Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

Generic Villain's page

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber. 1,461 posts. 10 reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,461 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Kvantum wrote:
Erum-Hel is Mythic as well. And they don't say for absolute certain what race he is, but the weapon kinda gives it away.

Doesn't Erum-Hel dwell in Orv? He could have just picked it up while murdering the natives. Like how the 20th-level dwarven fighter in Rival Guide picked up the elven curve blade from a bested rival.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Ah, thanks Liz. Well in the case of this particular adventure, I'm getting more of a "The Gates of Firestorm Peak" vibe. Which just so happens to be one of my favorite vibes...


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

What's S3?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Nick O'Connell wrote:
So what's with the PDF being pushed back another week?:(

My guess? So non-subscribers don't get their PDFs before subscribers have theirs shipped. After all, that's one of the subscriber perks. A few months back, Paizo switched to releasing PDFs 2 weeks after they started shipping to subscribers to avoid just such a situation. It happened the month after Bestiary IV shipped, if I recall.

At least that was my take on the situation. Don't remember if they ever said that officially, in which case take what I said with a grain of salt.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Well it's official: I'd hereby like to extend my invitation to the Dominion of the Black to come to Earth and take my brain. Guess that makes me a Night Herald...


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Hey James. I know Lirgen isn't really your thing, but I was still wondering: if you were to design a Lirgeni observatory-dungeon, what would it look like? What kind of architectural style? Any cool special features other than the obvious telescopes, orreries, etc.?

There's a little bit of Lirgen info in Lost Kingdoms that mentions the nation loved triangles, and their buildings featured ample balconies and skylights, but that's about all I could find.

Thanks for any thoughts!


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Well, the Reign of Stars was over 8,000 years ago. All the technology in Technology Guide is vastly outdated. Just think of all the advancements real life human society made from -6,000 B.C. to the modern day.

The odds that Androffa still exists at all are pretty slim. And if they do exist, the odds of them being anything like they were 8,000 years ago is even more slim. Of course the developers could just hand-wave realism in this case and say "meh, they entire society has been static for the past eight millenia."

So were they lawful neutral/lawful evil/militaristic? It's hard to say. But would they care about a ship that went missing 8,000 years ago? I'd say not so much.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

What's more useless than a review for a product by someone who doesn't have said product?

...

Nope, can't think of anything. Other than, I suppose, a post complaining about that review.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Aboleths.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
SAMAS wrote:

James suggested I ask this here(or hereabouts): What happens if you point a Harvesting Lens at the Sun?

The exact same thing as when you point it at any other star.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Well if you can wait a few weeks, Walkena will be statted out in next month's Undead Unleashed. There may be more info on his pseudo-faith there.

Personally, I suspect he's at best coldly indifferent about non-human natives. He would tolerate their presence, but they lack the birthright of a true Mwangi.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Yeah, the more I think about it the more terrible the strangler archetype is. The standard brawler's unarmed strike ability increases his unarmed strike damage as per a monk's. And it just so happens that, while grappling, a character deals damage to his grappled victim depending on either his unarmed strike or the use of a light or one-handed weapon.

So basically, the strangler needs to get Improved Unarmed Strike and Improved Grapple to function in his niche at all times. When he does grapple, he'll do damage with a melee weapon (whose damage is modified as per brawler's strike if he's at least 5th level) plus a small amount of sneak attack damage.

So a 5th level...

...brawler would do 2D6 damage while grappling.

...strangler would do 1D8 damage plus 1D6 sneak attack damage while grappling.

Furthermore the strangler loses the brawler's flurry ability, just for a maximum of 3D6 sneak attack damage. So yeah, he kinda sucks unfortunately.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

I really want to like the strangler archetype for the brawler, but I'm a little confused. He gains the strangle ability which allows him to deal sneak attack damage while grappling, but gives up the brawler's unarmed strike ability. That means, at first level, he can't grapple better than anyone else unless he takes Improved Unarmed Strike and Improved Grapple. He also gains the Stealth skill, so maybe he's supposed to sneak up on people?

Am I getting that right? If so, how would you play him? I guess the strangler is supposed to use melee weapons unless he gets the chance to sneak up on someone and choke them?

Thanks if anyone can help me wrap my head around this otherwise-awesome concept.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

*Sigh*

Thanks.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

I really want to like the strangler archetype for the brawler, but I'm a little confused. He gains the strangle ability which allows him to deal sneak attack damage while grappling, but gives up the brawler's unarmed strike ability. That means, at first level, he can't grapple better than anyone else unless he takes Improved Unarmed Strike and Improved Grapple. He also gains the Stealth skill, so maybe he's supposed to sneak up on people?

Am I getting that right? If so, how would you play him? I guess the strangler is supposed to use melee weapons unless he gets the chance to sneak up on someone and choke them?

Thanks if anyone can help me wrap my head around this otherwise-awesome concept.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Are you familiar with the tragic villain trope?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Evil cults in Golarion often have thematically linked monsters that they use as lackeys. For example...

The Whispering Way use undead
The Technic League uses robots (or is it the other way around??!!?!?!)
Blackfire Adepts use assorted evil outsiders
Old Cults use Mythos beasties
Evil churches use creatures associated with their god

So now my question: Is there a "type" of monster that the Night Heralds make use of?

Thanks for any insight!


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Hey James, I have some questions about Lirgen:

-Prior to the whole drowning-in-a-hurricane thing, what were the dominant languages spoken there? If adventurers were to plunder the depths of a Lirgen observatory, what would the journal of a Saoc Brethren be written in? I know Saoc himself came from Rahadoum, but I don't know how much of that culture he brought with him.

-What was the nation of Lirgen's alignment?

-Lastly, it is noted in a few sources that aberrations are dangerously common in the modern Sodden Lands. What kind of aberrations are we talking? I know skum inhabit some of the drowned cities, but that was all I could find.

Thanks!


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Unfortunately, I need to cancel my subscription to the Campaign Setting line.

Financial gods willing, I'll hopefully be able to re-subscribe soon.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Asterial wrote:


So I figure I'll go right to the source. What about in rise of the run lords that makes it so good ?

The fact that Paizo needed to prove that they could stand as a publishing company without the backing of the Dungeons and Dragons franchise, and thus had to make Rise of the Runelords the best they possibly could. If enough people hadn't stuck with them through RotRL, that would have likely been the end of Pathfinder.

Which is why I'm still somewhat ashamed that I didn't sign on as a Pathfinder charter subscriber when my Dungeon and Dragon Magazine scripts ended.

So to answer your question... desperation?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

"My Account" says that AP #83 and #84 won't even be authorized until July 31st, along with the first volume of Iron Gods (AP #85). I'm hoping this is an error?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Set wrote:

P. 47 of Into the Darklands has a sentence that could be read to either state that the orcs, or the megafauna used by the orcs in Belkzen (or both?) come from Deep Tolguth, in Orv.

Ah okay, I thought you meant the Land of Black Blood instead of Orv in general. Deep Tolguth I could see - LoBB not so much.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Set wrote:

Add in some lingering ties to the land of the necromantically-potent Black Blood, from whence they came oh-so-long ago...

Is that canon? Or something you made up? I always figured orcs evolved/originated in Sekamina.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Alex Smith 908 wrote:


Xenophobia is an unfair thing to say given the overall progressiveness in Tolkien's work. I think it was mainly in finding a villain that could be fought against in a guiltless fashion.

However if the evil orc gods presented in Inner Sea Gods have an active role in their society similar to Lolth in 3.5 with drow it would make perfect sense for their society to be inherently evil.

I suspect you know quite a bit more about the man than me. Xenophobia could well be the wrong word for it.

As for the orc gods, it's interesting to see how they originally appeared in Orcs of Golarion compared to Inner Sea Gods. In the former they seemed largely fictional - no proper names, suggestions that they are totems and ideas rather than individual beings, were in fact Demon Lords/Archdevils posing as orc deities, etc. That seems to have changed in Inner Sea Gods. Now there's little doubt they are unique individuals.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Axial wrote:

Where the hell did orcs come from, any way? Tolkien probably has the most credit for codifying them in fantasy fiction, but I'm not sure where they first originated. The word Orc apparently meant as many things as corpse, young pig, or seal.

And Orcus. That too.

I think you pretty much nailed everything right there. Orcs: what happens when a seal, a young pig, and a corpse love each other very much and share a special hug in Hell.

I don't claim to be a Tolkein scholar, but I believe they were original creations of his. Perhaps a slightly xenophobic outlet for the trauma he experienced during WW1. Which is to say, a horde of monsters ruining the planet with their mindless rage.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

I'd be alright with an orc AP I guess, but something tells me this is a companion for Daughters of Fury.

*Edit: You know what, I just lied to myself. I don't want an orc AP and I'm dreading that that is what this portends. Coming off of Iron Gods though, I think I will have enough good will to carry me through pretty much anything.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Larkos wrote:


The Hulk as an Alchemist/Barbarian

The ragechemist archetype in Ultimate Combat was custom-made for Hulk wannabes.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

-Hank Hill: LG Male Human Brawler
-Comic Book Guy: CN Male Human Bard (archivist archetype)
-Gex: N Male Lizardfolk Rogue
-Laharl: CE-ish Male Tiefling Magus
-Norman Bates: LN/NE Male Human Rogue/Assassin
-Frog: LG Male Grippli Cavalier
-X: NG Male Android Gunslinger
-Ripley: NG Female Human Ranger
-Pinhead: LE Male Tiefling Sorcerer (shadow or infernal bloodline)


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Lamontius wrote:

#firstworldproblems

I live in the first-world. Most of my problems are, as a result, first-world in nature. Just kind of comes with the territory.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Well this has been more eye-opening than I expected. I still think Dick won't rinse dishes because he's a lazy schmuck, but apparently there are some reasonable arguments in his favor.

However, if he ever puts the toilet paper on the wrong way (there are no kids or cats in this house, so there most certainly is a wrong way), I will destroy everything he holds dear with fire.

As an aside, we don't really fight that much and I might be exaggerating my frustrations just a little. But really, isn't it the little things that get under everyone's skin?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Charlie Bell wrote:

If by "rinse" you mean "run water over it to get off most of the gunk," then I rinse.

If by "rinse" you mean "scrub it with a scouring pad and soap," that's the dishwasher's job, not mine.

Yeah, I guess I should have elaborated. I mean the first one. Get the bulk off myself, leave the reminder for the dishwasher.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Drock11 wrote:


I hate thinking this, but when I got to this part I admit he might logically have a point.

That might be more of an indication of the general crapiness of dishwashers than his being right about not wanting to rinse them.

Logically, he does indeed have a point. But here's the thing. I'm going to avoid getting too personal here, but let's just say that the odds of Dick hand-washing dishes is about the same as me convincing someone on a messageboard to change a deeply held personal belief by repeatedly calling them a Nazi.

I don't mind doing the dishes; I just ask that, when they go in the sink, first rinse them off so I don't have to later soak them/use Ajax. But Dick is a Nazi, and the Third Reich can't be bothered with rinsing.

(That... might have been too personal)


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Alleran wrote:
Generic Villain wrote:
Zaister wrote:
Seven Days to the Grave has Nidalese midnight wine (at 14 gp a bottle).

I... missed... one.

Twitch

I wonder if you missed any others as well.

Maybe you should check?

Way ahead of ya. I've got my afternoon, evening, morning, afternoon, and maybe another evening all planned out!

(Literally no one cares at all, but I'll say in my defense that I didn't start comprehensively noting stuff like that until sometime in Second Darkness/Legacy of Fire)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Zaister wrote:
Seven Days to the Grave has Nidalese midnight wine (at 14 gp a bottle).

I... missed... one.

Twitch


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Hama wrote:

It's hilarious how people can heatedly argue about something as pointless as rinsing the dishes before putting them in the dishwasher.

I love it.

Do you mean this thread, or in real life?

Because let me tell you, when I come home and find Dick has "done the dishes," it always means just throwing them in the dishwasher and hoping for the best. I then get to go back and hand-wash everything, before once again running them through.

And that, friends, is a huge waste of water. And I feel genuinely guilty about it.

However, I have obsessive-compulsive disorder - and not the cute, fun, "OMG guys I'm like so totally OCD" variety - with a focus on dirt/grime/etc. I'd chew my own kneecaps off before using silverware caked with... leavings.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

This thread is brought to you by anger in its purest, most spiteful form.

Those of you who wash your own dishes and have a dishwasher: do you rinse dishes before putting them in the dishwasher? Or do you put them in, caked and encrusted with whatever food happens to be on them, and hope for the best?

Someone in my life, whom I'll call Dick, feels that rinsing dishes before putting them in the dishwasher is a "waste," and that if he were to do this, he may as well just go whole-hog and hand-clean them. I feel differently. This is a matter of contention.

Any thoughts?


5 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

I have an obsessively-updated list of various treasures from years of Pathfinder, and Dungeon Magazine before it. Relevant:

-Bottle of 4663-vintage wine from the Terverius Wineries of Southern Cheliax (300 gp)
-Bottle of fine elven wine (65 gp)
-Mendevian icewine (250 gp)
-Century-old elven spirit wine (175 gp)
-Bottle of fey wine (50 gp)
-119 bottles representing 48 separate vintages, including Taldan fire-brandy, hard liquor from Andoran, and even delicate berry wines out of the elven land of Kyonin (6,000 gp)
-Bottle of Korvosan wine (20 gp)
-Bottle of an excellent vintage of Corentyn red or white wine (50 gp)
-Bottle of fine wine from Ustalav (500 gp)


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

It turns out that I've enjoyed Mummy's Mask way more than I expected. I thought I'd find it incredibly blah, so the bar was pretty low, but I have been really impressed so far. Quality stuff.

With that said.

I cannot wait for this mummy crap to end so we can start Iron Gods. This Numeria sourcebook was such an enormous tease for how awesome this nation is. I want to know every bleeding thing about every bleeding thing about Numeria. Now!


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Alrighty, thanks to Jester David's info, I forsee a rewrite of part of my theories page. Obviously I'll need to get, read, and digest Emerald Spire first. Stay tuned I guess...


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
zagnabbit wrote:

So this is basically awesome GV.

I frankly love your take on the Vault of Ilvarandin and how it became the template for Aboleth Society design for Azlant. Solves a slightly lingering void in my mind.

It also provides some of the ammo for why the Aboleths act oddly during Earthfall, one group realizes that they have really just copied someone else and their God Complex Egos decide that is unacceptable and need to be rectified in the most complete way, a global extinction event.

They had some offworld gate ability to avoid partaking in the extinction event personally. But by also destroying a significant portion of their own empire or even eradicating most of their own race, they remove competition to their faction's dominance after the cataclysm.

Thanks. Unfortunately, recent news (sheds another tear) could very well require rethinking the whole Ilvarandin theory. Since I won't have Emerald Spire for a few weeks, all I can say is that Ilvarandin has always stuck out in my mind. Why would such an ancient Vault contain a vast, nation-sized city built in so many unique architectural styles? I could only arrive at two possibilities.

1): It was built all those countless millennia ago, as-is. Someone or something took the time to create a vast and varied ant farm, in all those different styles, from scratch. Utilizing preservative magic like that later mastered by Ancient Thassilon, the buildings have stood more-or-less intact ever since.

2): The Vault was originally empty, and over time, someone or something transported various races into its depths. The races, having nothing better to do, decided to go ahead and... build a giant underground city over a long period of time. And despite including powerful mages like the Thassilonians... never bothered trying to escape, or record their endeavor. Or maybe a bunch of cultures willingly traveled there to, for some reason... expand on the megalopolis? Yeah, I really can't even make a coherent theory here. While that doesn't mean my first theory is correct, it does mean we just don't have enough info on Ilvarandin's history.

Now as to the aboleths, I asked James Jacobs a question about them here. Based on his answers and non-answers, here are a few more theories/points.

James wouldn't answer whether or not the aboleths were a homogenous, world-spanning empire. He's keeping that information vague. However, in a past post he did confirm that there are no rogue veiled masters. All veiled masters answer to the aboleth rulers, whatever those happen to be.

However, there has been at least one semi-rogue standard aboleth, and that tells me there are more of them. James stayed vague on this subject as well, but said that this particular plot point was building towards something. I have a feeling that no aboleth could ever be considered benevolent, but based on all this, I think it's possible there were aboleth factions opposed to Earthfall. They would be in the minority, and in direct violation of the veiled masters, but they may well have existed. And may exist still.

Maybe these rogues helped ensure Earthfall was cataclysmic enough to weaken the veiled masters' tyrannical grip on the aboleth race. Maybe they warned the Thassilonian Runelords of the coming apocalypse (though I think it's established that the Runelords came about this info through magical divinations). Maybe they secretly egged on the Azlanti people, urging them to throw off the aboleth yolk.

Again, I just highly doubt anything an aboleth would ever do could be deemed benevolent. But that doesn't mean they all have the same goals.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Jester David wrote:

In a surprise twist, the Vault Builders (and Vault Keepers) are NOT the elohim.

As per Emerald Spire.

...

Sheds a tear

...

Freaking really?! Of all my stupid theories, that stupid theory was the one I was most sure of. Any chance you could private message me the truth? Or post it here? I'd be much obliged.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Okay, I have a ton of new stuff from just two sources. Two sources that I didn't look at for my original timeline: the Beyond the Inner Sea section from 'The Inner Sea World Guide' and the veiled master entry in 'Inner Sea Bestiary.' I'm a real dolt for not referencing the veiled master entry, but the Nameless Spire bit of info was easy to miss. Anyway, I'll look at both below. Shockingly, these sources actually sort of back up my theories. And without cherry picking!

The Inner Sea World Guide (pg. 207):

The Nameless Spires are said to "...predate Thassilon, Azlant, and even the coming of aboleths to Golarion." This is super important for a few reasons. First, it tells me that whatever built the Nameless Spires was most likely the first intelligent lifeform on Golarion. If they were the Vault Builders, and the Vault Builders were in fact the elohim, that would mean that elohim could very well have created most life on Golarion. However, while I'm like 99% sure the Vault Builders were elohim, I'm only about 51% sure they built the Nameless Spires.

If the Vault Builders/elohim didn't do it, than who did? The only other candidate I have are elder things. The strongest bit of support for this comes not from a Pathfinder book, but from HP Lovecraft's 'At The Mountains of Madness.' There, the protagonists visit a ruined elder thing city in Antarctica, wherein they learn that life on Earth was the result of elder thing experiments. Given Paizo's affinity for Lovecraft, you can see why I would name elder things as possible candidates for the Nameless Spire's builders.

But then it hit me.

Why does it have to be elohim or elder things? What if these two races built the Nameless Spires together? These two species share tons of similarities. They are both neutral (elder things lawful neutral, elohim true neutral), utterly alien in appearance, supremely intelligent, and highly advanced in the fields of science and life creation. What if elohim are actually highly advanced, ascended elder things?

Inner Sea Bestiary (pg. 57):

Before even getting to the veiled master entry, I want to touch on the fact that the Nameless Spires are said to have been built before the coming of the aboleths. "Coming" can mean several things, but taken literally, it would imply that aboleths came to Golarion from someplace else. They didn't evolve there, were not created there by an outside force, etc. It's an important distinction, and would mean they must have a home world or home plane of existence.

Now, as for the Inner Sea Bestiary, we learn a ton of stuff in just a single page. I'll look at each bit individually.

The first paragraph tells us aboleths dwelt in Golarion's oceans before humanity and even before most gods took an interest in the planet. The humanity thing we already know, but it's interesting to read that most - but not all - modern gods were not yet active on Golarion in those ancient days. I don't really want to theorize about gods, as that's a whole 'nother subject, but still, noteworthy.

The next part is far cooler. We learn that "In ancient times, elder forces and eldritch entities knew of the world." If these weren't gods in the proper (modern?) sense, what were they? The use of words like elder and eldritch suggests to me that they were Great Old Ones. As further proof, it's already been established that Great Old Ones existed on Golarion at some point in the ancient past. And while I'm pretty sure that is what's being discussed here, another possibility could be elohim - or perhaps some combination of elohim, Great Old Ones, and who knows what else.

The next relevant bit regards Azlant. Specifically, that the aboleths' "...hidden gifts and subtle coaxings" were a driving factor behind humanity's rise. This establishes them as a subtle, behind-the-scenes force. They aren't about grabbing the world by the throat and utterly dominating it, even back when that was well within their reach. No, they like to take their time, pull the strings, lay the groundwork, and watch the magic happen.

Later, we find out that aboleths began by punishing the humans of Azlant in minor ways for their perceived hubris. It was only after these failed attempts that they resolved to just scrap the whole experiment with Earthfall. This tells me that aboleths, though masterminds and geniuses, are just as capable of making miscalculations and errors as anyone else. They thought they had humanity under their tentacle-thumbs, thought that they could just gently cajole their pets back on the right track, and were mistaken. Then, they made another, far larger mistake with Earthfall.

Or was Earthfall actually a mistake? Was the devastation actually just as terrible as the aboleths had intended? Because the paragraph closes by nothing that, after Azlant was wiped from the map, "... the veiled masters retreated to the depths as well, content for now that the devastation above would serve as a lesson that would never be forgotten." That sure doesn't sound like a mistake to me.

And of course, the end of the veiled master entry informs us that the veiled masters are preparing to teach a new lesson to the humanoid races. Because life on Golarion tends to suck for the little guys.

And lastly, on an unrelated note:

Dominion of the Black:

In my Dominion of the Black post, I mentioned I thought mi-go may belong to the group. Looking back, that may not have been my idea. I'm going to credit that idea to aetherwisp from this thread. If you read the thread, you'll find that a certain Mike Shel makes a very ambiguous statement at the end, suggesting aetherwisp may be on to something. And guess who's writing Valley of the Brain Collectors (promised to at last pull back the curtain on the Dominion)? Yeah, freakin' Mike Shel.

To further drive home a possible mi-go connection: in an interview with James Jacobs by Robert Brookes, James concludes by noting that "That said... there are more brain-collecting monsters than neh-thalggu out there..."

Yup, I'd say mi-go are in.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Hey James. I don't have my finger on the pulse of the Paizo community like you, but it seems to me that the Dominion of the Black has been one of the hottest topics since its mention back in Entombed with the Pharaohs. Are you bummed that much of that mystique is going to be lost in a few months? All that rabid fan speculation kind of just dissipating? I'm hoping the upcoming DotB article will have plenty of new mysteries to chomp on of course, but I'm assuming it's going to finally pull the curtain back.

Also, did you have any idea the DotB was going to be such hot property when it was first developed? Or was it just a case of throwing stuff at the wall, seeing what sticks?


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
John Mangrum wrote:
To what category do the cosmic caravan traits belong? Or do they slot into a mix of categories on an individual basis? (If the former, I'm guessing Magic; if the latter, it looks to me like Magic and Social could encompass them all.) Or, indeed, do they fall into their own category?

They run the gamut. There are boosts to saving throws against certain effects, skill checks, initiative, and movement speed, as well as the use of minor spell-like abilities.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Cthulhudrew wrote:

I think the Dominion of the Black will have taken over in 2018.

All your Golarion are belong to us!

They already killed Aroden and transplanted his brain into a Giger-esque biomechanical cyberdemon to lead their armies*, so that's the next logical step.

*Not confirmed. Yet.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Drock11 wrote:
Overall I thought it was well done. I still would have liked some solid answers about the subjects in the book instead of a list of maybes.

My knee jerk reaction after reading the six big mysteries in the first chapter was mild annoyance for just that reason. But I have since changed my mind.

I decided to put together my own version of Golarion's timeline, answering many what-ifs in the process, and I have to say that while it was a fun little project, I ultimately felt kind of crummy about the whole thing. Solving these enigmas - even if only for my own campaign, in my own head - stole much of what made them compelling. They went from being these mysterious idols of coolness and creative potential, to just a few data points. If that makes any sense.

So yeah, I think this is a case of "never meet your heroes, because they'll always disappoint you." Nothing that Paizo could ever publish could compare to the things you conjure up in your own imagination.*

*But please keep trying to out-cool my imagination, because you've come close before.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Age of Legends:
Some idiot Azlanti decides that diamond dust should go into all the expensive cleric and wizard spells. From that day forward, spellcasters have had to find a way to grind the ultra-hard gems into powder. And so, the dragon-powered diamond mill industry was born.

Diamonds are hard, yo.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

I think the Dominion of the Black AP will be out in 2018. I really super hope the Paizo line will still be going strong by then, if not much stronger.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber

Glad people liked it. That was really the bulk of what I wanted to say, though I'm thinking of doing a Gulf of Abendego/Lirgen one and maybe a Ghol-Gan/Cyclops/Serpentfolk one.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Campaign Setting Subscriber
Ashkar wrote:
Cannot remember details, but there was an Old One dragged on Golarion surface, in his comet, by aboleth's meteor.

That'd by Xhamen-Dor, Great Old One of infestations and fungus. I've been trying to figure out where that meteor landed, but after asking on the Ask James Jacobs thread, all I learned was that it was not in Tian Xia. I figured Xhamen-Dor might've been the source of the mind-controlling mythic fungus on the island of Goroyasa (off the coast of the Valashmai Jungle), but nope. I guess the meteor could have landed in the Inner Sea region, but I think we would have heard something about it by now. Thus I'm guessing Xhamen-Dor landed somewhere in southern Garund, Casmaron, Arcadia, or even Sarusan.

Ashkar wrote:

And speaking about ideas/conspiracies:

The whole aboleth plan, to punish Azlant with a meteor bugs me - it is sad, that it ultimately backfired on them, causing a good piece of collateral damage, that affected their Second Empire. But this damage was caused by greatly weakened meteor (two Azlant gods gave their lives - one to put a moon on meteor's way, second to take away radiation and other nasty stuff from shards, after meteor went through). Imagine what it could have done, if not the sacrifice of Azlant Gods. And I have a feeling, this variant certainly does not include "no damage" option for aboleths. Considering the fact, that even a weakened meteor caused it. So, did they just miscalculate the outcome? Or were they so proud of themselves, that they didn't even thought about such "accidental suicide" variant? Or maybe there was somebody else, who tried to orchestrate the ultimate downfall of aboleths?

I don't think this is addressed anywhere officially, but I do remember reading on the messageboards somewhere that the aboleths really seriously underestimated the payload they called down during Earthfall. Still, even if that's the case, it seems pretty weird that they miscalculated as much as they did. Like you said, if it wasn't for the sacrifice of Acavna (the Azlanti moon goddess), Earthfall would have been even worse. It could well have wiped out the aboleths entirely. For a race of immortal geniuses, you'd think they wouldn't have screwed up quite so massively. I never thought about it that way, but yeah, I could definitely see there being some anti-aboleth conspiracy at work, using their own hubris and super-magic against them.

1 to 50 of 1,461 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.