Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Roy Greenhilt

Fromper's page

FullStarFullStarFullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 6,710 posts (7,915 including aliases). 4 reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist. 25 Pathfinder Society characters. 5 aliases.


1 to 50 of 966 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Silver Crusade ***

4 people marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Lune wrote:
Sorry Gary, there is a logical part of my brain that refuses to differentiate between synonymous words
as opposed to what happens when they don't break out the thesaurus and wind up with level, class level, spell level, race traits, raciAL traits......

Given that Banjo the Clown has already been mentioned in this thread, somebody had to post this link.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Lune wrote:
Also, wanted to point out that there is no issue of Cthulhu about copyright. You can't say "Call of Cthulhu" in reference to gaming unless you are Chaosium but other than that the IP is pretty much free reign. Same goes for all Lovecraftian stuffs. It is all public domain. That is why Paizo can print stuff with his name on it. Kinda like Sherlock Holmes.
I thought some of it was in or was out of public domain because of the age that it is and when Disney started patenting their stuff?

Disney is putting out Cthulhu stuff now? I always knew they were evil. I bet they turn it into a cartoon musical.

*duck* Yes, I know what you meant.

Silver Crusade ***

5 people marked this as a favorite.

If you want to bring a Cthulhu worshiping PC to the table, you can. What your PC is actually doing, in game terms, is venerating Cthulhu, not worshiping him. But that's minor semantics.

You won't be able to gain any mechanical benefit from Cthulhu. So you can't have any feats, traits, divine class levels, or other mechanical features that require worship of that deity, even though Cthulhu exists in the setting.

Nobody is arguing against this, as far as I know, though I haven't gone back to re-read the whole thread from the beginning, just today's new posts.

If you choose to worship Zon-Kuthon, you CAN get mechanical benefits. You can be a cleric, warpriest, or inquisitor of Zon-Kuthon, or just a fighter who's obsessed with him. And you can get traits, feats, or whatever else from that worship. That's because he's a legal deity for PFS.

On the other hand, if you show up with a Zeus worshiping character, everyone at the table is going to look at you weird, and someone's likely to tell you, "Umm, dude, Zeus isn't part of this setting." Which I think was Nefreet's point about bringing a klingon to a Star Wars game.

Silver Crusade ***

4 people marked this as a favorite.

The season 8 Pathfinder Society RPG Guild Guide (the document formerly known as Princethe Guide to Organized Play) has a glossary. The word "worship" is defined in that glossary:

Quote:

Worship: In this context, worship refers to a

relationship held between a PC and a deity where the
PC, in exchange for his dedicated worship, gains a
mechanical benefit (e.g. a cleric’s spells and abilities, a
deity-specific feat or trait, special functions of magical
weapons, or prerequisites for a prestige class). PCs may
only worship one campaign-legal deity and must always
be within one step of their chosen deity’s alignment. See
page 24 for more rules on worshiping a deity and how to
change the deity a PC worships.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Wow. I totally missed this. And Muser's quote from Ultimate Magic doesn't really help. You need to quote both the Spell Combat and Spellstrike rules to clarify this. One or the other isn't enough.

And to think, I've killed 2 PCs in 3 times GMing [redacted], even though I was denying the BBEG one of his attacks per round, because I was doing this wrong!

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I doubt if there are exact equivalents to those items in Pathfinder. I'm not sure if they were ever specific items in any version of D&D. But I bet someone out there has made up their own versions and put them out on the internet somewhere. Try google.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

It's meant to be a feat for only those classes that share their teamwork feats with their animal companions. In other words, hunters, and archetypes that impersonate them.

There are plenty of feats that are restricted to a specific class, or just those classes that have a particular feature. There's nothing wrong with this being one of them.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kerney wrote:
Kerney wrote:


Ambrose Dalcine--Summoner
Sita Dalcine-- His wife and Eidolon
Mina Dalcine-- Their daughter. A herold vanity. Age 14.
Lucie Dalcine-- Twin of Mina, squire vanity. Age 14. 1xp aasimar gm credit baby.
Severus Dalcine-- Younger brother, age 9.
Lucie Dalcine 16 year old Vigilante, squire vanity. "Please don't tell my parents I'm going on missions by myself. They'll so freak."

You spelled Dalsine wrong.

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.
GM Hmm wrote:

They're both excellent adventures, and they star my personal favorite VC, Calisro Benarry! I love her!

Hmm

"I love her more! I even asked her to marry me! She said she'd think about it." *sigh*

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, I know what you mean. When I made my first sorcerer PC, I tried to find a mini that just looked like a nobleman type without a weapon, and I couldn't find any. I eventually decided to make the character female because I found a mini of a woman in a dress just holding a staff, which was the best I could find.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Make a gnome prankster bard. Instead of just buffing your allies, you can also use the "mock" performance to debuff your enemies. My favorite moment with my prankster was telling an earth elemental "Yo mama was cubic zirconia!"

Silver Crusade ***

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Shifty wrote:

I've just gone 'rescue party' and picked up some MIA GM tables.

Good to know I have 9 days to deliver them :p

I wasn't signed up to run anything this gameday as I have been away a lot, looks like it ended up with me running stuff anyhow!

Be sure to ask for the GM boon. You've earned it.

Silver Crusade ***

6 people marked this as a favorite.

I really thought Asmodeus was, by far, the most popular evil god in Society play. I had no idea Norgorber was so popular.

Just as he intended.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
DungeonmasterCal wrote:

Now he wants to start a PFS game here at one of our FLGS'. I've never played Society, and if he's the GM I'm not sure I'm going to get involved with it. Society seems far too rigid to me, and with decisions like the ones he makes (my character's deafness is just one example of some of the things he does).

PFS is definitely worth giving a try. It's not nearly as open ended and free form as a real campaign, since you have to get through each adventure in 4-5 hours. But it also limits GMs from doing dick moves like what this guy pulled on you.

If nothing else, playing in a public venue like that might be a good chance to meet some other gamers in the area, and join a different group if you want to leave the one run by this guy.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Occultists actually seem to make good front liners. I don't speak from experience, as I haven't seen them in actual play much. But I've been designing a couple of occultist PCs lately, and between the 3/4 BAB, d8 HD, medium armor, martial weapons, and lots of buffs from their focus powers and spells, they seem like they should be at least as good on the front line as any other 3/4 BAB class. Add in a reach weapon and a high enough int for Combat Expertise, which is the prereq for Improved Trip, and you should be golden.

Check out my post here for what I was thinking of for two possible occultists for PFS, one of which is melee focused.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Andrew Roberts wrote:
Fromper wrote:

I haven't really looked at the spiritualist yet, but I've been looking at occultists lately as a possibility for my next PC.

It took a little time to wrap my head around it, but now that I understand the class, building a weapon focused occultist (melee or archery) doesn't seem like it would be that difficult. It's trying to figure out how to build one that doesn't revolve around weapons in combat that's hurting my brain.

Well, nothing in PF is exactly differential equations, but I would definitely call it complex when compared to other classes in PF. ;)

** spoiler omitted **

I'm leaning towards doing multiple occultists. I'm thinking a front liner, a pure caster, and maybe a pure necromancer later, with the necroccultist archetype, though that one's on hold, because it would require studying the necromancy spell list in detail to come up with a good design.

Occultist Builds:

Have you looked at the Haunt Collector archetype from Horror Adventures? It gives up the circles and summoning stuff for outsiders in order to create your own temporary haunts. Not something you'll do regularly, but neither is the stuff it's replacing.

More importantly, it doesn't give up any implements like most archetypes, but it does optionally let get some of the medium class's sceance bonuses instead of the resonant powers on some of your implements. So if you weren't going to use a particular resonant power anyway, trade it out for +2 on your weapon damage rolls, or your spell damage rolls, or your spell/class ability healing. That +2 on weapon damage makes it a GREAT archetype for weapon focused occultists, as long as you weren't planning to go Battle Host archetype instead (they don't stack).

That's actually my plan for a front line occultist - elf or half-elf with an elven curve blade (I've wanted to do a front liner with that one before, but never got around to it). I'll take Transmutation and Divination at level 1, Abjuration at level 2, but replace the Abjuration resonant power with medium's Champion sceance boon, for +2 on all weapon damage rolls for life. I'll probably take mostly Transmutation buffs as resonant powers to self buff in combat. Mental Focus would also go heavily into Divination for both the resonant power and swift action base power, which seems like a nice little bonus in combat. And use that elven favored class bonus for extra Mental Focus to be able to afford all that. All in all, a pretty easy build once you get past the initial roadblock of understanding the class.

For my pure caster, I'm thinking of skipping Transmutation altogether, even though it's clearly the best implement/school, just to avoid redundancy with the front liner. There are plenty of other good schools to take. I could do Conjuration early for cure spells and summoning minions at low level, Enchantment for the spells (Daze cantrip for something to do all day in combat at low levels), Illusion for defense and that early entry Minor Image, and Divination for out of combat scouting/utility. Also an elf, because that favored class bonus is too good to give up. And I'm thinking of going skill monkey/utility caster primarily with this, so the Breadth of Experience feat would work well for +2 on all knowledge checks and ability to roll untrained knowledges on a high int PC.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Quote:
Emotion Component: If a spell has listed that it requires a somatic component, for a psychic spellcaster that instead means that is has an emotion component. All this component really does is restrict when a psychic spellcaster can cast spells. If the psychic spellcaster is under any kind of non-harmless effect with the emotion or fear descriptors, then the psychic spellcaster cannot cast a spell with an emotion component at all as the effect interferes with spellcasting. Yes, this includes having the shaken condition from an intimidate check to demoralize.

And this is why all psychics, spiritualists, occultists, and mediums that focus on casting should walk around with potions of Remove Fear (50 gp). Mesmerists have a class ability to deal with this, I think starting at level 3.

Dark Archive ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

"Pharasma forbid! When the lady of graves commanded me to join the Pathfinder Society to hunt down undead in the ancient tombs we tend to explore, I'm sure she never intended me to work with such evil! And Norgorber?!? The god of murder!?!?! How could you even consider it?"

Sense Motive DC 27:
Julian is only pretending to be an inquisitor of Pharasma, and has an insane bluff check to back it up (that DC 27 is from taking 10 at level 5). He's actually an inquisitor of the Reaper of Reputations (Norgorber's aspect as the god of secrets).

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I have a pair of friends (a married couple) who are both 3 star GMs in PFS. They decided to switch to 5th edition D&D after buying School of Spirits, and deciding that learning a new edition was easier than figuring out how the NPC with the occult class in that adventure worked. I think they were expecting that kind of difficulty in GMing to come up more often in the future, so it wasn't just that the one scenario did something weird. It was more the expectation that this was becoming the norm.

I actually had a similar experience that almost drove me away from PFS. I didn't play much PFS in seasons 5 or 6, when most of my RPG time was spent GMing for a home group that kept things relatively simple, and didn't keep up with the latest and greatest books. I returned at the start of season 7, so the Advanced Class Guide, Pathfinder Unchained, and Occult Adventures had all been published while I wasn't paying attention, and I didn't know anything about them.

I played 7-01: Between the Lines at GenCon, then volunteered to GM it locally, only to be completely overwhelmed by players with the new classes at my table. Not to get into spoilers, but there's part of that scenario where the GM has to adjust the adventure based on what classes the group is playing, and I literally had no clue for 5 of the 6 PCs at my table whether they were full BAB, arcane casters, divine casters, etc. The paladin was the only class at the table that I knew anything about.

If I hadn't already been scheduled to GM again a week or two later, and felt bad dropping out of that commitment, I probably never would have GMed a Society game again. As is, my later game ran much smoother, and I realized the one bad experience was just a fluke. But it was a fluke based on the specific content of that scenario requiring a level of rules expertise that I didn't have at that time.

What we could probably use is disclaimers on the scenarios saying what level of difficulty they are for GMs. I know some of them already mention when they use material from a particular book in the product blurb, but I'm thinking we could use a more decisive disclaimer on adventures like those two.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I've been looking for a good excuse to do a Tsukiyo worshiper in PFS for a while now, but I already have too many divine PCs.

Silver Crusade ***

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Why is this just about evil deities? If we're talking about PCs worshiping non-PFS-legal deities, I'll mention a friend of mine who played an Aroden worshiper all the way to level 15 in PFS.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Numarak wrote:

My line of reasoning is simple: you declare full-round actions as a whole.

Except when you don't.

Core Rulebook wrote:


Deciding between an Attack or a Full Attack: After your first attack, you can decide to take a move action instead of making your remaining attacks, depending on how the first attack turns out and assuming you have not already taken a move action this round. If you've already taken a 5-foot step, you can't use your move action to move any distance, but you could still use a different kind of move action.

So under at least that circumstance, you can make part of a full round action, see how that part of it turns out, and then decide if you want to continue with the full round action or switch it out to be a different action type.

I'm not saying that spring attack necessarily allows for the same thing, but it's not quite as black and white as you're making it out to be. I could see arguments either way.

Personally, I tend to be a "nice GM", in that I usually rule in favor of the players in ambiguous rules scenarios. In this case, I'd probably rule that a PC could start moving, see if there's a target for their spring attack, and then decide if their movement so far was a move action or part of an SA. Of course, that's if a PC was trying to do it. But once our group decided that was the rule, it would apply for monsters and NPCs, as well.

Silver Crusade ***

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I have three siblings that started as a joke, based on the back story of my first PFS PC.

Venture-Captain "Mash" is a 14th level barbarian. His birth name is Reginald Bartholomew Brightsword VII, and he's the descendant of 6 generations of male paladins. His father desperately wanted a son to carry on the family tradition, but his wife gave birth to 6 daughters in a row. When the 7th child was finally a son, tons of pressure was put on young Reg to follow the family's footsteps, and he eventually snapped and rebelled. He became a barbarian instead, dropped the family name, and went by "Mash". He loves a good fight, but hated all the rules, so being a barbarian suits him. he's also nowhere near as stupid as he seems, but after years of being a disappointment to his father, he decided that it was better to be underestimated by everyone.

So when I later made a paladin and a cleric to good and holy gods, I ended up making them Mash's older sisters.

Sister Isabella Maria Victoria Brightsword is a priestess of Sarenrae (cleric 9), and the youngest of the 6 Brightsword sisters. Mash is her only younger sibling. She was actually my second Society PC, because I wanted to make a cleric, and a friend jokingly suggested that I should make her Mash's older sister. She's also the first female PC I've ever played in a table top RPG, though I've made several more in PFS since then.

Catherine Elizabeth Cassandra Brightsword is the eldest of the siblings, and a paladin of Iomedae. She had already begun he paladin training before Mash was born, and insisted on not giving it up now that there was a boy to carry on the family tradition instead. I haven't played her much, though, as she's kinda boring, and I later made a much more interesting paladin PC, so Catherine's only level 2.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The one page or so that I wrote above for this particular question will be formatted nicely in MS Word. It'll definitely be easier for a GM to skim than the wall of text above.

And it's not like I'll hand them the sheet and walk away. If they want me to summarize it verbally, I can say, "Basically, I've got these two feats" *point at the quotes on the page* "One lets my thrown weapon bounce back to me after every attack. The other lets me bounce it off two enemies with each throw. Can I combine them to bounce it off two enemies and then have it return to me at the end?"

And then the GM can decide how much thought they want to put into it. I'll have the page there, along with the pages from the book with the full feat descriptions, for them to read if they're interested in doing so.

It's really not that difficult. The key is to put a little prep into it, so you have everything in front of you to show the GM, depending on how much detail they want to see.

Silver Crusade ***

2 people marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
That question really is email it ahead of time level of complicated.

If possible, yes. But I don't think it's THAT complex.

I have a PC that will use this combo once I hit 6. He's only level 1 at the moment, and actually Core, until I eventually start taking feats from the Weapon Masters Handbook and convert him to standard, so I'm nowhere near that far yet. As Hilary suggested, I'll probably do a quick write-up to hand to GMs before the session begins to warn them this is coming and give them a chance to think about it in advance. Maybe something like this:

Quote:

My PC is a thrown weapon specialist, and utilizes the feats Ricochet Toss, Startoss Style, Startoss Comet, and eventually Startoss Shower from the Weapon Master's Handbook. See attached printouts of the pages from WMH for those feats.

There has been much debate on the Paizo forums about how (and if) Ricochet Toss works with the Startoss feats, with no definitive answer. So for now, this is a question for each individual GM to rule on.

Here's the relevant text from each feat description:

Ricochet Toss: "When you make a ranged attack with an appropriate thrown weapon, the weapon returns to your hand immediately after the attack is resolved"

Startoss Comet: "As a standard action, you can make a single ranged thrown weapon attack at your full attack bonus with the chosen weapon. If you hit, you deal damage normally and can make a second attack (at your full attack bonus) against a target within one range increment of the first."

So Ricochet Toss makes the thrown weapon bounce back to the thrower after an attack, while Startoss Comet bounces the weapon off the first target to hit a second target. Startoss Shower just adds a 3rd (and eventually subsequent) attack to the Startoss Comet.

The question is whether these can be used in combination to bounce a weapon off of two enemies, and then have it return to the thrower.

Interpretation #1:
Some people think that the Ricochet Toss would kick in after the first attack, so the thrower can either use Ricochet Toss to get the weapon back after the first attack OR use Startoss Comet to bounce the weapon to a second target, but they can't bounce the weapon off multiple targets and then get it back.

Interpretation #2:
Since using a feat is optional, some people think that the thrower can skip using Ricochet Toss on the first attack, and have it kick in after the second attack of the Startoss Comet is resolved. Or some people consider the entire Startoss Comet to be a single special attack, even though it attacks multiple targets, so the Ricochet Toss would kick in after the whole thing is resolved. Either way, these interpretations allow the thrower to bounce the weapon off of multiple targets before it returns to their hand.

Either way, I can just use Ricochet Toss to full attack normally, with the weapon returning to me after each throw, and the Startoss feats will each give me a +2 damage bonus. So they're not wasted feats, no matter how the GM decides this works at their table.

How's that for a single page explanation to hand the GM 5 minutes before the game?

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.

"I'm continually amazed at how often we get screwed by you not being pedantic enough."

LOL

But what happened to Roy and Elan? Aren't they supposed to still be on the ship with the crew?

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, with the 10 foot reach from the tongue and a racial wisdom bonus, they could be fun as a "bad touch" cleric, without having to tank on the front line quite as much as most. If I didn't already have a bad touch cleric in PFS, I'd probably go for that.

I really love the flavor of the Princely alternate racial trait. I'm just picturing this 2 foot tall frog walking around with a rapier and crown, charming people with his diplomacy skill. Given the dex bonus, maybe a swashbuckler or something, though that wastes the free rapier proficiency. The social skill bonuses are still cool, though.

Maybe a Princely divine caster (cleric, warpriest, inquisitor) with Weapon Finesse, to finesse the rapier and make use of the racial dex and wis bonuses.

The flavor of playing a humanoid frog is awesome - I just need to decide what to do with it mechanically.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
CBDunkerson wrote:
Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
You can't use a Swift Action to use Lay On Hands on yourself and remove the Nauseated condition via Mercies,

So Paladins have an ability that cannot be used?

They can't use it on themselves, but they can use it on their allies. Just like the mercies for the Shaken condition and Diseases, which they're immune to.

Darksol is correct about the RAW rules.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Are they legal only for goblin PCs?

Silver Crusade ***

4 people marked this as a favorite.

True. Only sylphs can cast Windy Escape.

And Nosig and I both know that any GM that won't let you take 10 on the spellcraft check is wrong about the rules. But that won't stop them from being wrong and not allowing it.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tyler Reid wrote:

(Spellcraft checks will be assumed successful for now)

Just wanted to respond to this part, since nobody else did yet. You can take 10 on those spellcraft checks, so nobody should ever fail, or have to roll, as long as they put a rank into it every couple of levels.

Silver Crusade ***

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I guess we can put that back on topic:

You know you're in trouble when...

... the GM makes you roll a perception check to notice that the rest of the party left without you.

... when one of the players brings his nephew along, who is new to the game, has ADHD, and just wants to bash monsters with a warhammer. (*whistles innocently and wonders if Wei Ji will notice this before playing at a table with my nephew and I tomorrow*)

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

And despite all the negativity, there has been some positive discussion in this thread. For instance, before this, I never would have even considered a single level dip in fallen Paladin or int dumped wizard. These obviously don't work as full classes, but there have been suggestions here for how both can be used as a useful single level dip on an oddball, yet playable, PC.

And others (myself included) have shared similar build suggestions, like my single level dip in a charisma casting class with a 7 cha PC.

Silver Crusade ***

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Neriathale wrote:

One question that intrigues me reading this - when you sit down at a table do you expect to know what class(es)/archetype(s)/race etc the other characters are?

Or do you assume that the guy in armour with an earthbreaker is some sort of warrior, and not an Int-dumping wizard, until he does something to demonstrate his weird build?

I like to introduce some of my characters without mentioning their class at all. We've had this discussion before, and I had some good examples there. From that thread, here's how some of my PCs introduce themselves (after I give a physical description). See if you can guess what class each one is.

1. "My name is Misaki. I'm a warrior these days, I guess."
2. "I'm Sister Isabella, priestess of Sarenrae."
3. "My name is Celia, priestess of Gozreh."
4. "I am Qassir, dervish swordsman from Qadira." (said in a vaguely faux-Arabian accent)
5. "My... name... is... Varg. ... Please... ac-cept... this... rose... from... the... church... of... She-lyn." *hands out small, hand crafted wood carvings of roses* (This is after describing him as a big guy in heavy armor with weapons)
6. "My name is Boon Sai Hong, and I am the greatest quarterstaff master in all of Golarion!" A monkey jumps on to Boon's shoulder and hits him on the back of the head. "Hey! Stop that! ... And this furball is Po Po. He helps... supposedly."
7. "I'm Green Beard the Pirate, because what else would you call a half-orc pirate?"
8. "My name is Erevel Heldanlissil, archer extraordinaire. We elves know how to shoot bows properly, unlike you... lower races, so pay attention, and you might learn something."

Hint: That last one is the only one that's Core.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Quevven wrote:
Katisha wrote:
Edit: by the way, I personally would consider any wizard with an INT below 16 to be "dumb wizard"... it is below the level I would consider the minimum. But if someone asked about one, I would pull out a couple...

Side question: What do all of you think is the minimum useable casting stat?

Reason I ask is I tend to count out the attribute adjustments (the every 4 level ones) to figure out when I would need that 19 to cast the 9th level spells, and thus tend to use 15's...

As others have said, I'd worry more about save DC's than getting 9th level spells. Most PCs don't get to that high level, and a lot of casting classes don't get that many spells. Besides, you should assume headbands as well as 4 level bumps, so getting to a 19 casting stat really isn't that hard.

For any PC that's worried about save DCs, I've always put at least a 17 in my casting stat up front. I tend to min/max, playing races with the right racial boost to get a 19 or 20. But I'll settle for 17 or 18 if the race doesn't get the right race bonus for that casting class, and I've got a good reason for playing that race despite that.

But for buff/heal types that don't worry about that, and/or secondary casters (usually with less than 9 levels of casting), I seem to usually end up with 14 as the starting casting stat. For instance, my front liner druid, warpriest, and huntmaster inquisitor all have exactly 14 wisdom. It's enough to cast my buffs, and I can bump it up with a headband later.

I even have a 12 on one PC that just gets a little casting from multi-classing and doesn't really focus on it. And as mentioned above, I'll be dipping a level of a cha casting class for a PC with 7 charisma, but that dip is for other class abilities, not the spells.

This is mostly based on my 24 PFS characters, along with advice in helping others build PCs here and there.

Silver Crusade ***

4 people marked this as a favorite.

I guess this would be a good time to (once again) repost my PC building criteria:

Quote:

When I make a new PC, I try to answer 4 questions (used to be 3, but I ended up with a couple of boring PCs, so added a 4th):

1. What's this character's specialty in combat? As long as the PC can do something that helps the party succeed in a fight, this can be anything, not just dealing damage, but make sure you're actually good at whatever this is. You don't have to be uber-optimized, but make sure you can contribute.

2. What does this character do in combat when they're specialty isn't an option? This is things like having a ranged weapon even though your character is a melee beast, or an enchantment based character having something they can do when facing mindless foes. Also, everyone should try to get some splash weapons for use against swarms, though that might have to wait until after your first adventure to be able to afford it.

3. What does this character do outside of combat? This isn't just for personality, this is also making sure you have something useful to contribute between fights. Sometimes, it's diplomacy or other face skills, even if it's just enough of a bonus to be the "aid another" guy behind the main face. Sometimes, it's knowledges, sense motive, stealth, or whatever other skills could come in handy between fights.

4. What personality traits will you be able to actively portray at the table? The above 3 questions are designed to make a playable PC by giving them something useful to do in most situations. This question was added afterwards to make a fun character. I had a couple of PCs that were mechanically interesting, but didn't have a personality. Or they had a detailed back story, but that didn't really give me something to role play at the table. This is about giving your PC personality, whether it's a distinctive voice, an obsession that you can play up, or whatever other quirk makes the PC fun to play.

You'll note that "Does this PC do what people expect from that class?" is NOT one of my criteria.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yup.

Potion of darkvision - 300 gp. Great for any rogue that wasn't born with it.

Or pick up scrolls for only 150 gp, and hope you have a party member that can cast it on you.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

There are plenty of people who generate enough spam just casting Summon Monster spells. Having one combat animal that replaces the one who died/retreated/was sacrificed to the gods for good luck on the missions/whatever doesn't seem excessive to me.

But again, I'd call this an "expect table variation" question. Nobody should be planning in advance to do this often enough to need a definite ruling.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't think V ever had an evil alignment. S/he has always been neutral, but made a VERY evil mistake that was worthy of a major GM warning and redemption arc to come back from it.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Sometimes I think Belkar's the smartest member of the time. But the raven's probably got him beat.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Blackbot wrote:

A had completly forgotten that o_o

Another problem: That feature is hidden in a question discussing scribing between players, suggesting that the last sentence applies to PC wizards. Which is obviously not the case.

witches definitely can

I always picture it looking like this

I always picture the two familiars sniffing each other's butts. Maybe I've just spent too much time around dogs in my life.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

No, Profession: Murderhobo is what Pathfinders actually do. Profession: Archaeologist is what Pathfinders are theoretically supposed to do.

Silver Crusade ***

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Or there's the occasional possibility of using non-social skills to avoid a combat. I once skipped two encounters in a PFS adventure with a really good profession: sailor roll.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

As others have mentioned, I'd be curious to know what adventures the OP has played. There are plenty of dungeon crawls in the early seasons, but more recent adventures (especially season 7) have seemed to focus much more on skills and diplomacy than those early seasons.

Yes, running out of spells for the day is always going to be a concern for spellcasters, especially at low level. Spend your first 2 prestige on a wand of Magic Missile, and your sorcerer will always have something to do. Actually, I recently saw a level 2 wizard dominate a 1-2 with a wand of Color Spray. You'd think DC 11 wouldn't work often enough to bother, but the bad guys had such low will saves that he was knocking half the enemies out to start every encounter, then running away while us beat sticks mopped up the remainder.

And it's been a while since I've posted this, so here's my general character building advice that I post every couple of months around here:

When I make a new PC, I try to answer 4 questions (used to be 3, but I ended up with a couple of boring PCs, so added a 4th):

1. What's this character's specialty in combat? As long as the PC can do something that helps the party succeed in a fight, this can be anything, not just dealing damage, but make sure you're actually good at whatever this is. You don't have to be uber-optimized, but make sure you can contribute.

2. What does this character do in combat when they're specialty isn't an option? This is things like having a ranged weapon even though your character is a melee beast, or an enchantment based character having something they can do when facing mindless foes. Also, everyone should try to get some splash weapons for use against swarms, though that might have to wait until after your first adventure to be able to afford it.

3. What does this character do outside of combat? This isn't just for personality, this is also making sure you have something useful to contribute between fights. Sometimes, it's diplomacy or other face skills, even if it's just enough of a bonus to be the "aid another" guy behind the main face. Sometimes, it's knowledges, sense motive, or whatever other skills could come in handy between fights.

4. What personality traits will you be able to actively portray at the table? The above 3 questions are designed to make a playable PC by giving them something useful to do in most situations. This question was added afterwards to make a fun character. I had a couple of PCs that were mechanically interesting, but didn't have a personality. Or they had a detailed back story, but that didn't really give me something to role play at the table. This is about giving your PC personality, whether it's a distinctive voice, an obsession that you can play up, or whatever other quirk makes the PC fun to play.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Cenorin wrote:
You're on a Tier 5-9 diplomatic mission, and the question "who's the party face?" is met with blank stares.

Yeah, I had one of those once. The GM warned us that we should bring PCs with social skills, and the rest of the group just didn't have any. So having a choice of PCs, I brought my battle oracle, since he has some charisma and diplomacy skill, though in an emergency, he can only speak Infernal, due to the tongues curse.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Avril Axiel wrote:
Do you mean the x next to the new markers? That doesn't prevent the thread from taking up half the screen, i otherwise can't find an ø button.

No, there's an O with a line through it (like a theta), to the right of the last post date/time. If you click that, the thread stops showing at all.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Obviously, the most damage is done to the party's enemies by the wizard who casts Haste on both of them.

Silver Crusade ***

5 people marked this as a favorite.

"I'm not that kind of bard" is actually a pretty common refrain around here.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
KingOfAnything wrote:

1053: Over the Edge

What kind of bird can't fly?

Dodos, turkeys, ostriches, middle fingers...

I wonder if this joke might not translate well for readers whose native language isn't English.

Silver Crusade ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

... when you're playing a season 4 scenario with mostly level 1 PCs, and the only healing is a couple of CLW potions.

True story. When I GMed Night March of Kalkamedes, they had to turn back and go get healing before they even got to the tough part of the adventure.

1 to 50 of 966 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.