Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Pathfinder Tales: Prince of Wolves
****( ) by Saint_Meerkat

Pathfinder Chronicles: Dark Markets—A Guide to Katapesh (OGL)
***** by voodoo chili

Pathfinder Adventure Path #24: "The Final Wish" (Legacy of Fire 6 of 6) (OGL)
**( )( )( ) by voodoo chili

Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Distant Worlds (PFRPG)
****( ) by Chris Nehren

Mythic Menagerie: Faeries of the Fringe (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Kelsey MacAilbert

   RSS Posts
Fighter

Haad Knut's page

28 posts. Alias of Aubrey the Malformed.

Posts

Search Posts
Search Haad Knut's posts:
RSS Recent Posts

Fighter

Shut up, hippie!

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter
Aldurin Dolkin wrote:
"AHA!" with a big scary smile on Aldurin's face,licking the blood off his sword, "mmm the sweet taste of victory!" Aldurin then looks at Haad, "Don't worry i still haven't forgotten you, there is still more pain to come...later on."

"There is indeed - but it shall be yours."

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"From Hell's heart I spit at thee....." <gurgle>

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter
tdewitt274 wrote:
In Talin's defense, I don't believe him to be prone. The Tumble doesn't state that he's prone, only in the last legal square. The crouching was the the dramatic effect of the tumble. But then, I'm the crowd : )

What about my defence? I need it more. But yes, I checked the SRD and you are right. But I missed anyway, so no harm done.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

Yes indeed - thanks! So, prone gives me +4 to hit, which is what I was trying to get by tripping you! The herald of hell still smiles upon his disciple...

Haad looks in in amazement as the halfling trips over its feet next to him. So amazed, in fact, that he misses with his flail as he attackes the prone rogue.

grumble, grumble: 2 (roll) + 3 (attack bonus inc. magic Weapon) + 4 (bonus for prone) + 2 (charge) = 11 - a miss! In the link I forgot the charge bonus, but it makes no difference.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"How dare you accuse me of cowardice, you freak! You puppet of a higher (and doubtless cheating) power! You shall die the death of all such crave slime - on your knees, begging for mercy that shall not come!"

Phew, I guess I'd better hit him, then. Charging Aldurin, whirling my flail. On connection (assuming I hit) I will attempt to trip him and then follow up with my Improved Trip attack on his hopefully prone derriere.

Touch attack = 9 + 2 + 1 (Magic Weapon) + 2 (charging) = 14, which I presume hits. Trip attempt = 8 + 2 + 4 (Improved Trip bonus) = 14. Hmmm, so now we wait......

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

Moving from D7 to A7

<mutters to self> "Pull yourself together, you big girl's blouse. It's only four to one - the dread many-armed lord laughs at such odds."

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

The DM is a cheating b.... You are banned from my games, no doubt about that.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

Withdrawing from L7 to D7.

"Master of the Lash, forgive my weakness!"

I assume I'm allowed to do the withdrawal action and avoid attacks of opportunity. I'm frightened, not panicked, so far as I can tell.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"That's funny and scary at the same time! Ha ha! Yaaaargh!"

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

Fear save = 7

"Yaargh - Lord of Tyranny, why have you forsaken me?!"

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"F~@% off, camel!"

Smiting the camel. 23 to hit, 11 damage.

"Take that! I'll deal with your short-arse master next!"

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

Haad's initiative = 19

"I'm surrounded by weaklings!"

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"You stupid halfling, you blocked my charge!"

Move to L7, cast Vigour.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

I'm at I10, not M10 per your map.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

I don't mean to be difficult - well, actually I do, since we are playing to win here - but doesn't Cashmere need to be making Handle Animal checks to manoeuvre Camela round the arena? Assuming she knows the right tricks. Just saying....

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"Unholy Herald of Hell, give me your power to smite this bloody shower!" Casting Magic Weapon on flail, moving to I10.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"Yes, bloody get on with it. I'm freezing my knackers off waiting here."

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

"What, we've bloody started and no one told me? What sort of a place is this? An absolute bloody shower! That's what this place is!"

Casting Shield of Faith, +2 AC (deflection). Moving to F13.

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

Nor me.

"In the name of the Herald of Hell, who is running this arena? I can't see a thing! Couldn't organise a slaughter in an abattoir!"

Haad Knut (M Human Cleric 1)

Fighter

Initiative: 16

Position: B12

"Right, you lot - I'm in charge here! We strike hard, we strike fast, no quarter!"



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.