Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Psionic

Dennis Baker's page

RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor. Pathfinder Adventure Path, Roleplaying Game Subscriber. FullStarFullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 2,449 posts (11,858 including aliases). 43 reviews. 2 lists. 1 wishlist. 8 Pathfinder Society characters. 12 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 2,449 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Axial wrote:
Skeld wrote:
Axial wrote:
Why is it that the archetypes aren't useful for PCs? Are they...overpowered or something? Or can they just not be used with 0HD characters?

Because this is a Monster/GM book. It's not meant for PCs.

-Skeld

But WHY can they not be used by PCs? Is there something mechanical preventing them from being used?

There is no reason players can't take them. Some might have abilities or powers that assume racial abilities though.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Crystal Frasier wrote:
Sutter tells the truth on this: I am rad.

That pretty much sums it up.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

14 people marked this as a favorite.

Office romances are different at Paizo I see...

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Maybe it's just a bunch of bored people trying to hit up PaizoChat while waiting in line for their new iPhones :D

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm sure they will be in tomorrow morning during business hours. They only come in during the evening hours when posts are flagged because you know... they have lives.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I've always thought of throwers as crossover characters that should be good in melee and at close range which isn't really the archer schtick. If you are close, you stab em, if you are far you throw a knife. If you kill someone you throw a dagger at his cousin. You build around melee and only spend one or two feats on throwing.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Gah! How did I miss stinking cloud, dimension door, and teleport... I must have been dozing off.

The point isn't that magus doesn't have a good spell list, their spell list is fairly narrow and misses key spells. Not sure what you mean by "pull away", but fear and confusion are pretty much mainstay spells. Sleep? Summon Monster?

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

AndIMustMask wrote:
you're either a martial or a caster--there's no middle ground.

Picking one path or the other is certainly easier.

Quote:
you're CERTAINLY more powerful on the spell end for EK by way of better spell list, but when you're spending more rounds dropping these amazing end-the-encounter spells (pits, clouds, tentacles, SoDs, etc.), why even carry a sword in the first place?

Again, it's not about optimizing. If it was, just go straight wizard.

Lots of those encounter ending spells don't entirely end encounters. Instead they massively change the odds. Instead of fighting 4 bad-guys you are fighting 1-2 and rather than waste a bunch more spells, the eldritch knight can just wade in and help finish the job. Spells are a limited resource in the game, stabs are not.

Also, being able to cast magic jar and take over a fire giant and smash a bunch of other fire giants is cool. Or being able to transform into a dragon and actually kick butt like a dragon.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

AndIMustMask wrote:
i still have to raise my question of how getting great spells later is a point in EK's favor--besides the obvious, naturally. they're supposed to be a combo of might+magic, but in the late game (where they pull ahead of the magus' spell progression) they're going to completely ignore melee anyway due to how much better spells are comparatively.

The way I would sum up your thought here is: "It's a better caster, but it doesn't matter." Which doesn't make any sense to me. If you feel wizards "win the game" because spells always win, you aren't playing either of these classes. When you pick one of these classes, you've already decided that you want to engage in melee and cast spells.

As for the magus being a comparable spellcaster at lower levels... maybe you should review their respective spell lists again. Casting charm person, sleep, create pit, fear, stinking cloud, confusion, dominate person, are very often vastly better options than fireball or shocking grasp. Guess who can't cast any of those? A magus can be invisible but can't see invisibility, nor can he teleport, dimension door, or stone shape; summoning even a minor ally is similarly outside his abilities. Tons of great combat spells are outside the magus's list and almost all the great utility spells are missing. There are a few levels where the magus comes close, but in general their spells are limited to evocation.

Saying one of these classes is better than the other is misleading, they are much more different than they appear at first. A magus is always going to be better at DPR, but the eldritch knight has options the magus lacks. Don't under-estimage the advantage that spell-list offers.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Quote:
what is the point of having a sword if your spells will do literally everything better for you?

Being an arcane spellcaster with the option to stab is never going to be the 'optimized' route. There are going to be martial characters who can out-stab you and straight spellcasters will have more powerful spells. If there is an advantage to the Eldritch Knight it is that he is more versatile. When you've run out of spells or when magic doesn't work, you still have interesting things you can do without burning your resources.

As for magus, I don't really see them as spellcasters. The majority of spellcasting they do is to enhance their melee combat. On whole the magus is much nicer in the lower middle levels... 4-8th level, where the knight is in it's awkward transition phase. Starting around 9-10th level, the knight's casting really starts to pull ahead of the magus and never looks back. The eldritch knight is unlikely to ever match the magus in melee due to spell combat, but he can wield a great sword or falchion which the magus can't. More important, the eldritch knight gains access to spells like dragon form and earlier access and more frequent castings of things like beast shape. Plus... tons of 7-9th level spells which the magus never sees.

Edit: IMO if you never reach 10th level, you are almost certainly better off playing magus due to the bumpy transition between wizard/ fighter and eldritch knight. I really wish it were laid out where the two missed caster levels were spread apart a lot more. Or perhaps drop the requirement for all martial weapon proficiency and have them lose 1st and 5th level casting.

The Exchange ** RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Glad you found the video helpful.

As far as blank maps goes, if you can't get copy/ paste going you are probably going to have to take a screenshot and work from there. Zoom in so it's as possible first.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

DungeonmasterCal wrote:
This is exactly the way I look at it. I don't care if the number crunching seems to indicate one class is more or less powerful than another. For me it's about fun and flavor. Play a rogue? Sure! Play an arcanist? You bet! I don't care how under powered some people believe the rogue to be, or how over powered some people think the arcanist to be. I don't give a fig about the math; I play for fun.

To be honest, my frustrations with the rogue/ monk are more about the fact that they are very tricky to master. They call this newest book the "Advanced Class Guide", but it's much easier to make a slayer or swashbuckler who is able to fill the rogue's role in combat than it is to build a good combat rogue friendly rogue.

When I see a newer player looking at the rogue or the monk, it bugs me not because I'm pretty certain they are going to struggle to get what they want out of them.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Mystically Inclined wrote:

I think Marroar is trying to say that sorcerers are viable (they still 'function just fine') but are inferior (for reasons given in the rest of the post).

I don't agree with this, btw. I think it's okay for the sorcerer to have a niche, and have them be superior in their particular niche.

I've never understood this sort of mentality. I honestly could care less if my character is the most powerful guy at the table. The only question I care about "Is it fun to play?"

I can understand the frustrations with the rogue and the monk because they can easily be outclassed by others doing what they are supposed to be great at and can seem like the 5th wheel in a party... the sorcerer? Maybe if you are completely horrible at picking spells. Of course if that's the case, wizard isn't going to be better.

The Exchange ** RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

...

Awesome. I'm a bit surprised Sewer Dragons beat out God's Market Gamble!!

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

4 people marked this as a favorite.

I've never had trouble making sorcerers that are fun and effective and this isn't going to change that. Bloodlines, racial favored class bonuses, and new items have made playing sorcerers far less painful then they were when the class was just a few known spells you could spam over and over.

For me, the arcanist will likely replace any future wizard characters I might make. I've always hated the spell prepared/ burned mechanic; the mechanic the arcanist uses is just much more natural to me.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Seems to me this post is more about a disconnect between your expectations of the game and treatment of monstrous creatures and that of your GM and fellow players.

It's very hard to play a redemption focused character when everyone else in the group is focused on killing everything you encounter. It's particularly difficult when the GM is running goblins and many enemies as irrevocably evil. I've run much of Rise of the Runelords and while playing the paladin redeemer type could make for a very fun adventure, this particular AP is only going to get more and more confounding to you unless you iron this out.

I'm not trying to criticize your character choice here, but without some kind of buy-in from the GM and from the other players in your group, this is going to be a frustrating, uphill battle for you.

To be clear here:

Redeemer type characters are a blast, nothing wrong with them.

Trying to play such a character when the rest of your group and GM are determined to run a classic hack & slash game is a huge challenge.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Some Other Guy wrote:
Marroar Gellantara wrote:
Dennis Baker wrote:


Sounds to me like the slots per day are independent of preparing spells and the pearl of power would not work. (But things like rhinestones of power would)

The pearl works.

You get to re-prepare the spell. That doesn't give you the slot back though, since that is not what arcanist preparation does. So you just get one spell prepared twice.

I disagree with this completely. When you use Consume Spells, you do NOT lose a prepared spell, thus cannot recall it, as Pearl of Power is worded. I can almost guarantee an FAQ is needed for this.

I think we're all on the same page here, just phrasing it slightly differently. I also think most people of us feel an FAQ would be good to help clear this up.

As an aside, there is another roadblock to pearls working with consume spell. Pearls of power explicitly restore spells "prepared and then cast". Even if you assume the pearls work with the arcanists normal casting, consumed spells are never cast.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Mystically Inclined wrote:
If people are saying that the Arcanist is just barely under the Wizard, and that the class has a "eh... some will take em, some won't" feel to it, then I think Paizo nailed things perfectly.

This is more or less my impression also. It has some neat non-casty abilities and it's casting is super versatile, but that's offset by lower spells/ day and slower spell progression.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well... from Pearl of Power:

Quote:
Once per day on command, a pearl of power enables the possessor to recall any one spell that she had prepared and then cast that day. The spell is then prepared again, just as if it had not been cast.

For an arcanist, preparing a spell only puts it into her memory so she can cast it from the book, there are two pieces here: "While studying, the arcanist decides what spells to prepare and refreshes her available spell slots for the day." The memorizing and spell slots are separate.

Sounds to me like the slots per day are independent of preparing spells and the pearl of power would not work. (But things like rhinestones of power would)

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Guy St-Amant wrote:
Ross Byers wrote:
Axial wrote:
Dennis Baker wrote:
Allies last for multiple sessions and often you don't even need a full stat block. A party might kill off 20 enemies in a single session and always require full stat blocks. So GMs need about 100 times more enemy stat blocks than allies. Thus the need for books filled with people to fight are more in demand than books filled with allies.
Not if you're running an evil campaign. ;)
Because evil is less likely to have allies?

When 95% of the well designed NPCs are Evil, having guidelines on how to make good guys would be nice.

I don't follow your thinking here. There are tons of sources of stat blocks for good aligned creatures and NPCs. NPC Codex, Giants Revisited, Dragons Revisited, the Rival Guide, every single bestiary, the bestiaries in the APs, and many times the APs and modules have good aligned creatures or NPCs as allies.

Evil guys outnumber good for the reasons I stated above, but if you are looking for allies there are plenty of sources and given Paizo's history, I'm certain there will be more in the future.

If you are looking for opponents for evil aligned NPCs to face, you have an even bigger pool to choose from. Bad guys are just as likely to steal from each other as they are to steal from good guys. Rivalries and betrayals between evil groups can easily turn into entire adventures. I can easily see an evil group trying to steal an artifact from a liche king or the middle of necropolis. Baba Yaga is just as concerned about her daughters as she is about good aligned adventurers. Orc or goblin raiders don't care if the neighboring kingdom is run by a benevolent dictator or an evil despot. Evil groups operate in a target rich environment.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ssalarn wrote:

"Eldritch Blade: A blade adept with this exploit uses her

caster level instead of her class level for the purpose of
advancing her bonded sword’s powers."

I guess that does make for a pretty solid Eldritch Knight.

It's almost as if someone were thinking about moving into Eldritch Knight when they wrote it....

It's best to wait and to take Extra Exploit (eldritch blade) as your 9th level feat. The blade's effective level lags behind the magus by 2 levels. That's mitigated a lot by the more flexible nature of the arcane reservoir.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

KidDangerous wrote:
Dennis Baker wrote:
My favorite thing about dropbox is the fact that I can set a crop level and it applies it across the entire book so I can get rid of thick borders and just view the text.

Cool, how do you apply the crop?

I've found that the dropbox app for iPad actually opens and runs the PDFs way faster than iBooks. It also runs word documents and is much easier to upload to.

Never tried goodreader

Sorry, I meant to say "My favorite thing about Goodreader is the..."

In Goodreader, you just tap the display and pick the crop button and it is pretty obvious. Not sure if you can with the Dropbox reader (which is also pretty good and free).

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Paizo gets lots of inspiration from movies and books. The list would likely be "Too many to count".

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Bigdaddyjug wrote:
Will Goodreader unzip them as well? If so, it might be worth downloading just so I don't have to use 2 different apps.

Yes,

Good Reader can deal with zipped PDFs also. Generally when I'm using my iPad to download direct from PDF it prompts me to open in Goodreader and it just takes care of everything.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Goodreader 4 is on sale right now for $.99. You can transfer over wifi, send PDFs downloaded from the web to it, or use DropBox or other services. Easily worth a buck.

My favorite thing about dropbox is the fact that I can set a crop level and it applies it across the entire book so I can get rid of thick borders and just view the text.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I would love for a way for the current rules to "evolve". No huge changes, but a simplification of presentation and clarification of many of the currently confusing rules. Essentially taking much of what was learned in the Beginners Box and expanding it to the entire core book. Perhaps folding some of the better (better as in more interesting/ balanced not as in stronger) play options from later in the game into the core book (for example: get rid of seldom used rage talents and fold some of the better ones back into core).

Is that a new version? I don't think it needs to be, but I suspect many would argue it is.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

ZanThrax wrote:
I pretty much buy all my books from Amazon. Even with the delayed release for not buying directly from Paizo, it's quicker (and vastly cheaper) to get books from Amazon.ca

The copy of the ACG sitting on my shelf begs to differ with 'quicker'. As for cheaper, the link I posted from Miniature Market is $4 less than the Amazon price. Depending on shipping/ Prime membership, etc you may well be able to get it from Miniature Market both quicker and cheaper.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Joe Bots wrote:
How long after general release does Amazon get the books? I pre-ordered there and they still don't have them in stock to ship.

Paizo doesn't sell direct to Amazon so they won't know.

It is in distribution and 3rd party retailers are selling it which is about all Paizo can control.

I would say contact Amazon, but that's a black hole. My suggestion is buy through a company with better customer service or that at least pays enough attention to give accurate dates on products. Miniature Market has some listed in stock, have a decent discount, and I've gotten good service from them in the past (though I generally don't order books from them).

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Benchak the Nightstalker wrote:
Alexander Augunas wrote:
SamuraiFlamenco wrote:

I have a question about the Swashbuckler: Flying Blade, can you use him with the Deadly Dealer Feat or does he throw just Star/Knives??

Thy for the quick answer...(^.^)

Daggers and Starknives only. Deadly Dealer transforms cards into darts, so it doesn't work.
I would so houserule to allow this though, on cool-factor alone!

Definitely a great idea.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

6 people marked this as a favorite.
Darche Schneider wrote:
Paunch points can be regained through completing dares as well.

Paunch points are regained by spending time on the couch and eating an extra helping of dessert. Spending a long weekend gaming with a bag of Cheetos and Oreos is also a quick way to pick up some Paunch points.

Spoiler:
Not trying to be language police, but Paunch Points.... couldn't resist

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.

If you want a character to occasionally be able to do something awesome, there needs to be some kind of limit to it.

How do you solve the problem of metering "awesome" for non-magic-weilding characters?

Tell people playing characters without magic they can't do awesome stuff?

Let them do awesome things every round?

Put an arbitrary limit on it? (Rounds of rage, uses per day, panache)

Use another expendable resource which is possibly easier to game? (Hit Points, ability scores, fatigue, consciousness)

At some point you have to make a choice and something needs to meter the awesome.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Quote:
The blade advances as a black blade (Ultimate Magic 47) using the blade adept’s class level in place of the magus’s class level and points from her arcane reservoir in place of the magus’s arcane pool.

A blade mage gains an arcane reservoir as normal (and uses them as normal for other exploits), any time she would spend points from her arcane pool, she spends points from her arcane reservoir instead.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

You can use rapid shot. That doesn't open up the rest of the TWF chain, but does get you one extra attack.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

3 people marked this as a favorite.
anonymous101 wrote:
For the sake of simplification, let's just say that in August 14, 2014, Paizo.com did not have an option to use a cc registered to Republic of Korea (South Korea) address, but it did have the option to use a cc connected to Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) address. Hence my rant.

This is something you should bring up with customer service, not on a random thread. They'll get you straightened out.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

j b 200 wrote:
Arikiel wrote:
Dennis Baker wrote:
Arikiel wrote:
Please tell me there is going to be a pawn set to go with this. I'm going to need more then just the three or four Bestiary Box hobgoblins, kobolds, etc for this awesomeness.

Buried on page 3 of the replies, Erik suggests it's "Likely" .

Yay! Thanks for pointing that out. That would be so awesome! :D

20 races with 10 stat blocks each. That suggests that there's 200 pieces of art just waiting to be pawnified. Really useful art of core monsters. At my table his would definitely see a lot more use then Bestiary Boxes 2, 3 or 4.

Since art A) is expensive, and B) takes up a lot of room, you will probably only get 5 or so pieces of art per race instead of 10. In ACG you get only 1 piece of art for each class, some of which have 4+ pages.

It's likely there will be a mix, some pages with 2 stat blocks and 1 piece of art and some larger, more important pieces with a piece of art for each stat block. Somewhere between the NPC Codex and a bestiary.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

It was a 2 minute spell, but I'd say it's balanced against other cantrips. It affects more targets than disrupt undead, but with a range of touch it's not exactly caster friendly.

Magii would love it though since it would give them a zero level spell which deals a bit of damage to use while spamming spell combat, so it would probably not have magus in the listed classes.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Stab
level 0 Bard, Magus, Sorcerer/ Wizard, Witch
Casting Time 1 standard action
Duration 1 round, see text.
Range touch
Target creature touched
Saving Throw No; Spell Resistance Yes

A stabbing thing of pure force appears in the caster's hand. If the caster strikes a target, the stabber deals 1d6 points of force damage and the spell ends.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Azreal423 wrote:
Does anyone know when Amazon is going to be getting this? They keep telling me that Paizo hasn't updated any shipping info so it might not be til sep 2nd. Anyone else have any updates?

There have been issues with Amazon for a Very Long Time the short answer is if you want predictable delivery of new releases from Paizo, Amazon isn't the best online source.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Ross Byers wrote:

Gunshoe?

(Course, that would be like actually calling the Magus a Stabracadabra.)

I think that one actually crossed my list but struck me as entirely too anachronistic and also... seems like a joke name.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Melkiador wrote:
Artanthos wrote:
Melkiador wrote:
I am assuming there is nothing summoner related in this book; and if there is, it will be banned from Pathfinder Society.
I believe only one of the summoner archetypes was banned.
i wonder if the guys in the design office ever talk to the guys in the society office. Why come out with so much stuff that is immediately banned.

Because PFS isn't Pathfinder. Not every class or concept that fits the game system fits PFS well.

I suspect even if all of the archetypes/ feats/ items/ spells were run by the PFS team in advance (they aren't), many of them would still be in the book.

Overall, very little of the book is held back from PFS. A few archetypes with firearms, a couple archetypes that summon lots of things, and one or two evil oriented archetypes is about it; some feats that do similar things; and a few magic items. Out of the 290+ pages in the book, maybe 1% is not allowed.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Necromancer wrote:
I saw "steel hound" and got the knee-jerk image of a detective with a clockwork hound construct companion. Knowledge of existing class balance dismissed this theory and I started reading. I like what it does...if that counts...

*Shrug* the mecha pup has tons of appeal so I can see that.

A hound is a tracker... an investigator is a tracker... Granted the parallels are thin, but there you go.

As for steel, that's meant to be a reference to the weapon.

I'm still not sure where I could have gone with a name for this guy that would be more evocative/ descriptive. It's an investigator with a gun... IMO a good concept for an archetype but a tough call on naming.

Sometimes you have a good name and the make the concept follow, other times its the reverse, you have a great concept and need a name.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

QuidEst wrote:
Dennis Baker wrote:
Necromancer wrote:
It's a weird choice, but I still think the worst-name archetype is the brown-fur transmuter with steel hound running a close second.

Ouch, I don't think it's that bad. At least it's only second worst :|

Sometimes great names for abilities or archetypes are tough, particularly when you have to come up with a pile of them. In my defense: Stygian Slayer

Forget the name... Now I can transmute other people! Barbarian unicorns! Bardic birds! This is something I've wanted for ages.

Well mine was Steel Hound not brown-fur transmuter... personally, I don't think brown fur is bad at all. Not sure why 'brown fur' though, I don't get my PDF until tonight!!

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Necromancer wrote:
It's a weird choice, but I still think the worst-name archetype is the brown-fur transmuter with steel hound running a close second.

Ouch, I don't think it's that bad. At least it's only second worst :|

Sometimes great names for abilities or archetypes are tough, particularly when you have to come up with a pile of them. In my defense: Stygian Slayer

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
DeciusNero wrote:
Necromancer wrote:
It's a weird choice, but I still think the worst-name archetype is the brown-fur transmuter with steel hound running a close second.
I'm (supposedly) getting my book tomorrow, but I have to ask, what does the brown-fur transmuter get?

If I were a betting man, I'd say something with brown fur.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

nighttree wrote:

Can we get a rundown on the Blade Adept ?

Gains a weapon as a bonded item at 1st level, it grows intelligence at 3rd level as Blade Bound Magus' black blade. Deliver touch spells through the blade. Other abilities that revolve around that along with some exploits it can take. The most notable being one which allows the blade to progress based on caster level so the arcanist can switch to eldritch knight.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

SiegeEngine wrote:
I hate asking again seeing as it was technically already answered, but is the Flying Blade capable of going ranged only, or is it more of an off throwing build. As I said, throwing has gotten no love so far so I just wanted to know.

Unfortunately, I don't have the final print version in front of me. It was built on the throwing dagger and star knife so it would work with both ranged and melee attacks. You could certainly just throw or mix and match. Lots of limits around thrown weapons so it's tough to be as good at ranged combat as an archer, but it should be decent.

Not sure about Slashing Grace.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Ashanderai wrote:
Wolfgang Rolf wrote:
Sorry to ask this again, but anyone care to shed some light on the Eldritch Scrapper, also is there an investigator archetype that gives more martial weapon access and heavier armor?
The Steel Hound is the only Investigator archetype I see that grants a little bit more in weapon proficiencies, but he also gives up shields.

Does the Steel Hound get anything aside from a firearm?

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

There are a lot of things in the book that aren't exactly as the designers intended them to be that aren't worth publishing an errata. Errata is for for things that affect game play.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

Petty Alchemy wrote:
Exocrat wrote:
SiegeEngine wrote:

I have got to ask, what are the specifics of the Flying Blade, thrown has gotten very little love in pathfinder and I was hoping this book might change that.

I was sorta hoping to turn my playtest Swash-Y into a Bullseye-esque Throw Anything build.

Flying Blade focuses on daggers and starknives. Abilities mostly just increase damage with them and convert a few swashbuckler deeds to ranged.
Anything in the book to make thrown weapons viable past the earliest levels, such as magic gloves that temporarily enchant anything you throw as the bow does arrows?

i think you are going to have to rely on the blink back belt and returning weapons for this. The flying blade helps quite a bit by boosting thrown damage, but it's kind of geared towards swith hitting and some abilities are designed to work when you mix throwing and melee.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Glad I got in on this Kickstarter. Looking forward to this bad boy.

1 to 50 of 2,449 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.