Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search

Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Pathfinder Society Scenario #4–19: The Night March of Kalkamedes (PFRPG) PDF
***** by ZomB

Pathfinder Society Scenario #4–18: The Veteran's Vault (PFRPG) PDF
****( ) by ZomB

Cavalier Mounts (PFRPG)
****( ) by Eric Hinkle

Pathfinder Adventure Path #69: Maiden, Mother, Crone (Reign of Winter 3 of 6)
***( )( ) by Lord Snow

Pathfinder Society Scenario #53: Echoes of the Everwar—Part IV: The Faithless Dead (PFRPG) PDF
**( )( )( ) by KestlerGunner

Paizo People
RSS RSS RSS RSS Facebook Twitter Email

Rombard

Howie23's page

FullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 2,107 posts (2,111 including aliases). No reviews. 1 list. No wishlists. 5 Pathfinder Society characters. 1 alias.


Full Name

Howie23

Race

Sentient

Classes/Levels

Expert 7

Gender

Yes

Size

Gamer

Age

Older than the hills

Special Abilities

-

Alignment

As a player, CG. As a DM, LE.

Deity

Nuh Uh the Great.

Location

Seated

Languages

English, some French, German, Spanish, Dutch, and Danish. Just enough to be confused.

Occupation

Cynic

Homepage URL

http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/CI_Gamers/

Strength 10
Dexterity 16
Constitution 8
Intelligence 16
Wisdom 7
Charisma 14

About Howie23

My forum interests are primarily rule discussions as well as Pathfinder Society news, rules, and community culture.

Rules discussions are interesting beasts. They tend to start as trying to come to a meeting of the minds. If that fails, lines are drawn up, it becomes an informal debate. The purpose is no longer to convince the other side, but convince the audience. But...they tend to flip back and forth between the two states. They can be frustrating. :)

Here's my expectation: If I provide a logical argument, I expect it to be accepted or for it to be demonstrated as to how it fails. That means either pointing out where my statements are false or lack consensus, or how the form of the argument is invalid. My task is to either show how the objection is incorrect, adjust the argument in a way that responds to the objection, or cease using the argument. My expectation is that my partner in the dialogue follows the same rule.

******************************************************************

Author of 6 Living Greyhawk adventures (Nyrond and Naerie) and editorial contributor on another 15 (copy edit, statblock edit, developmental editing). Reviewer (copy edit, statblock edit, developmental editing) for Moonlight Lodge (MLL). Interesting in taking on commissions for writing and editing assignments. I can be reached at howie232002 at yahoo dot com.

Resource Pages
D&D 3.5 Final FAQ (hard to find on WotC pages)
Mounted Combat
Summary List: Things about PF you might not know
Highly Debated Rule Topics Calling out for FAQ/Errata/Blog



©2002–2013 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.