Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Roy Greenhilt

Cire's page

246 posts. Alias of CireJack.


1 to 50 of 246 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge ****

Grats Carl!

Grand Lodge ****

Congratulations you two! Glad I was there to witness the presentation.

Grand Lodge ****

David Neilson wrote:
Two hours is a bit fast. Was it the same group every time?

Different groups each time. The quick ones were Roll20 if that helps. I have found that online games are a bit quicker due to the built in tools. Combat seems to go quicker and folks seem to waste less time on average than in person. Just my experience.

Grand Lodge ****

I have run Level 1 3 times. 2 hours. 2 hours. 4.5 hours (I blame the players for the increased run length).

I have run level 2 one time. 2.5 hours.

Grand Lodge ****

I didn think canons were PFS legal. :)

There is a module where you could actually die of old age if you are not careful.

Grand Lodge ****

Jayson MF Kip wrote:

The question that I've been trying to reconcile is:

"With the 'scavenger hunt' style faction cards, will people who have played the vast majority of old scenarios have the ability to earn 'achievements' (for lack of a better word)?"

I've played the two examples listed (Silent Tide and Voice in the Void)- -are those 'achievements' unavailable to me?

Also interested in this question. I have played all scenarios prior to season 4 (minus some retired year 0 scenarios). In all, there are 13 scenarios up to and including 6-09 that I have not played. A non trivial number of those on retired or soon to be retired characters.

So even if you can retroactively get credit for something you played in the past, its not going to help me very much.

If this is the way it works, then I feel like I'm being short changed for having stuck with the campaign for a long time.

Grand Lodge ****

Nefreet wrote:


Or, when an enemy Spellcaster tries to cast Dominate Person.

But, really, where does in-character perception cross that line?

I'd say he crossed it a while ago.

Should be treated as an opposed perception vs disguise, no? If an enemy cant tell what you are and tries to use an invalid spell on you, then she is just out of luck. I dont really see any lines being crossed.

Grand Lodge ****

BigNorseWolf wrote:
The problem with that then is the wizard using one of his two spells that night to try and enlarge person you.

Except the wizard really should be asking if he would like to be enlarged. To which he would reply, no thanks (knowing it wont work). Problem solved.

Grand Lodge ****

BigNorseWolf wrote:
Where exactly do you download the additional resources? I just always check with the web page. Attempts to find a download got me something from the Joshua frost Epoch.

From the web page you check... :)

Right at the bottom of the first paragraph on the Additional Resources page. Right under the line that reads: "Red indicates the most recently updated content".
"Click to download a PDF copy of the list of Additional Resources."

Grand Lodge ****

Sammy T wrote:

I hope campaign leadership finds a way to distribute a GM Star recharge boon to FLGS GMs--even if it is: "Dear VC, here are (X) recharge boons. Distribute them out however you wish to your local populace to encourage repeat GMing."

I agree. I've run games at 4 conventions since GenCon and have yet to see that boon.

Grand Lodge ****

Scott Romanowski wrote:

I like these ideas. It's getting tough to run scenarios in four hours. I run scenarios on weeknights from 6pm to 10pm at a game store. The store closes at 10pm so we can't run late. It's just not an option, so I usually omit the optional encounters no matter what time it is.

When you provide an encounter map intended to be printed, please include the zoom factor needed for the grid to be exactly 1". I can figure it out, but it takes one printing at 100% zoom, and a second printing (often of part of the map) at the calculated zoom factor to check and make the small adjustment needed for perfection. That's a few minutes and two pieces of paper that can be eliminated by simply including a single line like "Zoom to 437% when printing" by the map.

Along the same line a Teberous's comment, I'd like to see PFS staying true to its fantasy theme. IMHO SF and psionics have no place in PFS. Can we get rid of them? I'll neither play nor GM a scenario involving either because they're as inappropriate in a fantasy game as dragons would be in a Twilight 2000 campaign.

All it would take to fix the problem is for the dramatic, season-concluding adventure to reveal that Season 6 was simply a nightmare of Kreigton Shaine (similar to how season 9 of "Dallas" was a dream of one character).

Does this not depend on the native resolution of your printer? Through trial and error, I have figured out that if I print an image at actual size it takes 96 pixels to equal 1 inch. I dont think that is the same for all printers.

Grand Lodge ****

Right. Already at the LEVEL. Not already at the TIER.

Grand Lodge ****

Mike Bramnik wrote:

Moot point, since I don't think that's allowed in the first place.

If you (proverbially) have a PC who's in-tier for a scenario but play a pregen, you can't put the pregen credit on that character, since you could (and should) have played the character.

All three Bonekeeps are 3-7, so if they've played 1 and/or 2, they're in-tier for 3.

That is not what the rule says.

Grand Lodge ****

We Be Goblins (#100 and #101).

When I actually count sessions instead of table credits, my 100th was 6-01 Trial By Machine.

Grand Lodge ****

If someone plays part 3 with a pre-gen but assigns the chronicle to a character that had played part 1 or 2, are they eligible for the Cairnlands boon? If so, how is XP calculated?

Grand Lodge ****

John, do you have an estimate of when we might expect the first few levels of Emerald Spire being sanctioned or are you going to wait until all the levels are done? Is there any hope of something being done before GenCon? I dont get to go to GenCon. Throw me a bone!

Grand Lodge ****

I never knew about animal companion archetypes. You truly do learn something every day. Thanks!

Grand Lodge ****

Chomm Skee, M.D. wrote:

"You're a cavalier riding a turtle?"

Typically followed by "Your turtle has a 50 foot move speed?"

And soon after "The turtle has the 'sprint' ability?"

Beast master for the turtle?

Horseshoes of speed to bump up to 50?

How do you get it sprint?

Grand Lodge ****

I vote for option 4. Factions are dumb. We should all be working towards the advancement of the Society and not having personal side agendas that detract from our true purpose.

Grand Lodge ****

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Human female negative channeling cleric of Hanspur with a -12 swim score and profession(lifeguard). Name is Notkyra. I get raised eyebrows and I LOVE it. That's the point.

My favorite quote from a fellow player: "Your god is an a**hole"

Grand Lodge ****

Thanks for the opinions. That helps.

Grand Lodge ****

As to one of the secondary effects of the weapon...

"The effect also destroys non-artifact magic items with evil auras within 100 feet, though such an item protected by one of the leather suits receives a saving throw to resist destruction."

Has anyone come across a player that has had an item with an evil aura where this has come into question? I'm specifically concerned about players that might have

one of these items:
ocher rhomboid ioun stone from scenario 4-12 (not sure how they could be using that "inside" of the suit).

sihedron brand from 4-08 (not sure if this actually counts as an item or not)

Grand Lodge

Yeah, my one table of WBG Too! is showing up correctly.

My count is now correct.

Grand Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I've personally never had an urge to play a race that can only be gotten via a boon and of the boons I have gotten (maybe 6 now), I have given away to friends because I know they would enjoy them more than me.

If this gives my friends more access to race boons then I'm all for it.

Grand Lodge ****

Human: 5
Aasimar: 2
Tiefling: 2
Halfling: 1
Half Elf: 1

Grand Lodge ****

Would be nice if we could collect all this data and do some mining. :)

Grand Lodge ****

Ranger: 14
Barbarian: 11 + 2 = 13
Sorcerer: 12
Bard: 11
Alchemist 9 + 2 = 11
Rogue: 6 + 2 + 2 = 10
Paladin: 8
Witch: 6
Druid: 5
Cleric: 4
Fighter: 1

Grand Lodge

<Magistry> Athansor wrote:

Right now I show as having 60 something tables of credit, which I'm fairly certain is short about 10 or so tables, but only 2 GM stars. I know I was at 3, working towards 4.

I'm at a convention right now but I'll take a closer look when I get back.

I think it only updates stars when a session is reported. I went to report a session and deleted the session without saving it and the stars updated. You might try that.

Accursed Halls seems to be counting for me now.

We Be Goblins and We Be Goblins Too seem to still not be being counted though (which accounts for the 10 missing credits for me).

Grand Lodge ****

TriOmegaZero wrote:
My party was very unenthused to be babysitters, but I had a fighter whose backstory was specifically a former guard of House Lebeda and managed to convince him to come home 'parading the bandits to justice for the people to see'. The rest of the party gritted their teeth and made snarky remarks along the way.

Second group I ran this for did something very similar. Let him take all the credit for defeating the werewolf and discovering the bandit leader's identity.

Both groups I have run this for have discussed just leaving him in the trunk before even talking to him. One group considered putting him back in the trunk after letting him out.

Both groups wound up making him friendly in the end though. I rather enjoy seeing groups struggle with how to deal with this one.

Grand Lodge ****

When I run games, I try to make sure that at least I can read what is on the tracker and verify at the table if I cannot. I re-write any illegible handwriting.

I have seen some convention organizers enter trackers right there on the spot between sessions. That way you can detect any anomalies and get them fixed. Seems logical to me. On the other hand, why do anything today that you can always put off until tomorrow?

Grand Lodge ****

Sior wrote:

A special can be the Paizo/Gen Con specials or the SP released (most) years for 4-star GM's. Example, two years ago it was the Cyphermage Dilemma. Last year it was Day of the Demon. This year it is Bonekeep lvl 1. To qualify, a GM must run any combination of these 10 times (while they're still specials and not available to run for the general public, just to be clear).

** spoiler omitted **

That is good information! Thanks Sior! I signed up to run the Season 3 special thinking I would get one out of the way but apparently not. That makes getting 10 specials all the more difficult. Not sure its worth the effort, actually.

Grand Lodge ****

Elvis Aron Manypockets wrote:

Still at 41 tables of credit / 2 stars, should be 61 tables for my third star just earned over the weekend.

Also We Be Goblins is giving me a warning that I already ran it for credit - but it should be available for multiple credits (these were applied to 2 different characters).

The level 1 repeatables saying that has been an issue for a long time. That is not a new "bug".

Grand Lodge ****

Duncan7291 wrote:
So, I throw a "pretty" cloak over my torturous actions and call it interrogation? Seems just as morally ambiguous.

How about the use of the "confess" spell? Seems like window dressing on an "enhanced" interrogation technique to me that they intentionally gave to a paladin archetype (Oath of Vengeance).

Grand Lodge

So you changed titles from "Digital Products Assistant" to "Paizo Glitterati Robot"? I hope that was a promotion. Its hard to tell. :)

Grand Lodge ****

Sior wrote:

I don't think mine are coming back until Saturday's games are reported.

Also, apologies if my test posts are annoying anyone. Just curious with nothing better to do, hahaha.

I'm not annoyed but... you know, you can see your stars on your "My Account" page.

Grand Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Providing pancakes gives a +2 circumstance bonus on diplomacy.

Grand Lodge ****

The group I ran for failed most of their spellcraft checks to identify items and being seasoned and very paranoid players declined to use anything they couldnt identify.

Grand Lodge ****

12 sided "roman" d4s are excellent. I use large dice though and I wish they made them in larger sizes. I ordered 10 off of the Paizo site and it took almost a month for them to arrive (due to being back ordered from the manufacturer).

Grand Lodge ****

In terms of trample, it does not require the use of a charge (see overrun). You can trample them anyways. Choosing not to I guess is an option.

The group I ran this for had all seasoned players. Full table and 2 of them chose to play pre-gens (warpriest and swashbuckler). In fact the person playing the swashbuckler fell in love with dodging panache and claimed that they must make a swashbuckler now.

so many unspoilered spoilers in here, I dont know why I'm bothering but here goes:

Pyramid was dispatched via the use of a tanglefoot bag along with a failed reflex save. The small mounted cavalier with adamantine lance then charged and effectively "gutted" it.

The mimic took them by surprise. They were kind of irritated with the "auto grapple from the adhesive ability". Too bad, so sad. I knocked one player unconscious and grabbed and proceed to describe how it was licking its lips in anticipation of a meal (too bad it doesnt have swallow whole). I completely forgot about the fact that their weapons stuck to the mimic without a reflex save so I did make that fight easier than it should have been, oops.

They stealthed up to the chariot room and saw the skeleton archers but avoided being seen. They then proceeded to spend 20 minutes talking about strategy. This was a fascinating process to witness (although in hind sight I should not have let it go on for so long due to time constraints). They settled on "hide from undead", which the warpriest had prepared (no rules I know of say that a pre-gen cannot prepare new spells at the beginning of the next day). I thought it was genius personally.

The tough fight of course was the Pharaoh. He critted a monk in the first round taking him to within 3 points of death. The monk made his save verses mummy rot. I got two other hits off and both made their save (which made me happy because I didnt want to perma kill someones character with that nonsense).

Grand Lodge ****

No modules except Thornkeep seem to be being counted. At least in my case.

They are aware of the situation and are working on it. Patience, grasshopper.

Grand Lodge ****

I have an open event and I just hit report and then deleted the session and my stars showed up again (well most of them).

I think the 16 tables I'm missing are from 8 modules that I have run that are not showing up as GM+2 (they are apparently not counting at all).

Grand Lodge ****

Whatevs. Went from 12 to 50 but still only 1 star shows. Eh. Still doesnt look like modules are correctly reporting as 2 credits. Baby steps.

Grand Lodge ****

Confused. My understanding from reading the rules is that that players may NOT use a regular level 4 pregen.

Please tell me I'm misinterpreting that. :)

Grand Lodge

D_GENNEXT wrote:

I've got 4 tables of this scheduled on Free RPG Day at my FLGS. As soon as we have enough for a table, it's starting and we will do this until either all 4 tables are up and running or we run out of players.

Unless the PFS rules sheets say otherwise, I'm planning on just rotating pre-gen character sheets like We Be Goblins did in the event of death.

What do you mean by "rotating pre-gen character sheets"?

Grand Lodge ****

Ummm, where are the chronicles? They were supposed to be up yesterday. Am I just looking in the wrong place?


Grand Lodge ****

I seem to have all my sessions as well. Says I only have 12 tables (actually 66). Lots of modules are showing as only 1 table though and I have been reduced to 1 star. Not even sure who to contact about it.

Grand Lodge ****

Zrinka Twilight wrote:
I will share my wand with you if you'll share your armor with me. ;)

Ok. Aid Another action (AC). Done. Now heal me. :)

Grand Lodge

Illeist wrote:

The Guide does not distinguish between spells cast by NPCs and spells cast by PCs. If you pay an NPC to cast masterwork transformation on your longsword and your heavy steel shield, only one of those will remain active after the conclusion of the scenario. Likewise, if you pay an NPC to cast an extended duration spell that isn't mentioned in the Guide for you (such as shrink item), that spell ceases to function at the scenario's conclusion.

Since the only method for creating holy water is, at the moment, the spell bless water, there are two ways to look at this dilemma:

1) Items created by spells not otherwise allowed by the Guide cease to exist after a scenario's conclusion. This would mean that holy water, whether PC-created or NPC-created, disappears if not used in the scenario in which it is purchased or created.
2) Items, being neither effects or spells, are not affected by the relevant page 24 clause. Holy water persists from scenario to scenario, regardless of its origin.

If we value rules consistency, we cannot choose to inconsistently apply the spell persistence rule. If this means that the Guide needs to be updated for season 6, then it's good that we're bringing this to the campaign's attention now.

Sidenote: The campaign's current position on infinite wealth schemes is, by all appearances: don't abuse them, and we won't ban them. Blood money has been allowing for theoretical infinite schemes since its publication, and Mike Brock has chosen to let it remain in the campaign until he hears that PFS isn't mature to handle it. I'd imagine that the combination of bless water and False Focus falls under the same umbrella.

Thank you. I'm going to FAQ that post.

Grand Lodge

Andrew Christian wrote:
Cire wrote:

The rule makes NO distinction between a spell cast by an NPC and a PC when determining whether or not it carries over past the scenario (so then your purchased holy waters expire at the end of the scenario too).

Plus bless water has an instantaneous duration which I would think does not apply to the rule.

Reread the rule. Its any effect. Not just permanent effects.

Secondly, the purchased holy waters are not going to go back to water between scenarios.

I did reread it and thanks for the clarification. Still, I see no justification for claiming that an NPC casting of bless water persists past the end of the scenario as the rule is written.

Grand Lodge

The rule makes NO distinction between a spell cast by an NPC and a PC when determining whether or not it carries over past the scenario (so then your purchased holy waters expire at the end of the scenario too).

Plus bless water has an instantaneous duration which I would think does not apply to the rule.

1 to 50 of 246 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.