|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Each of those abilities can be used 3 times per day.
Remove the space in the word grail. If you don't use URL tags, the board automatically puts a space in there on longer URLs.
Kitty Catoblepas wrote:
No it doesn't. Only armor, weapons, and shields have to be masterwork before you can enchant them. No other item type has that requirement.
Also, the masterwork backpack didn't even exist when the handy haversack was created. Assuming the haversack includes the masterwork backpacks bonus is wrong on multiple levels.
Pirate Rob wrote:
Actually 1 square foot, not 1 foot square. There is a difference. A 1 foot square is 1 foot by 1 foot. A square foot can be the same, but could also be something like 6 inches wide and 24 inches long - anything that adds up to 144 square inches.
Lou Diamond wrote:
Metamagic rods can not be used on spell like abilities. There is a Quicken Spell-like Ability feat, however.
Monsters have whatever abilities their designer wanted. There doesn't need to be a reason for something - if the designer wanted them to cast quickened Fireballs, then they can cast quickened Fireballs. Though some of them may have the Quicken Spell-like Ability feat, like the pit fiend does.
Though with more digging I found this rule: . The DC for any of these abilities equals your DC for the polymorph spell used to change you into that form. So it looks like for my potential character I will have a dc 17 poison (10+5.5(11/2) + 2(14 int)
How are you polymorphing into a thriae queen? Casting a spell usually requires your spellcasting stat to be at least 10 + spell level (or 15 for the 5th level spell Monstrous Physique 3). Your intelligence isn't high enough to cast 5th level spells.
Also, the formula is wrong. It is the same as figuring the Save DC of your spells: 10 + spell level (of the polymorph spell used) + spellcasting ability modifier.
John Ryan 783 wrote:
DC 29 looks correct to me. They have 25 hit dice and a Constitution of 25 (modifier +7). That would be 10 + 12 (1/2 hit dice) + 7 (con mod) = 29.
Since you mentioned polymorph spells in the title (but not in the post?) I should point out that polymorphing into a thriae queen does not give you a DC 29 poison.
The DC for any of these abilities equals your DC for the polymorph spell used to change you into that form.
Since Monstrous Physique 3 (the first spell that allows Huge monstrous humanoids) is a 5th level spell, the DC for any poison you get from it would be 15 + your primary spellcasting stat modifier. Monstrous Physique 4 only boosts that by 1 to 16 + your primary spellcasting stat modifier.
In some cases you poison DC may be higher than a thriae queen, but will usually be lower.
Spell level x caster level x 50gp. Plus the cost of the material component, if necessary.
Potions are limited to 3rd level spells or lower, so a potion of Stoneskin (normally a 4th or 5th level spell) isn't possible.
Barkskin is a 2nd level spell, so 2 x 10 x 50 = 1000gp to buy.
Expeditious Retreat is 1st level (which is low enough to be made into a potion), but has a range of Personal. Spells with a range of Personal can't be made into potions.
Enhancement bonuses increase the armors armor bonus, it isn't added separately to your armor class. +4 leather armor doesn't have a +2 armor bonus and a +4 enhancement bonus. It has a +6 armor bonus. Likewise, +1 chain shirt has a +5 armor bonus.
Even if you could wear multiple suits of armor, they don't stack to change the category. Two suits of light armor is still light armor, not medium armor. Their combined weight may be enough to increase your encumbrance to a medium load, however.
Besides, you can't wear 2 suits of magical armor. Magical armor occupies a body slot, and you only have one armor slot.
The half cost when crafting thing only applies to magical items. The mithral chain shirt isn't magical and so uses the rules from the Craft skill (only payinig 1/3 of the items price in materials).
Only after you already have the mithral chain shirt (either by making it yourself for 1/3 the cost or buying it outright for normal cost) can you start the magical part of crafting, where the magical effects cost half when made by yourself.
What is the radius of a 20 foot spread? A player and I were discussing the area of a Dust of Sneezing and Choking, which is described as having a 20 foot spread. I interpret this to mean an area with a ten foot radius, like the Dust of Appearing; but the player said that a 20 foot spread effects only 4 squares (a 5 foot radius) in total because that represents a 20 foot total movement (5 feet in each direction).
Area effect distances are the radius, not diameter. So a 20' spread will effect a total of 8 squares from one side to the other side (everything within 4 squares/20 feet of the origin point).
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
You would have a hard time turning an army of hundreds into anything - the spell effectively effects a 30 foot diameter sphere (all targets must be within 30 feet of each other).
Channel Smite doesn't define the type of damage done (it doesn't say it's positive energy damage, or negative energy damage) It simply says the weapon does more damage - so more Slashing, Piercing, or Bludgeoning damage. DR would still apply.
No it doesn't.
Benefit: Before you make a melee attack roll, you can choose to spend one use of your channel energy ability as a swift action. If you channel positive energy and you hit an undead creature, that creature takes an amount of additional damage equal to the damage dealt by your channel positive energy ability. If you channel negative energy and you hit a living creature, that creature takes an amount of additional damage equal to the damage dealt by your channel negative energy ability. Your target can make a Will save, as normal, to halve this additional damage. If your attack misses, the channel energy ability is still expended with no effect.
The creature just takes additional damage. It isn't an increase to the base weapons damage, just additional (but separate) damage.
You are spending a channel attempt (just like a normal channel), the damage only applies to certain targets (just like a normal channel), and there is a saving throw (just like a normal channel). If anything, it works exactly like a normal channel with the exception it only targets one creature that you hit with a weapon instead of a burst.
You add up your primary base attack bonus (The first number) then see if you get multiple attacks from that. A barbarian 3/fighter 3 would have a primary BAB of +6, and so would get a second attack at +1, the same as a Fighter 6 or Barbarian 6.
Spell DC has nothing to do with caster level. It is based on ability scores and spell level. Still, all caster levels are separate unless they specifically say they stack (And as far as I am aware, only prestige classes have that language).
apparently you didn't read my post or you have a very poor understanding of the rules. that FAQ very clearly states it is in reference to abilities that refesh Spell Slots it has nothing to do with the spell level of the spell after metmagic has been applied. by your logic every spell cast with metamagic has heighten magic applied to it and I get an increased DC and more damage dice because the spell is actually a higher level spell now and no longer its original level. you keep quoting the faq out of context. read it as a whole or don't use it.
Reread that FAQ. It also talks about concentration DCs in the question, which has nothing to do with refreshing spell slots. That FAQ applies to more than just refreshing slots. It has to do with what level a metamagiced spell counts at, which is what the OPs question is also about.
There is a FAQ that gives an answer.
So adding the feat first (which raises the spell to 7th level) is more of a disadvantage and would be the correct way to do it.
It isn't multiple scrolls, it is still one scroll (just with multiple spells on it). A single magical item. If you rolled a 1, you couldn't attempt to use any of the spells on that scroll until the next day. Just like with a staff - if you rolled a 1 trying to use one power, it blocks you from attempting to use any of the other powers in that staff for the next day.
As for C, you wouldn't be prevented from trying to cast Passwall from another scroll, just the scroll you rolled a 1 on.
And as Saethori said, rolling a 1 only locks out that particular person from using that particular item. The rest of the party can still attempt it until they succeed or roll a 1 themselves.
Dragonchess Player wrote:
(Druids only), like all of the other examples, is an example of the typical speaker. Someone who has spent a rank to learn it isn't typical.
Druids are forbidden to teach it, but they still can. They lose class features when doing so, however. There is absolutely nothing that says anyone else is prohibited from taking the language.
If you were forbidden from taking the language with Lingusitics, then why bother listing it in the skill in the first place?
And as p-sto said above, PAthfinder Society play has a rule specifically saying you can't choose Druidic with Linguistics. Why make a rule if the core rulebook already prohibits it? Because the core rulebook doesn't prohibit it. It doesn't place a restriction on any language with the Linguistics skill.
Mechanically, finding a teacher isn't required. Just putting a rank in Linguistics is enough and implies you were able to do whatever was necessary to learn the language. Just like putting a rank into any other skill.
Yes, the GM could put roleplaying restrictions on learning a new language. That would make it harder to learn, but still not impossible. A druid may have fallen already, and no longer care about teaching Druidic to anyone who wants to learn. A ranger, after a long career of helping the local druids may have been taught Druidic as a reward. Or maybe like Ahmed ibn Fadlan in the movie 13th Warrior you were able to just pick up the language by sitting and listening to a group of druids talk. Maybe you touched (After being warned not to) the sacred stone in the center of the site most holy to the druids, and in addition to a splitting headache you have somehow been granted the knowledge of the Druidic language.
How you justify learning the language does not matter. You can come up with any number of ways. Mechanically, there is nothing stopping a non-druid from putting a rank into Linguistics and selecting Druidic as the learned language, and that was the point. The Linguistics skill does not put a restriction on what languages are possible to learn.
Dragonchess Player wrote:
No, even Druidic. It is even listed in the Linguistics skill (the druids-only part there only refers to the typical speakers).
If druids can lose their class features by teaching druidic to non-druids, then by extension non-druids must be able to learn druidic. They would do so by a rank in Linguistics.
Hey guys, I have a question. Characters with the standard language option can choose from 7 other languages of they have a high intelligence score. Does adding points to the linguistics skill allow you to learn a language outside those 7?
The starting languages are just a list of languages your race would probably have the most exposure to, and so would be the most likely languages you picked up as you grew up.
The languages you learn by spending skill points are totally separate. You can learn any language by spending skill points.
First: Furious says it requires rage. Is she taking the +5 DC for not casting it, despite having the much cooler rage feature?
Spell names are always italicized. In the PRD, "rage" is not italicized, so it is talking about the class feature and not the spell.
Edit: Apparently, it appears in the PRD both italicized and not italicized depending on which book you look at. As the Ultimate Equipment entry is more recent, it takes precedence. It is indeed talking about the rage spell and not the rage class feature.
I'm curious, what benefit does an orc (all of which have ferocity) gain when taking the Diehard feat?
With Ferocity, you always lose 1 hit point per round when in negative HP.
With Diehard, you may or may not lose hp when negative depending on your actions for that round. You can also choose whether or not you go unconscious at negative HP, unlike ferocity which requires you to stay conscious.
Lord Corvus wrote:
The text remains unchanged from 3.5 D&D, where the paladin mount had a different progression from animal companions. 3.5 paladin mounts started with an Intelligence of 6, so Handle Animal wasn't needed as they weren't dumb animals (and indeed couldn't even be used anyway, as Handle Animal was limited to creatures of 1 or 2 Intelligence only).
The rules changed in Pathfinder, but not all of the text itself got changed.
Sure they can. Druids and other Animal Companion classes have been bumping Int up to 3 for years to get access to greater feat variety. Giving a Gorilla a greatsword is surprisingly effective.
Just because they have been doing it doesn't make it right.
Though there are passages that contradict that, so at best it is a GM discretion thing.
I have a question along these lines and that question is coupling the second ability of the Arcane Archer I believe it's imbue arrow which state is it takes a standard action to imbibe the arrow with the spell of you metamagic the spell that is being imbued will that take a full round action then you may fire it on your next turn?
First, this has nothing to do with the original topic, so should of been it's own thread.
Second, you misread Imbue Arrow.
Imbue Arrow (Su): At 2nd level, an arcane archer gains the ability to place an area spell upon an arrow. When the arrow is fired, the spell's area is centered where the arrow lands, even if the spell could normally be centered only on the caster. This ability allows the archer to use the bow's range rather than the spell's range. A spell cast in this way uses its standard casting time and the arcane archer can fire the arrow as part of the casting. The arrow must be fired during the round that the casting is completed or the spell is wasted. If the arrow misses, the spell is wasted.
Not a standard action, the spells standard casting time. The standard casting time for a metamagiced spell for a bard/sorcerer is a full round action, so to use Imbue Arrow with a metamagiced spell would also require a full round action. During that full round action, you both cast the spell and get one attack with the imbued arrow.
That is for abilities that don't duplicate spells. Even in 3.5, spell-like abilities had a different formula:
I see what you mean RavingDork, but doesn't the magic rules for casting time say something about this? I believe chapter nine says something like, "if it takes a full round action, the spell occurs right before the start of your next turn,"
That is a spell with a 1 round casting time. Different from a spell with a full round action casting time. With the 1 round casting time, you are casting the entire time until it comes into effect - you start casting on your turn, and continue casting through everyone elses turn until right before your next turn.
There is no delay - you are casting the entire time and the spell comes into effect immediately afterword.
The core rulebook paladin isn't a Golarion paladin. The core rulebook is setting neutral. Specific setting can (and do) change the basic assumptions laid out in the corebook. The same was true in 3.5 D&D - the core rulebook paladin didn't require a deity, while all divine spellcasters (including druids and rangers) required a patron deity in the Forgotten Realms setting. A rulebook published for a specific setting (like Gods of the Inner Sea) has absolutely no bearing on paladins from any other setting or, in this case, generic paladins from the core rulebook.
Seems to me that the "forces of law and good" are ultimately powered by the positive energy plane, which does seem to have some absolute existence and value independent of the various gods who represent it.
That doesn't really work, seeing as how positive energy is what powers all life. That includes demons and devils (who are healed by positive energy the same as a human or elf).
I will admit there is a trend to associate positive energy with good, but that isn't really the case. Positive (And negative) energy is neutral.
Your numbers are wrong. A staff (or any other magic item) only has 1 caster level. Each spell going into a staff doesn't get to have a different caster level. Also, staffs have a minimum caster level of 8 - you can't have a staff with a caster level below that.
So your example staff would be:
4th level spell: 400 x 4 x 8 = 12,800
Adding a 6th level spell to it (Which raises the minimum caster level for all spells to 11th):
6th level spell: 400 x 6 x 11 = 26,400
PS. How much would a cantrip/orison cost to be crafted into a staff? Would it be crafted as a one half level spell with a 1st level caster?
Cantrips are priced as if they had a spell level of 0.5. Actual cost to add a cantrip would vary based on the staffs caster level, as well as how many other spells are in the staff.
PPS. Is a staff cast cantrip/orison treated as a prepared cantrip (at will) per charge used? or is it a single casting? how many charges does it use?
It would use charges the same as any other spell. Minimum of 1 charge per use, like all other spells in a staff.
Doesn't matter if it gets the free trip or not. As an AoO occurs before the action that triggered it, the target is still prone and tripping them again would do nothing. After the AoO, the target would then finish his action and stand up (as nothing prevents him from doing so).
You can't keep someone down this way.
Then shouldn't it be called an Acrobatics check?
Some bonuses only apply to specific uses of a skill. For example, the jump spell only applies to Acrobatics checks made to jump. So a jump modifier would be your normal Acrobatic skill, plus any bonuses that apply specifically to jumping.
Morag the Gatherer wrote:
Nothing. An illusion only causes damage if it specifically says it does.
Based on the space/reach link, there are two large options (Long and Tall). Based on the description of Enlarge Person, the 10 feet of natural reach make me think that I'd be considered tall. Is this correct?
Because of my assumption there, on the space/reach sheet, I would use the "Large (Tall)" grid for my attack layout, but I'd only use the green grid, as my Great Axe doens't have reach. Is this also correct?
If I were using a weapon with reach, like a Glaive, then I'd use the green and red grid for attacking enemies?
Partly correct. With a reach weapon, you can't attack a creature inside your normal reach (within 10 feet of you, in this case). With a reach weapon, you would be able to attack a creature in any of the red squares, but not a creature in the green squares.
Das Bier wrote:
That's...interesting. Two casters could contribute to recharging a staff so it could regain power faster? Interesting idea. Honestly never considered it.
No, that is specifically called out as not possible.
Staves hold a maximum of 10 charges. Each spell cast from a staff consumes one or more charges. When a staff runs out of charges, it cannot be used until it is recharged. Each morning, when a spellcaster prepares spells or regains spell slots, he can also imbue one staff with a portion of his power so long as one or more of the spells cast by the staff is on his spell list and he is capable of casting at least one of the spells. Imbuing a staff with this power restores one charge to the staff, but the caster must forgo one prepared spell or spell slot of a level equal to the highest-level spell cast by the staff. For example, a 9th-level wizard with a staff of fire could imbue the staff with one charge per day by using up one of his 4th-level spells. A staff cannot gain more than one charge per day and a caster cannot imbue more than one staff per day.
I think what Gevaudan meant was that multiple party members have the possibility of recharging the staff, it doesn't have to be the same guy every day. One day it could be the cleric, the next day the party wizard does it, and so on.
Orfamay Quest wrote:
So magic items are, at $100 per gold piece, extremely expensive; the price of a simple +1 long sword comes in at close to two million dollars, and the price of the +2 or +3 sword that an 8th level fighter would need is closer to ten or twenty million. I can't think of anything I could buy in the real world for twenty million dollars and expect to carry with me into a dangerous wilderness survival experience, but this provides a cash sink for the game that makes it practical for adventurers to earn huge rewards without making the game unplayable.
Off by more than a little. A +1 longsword costs 2,315 gp. At 1gp = $100, that is only $231,500, not 2 million. Likewise, even a +3 sword (18,315gp) would only be $1,831,500, not 10 to 20 million. A +10 equilivent weapon would be $20,000,000.
It doesn't have to specifically mention their loss. Spell completion items require you to be a spellcaster to use. Spell trigger items require you to have the spell on your spell list. Completely removing your spellcasting abilities (as Ilsurian Archer says it does) would also remove the ability to use spell completion and spell trigger items.
Note that a CL 0 character like Paladin, Ranger or Bloodrager levels 1-3 can still use wands.
Because the spell trigger rules specifically say so, and they still have a class spell list even if they haven't gained spellcasting yet. Ilsurian Archer removes all ranger spellcasting abilities, which would include the ranger spell list.
As you are breaking the rules of magical weapons anyway, price it how you see fit.
Improvised weapons aren't designed to be weapons. Masterwork weapons are finely crafted normal weapons. The two would be mutually exclusive.
You can't have a vicious weapon without it first being a +1 weapon. That would make the vicious property worth 6000gp at the least (the difference between a +1 weapon at 2000gp and a +1 vicious weapon at 8000gp), assuming you could actually price it that way.
My recommendation wold be to simply treated it as a +1 vicious dagger in all aspects (so not an improvised weapon). Or make it a necessary component to make a vicious weapon (reducing the component cost to make one).
It does very well state that.
Weapons with an enhancement bonus of +3 or greater can ignore some types of damage reduction, regardless of their actual material or alignment. The following table shows what type of enhancement bonus is needed to overcome some common types of damage reduction.
You have to have an enhancement bonus that high. A +2 weapon flaming weapon only has a +2 enhancement bonus. IT is just priced the same as a a weapon with a +3 enhancement bonus, it doesn't actually have a +3 enhancement bonus.
The rules on DR/Epic are found in Mythic Adventures.
DR/Epic: A type of damage reduction, DR/epic can be overcome only by a weapon with an enhancement bonus of +6 or greater. Weapons with special abilities also count as epic for the purposes of overcoming damage reduction if the total bonus value of all of their abilities (including the enhancement bonus) is +6 or greater.
Evasion has a limitation that it only works with light or no armor.
I don't see the problem here. Medium armor made out of mithral counts as light armor for limitations, and would therefore work with evasion which is limited to light or no armor.
Also, this has already been answered in the FAQ.
You have 13 hit dice at 13th level. Your eidolon doesn't. As a 13th level summoner, your eidolon only has 10 hit dice, and so a base attack bonus of +10. The eidolons base attack bonus is based on its hit dice, not yours.
Pathfinder and 3.5 are not Lord of the rings. Hence hobbits vs halflings. Outside of that, both pathfinder and 3.5 did their best to let people know that elves _seem_ to be immortal, due to the fact that they live through several generations of humans, and sometimes 2 generations of dwarves.
Let us speak of other old things. Like this thread from 2011. I'm sure 5 years dead is a little beyond a threads lifespan.
You add both together, so 3 + 7.
For an example, look at the war flute they have stated out. It has taken Weapon Feature twice (the price for Weapon Feature also increases when taken multiple times). It is listed as costing 4 design points for the two features total, and Weapon Feature says the first time you select it costs 1 design point, and the second time costs 3 design points. 1 + 3 = 4, showing that you add of each individual cost if you take a weapon quality multiple times.
Oh, and let's not forget about the tarrasque's frightful presence. Between that and combat maneuvers, the tarrasque could incapacitate the golem however it pleases without dealing a single point of damage.
Constructs are immune to mind-affecting effects, so the frightful presence would do nothing.
When you cast a Quickened Gate spell, do you still have to use your standard action that round to concentrate to keep it open?
When you cast any other spell with a duration of Concentration, do you have to spend a standard action that first turn to maintain it? No. (In fact, it is generally impossible, as you have already spent your standard action to cast the spell, you don't have a 2nd standard action to maintain it.)
The same applies in this case. You don't need to spend the standard action to maintain the spell until your next turn. A concentration-duration spells casting time is enough to let the spell last one single round. After that, you need to spend standard action to keep it going.