|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
Every time I read one of your postsVlad Koroboff wrote:
In other news,yesterday's battle near Shakhtersk was GLORIOUS.
Sometimes when i read your posts i can't understand how you finished elementary school.You can't even read.Or maybe you think that battle of this proportion,with artillery used on both sides can possibly have the city it happens IN standing.
Umm…… who's the one who can't read? Please point out where in my post I made any reference at all to that particular battle and where it was? I guess you are just projecting aspects of your own education when you try to make claims about mine.
Gallo wrote:There is nothing glorious at all about war.That's your opinion.I was raised differently.
Obviously. Have you ever been in a conflict zone and seen it firsthand? I have - mass graves, bullet marks on church walls where people were lined up and murdered, entire communities burnt to the ground. And that was a low level conflict. Factor in the scale of fighting in the Ukraine and the types of weaponry and no sane person could ever see war as glorious.
Gallo wrote:You thinkAre you some kind of telepath?Because it's kinda not working.
Gallo wrote:Russia = good, Ukraine = badNnnnever said that.
Well, dozens of your posts would suggest otherwise. I don't need to be a telepath to understand the common tone throughout your posts in this thread.
Gallo wrote:Western media = bad, your own special sources = good.My own?I do not own news sources.I use what's available,but i'm good at searching beyond first page of yahoo or whatever.
Here is another common aspect of all your posts. You quite happily respond to a comment someone makes but conveniently twist what the person says it make them appear inconsistent or wrong.
My saying "your own special sources" is not saying you own sources. See what you have done there? You have been quite open in previous posts about your own sources "on the ground" and how you don't rely on the MSM for your information. So it is ok for you to refer to your "own sources", but as soon as someone refers to your "own sources" you try to deftly twist it into "own[ing] news sources". Not deft enough though as it stands out for what it is.
Are you some kind of paladin?
No. I'm an atheist. Roy is more my style. I guess that would make you Belkar without any of his endearing attributes.