|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I read a fair number of Dark Horse comics. Have you guys ever thought of putting out a RotRL or Pathfinder inspired comic, possibly teaming up with DH? The DH artists are pretty good, and they really put out some quality stuff. You could even do a rendition of a Gamemastery Module (like, Entombed with the Pharoahs) using the iconics as the protagonists. Or...even a comic for Eando's adventures, or a comic tracing Valeros' early adventures or upbringing. You guys have created such a rich world, the possibilities are endless. You could start with a small limited print run, like 3 or 5 issues, to see how well it sells. I for one would definitely pick this up. Aside from me, would anyone else be interested in such a thing? Jodah wrote: Oh, ye gods, do I love Low-level play. Me too. PCs aren't decked out in umpteen magical items and don't have adventure breaking powers/spells/abilities, etc. They are forced to rely on their wits, not their equipment or latest splatbook superpower. Life is cheap and death is always just a good dice roll away. PCs are just as likely to kill their opponents as they are to go down in a heap. I heart low level play. Jodah wrote: villains dont have to be archmages, overwhelming numbers, or a strength score of 30- they just need a bad hat and a 'gator I totally agree. Really looking forward to seeing this guy in action. I wonder if he talks with a cajun accent? Or has a wad of "chaw" in his mouth, and he spits black goop frequently? He just looks dirty, and it's awesome. I think a gnome druid would be awesome. It matches with their close relationship to fey and all things wild. It would be a great showcase for Golarion gnomes. Maybe he or she is painted in blue woad, and carries bits of animal bones on him like quasi-magical fetishes. Human monk....always cool. I liked Paizo's STAP monk iconic, can't wait to see what else they pull out of their hat. Weighing in late here, I'm glad Scribe gave Rodney some props here. For a long time, it has been a permeating sentiment that "the people at WotC don't care about us, blah blah blah." It was also wondered aloud by many whether any "WotC folk" ever perused these boards. I've skimmed over your multiple posts Rodney, and seriously, thank you. Amidst all the 4e furor, it's really nice to read something honest and plainly stated by someone in the know. I think you've done wonders in terms of quashing some of the anti-4e hysteria that has been clogging up these boards for some time. I can understand the requests for anonymity, but really, I think one of the main aims of this contest was to develop/discover new talent, and build a small fan base for the Superstars so people actually *buy* the adventure that's produced. The adventure created will be based on the adventure outline submitted. I don't think removing the names of the contestants is an option at this point. Honestly, I expect big things from all 4 of the finalists, regardless of the actual winner. I've also seen some real standouts in the other finalists, and hope to see their work published later on as well. Muad Halmnerious wrote:
ooh, I'm sorry to be the one to break this to you, but the print run for both magazines has ended. Paizo was producing them under a license from Wizards of the Coast (the company that owns the intellectual property rights to D&D). Those licenses were pulled some time ago. Paizo now produces the amazing Pathfinder series, and Wolfgang Baur (whose name you might be familiar with from many adventures in the pages of Dungeon magazine) has started the excellent Kobold Quarterly. Wizards of the Coast has something now called "Dragon" but it's online only, not a print magazine, is only accessible on their website, and thus far has been very underwhelming in terms of quality. Hope that helps. You kind of came in at the end of an era my friend. But, welcome to the boards in any event! EDIT: Of course, you can still attempt to pick up and collect back issues of Dragon and Dungeon through the Paizo store. I like the savage bard for flavor reasons. The urban druid has seen a lot of NPC use in some of my games. In a similar vein, I came up with an urban druid variant that a PC used in an urban mini-campaign. I like the concept of the variant monk styles, so I also came up with a new monk style. Those are the real standouts for me. SirUrza wrote:
Respectfully, I disagree. They're only *just stormtroopers* if you portray them as *just stormtroopers.* In a similar vein, the Paizo staff got some flack early on for their portrayal of the first batch of iconics - i.e. that they didn't have flashy new feats and weren't built to the most optimal/munchkin standards. I like the way they took a very "basic" approach, used mainly core materials, and yet built highly distinguished and interesting characters. Mike McArtor wrote:
See, this is an approach I could come to adore. I'm _sick_ of prestige classes. You can customize a character so much with *just* distinct equipment, backstory, etc. You don't need a prestige class for every little role in the world. Mike McArtor wrote: An entire PF adventure path devoted to psionics is not going to happen. We'll continue to look for a way of putting out something psionic-related that won't kill our bottom line, though. :) Yikes, an entire Psionic AP would not be my cup of tea (and wouldn't be for alooooot of other folks I'm guessing.) But, I would like to see (**Very Sparingly**) the occasional use of psionics in Golarion. With all the Cthulu references that have already slipped in, one of the freaky monsters That Should Not Be that somehow slip into our reality could have psionic powers. Some tear in the fabric of reality produces an alien menace from some dark, twisted Far Realm. It exhibits magic unlike anything anyone has ever seen or heard of before. One singular monster in an entire 6 part AP with psionic powers might be a good way to shake things up, and even the psionic haters out there couldn't really complain. (As long as enough information was printed so that anyone could run the monster effectively and comfortably, regardless of their comfort level with psionics.) And this is coming from a guy that doesn't really like psionics at all. I just think it would be a fresh twist, and I would love to be able to stare at an overconfident player and tell them that dispel magic _simply_does_not_work_. I just have a quick question (sorry if this has been answered before, I did some quick searching but couldn't find an answer). I loved RotRL and want to keep the ball rolling into CotCT. I subscribed to PF #1-6, do I need to re-up my subscription? Or will I automatically keep receiving more PF goodness? Shisumo wrote:
It doesn't necessarily have to be a new class. We might just see another wizard or sorcerer iconic. Hunterofthedusk wrote:
I like the item, but I think the pricing is off. I think it would cost closer to 1,000 gp. as a permanent item. Also, an interesting twist might be that the prism material component required is part of the eyeglass material itself. And if eyeglasses are too anachronistic for your D&D, this could easily be a single lens too. YMMV secretturchinman wrote:
In 3.5, yeah....they kind of got the short end of the stick. They have potential though. Here's to hoping they aren't as lame in 4e. Blackfeather Cloak These long, elegant cloaks are made entirely of black Corvus feathers, complete with a high crested collar that doubles as a hood. Rare and sacred to many shamans of the plains, these cloaks are often symbols of elite religious status. Any character wearing a Blackfeather Cloak may use the spell feather fall once per day. Additionally, once per day the wearer may fill the skies with a torrent of scattered black down, forming a nearly impenetrable cloud of feathers that obscures vision. The effects are identical to the spell obscuring mist. Faint conjuration and transmutation; CL 2nd; Craft Wondrous Item, feather fall , obscuring mist; Price 800 gp; Weight 3 lbs. Mothman wrote:
Me too. They're probably just craaaaazy busy. I think they're all working on separate projects right now, IIRC. Lilith wrote: I would certainly give him bonuses to Knowledge (religion) on Lamashtu. As far as a creature's special abilities, that's not something I would reveal unless a creature has particular ties to Lamashtu, or appears in Lamashtu's mythos. Agreed. I might also give him nightmares. Some things are best left undisturbed . . . I think he looks great. Well done guys. I'm not usually a fan of bards, but I can't wait to see how you guys develop him further. Maybe, if his flute doubled as a weapon . . . like if a certain note is blown, a shortspear blade springs forth from the flute's end, or whenever he plays a certain shrill note, a poisoned blowgun needle is shot out . . . he has potential. I like the mischievous look in his eye. Arctaris wrote:
Yeah, Richard Pett just wrote a FANTASTIC article about Liches and you can....oh...um....whoops. Nevermind Nick. Sean Mahoney wrote:
It will be a fully rendered, professional product that is only open to patrons. Rambling Scribe wrote: That wouldn't be Jeff Alvarez would it? Jeff is Paizo's Director of Operations, so if it's him, then I guess they have kept in touch. I thought about that, but they have different listings on the RPG Database....so I assumed they were different people.... If they are the same person, he needs to get back to writing adventures, pronto! Last night I was flipping through some of my favorite old Dungeon mags, and I came across The Elfwhisper in Issue #90, penned by J.C. Alvarez. Elfwhisper is one of my favorite adventures - kind of an overlooked gem. Looking Mr. Alvarez up - I see that he did another article for Dragon, and has done some work for Mongoose Publishing, but not much else I can find. Have you guys at Paizo kept in touch with him? Any plans to ever have him write a GM module or pathfinder chapter? (Completely random, I know - I was just wondering.) Matthew Morris wrote:
Awesome - you won't be disappointed. Wolfgang's genius binds the project all together, and he designed two of the six fantastic side trek adventures himself. He also had two well known industry authors each write an adventure (I won't ruin the surprise). Valmiras (from the boards here) co-wrote another of the adventures with Wolfgang, as did I. (So, obviously I'm biased.) Looks to be a really good set of stand alone adventures, that can be run together into an Arabian campaign if you want.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|

