Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Gem Inspector

GoatToucher's page

139 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 139 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Now imagine the 1st level wand of Grow Tree.

This creates full sized, permanent trees. If the trees lasted 1 hr/lvl, maybe it would be good as a first level spell. It would also need some language about not being able to rend structures, in order to not be used as a first level siege engine/door destroyer.

For permanent trees that can do damage (thorn bushes or the aforementioned utility uses) I would say level three with a minor component cost. Then you can reverse it to "Destroy Tree" which would completely eliminate normal sized plants and damage larger ones. You could also create a Shape Tree spell to make a tree suit your purposes better (shelter, increased hardness, thorns, Goodberries, etc...)


I have all sorts of superfluous gears and whatnot on my football shoulder pads, and I wear a top hat while driving my dune buggy through the wasteland.

The next poster had a problem related to pork products.


Yes, and I still want to know if the "Pen is Mightier" works.

The next poster has something -very- interesting in his/her pocket.


Dotted for interest.


I'll have your money next week, which, one notes, was the agreed upon date. I have never been late with a payment in five years of association, and frankly I am a bit offended at the suggestion that would not fulfill my obligations.

The next poster knows what I spent the money on.


Nirmathas. I ran Crypt of the Everflame and loved the fluff for the place. Full of forests. Beset by political rivals to the south. Beset by orcs to the north west. Supported by the Paladins of Lastwall to the northeast. Framed by mountains to the west and a lake to the east. Nice for wilderness games.


Dotted for interest.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

What gets me about this debate is that good characters have to be good, but evil characters choose when to be evil. Good has to be good constantly, while evil only has to be evil when it suits it's purposes.

This is bunk. If you are mostly stable, but willing to do rough stuff when the need/opportunity arises, you are neutral. People set standards for what behavior is necessary to stay good, but none for what is necessary to stay evil. An antipaladin is meant to be the mirror to the paladin. Where a paladin is meant to portray the best of what is good, the antipaladin is meant to be the worst about what is evil. Capricious, cruel, sadistic, commanding through fear rather than loyalty. We're talking puppy kickers here.

Paladins arent special because their way is the most effective way to fight evil, but because theirs is the best example to set to other good people as a representative of good deities. Antipaladins, therefore, should be similar exemplifiers of the cruel malevolence of their masters. This does not necessitate stupidity any more than paladinhood does, but an antipaladin should be on the lookout for opportunities to do evil, to spread misery and fear, to selfishly increase his own power.

An antipaladin in my game would fall (rise?) if he were not evil enough. If you don;t walk the walk, you don't get the goodies.


The feat says you have to have the potion in hand at the beginning of the turn. To me, that means that you could retrieve the potion with your tail on turn one while making a move and standard action, and drink the potion as a move action on turn 2.

As for potions vs weapons, without the Quickdraw feat, a character with +1 BAB can draw a weapon as a free action as part of a move action.

From the SRD:

"...you may draw a weapon as a move action, or (if your base attack bonus is +1 or higher) as a free action as part of movement."

So it is not Draw+Move+Standard, but Draw/Move+Standard.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It does seem to me that there are some balance issues, but I also think that I might eliminate Sorcerers and Wizards and make Arcanists the new Arcane Paradigm, depending on the final product. I like the idea of having access to all the spells via spellbook, but I am not a fan of Vancian memorization. Memorizing a few but casting them at will is right up my alley.


Dot


Everybody Loves Stalin


Ninnies in Paradise


I feel like penetrating DR is more in tune with the pure power of axes, rather than the finesse of swords.

I admit that I am at a loss for what -would- display for the finesse of swords, and for that, I apologize. I like the options you have made for these three styles a lot, but the other two are for heavy bludgeoning and piercing weapons on a general basis, where this one is for swords (or axes) specifically. Though I do feel that swords and axes are sufficiently different in style and theme to warren their own distinct entries.


Paladins are Iconic in their dedication to a personal code (Lawful) and of protecting the innocent and smiting the wicked (good). I think the problem came in with antipaladins. They were made to be dark counterpoints to paladins, but acting within a certain code of behavior is the antithesis of chaos. There are plenty of ways to be an evil opponent to a paladin without making up a class. However, they opened the door for other alignments getting special archetype classes, which people now demand even though they are thematic stretches at best.

That said, I think Paladins would work much better as a PRC. You design a character toward being a Paladin, pass the required tests, earn your powers (and retain them) through obeying your code, and then continue developing as a warrior or cleric when you have finished with your ten PRC levels.

I think 9/10 of the beef people have with Paladins are that one alignment gets a nice thing (even though it doesn't really work with other alignments thematically) and that the alignment in question is LG, which a large and vocal portion of the player base hates with far more fervor than a couple of Lawful Stupid/Jerk players justifies.


Licking the Badger


Red Menace


F$%& Da Police

N.W.A.


Crypt of the Everflame is a great first module.


I'm surprised that Halflings don't have a resist corruption ability, as their lack of grand ambition and value of simple things were the entire point of trusting them with the One Ring.


Tatum is a bit bulky for Gambit. Kitch was a much better physical match, but he's not allowed in movies anymore after his two star vehicles tanked.


Assassins don't have full BAB because they are not specialized at fighting. They are specialized at killing. Waiting for the perfect shot and taking it. Someone who kills somebody in a fight is an assassin in the same way the Conan is a thief because he kills all the guards so he can steal things.

Classes with precision based abilities are supposed to take advantage of situational modifiers, not just stand there and trade blows with melee types.


Neutral Good. Sometimes liberty is good, sometimes order is. Whatever benefits people.


Year of the Salad.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I don't see what the problem is with the old standby:

If you don't like it, don't have it in your game.

I personally am not a fan of most of the new races in the ARG, but it doesn't hurt the game to have them. In fact, it gives people more options for fun play in their style, so it's a great book for the game, even if I don't use it in mine.

The problem is that one side is calling wrongbadfun, which is never productive. Don't worry about what other people like. Play the game that you like.

Meanwhile, a lot of the people on the other side are waxing elitist, implying that those of us who like our JRRT are small minded, backward, and old fashioned, and those of us who limit players in any way are overbearing control freaks, and are having wrongbadfun ourselves. Don't worry about what other people like. Play the game that you like.


I'm just gonna put this right here.


TFF is banned for stumbling at the threshold of a new era of information.


Mutants and Masterminds and the odd Rapture: End of Days.


Charisma, because I often end up RPing the party face, no matter what my class.


Frowny MacGrump


Mark Hoover is banned for telling an inconvenient truth.


6. No spiked chains, or other RAW elements that break the idiom of the game.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Play with players that prefer mostly good behavior, and who think that getting up to shenanigans behind the paladin's back is only fun when the paladin doesn't find out.

As a paladin player, have a sense of humor about people working around your code, and appreciate their courtesy.


I don't mean to imply that all PvPers are children, but that there is a significant segment of the MMO player base that thinks that the shenanigans displayed on that video are not only funny, but acceptable and justifiable. You can bring the adults into the community, but some people just want to watch the world burn.

If the designers are serious about stopping it, that's awesome, but i'm unsure about how effective they can be, unless they are willing to bring the ban hammer down liberally in the first weeks of launch.


We can say we don't want it, but, realistically, what can be put in place to stop it? The perpetrators will simply claim that they are roleplaying Chaotic Neutral, and the people in charge won't want to permaban twenty or thirty accounts.

Video games attract young people (read: teenagers and children), and young people think this sort of thing is funny. In an open PvP game this sort of thing can't really be stopped, and it will drive players away. I understand that the project doesn't have enough money behind it to hire the people to write and create enough PvE content to make the game viable, but you have to wonder if all the time, effort, and resources are going to go right down the drain when PvP greifing drives away all of the playerbase aside from PvP greifers


Zhayne, do you really expect them to produce eight distinct sub orders of paladins in order to satisfy a group that is clearly in the minority?

There are plenty of resources out there for off alignment "paladins". Use one, or make your own, if your goal is to broaden your experience.

If your goal is to be accepted as "right" or to effect a change in the game, I wouldn't hold your breath on either account.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't know what's wrong with the notion of houseruling. You want Paladins of other alignments? Include them in your game. You don't need (nor will you likely get) validation for your preferences from Paizo, particularly when so many are content with things the way they are. Will your CG paladin be somehow -less- if it doesn't have the official rubber stamp on it? Will it not be as fun to play? If either of these are the case, the issue runs deeper than a problem with Paladins.

Just play things the way you want to play them.


Nope. Paladin alignments are fine the way they are, particularly now that warpriests have been introduced.


I have seen this suggested before. In theory, there would be BAB requirements (and perhaps ability requirements as well?)

Perhaps a Fighter SA could be ignoring the attribute requirements for combat actions or feats.


'Biter, I am reading Doctor Sleep. It is worth the trip through The Shining.


5 people marked this as a favorite.

Humans are typically the center of game worlds because the audience of the games is (shocker) primarily human!

Some people like fantastic worlds populated by otherworldly creatures, but being a human interacting with all the fantasy. Essentially, playing themselves on an alien world interacting with alien beings.

Most demihumans play like humans with hats on because it would be an intellectual exercise with diminishing narrative returns to develop a race with a sentience unlike humans. Instead, we get beings that think the same, but are culturally different.

When you conceive of the core setting as an entry point for new players, a human-centric setting is a good idea. Experienced players who do not like this generally have the skills to craft their own worlds to suit their own preferences.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Neurophage:

I think referring to those with alternate viewpoints as "impotent plebeians" in inappropriately insulting.

It is also an obvious attempt to display an elevated mastery of vocabulary, which is sadly lacking, as they were neither powerless (they got what they wanted) not were they an underclass (despite your claims of minority, they got what they wanted).

You have an axe to grind. Awesome. Slow your roll and keep things polite.


I tend to lean towards CN, but he -does- come up with some pretty "creative" deaths (by which I mean poetically appropriate/grusome and horribly painful).

However, he does none of this for personal gain, which is a hallmark of evil.


He has disdain for the law and those who enforce it, and has no problem breaking the law to do what he thinks is right.

His issue is not merely with lawbreakers, but those who harm the innocent. It's an opposition to evil, not chaos.

I can see slayer over Ranger, though. Frankly I forgot about them.


I only stayed away from Gunslinger because, while Frank uses guns, they are a means to an end. He doesn't do trick shots or anything like that.

He's really-really good at hunting down and killing evil people, but I agree with you entirely on the non-good argument. I stayed away from Evil because he gets no personal benefit from his actions, and, indeed, suffers a great deal for them. His actions stem more from obsession than malice. He respects good (though he does not practice it himself) and hates evil. CN.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Chaotic Neutral (lives by his own code, not Daffy Duck) Ranger with Favored Enemy: Human.


Burning Straw man is banned for being rhetorical


Magic is banned for having too many non-alphabetic symbols on his.


Have "Silver Wool" (manes implies predator) as a racial feat that can only be taken at level one and gives a +4 Diplomacy bonus when dealing with other Shoray.

I don't see a bonus to craft skills or perform, as both of those imply an individual ambition that goes against the Shoray idiom. Their cooperation helps them build quickly and effectively, but doesn't lend itself to innovation. They hum happy little songs to themselves,and even sing together, but -love- when wandering minstrels come to town, and such people will be kept in room, board, and creature comforts by the Shoray for as long as they are inclined to stay.

Playing the same songs and telling the same stories.

Over and over again.

For months.

To the unmitigated delight of the Shoray (and their cute little lamb-children).


Most of the arguments against gunslingers have listed pretty specific mechanical issues. The arguments in favor (which initially decried anti-flavor arguments) fixate on the flavor argument. Can any of you speak (with specificity) to the mechanical issues with the class?

1 to 50 of 139 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.