|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
Gallo wrote:Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the EU
,Greenpeace...Only UN matters.Others have the reputation of selling out.
So apparently only the UN is a reliable source of information, yet you'll happily quote unreliable media sources, discount reliable ones and basically ignore anything that doesn't support your position, up to and including statements by Russian soldiers in the Crimea that they are Russian soldiers in the Crimea. If only the UN matters, presumably in terms of what can be considered reliable, accurate and impartial, what does that say about all the arguments you have been presenting?
NATO in last two decades used everything in it's arsenal short of nukes against targets both civilian and military.
Might makes right,this is how world works.
The difference is any actions by NATO have been authorised by UN resolutions and the like. Russia's weren't. Nor does NATO deliberately target civilians. Russia and its proxies do.