|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Folks that are convinced that they deserve this fate, or that it's worth it to achieve their goals.
Contradictory sources. Sure, that knowledge check means some reliable sources claim that horrific fate will happen, but you're being told differently by the evil god recruiter. People get scammed and conned all the time, even when the facts which could save them are readily available.
Bonus is a game term, a positive modifier. Being able to cast a spell would e a benefit not a bonus. Adding sorceror levels to wizard levels to determine the arcane bond's power is a bonus, and specifically allowed in this case despite possibly arguably the same source.
Sorceror arcane bond explains that its levels stack with wizard levels for your arcane bond. Singular not plural. If it meant you get a 2nd item more powerful than the first, it would explicitly say that instead. By saying it stacks, that means it does that instead of giving a separate item.
I like to use a dungeon with various little figurines scattered around. At the end there was a statue of a sphinx with a riddle on it and an arm-deep hole. Put the figurine that answers the riddle in the hole, if correct it opens, if not it chops off the arm.
I usually run it as an annual competitive dungeon crawl event, so if the party missed the correct one, they could pick it up by encountering their competitors, and to justify a crazily old-school .designed dungeon. Small cash prize for the winner,and possible employment opportunities from the audience for any survivors.
SOP for any puzzle or mystery is to have 3 clues available for every 1 you want a party to find and use correctly. I like the party to ponder openly, so if they come up with a better idea than mine i can roll with that instead, or throw something more obvious at them if they're going nowhere..
You have it already, slumber is a win button, unless they're immune in which case it's useless.Misfortune works on anything that rolls, although it requires cackle and/or levels to improve the duration.
The hidden downside to Slumber is that it's much more likely to provoke GM frustration. Many just ban it outright, or it falls under the all too common BBEG fudged immunity to death in the first round, but even if the GM plays it straight it's more likely to just piss them off.
Standard action charge is supposed to be restricted to the surprise round, being restricted to a standard action is not the same as having a standard remaining after using your move action. However, unless it's been errata'd, this abuse may be technically RAW, as PF lost the partial charge definition from 3.5..
Aspect of the beast requires wild shape, lycanthropy (doesn't say shapeshifter subtype, specific to lycanthopy infected, which shifters are not), or ranger 2.. also, as said, there's a limit of 1 natural attack per limb, so 4 claws are right out, and indeed bite with gore could be argued..
So, ranger 2 (if nat wpn style chosen) or barb 2 (only while raging) can give claws.. barb 2 can also get a bite attack, apparently as a secondary although that's certainly arguable, and it's also arguable if you can both bite and gore.
Racial Heritage - aasimar would let you spend 2 feats about lvl 11 to get 2 secondary wing buffets..
Tentacle cloak gives 2 tentacle attacks for 1 minute, 1/day.
I believe there's a lamashtu spell in Faiths of Corruption that grants a natural attack..
The best natural attacker is polymorph into great lake octopus, i believe, don't recall which book it's from but it's 8 tentacles and a bite.
I'm itching to play a Rahadoumi monk, maybe with a splash of paladin later, for a bit of that 'Death's Heretic' vibe.
Sometimes i threaten to build a freakish natural attack specialist with pressure points, chill touch, and shadowdancer dip, specialized in paralyzing anything not immune to str damage.. (if i can handle the ridiculousness, boar shifter for gore hoof hoof, barbarian 2 for bite claw claw while raging, and either ninja for extra ki attack, or rogue bandit for surprise round full attack.. could instead go tengu for claw claw bite, racial heritage for eventual wing buffets, mammoth helm for gore, or other even weirder combos)..
Would love to do a mystic theurge holy fire deal, elemental/draconic sorc plus blackened/tongues oracle, with experimental spell caster for the versatile blasts as extra spells known. Like a holy version of that fire sorc from 'Worldwound Gambit'...
Want to play a badass rogue-type with a knife, like Royce from the Riyeria books. Still pondering how to make him effective enough to pull his weight though. Maybe just have to wait for a woefully unoptimized group, or a campaign based on capers and heists.
+1 to having the players figure it out. If they're stuck for ideas, there's a table in UC for inspiration or random pick.
In the past, once i had one player recruit the others, char-gen restriction that they all had to be willing to adventure for fun and profit; similar to the creepy tavern employer, but with more player agency..
In the future, i plan a sequel to an old campaign, where all the PCs are descendants of one or more of the original party, dealing with the fallout of some of that game's loose plot threads.. i've seen similar games where all the characters are related to eachother..
Once we had a list of pc connections, and a list of dark secrets, each player randomly drew one of each to incorporate into their character..
Dresden Files RPG has a neat system i'm itching to use.. each player writes a short description of a story worthy event of their character's past, then passes it to the left, where the next player adds the short description of such an event that involved both of their characters, so each pc has a history with each other pc which they can riff on..
I ran a werewolf game once inspired by SK's It, where i dumped them into the action telling them they were childhood friends that hadn't seen eachother for 20 years, then slowly filled in the blanks with flashback scenes..
I agree with the majority here, especially talking to the GM. If he's going story over sandbox, this monk probably has unbeatable plot armor, as well as killing him derailing the planned end game. They also just might not realize how irritating massively overpowered NPCs are
Otherwise target his caster allies first, and introduce him to (greater) dispel magic or disjunction or antimagic once his support base is weakened. See if GM allows using maximize and/or empower on the dispel checks to auto-win them.
Dust of Sneezing and Choking is generally a win button against anyone.
In various rebuilds and editions from 2e-PF, my war priest Ulfgrim has been a fan of using antimagic field to bully and pummel archmages and phaerimm.
Charm spells do two things, they make the target treat the caster as a close friend, and they allow the charisma check to get them to do things they ordinarily wouldn't do.
you must win an opposed Charisma check to convince it to do anything it wouldn't ordinarily doThe caveat is the "obviously harmful" phrase.
An affected creature never obeys suicidal or obviously harmful orders
Interpreted by one extreme, it means other than physically hurting themselves, any order is acceptable with the cha check, no matter how monstrous. Interpreted to the other extreme, any request that even inconveniences the target is automatically refusable.
I think the common sense middle ground is to determine it by the personality and alignment of the target. Anything that would drive them insane with regret and grief afterwards, that they'd prefer death or prison or public humiliation to, they get to auto-refuse.
In that case, much like alignment and codes of conduct, the mileage of a charm spell is under GM discretion, and requires discussion with the GM rather than some impossible faq or errata.
11 levels of paladin to get the evil=dead aura of justice, 8 levels barbarian for the superstition/spellsunder goodies?
Paladin 3 for rage cycling with the fatigue mercy, barbarian the rest?
I'd be curious about bloodrager/paladin, to get more mileage from cha.. i'd guess the lack of cha synergy and class feature delays would hurt barb/pal enough to make it less than stellar, barring ridiculous point buy or luck for attributes..
Many divine spells are situational, but when you do need them you need multiple castings, which is exactly when spontaneous casters shine over prepared.
I think revelations are generally much better than domains, and there's the extra revelations feat to get them all. The curse is pretty nifty too, and I love the feel of the class and the variety of the mysteries.
All that and 2 extra skill points, the experimental spellcaster for a word every level, and the human favored class or half-elf paragon exploits, and if anything I think the oracle obsoletes the cleric, barring situations where the delayed spell level really stings.
Arcane duelist works. I'd be tempted by sound striker even with its wonky mechanics, but the bonus feats from AD are probably better. I'd also want to go catch of guard and improvised weapon mastery with an adamantine guitar, maybe bladebound magus with the same instead of bard.. think about dragon disciple after bard 7 or 13, for the battle-mode transformation..
In general, increases to Int give you skill points (and starting languages) just like increasing Con gives hit points. The exception is enhancement bonuses. Headbands of Int have an assigned skill per tier that functions as max ranks, this replaces the free skill points you'd otherwise get. Also, there's been a faq or post that the headband should also have assigned languages known as well, but that hasn't been errata'd yet.
Immune to fatigue at oracle 5, or oracle 1 barb 8. Allowing you to end rage and restart it to use 1/rage abilities. Also will saves and wand use and a revelation at the cost of 1 bab.. also frees you up to get your skilled human racial back possibly..
Cleave would only be useful as a prereq for finishing cleave, so if you only have 1 feat free, definitely stick with witchhunter.. even with another feat, i think ghostrager would be better..
Very different. Not a player vs player conflict, character vs character. In that case, in character conversation letting them know that due to the crisis you all need to work together. That means you won't hassle them on petty theft and racketeering stuff, but they need to avoid blatant murder and terrorism in return. Once the enemy-of-my-enemy truce is done, all bets are off. Argue for a grace period once the mutual threat is done with, but then prepare to be betrayed or betray them yourself.
If that's a no go, and you are outnumbered, the alc fire/ smokestick combo sounds like a good way to ninja vanish, with the option to skirmish and harass them down, or to set up a raid on their guild in reprisal. Alternately, just work with their guildmaster if they would seem more reasonable. Make a deal to have those two taken out by their own guild and delivered to the guard, because mass murder and bioterrorism are bad for business and tainting the guild by association.
The group apparently doesn't have a problem with pvp, many groups don't, doesn't mean they're jerks or bullies.
Still best thing to do is talk it out (try again, discarding the preconception that you're 100% right and he's a stupid jerk), in and out of character.
You could go for cloak of displacement or perma-blur some other way, letting the miss chance substitute for or enhance your crane riposte, and go moonlight stalker line for free feints once a round. Either full rogue/ninja, MoMS 2 dip for crane (and possibly snake too to add some of the cool hand to hand combos), and/or ranger dip for FE human.
For crit fishing, consider a winds oracle 1 level dip. Any time you spellstrike crit you also stagger, and if you dual curse you're a feat away from misfortune reroll happiness.
Air mephit to go along with the theme, and for their perma-blur, eventually for the whole party.
I'd consider dropping the int a smidge to get more con.
I'm guessing one of those splashes is MoMS monk so you can snake and fang. Combat Style Master would save you two swift actions. I'm sure you'd get more help if we knew classes, race, and stats. Additional traits could be useful, rime spell for more bang for your frigid, or elemental spell to get around resists.
Shield slam and greater bull rush is all sorts of fun. If you want to do something else, try bard and/or the steel falcon prestige. First round inspire while your party swarms the enemy, next round bull rush so they all get AoOs..
Simpler fix, make sure you have UMD maxed. Even consider additional traits for dangerously curious or the like to get it higher. Wands are fun for status removal, anti-swarm, utility..
Kingmaker us all about extremes, cakewalks or epic danger, 15 minute workdays or long dungeon crawling..
save the summons for when there's more enemy than they can handle, or they can use the flanking bonuses.. they're a tool in your toolbox, no need to use it exclusively when there's other stuff to do.. the rest of the time with this party just haste then relax and have fun..
Wizards can get a free raise dead once a day at 10th level with the true name arcane discovery if they pick the birth/death Aeon..
The worst part of free party res is a more cavalier attitude towards death, with the perk of character continuity without the GM pulling any punches.
As far as rampant abuse of it, there's always having souls refuse the raise because they love their afterlife or hated their life, or having the mortality inevitables or pharasman agents start taking an interest
Spells known refers to a spontaneous caster's spells known, it's a game term not just English.
A prepared divine caster has neither spells known nor a spell book of their own, so I don't believe it would give any benefit other than an enchantable object.
The arcane bond section for wizards specifies a spell in their spell book that they are capable of casting, so even if your GM agreed to allow the divine caster's spell list to count as their book, they'd still be limited to a spell they are capable of casting.
Just make sure you allow them to rebuild or replace characters too. Some severely suboptimal builds may only be working at all due to the ubermensch stats.
My group had also been using similar rules for superpowered attributes. Switching to 20pt buy was a shock, but after playing for a few sessions everybody was on board with it being a superior play experience. It was unexpected how the RP with NPCs improved, we hadn't realized how much the superior stats had led to being so dismissive of average folks.
On skill checks, a natural 1 counts as -10, a natural 20 counts as 30. This helps keep our excitement on rolling the natties, but still allowing character (in)competency to matter.
When aiding another, the primary is whoever rolled highest, any lesser rolls count as the aiding attempts. This encourages teamwork and avoids the frustration of a wasted successful roll.
Quick draw works with unattended weapons in your square, as well as any object stored in an easily accessible manner, like a bandolier or specially made harness.
Dice rolls that hit the ground, disrupt the map, or otherwise create a mess all count as natural 1s (or equivalent worst outcome if that would not be a penalty).
During combat, each PC has no more than 1 minute to declare their actions. Failing to do so results in delaying to last. The same goes for the GM for each NPC or initiative group thereof.
With the number of feats involved it's a mid-high level tactic, used to spread your damage amongst multiple targets, and it's shut down by enemies recognizing your tactic and no longer making AoOs against you. All in all, it's for clearing mooks less efficiently than a fireball.
That's an unexpected faq. It does raise the question for this and other more corner cases on how it's augmenting the unarmed strike damage. Is it a straight replace, and if so does it scale normally for sizes past small or large? Or is it an increase,and if so how does it increase a base other than 1d3, for natural attacks or for other abilities like a brawler barbarian?
For ease of use, and lack of necessary formula or tables, I'd assume it's a replacement, but in that case, does it decrease the damage dice with FCT and a bigger natural attack, or do you take whichever is better?
Barbarian/martialartist biters and druid/monk shapers just got buffed, reiterating that the best monks are the multiclassed monks.
This is why it's important to not be a jerk. If playing your character annoys or offends the PCs and NPCs around him, they may be more relieved than sad that he's gone. If so, instead of prolonging the agony, the players should explain to the culprit how he's not getting brought back because of the consequences of how he RP'd, and (if true) that he's welcome to end his one-man strike protest whenever he wants to rejoin the game within the strictures provided.
When we switched from 3.5 to PF (long campaign that started as ad&d), we had a long period of downtime after a harrowing and costly escape from the Xanathar's clutches. My Tempurian warpriest, Ulfgrim, finally lost his god's favor after years of choosing heroics over war, devious strategy over honorable brutality.
Reduced to mere mortality, he descended into alcoholistic depression. When his sight began to blur, he welcomed it as a sign of impending death. He was slacking his way through occasional caravan guard work for beer money.
One night, staring into the blurry mystery that had become his world past 30', he saw an unusual spec of detail in the distance. As it grew closer, he recognized it as a raven winging its way towards him at preternatural speeds. He grinned and gave a gallows laugh as it dove beak first into his right eye, sure that death was finally claiming him.
He woke with tears of blood streaming from that eye, feeling exalted at the divine connection tingling through his veins again at long last. He drew his blade and howled his joy, waking the camp and startling the sneaking wargs about to slaughter the undefended. A stranger's laughter echoed in the back of his skull, managing to be mocking, feral, and approving all at the same time.
Pledging himself to his unknown patron in return for his renewed sense of purpose, Ulfgrim drew walls of fire across the sands to funnel his foes towards him. Soothed by the upcoming bloodshed, he looked forward to drawing old and new companions to his side to meet the challenges sure to come his way again.
That will swiftly get to one-hit paralyze range, or kills with the rod of withering. So, for game balance alone I hope it doesn't work. Certainly better than my idea of dual-wielding rods of ice to bring roguely icy doom, though.
Given the faq that weapon spec ray would only add to hp damage, not ability or other types, I'm pretty confident that massive ability damage on these rods is not RAI. However, I haven't found anything that technically disallows it.
For the OP, a cestus is B/P, not slashing, so no good regardless if light or not.
As far as the bastard sword, there is a mechanics reason why the semantics are important. The bastard sword is a 1-handed exotic, that has a special ability to be wielded 2-handed as a martial. The opposite of a lance, which is a 2-handed martial that can be wielded in 1 hand while mounted, the only weapon with that special ability. There's a FAQ that allows the lance to get the 2-hand power attack ratio while wielded in one hand, so the difference restricts that power-up to just lances, not bastard swords and their ilk.