I don't see Goblins being Neutral Evil psychos makes them unplayable and undeserving of being in Core. Not all campaigns are Good-aligned or even take place in Golarion.
Just because they're in the book doesn't mean you have to use them. Besides, I think having an "Evil" race in Core will help out tables that just want to play murderhobos. They deserve attention too after all.
Seems to me that taking away Goblins murderous attitudes waters them down to point that there largely no different from Halflings or Gnomes when it comes to their wackiness.
Why take that away? Let them stay psychotic pyromaniacs. It might not work for some tables, but I think you still have them in Core while still retaining most of their original flavor without pulling a "Well, some tribes are Good or friendly" retcon.
Tarik Blackhands wrote:
Can't we just write her out of the story entirely? I think Star Wars can only handle so many characters and Rose is one to many.
This new trilogy should be about Rey, Finn, Kylo and maybe Poe. That's it. We don't need three different storylines and multiple arcs occurring all at once.
Creon Vizcarra wrote:
Does that logic even still apply in a universe where people can be constantly resurrected from death and have their lifespan lengthened considerably?
Why bother fathering/mothering a bunch of brats to continue the dynasty when I can just live forever as an Immortal God-King/Queen.
Death is poor people after all.
Well since men have been kissing,hugging,groping women for so long in movies, turn about is fair play.
Not really. It was horrible and gross when dudes thought they could get away with (looking at you Han) and its horrible when woman try to get away with it. We should break the cycle because there is no such thing as fair play when it comes to this.
Just watched the film again with my brother and I got to admit I liked it a lot more. Well, actually I just loced everything with Rey and Ren a lot more. I idea that Rey wanted to redeem Ren not only because she felt it was necessary but also because she was on some level attracted to him really added a lot more dimension (and sexuality) to the story. That said, I give even less of a s#%! about Poe, Finn and Rose's stories. They really feel like distractions from a much better story and the themes in them are cookie cutter and obvious. But, hey, Daisy Ridley's "your breaking my heart face" was still awesome.
I actually really appreciated that rey's parents where nobodies all the endless speculation about it irritated the tar out of me.
I like that Rey's parent were nobodies but I really don't see how that twist is all that worthy of praise. Rey still is essentially a magical chosen one with abilities that only a small amount of people have and if Snoke is to believed she's has been chosen by the Light to bring down the Dark of the First Order.
The Star Wars story is still about metahumans with magic swords empowered by an all-powerful Force being at the center of an intergalactic conflict. Sure Finn, Rose and Poe are around but the narrative of the Last Jedi marginalizes them compared to all the Force users.
Really, if the sequel wanted to really change things Rey wouldn't be a Force user at all and would kick Kylo Ren's just using a blaster like a normal person.
Black Dougal wrote:
Isn't that a microcosm of the problem of the whole film? Twists that actually aren't twists but predictable 180s. Rey parents are no nobodies instead of someone important. Snoke isn't the main villain instead its Kylo Ren. Luke doesn't really train Rey to be a Jedi instead she's supposed to chart her own path or something. Kylo Ren isn't redeemed but instead takes over the First Order.
Did those twists really surprise anyone? I guess they did. Honestly, going into this film I just assumed that the plot would either play things straight or just do the opposite and thats what happened.
Sort of wish they did something really shocking and had Rey join the First Order or something. Wouldn't make a lot of sense but it would be interesting.
Bill Dunn wrote:
Agreed. That arc has a lot of potential. I just wish they executed it better.
The more I think about it the more this movie reminds me of Batman v Superman. It's nowhere near as bad as B v S but it has the same problem of having a lot of interesting themes and ideas, but ultimately bad execution.
Laura Dern is a great actor and probably would have made Holdo a fan favorite if her character wasn't badly written.
I hate to say this yet again, but I really think its a shame that they killed her just so Poe can a leader. She could have been a replacement for Leia and the next film as the strong female leader of the Resistance with Poe as her right-hand man.
But no she gets fridged. It's made even worst by the fact that I think Holdo is supposed to be a lesbian in the books.
I think if Admiral Holdo had instead been played by Admiral Ackbar everyone would have just got on board and been “what a strategic genius”. But because Vice Admiral Amelyn Holdo is new to the audience, feminine and doesn’t acquiesce to the handsome flyboy nerds everywhere feel the need to pick apart her plan and sacrifice.
I dunno. Holdo only looks bad back because the script demands that she make convoluted decisions and sacrifices because Poe needs to learn a lesson about leadership. Really won't matter if it's her or Ackbar.
Than again, I might have been less frustrated if was Ackbar because at least than a female character won't be fridged for a male character's development.
Tarik Blackhands wrote:
That's basically the fundamental problem of the sequel trilogy. They have good characters but premises and plots that are stale.
Tarik Blackhands wrote:
This is a quote from someone talking about the political landscape of Star Wars being chaotic to say the least.
"The title “Star Wars” is no lie. Someone born during the Separatist Crisis would be in their sixties by the time of Hosnian Prime’s destruction. In his life, he would have seen the fall of three galactic governments, and the total decapitation of two by outside hostiles. The Star Wars galaxy has political stability comparable with the Middle East."
Does anyone think the film would have been more interesting or exciting if the New Republic was still around on some level and the battle between the First Order and the Resistance was a bit more evenly matched?
I don't like the prequels but they at least managed to convince me that an intergalactic war was going on.
The whole resource-starved underdogs vs all powerful empire is starting to get stale in my opinion.
But doesn't that sound exactly like what Holdo did?
I really do wish that the First Order actually suffered consequences from their mothership getting destroyed and their leader killed, but instead they just keep moving on to kill our heroes as if nothing ever happened.
Starkiller Base getting destroyed. Doesn't matter.
The First Order really needs a nerf.
Isn't there not being an autopilot or a droid capable of piloting the ship just a contrivance of the plot, so that Holdo can nobly die (read: get fridged for the sake of a male character's arc) and Poe can get the mantle of leadership?
When I think about it that way everything kind of makes sense. Poe needs to become the leader of the Resistance by the end of this film, and thus Holdo must die regardless of the narrative hammering in that noble sacrifices are dumb and that strong, experienced leaders are needed.
Oh, sorry about that. I misread your comment. Just edited with last comment with more explanation and I think a better reading if what your talking about.
So Rose is an idiot and Finn should have tried to save what little of the Resistance was left by sacrificing himself. Ok...
I get that the numbers changed at some point but themes need to be consistent, right? You can't just say that sacrificing yourself is bad than say it's fine under these circumstances but later on say it's bad again. It's gives the audience mixed messages and is hampered by the fact that the First Order doesn't seem to actual suffer that much when heroic sacrifices are made in almost any situation.
I hope that made sense to you Rysky. I don't want this discussion to go toxic.
Finn was trying to protect the Resistance, a group that had grown to love. Sure he hated the First Order too but those two things don't have to be mutually exclusive, right?
Also, Holdo's sacrifice was just as useless as Finn's probably would have been. Even with the Supremacy gone, the overpowered First Order still has a bunch of landwalkers and a Death Star cannon. Her death barely made a difference. Just like those bombers barely made a difference at the beginning. Holdo should have stayed with the Resistance and been a leader that kept the spirit of the Resistance alive with her decades of experience and wisdom.
“Well I’m in charge and important and this is a suicide mission so I need someone who I think is less important to sacrifice themselves in my place” said no one with a soul ever.
I thought the whole point of Holdo was that heroic sacrifices are dumb and that people like her need to stay alive for the Resistance?
Instead she sacrifices herself which is something that Rose was angry about Finn almost doing. Kind of thematic whiplash. The message of staying alive to fight another day would have been stronger if Holdo actually stayed alive and let some kind of autopilot destroy the Supremacy.
Honestly as much as I like Finn and Poe, the Last Jedi would have been a better film if their stories (diversions really) were completely cut and more time was given to Rey's training.
My problem isn't Holdo motivations for withholding that information. It's the fact the entire conflict could be solved if either Poe or Holdo just talked to one another openly. I hate idiot plots like that because they make both characters in the situation incredibly annoying, and sure, I get that's supposed to Poe's arc but couldn't there have been another way to have him grow up that doesn't involve the characters acting like children that refuse to share a secret.
I know that the base was supposed to be a temporary for the Resistance, but Holdo's plan to get them was bound to get a bunch of people killed despite the hacker revealing to the First Order their plan, because they would have still have been shoot at in defenseless transports when they left the command ship. And any survivors would have still been put under siege by the First Order which has a bunch of weapons to destroy that base. Now of course, Holdo didn't know about the mini Death Star cannon to be fair, but her plan is still terrible. Honestly, I think I would have been ok with the entire plot if Poe straight up told Holdo about the tracker, and Holdo straight up told Poe about the crappy plan. If he goes mutineer because he thinks the plan is terrible and his find a hacker in Canto Bint scheme is better than I think the mutiny would have been palatable for me. At least then Holdo doesn't look useless and Poe's mutiny is less defensible.
Why? Why would the New Republic remnants think that the genocidal Space Nazis can be negotiated with? You're just guessing their motivations because the film doesn't give us an answer. If the plot explained the entire New Republic fleetyards were destroyed by Starkiller base than fine that's a reasonable explanation, if still shooty, but they don't even do that. The First Order just suddenly starts taking over the galaxy, with nobody but the Resistance responding. Why are the politics and military logistics of these films so irrelevant?
I should probably stop thinking about these kinds of things shouldn't I? Star Wars isn't A Song of Ice and Fire where the politics of the setting actually matter. Everything is character-focused to the point that plot and setting only exists to serve the characters arc, regardless of whether it actually makes sense. I think that I just have to learn to be fine with that.
I seriously hope the Starwalker destiny thing is finally put to rest by this film if nothing else. Kind of disappointed that neither Kylo or Rey lost an arm though.
To be honest, I really didn't feel much for the Resistance's dire straits because I felt them losing throughout the film and the New Republic getting basically written out of the story, to be lame and completely unearned. The galaxy is a big place and you'd think that a galactic government would have a mass military force at its disposal. Then again, if it did the Resistance wouldn't be as important, so of course that gets ignored so our heroes can take center-stage.
Holdo's plan wasn't solid at all and was doomed to failure. Regardless of Poe's dumb mutiny, which only happened because her dumb refusal to share information, their base on the salt planet was going to be cracked up by the First Order's mini Darth Star laser. The Resistance was basically doomed without ghost Luke showing up at the nick of time.
The Last Jedi has great characters, besides the hacker and Captain Disappointment of course, but the plot just fails everyone who doesn't have force powers.
Isn't kind of weird that in a story all about metaphorically and literally killing the past, that story is fundamentally once again a conflict centered around an evil empire taking over the universe and bunch of plucky rebels trying to stop them?
I was fine with it in TFA when I thought that the conflict with the First Order was going to be reversal of the original trilogy, with the First Order being underdog terrorists and the Republic being the empire that gets outsmarted constantly, but instead the entire Republic is just gone and the First Order has literally taken over the entire galaxy in a matter of hours after blowing up Hosian Prime.
It really does seem that the new trilogy is overacting to people's boredom with the Senate politics in the prequels and have just completely removed any kind of political context and exposition to help us understand why an entire galactic Republic can just get one-shotted.
I dunno, Moffat had his issues but I thought he was fine. At worst I think he was to sappy at times and treated Doctor Who more like a folk tale than a sci-fi series.
And yeah, I think he had a problem with writing female characters sometimes. I guy clearly had an archetype he liked and kept going back to that same well. Kind of got boring after awhile.
Oh my god I freaking love that anime. Tony Stark's insane daughter fighting someone whose highly implied to be Superman and Wonder Woman's daughter in an attempt to win the love of an idiot blonde highschool girl, is just stupid enough to go completely overboard and become awesome.
Seriously, why can't Marvel and DC make Project A-Ko their big crossover movie? I need it in my life.
Mark Thomas 66 wrote:
Yes, because a swamp man isn't corny and is still totally culturally relevant. Also, I think Constantine the loner private detective who smokes all the time wearing a trenchcoat is as corny and cheesy as it gets. But that's fine for me because superheroes films shouldn't be afraid to be corny, and well, comic booky.
Anyways, I honestly just wished she at least kept the stage magician tuxedo.
The hat getting lost when the action happens is fine by me, but I would have liked to seen her wear it during the talky bits. And I'm fine with losing the fishnets actually.
I dunno. The whole perky goth mage look has been used so much these days that Zatanna's original costume doesn't seem cliched anymore.
I mean, I'd maybe drop the pantyhose and give her pants, but the vaudeville stage magician is really cool and distinct if you ask me, and losing it while Constantine gets to keep his noir trenchcoat just seems wrong.
I think the book's worst crime is that they're somewhat bloated and sometimes take extended tangents to reach a point, Arianne's Queenmaker plot and Brienne's hunt for Sansa being the biggest examples.
That said, even at their worst the books aren't stupid and flippant and I'll take bloated and long tangents over the Reach getting curb-stomped out of nowhere and the ridiculous Winterfell plot.
Mark Moreland wrote:
Nope. They get micro stat blocks (ie. we list their alignment and class levels) but not full stats. Those appear in the War for the Crown AP, however, where both NPCs make prominent appearances.
Thanks for the info, Mr. Moreland!
Think you could spoil what classes and alignments they have? Pretty please.
I think you just nailed the reason why I don't care if villains come back.
Most of them aren't interesting in the first place and thus in my eyes are already faceless stormtroopers that our heroes have to defeat.
Iron Monger, Whiplash, Malekith, Red Skull, Crossbones, Yellowjacket, Ultron, The Abomination, Ronan, and that evil wizard whose actor who played Hannibal Lector, either didn't leave an impression or served their purpose for fulfilling the hero's arc.
Trying to develop them further beyond a cameo just seems pointless to me, but hey, different strokes for different folks.
The few villains that did work, Loki and Vulture, have been spared so I at least think Marvel is willing to bring people back when they know they have a real compelling antagonist.
Honestly, I just think I'm not all that interested in a Masters of Evil plot. One, because it's almost definitely not going to happen and two, because I prefer Marvel focus more on their cosmic stuff.
I thought Zeno served his purpose will in Civil War, but in all honesty, I never really cared much for Zemo in the first place.
I really, really, hope that death actually has meaning in the MCU, so Killgrave staying dead is fine by my book.