer, geomancer, etc...) have put it as an "occult" class? Is manifesting elemental energy that special?
What's so "occult" about the Kineticist again?
Ok, you can shoot a Kinetic Blast with a ranged touch attack, but outside of Kinetic Fist, there's no Talent, let alone an option to use a Kinetic Blast in melee, thus using a melee touch attack.
Y'know, simply making a melee touch attack that deals your regular/standard blast damage.
So... aside from Kinetic Fist, any Talent that simply allow a Kineticist to deliver a Kinetic Blast up close?
Reason is that a Kineticist CAN use a conductive weapon with his Blast. Problem is that since the regular Blast is a ranged touch attack, the conductive weapon HAS to be a ranged weapon as well. Yeah... I can't really use a conductive spear and be able to poke opponents while igniting them at reach, because it's a melee attack, which the Blast isn't.
Ok, there are several archetypes and character concepts that rely on unarmed strikes and several regular classes can focus a lot of unarmed strikes, such as the recently-released Kineticist. (Kinetic Blast requires one hand free, Gather Power requires both hands free, Kinetic Blade requires one hand free and Kinetic Fist... speaks for itself.)
Here's my problem: Unarmed strikes are weak and pathetic...
1d3 points of damage for a Medium character, needs a feat to make them lethal and safe to use, you can injure yourself against certains enemies and every single item that is worn as gloves doesn't enhance them. For instance, I need a certain amulet, because a gauntlet doesn't transfer its properties to your hand... somehow...
Natural armor bonuses don't get replaced by regular armor bonuses, but damage does...
If Improved Unarmed Strike increased your damage from 1d3 to 1d6, that would have been a touch better, but it's not the case as of now.
So, here's my question: how to make unarmed strikes viable?
- 11 classes in the Core Rulebook
- 7 classes in the APG
- 1 class in UM
- 3 classes in UC
- 10 classes in the ACG
- 6 classes in OA
- 1 class in Ultimate Intrigue
Point being that after the viligante, we'll be at 39 classes. That's a lot of options, WITHOUT counting the archetypes and the Unchained versions. If you can't find your niche with 39 classes, there's a little problem :P
I'm not talking about bloating here. I just don't think that the Pathfinder system will need more classes after the viligante. I mean... what else can be turned into a class? Pretty sure that if it would be a class, it could be turned into an archetype or a prestige class instead. Sure, there are many hybrid classes that could be made, but... even then, the current hybrid classes fill up most of the roles a player could be, and that's without checking the archetypes that USE other class features to change completely the base classes.
Ok, fine, if there's only ONE more class to be added... and to make it 40, a nice round number, I could see an Engineer/Tinkerer/Artificer class. Basically, there's a room for a class that build gadgets that mimic spells, as well as large mech-like armors, vehicles and other steampunk-like contraptions.
BTW, I'm not including 3rd-party classes, but you get my point about official 1st-party classes, right?
You know the hybrid classes that were left out of the Variant Multiclassing Unichained rule? Here's a first draft... like "first draft".
Any comment and help would be appreciated ^_^
BTW, this topic can be used for other classes, be 1st or 3rd parties.
For instance, I like the Variant Multiclassing rule in Unchained... except that it only covers the core classes and the APG classes. (Oddly enough, the ACG classes were left out ?_?)
In Occult Adventures, will there be sidebars for each class stating what features can be allowed using the Variant Multiclassing rule? "If you want to use the Variant Multiclassing with the Kineticist, here's how to do it." See what I mean?
I'm asking this because most of the time when an alternate rulebook is released, the developpers... don't usually get back into it in later products, considering that the alternate rulebook is, well, an alternate rulebook, completely optional to GMs and players alike. I was wondering if Paizo has plans to reference Unchained rules in later products.
Y'know, just so it doesn't get forgotten ;)