|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
This is not quite true; they also reprinted the spell and magic item compendia, which were generally not open content. [And, as PDFs, they've released a lot of 3.5 non-open books.]
One needs to put "http://" in the URL, or the website thinks the link is relative.
Interjection Games wrote:
Interjection Games is proud to announce the Interjection Blog, a hub for free expansion content to IG classes, news on upcoming IG releases, random gaming musings, and whatever else seems like a good idea at the time.
This one's my favorite, and it's probably the most flavorful and creative. I even tried to come up with a name for it, although it's probably something obscene in Nahuatl.
Cuahumatque (Forest Guardian):
CUAHUMATQUE (FOREST GUARDIAN) (amalgam couatl/treant)
NG Huge plant
Init +4; Senses darkvision 60 ft., detect chaos/evil/good/law, low-light vision; Perception +13
When viewed plainly, this creature looks like a huge winged serpent with arms that has been carved from wood, although usually its arms and wings are held close to its body. It then resembles a tree branch or large vine.
The name doesn't mean forest guardian; it's a weird amalgamation of tree ("cuahuitl"?) and wise man ("tlamatque"?).
I removed the trample ability because, well, it didn't make sense to me when the creature didn't have any legs. The transition from outsider to plant made it lose a lot of skills. It made more sense to me for this creature to have access to druid spells, rather than cleric spells. I kept the Improved Sunder feat chain because of the double damage against objects special quality. And, as before, I didn't recalculate save DCs.
The previous creatures have ended up as "the bigger creature, with a few added goodies". These next two are a bit trickier to resolve; they involve stranger monster types and more special abilities.
I'm also bad at naming things, so these monster names are more descriptions than names.
ABYSSAL HORROR (amalgam hezrou/aboleth)
CE Huge outsider (aquatic, chaotic, demon, evil, extraplanar)
Init +4; Senses darkvision 60 ft.; Perception +20
Aura mucus cloud (5 ft.) in water, stench (10 rounds) in air
A huge, vaguely humanoid shape with twisted frog-like features and four grasping tentacles, it corrupts its surroundings even more quickly and thoroughly than its hezrou cousins.
This one has lots of SLAs. The stats seem to end up at about CR 10, but the combo of projected image and chaos hammer/unholy blight might bump it up to 11. Of course, "amphibious aboleth" should probably scare anyone with half an imagination.
I didn't recalculate save DCs. I can do that if I ever use it. :-)
And now for something completely predictable.
ALICORN (amalgam unicorn/pegasus)
CG Large magical beast
Init +3; Senses darkvision 60 ft., detect evil, detect good, low-light vision, scent; Perception +11
Aura magic circle against evil
This looks like a unicorn with wings, and not a pegasus with a horn. There are subtle cosmetic differences.
The alicorn should technically have a bite, I think, but it'd be relatively weak (1d3 base damage), and I have trouble picturing it using a gore and a bite in the same full attack, so I left it out.
I wanted to merge two humanoids together this time, with a few special abilities.
TROME (amalgam troll/gnome)
CN Large humanoid (giant, gnome)
Init +0; Senses darkvision 60 ft., low-light vision, scent; Perception +10
This 14-foot-tall humanoid is strong and has sharp claws, but it not quite as ugly as its troll cousins. They tend to have widely varying and colorful skin tones, hair colors, and eye colors.
I didn't include the gnome's spell-like abilities, both for simplicity and because the default creature has a Charisma of 9. I think that defensive training and hatred could be dropped without much loss; I kept them in because that's what the template said.
Changing size seems to drop Dex, and thus AC, by a lot. Adding a suit of hide armor might bring its AC up to a more expected value for its CR.
Beware the trome illusionists!
First, I thought I would start out simple, and merge two animals together. I'll pick two differently-sized animals, two animals no one in their right mind would ever merge together: a bear and an owl. I give you:
BEAROWL (amalgam grizzly bear/owl familiar)
N Large animal
Init +1; Senses low-light vision, scent; Perception +9
This monster appears as a bear, with the hind legs and wings of an owl, and owl-like features on its head.
This creature turned out similarly to a griffon, or an owlbear.
Note that the bearowl is an animal, and not a magical beast. It has both claws and talons, but one should probably have it attack with claws on the ground, and talons in the air. Only rarely should both be used in a full attack.
I've been playing around with the amalgam template from Advanced Bestiary, trying to get used to how it works, and I came up with a few creatures. Feel free to check to see if I used the template correctly, if the stats look good (especially CR), and how you might tweak them.
Also, feel free to post your own amalgams!
Note: I can't guarantee all the numbers add up correctly. In particular, I probably messed up CMB and CMD, and I may have forgotten to add in class skill bonuses on some of the creatures. I also didn't reiterate special ability wordings, unless the special ability changed significantly.
Andrew Eakett wrote:
Thanks. Before you send anything, though, I'd like to see if someone (Paizo?) has a complete archive. How many do you have?
<I couldn't resist>
So I am currently running a campaign and I thought it may be a good idea to have displayable heath bars for the PCs/NPCs for combat.
If I were a player, I'd probably eat mine, and my character would die quickly.
</I couldn't resist>
[Except for the thread title, you were remarkably consistent.]
It's a neat feat... but it seems off a bit. When you summon from a chart of the Spells level you only get 1 creature not 1d3.
Normally, yes. Adding the ofuda template gives you more (since it makes the creature significantly weaker). The feat increases the number even further.
I'm looking to cook up a wall of wolves spell. [With the Legion of Folded Paper feat and a maximize metamgic rod, a maximized empowered summon monster vii gives ... 13 + 1d4/2 ofuda celestial wolves? Do I have that right?]
Cleric, Magic User, Fighting-man, Thief.
<old man>Bah, you young people and your "Thief"! It's blatant power creep. Also, we used to be able to search for traps, but now they had to add rules for it, and only these "Thieves" can do it. I blame MMOs. Now get off my lawn...
(Spell slots are per adventure! And all weapons do 1d6 damage!)</old man>
More seriously, I've always wanted to try the Expert/Spellcaster/Warrior generic classes from Unearthed Arcana.
The worst roll you could possibly get is all 1s. While that is nearly impossible, let's say that someone does get this result. At Level 14, this means you've rolled 14 1s.
Actually, the worst roll you could possibly get is all even numbers. That's an autofail.
Edit: Whoops, I'm wrong. I forgot about division. Still, I'm not convinced all 1s is the worst roll. Not that it makes much difference; the worst roll is still pretty good.
Actually, psionics debuted in First Edition. It just didn't get its own book, being integrated into the PHB and DMG. You can even find entries for psionic abilities as a standard part of the stat block for 1E monsters.
Actually, psionics showed up in Eldritch Wizardry, the third supplement for the white box. And I'm not going to guarantee that's the first place they showed up, either.
If I'm understanding the rules correctly, I think I can prove it's impossible. (Edit: Then again, this is 6 a.m. math.)
[getting past the avatar picture]
Now that I've proven it to be impossible, someone will go ahead and do it. :-)
Lyra Amary wrote:
Only if you consider that a problem. Some people may want to play characters who can defeat the published gods. And "above CR 30" is a big range; I'd imagine some gods are more powerful than others. There may also be creatures (out in the vastness of the planes, perhaps) that are to gods as a t.rex is to us humans.
If people enjoy that sort of thing, why call it "pointless" and a "problem"?
20th level is not enough for some players? The game is absolutely ludicrous at those levels. Add Mythic levels onto 20th level, and it gets ever worse. I guess there's never enough power creep for some folks.
So, badwrongfun then?
I'm not sure you're using "power creep" the way most people use it.
Edit: Also, if you're into epic, I don't think you'll be creeping up to power, but grasping it with both hands!