|
|
|
Recent posts by
Cpt_kirstov:
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevynxxx wrote:
Joshua J. Frost wrote:
Here's some general advice based on queries so far:
Hey! no fair, you could have used more than one submission for your tips!
<hangs head in shame and wanders off to think some more....>
** spoiler omitted **
Many word processors allow for custom dictionaries for their spell checkers. People might want to think about adding words that they think they will use often in their proposals/drafts to their custom word list before spell checking (or before writing) so that they will pop up as suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharoth wrote:
Shadow13.com wrote:
Illithar wrote:
And Wizards ALWAYS have stave's! Use something else! I actually don't have any suggestions for this one.
Baseball bats?
~innocent look~ Hockey Sticks? Would that work as a replacement to a Staff? ~grins~
Nope, the blasting rod is better than the hockey stick.... and he did better stuff with the drumstick anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
petalred wrote:
I'm going to be running Pathfinder Society at my store in Philadelphia soon, and I was curious when we should expect the 2.1 rules update? I have quite a few players interested in playing oracles or cavaliers and I wasn't sure if they were legal immediately or if we had to wait for the 2.1 rules. We're running our first games this Saturday and wasn't sure if there was a chance the rules might be out before then, though I realize Paizo may want to wait until all six playtest classes have been released before opening the classes up for organized play.
Also, on a similar note, is the Bestiary going to make it into the 2.1 update? I have a lot of players who want to play kobolds or orcs or whathaveyou, and there's currently no mention of the Bestiary in the rules. Will we see monstrous PCs opened up for PFS play, or does that contradict the way Golarion works?
Thanks!
2.1 was set to come out before thanksgiving until This post for your other questions, the responce so far has been see v2.1 when it comes out
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enlight_Bystand wrote:
GabrielMiller wrote:
Are there any hints in Escape from Old Korvosa that I missed? As far as I can tell the party will wander into the dungeon pretty clueless and get jumped by not just a Rakshasa but one with levels of monk. In this situation there is no prep and one cannot really retreat well to get prepped and come back.
Also as a side item. Clerics in the PFRPG do not have a single SR ignoring spell to throw at a Rakshasa. All they can do is align weapons if they have the spell handy, or summon meatshields of Summon Monster. Since Rakshasas do not have spellcraft but can read minds I would expect one in battle to throw a magic missle spell at any caster trying to summon allies with full round casting spells.
There are lots of rumours surrounding the Arkonas that hint that they're not what they seem (especially in the Guide to Korvosa). Certainly my players had worked it out and prepped for Rakshashas.
In the actual AP there are hints as far back as
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Brambley wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Zaister wrote:
Is this second printing any different from the first one?
The first round of errata is incorporated into the second printing, but those are pretty minor changes; the overall book looks exactly the same.
Is there a trade-in value of first to second printing - to get the errata...? :-)
Is there a list of said errata that I can just print out and loose-leaf it into my copy of the book?
Thanks
Robert
From the August 13th Blog :errata
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clonge wrote:
Hi all,
I signed up for PFS at GenCon and I'm trying to register. I have my PFS number, but not my confirmation number.
What can I do? I don't want to lose this character that I'm playing and I want to be able to track his progress on the site, make sure everything gets reported.
Any help would be great, thank you.
Do you mean your character number? if this is your first character, it would be (your pathfidner society number)-001
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perry Snow wrote:
I'm trying to organize the schedule for next year's monthly game days. We only have a few pathfinder players as-is who attend, and they often walk away because their table doesn't get enough players. I can't schedule older modules (season zero) because the veteran players have already played them at conventions, and it is really hard to 'build up steam' for new players if they only get to play one scenario per month (since Paizo releases one low level and one high level per month). Extra releases in only June and August doesn't help.
Is anyone else running organized play for Pathfinder?
-Perry
Question - could some of those veteran players DM for the new players?
Your veteran players have played ALL of the season 0 senarios? you might want to print out a spreadsheet of the scenarios, and have your players check off the ones that they have done, maybe there are one or two season 0 senarios that got missed that you could run a full table at, and just don't know it?
Usually we try to run one new senario and one old senario per month.with a group of 15-18 players, mostly that's 3 tables... at this point, soon the higher people will be making a second character to be able to run the new low level senarios when we run them new, but that's ok, as that mean they (who know the rules better/have been playing longer) can help the newbies out in strategy and character creation/optimization. It also means that they can try a different faction in the shadow war, which is fun.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zaelthar wrote:
Not sure if this is the right forum, so I apologize if I'm posting in the right spot..
I found the Pathfinder official wiki, and there seems to be some great information on there, but every time I go to the web page it freezes up within a few minutes and locks down IE.
I tried fromthree different computers now, and on each one the web site eventually locked up, usually after only a few minutes.
I'm just curious if everyone has this problem or just me?
which URL are you using? http://pathfinder.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page is the direct link... www.pathfinderwiki.com was the old link, but seems to have issues forwarding to the wiki since wikia went down on Monday or Tues... I've have a few windows freeze when using the old link.. I use firefox, but will go browse around in IE now to see if its anything else.
Also did you make an account on the wiki? If you make an account it blocks many of the flash adds that show up for non-members, it may be these adds that are freezing your seassion.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l00py2 wrote:
In basic speak, point me to the place that explains how I can get past Planet Stories books as part of my ongoing subscription. Or, tell me that is not possible. If the later then I will just buy them outside of my subscription.
I understand the shopping cart concept. Still a little confused by the side cart concept. If that is how I can get past issues then I will figure it out.
Thanks,
Jim
If you click on 'my acccount' on the top of the page, you'll see about half way down on the right a window saying 'my sidecart'. If you preorder items, or select items to ship with your next subscription shipment, you will see items here. You will also see items here when paizo starts authorizing credit cards to send you your subscription shipment.
If you buy the back issues separately, on the shipping method selection screen, you can choose to hold the items for your next subscription shipment. If you do this, the items will show in your sidecart until the time that your next subscription shipment ships, and your items will go out with the subscription.
so to summerize - you can make past books ship with subscription orders, but you still need to buy them separately, as paizo has no way of knowing if you had picked up the past books at barnes and nobel or something like that, so won't charge you for something you may already have.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|