|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Go ahead and try this mechanic out at your table, but you should know that there is already an existing mechanic in place. You can use a readied action (a standard action) to move your speed. Obviously, the exact conditions in the battle and the wording of the readied action are important, but it can work.
Remco Sommeling wrote:
You could also change all of those +2s to +1s. Thats how prestige classes work (unfortunately).
If your players agree to such a trade-off, then tell them that it is an experiment and a conditional agreement: if you feel an advanced race is overpowered (or underpowered) you will adjust the point buy when they level up and that they will then make the appropriate modifications to their characters' ability scores.
You sound very cocky yourself for wanting to repay a personal slight with death. Since it was "IRL" then you can't use your character's alignment as justification. It's immature to respond to an out-of-game dispute with an in-game retaliation. Moving forward with this plan will result intention in the gaming group. What will you do if the party defends the cleric, or avenged him, and kills your character? I suggest you swallow your pride and think of a reason why your evil character should cooperate with the group, instead of thinking of ways to use a fantasy game to hurt someone in your family by group.
Is PvP acceptable at your table? If you insist on proceeding, just coup de grace him in his sleep.
It was foolish for the ranger to head out on his own, especially since he would have had help it he waited until the shopping was done. They could have left the next morning. The consequence you choose was a good one.
As an aside to this, I think I would be good for the game as a whole if there were more situations where splitting the party was a possibility, depending on lots of things. If it makes the game feel more realistic or cinematic (player immersion), that is a good thing. If it allows the party to achieve two goals at once, that is a good thing. If it causes half of the players to sit and do nothing for longer than they are comfortable, that is a bad thing. If it causes the GM too much rewriting, that is a bad thing.
I can't think of a PF race whose features scale up with level, even though I'm sure there are some. This is more like a 3rd edition racial template. Your four dragon abilities are not well balanced against each other and they are more like spells than racial features.
I think it is important for a playable to race to have some funky little features that do more to suggest the personality of the race as a whole than they do to create powerful characters. For example, dwarves are skilled masons and jewelers, and are good at fighting orcs. Halflings are athletic and brave. These are racial features that have little effect on game play, yet still cost points in the race builder.
This might as well be the warrior NPC class with an aura, instead of a fighter with an aura. If the goal is for no one to cast cure spell, then you have succeeded, but the person playing this class has nothing interesting to do. At least a fighter gets to choose which weapons he a better at, and gains a slew of extra feats to customize and diversify his fighting style. This class doesn't have that. There are no options during combat. There are the full-round action restorations, but a character will wait until combat is done unless its a life and death emergency.
I suggest starting over.
If the class has a point pool and a list of talents, then you gain customization when you level up and resources that can be used as the player sees fit. Maybe activating the fast healing aura requires a point. Maybe the healing becomes better when you slect certain talents, maybe it supressed certain conditions an ally has depending on talents, maybe you spend a point to use an ability like Lay on Hands.
But how does this translate into a combat style? I think a focus on non-lethal damage would be cliche and boring, but what if the healer absorbed ailments from his allies and inflicted them on enemies? What if he had a means to supress an enemy's healing or resistance? What if he could dabble or focus in necromancy?
It would also help if you wrote a paragraph or so describing what the character does and/or where the power comes from.
On the one hanf, Focused Casting seems reasonable, but on the other it has the potential to be much stronger than other "similar" feats with almost no downside. I suppose my suggestion is that the casting time of the spell is increased from a standard acction to a full-round action. And Cyrad is right that you should work on fine tuning the wording. Try to use wording lifted directly from exist feat, rules, etc as much as you can. Piece them together and make modifications so that it does what you want it to.
For Attuned Focus, try "Choose an ability score when you gain this feat. When you cast a spell that requires a touch attack or ranged touch attack, you can use that ability score's modifier in place of your Dexterity or Strength modifier to determine your attack bonus.
STUFF IN YELLOW
WHERE IS THE SEDUCTION?
Seductive Spell/Spontaneous Charm: A seducer has the ability to cast charm spells even if she did not prepare them ahead of time. The seducer can “lose” any prepared spell or (if she prepares spells) or spell per day (if she is a spontaneous caster) that is not an orison or domain spell in order to cast charm person, except the spell's level is equal to the level of the spell sacraficed. If she sacrifices a spell of 4th level or higher she can instead cast charm monster. If she sacrifices a spell of 5th level or higher she can instead cast charm person, mass. If she sacrifices a spell of 8th level or higher she can instead cast charm monster, mass.
Alternately, the seducer could instead gain bonus spells as she advances in level. Wizard would add it to his spellbook, cleric would add it to her spell list, spontaneous caster would add it to its list of spells known. There are quite a few spells withe with the "charm" descriptor.
We generally only see it outside of combat, although in order to avoid the GM's ire for perceived cheese we don't use it when the main PC has a high modifier. If it's a difficult DC or the skill user has negative levels or whatnot, then we'll go ahead and use Aid Another. In combat I have only ever seen it a handful of times. The only character of mine who ever used it was a cleric with a pitiful attack bonus who was trying to conserve spells.
I'm glad it is available for use, but while it appreciate its simplicity I think allowing for situations where the bonus is higher might make it more appealing.
At 1st level, I think you should just let your skill points handle the RP/intrigue/non-combat aspect of the game. Wait till 3rd level to pick a feat that will help that. Weapon Finesse is a good idea, because eventually you will need to fight and when you do you'll want to hit things. For the second feat, you might look to one of the feats that is beneficial to literally any character, such as Toughness or Improved Initiative. I know you would prefer something that is non-combat and not just a skill bonus, but at 1st level that leaves you with few choices. If we're talking CRB and you're not a spellcaster, you've left with feats like Run, Endurance, and those that increase saving throws. If your game includes traits, you could take the Additional Traits feat. Check out the Cosmopolitan feat.
It's cool that you have taken the time clearly word your house rules, but I don't see what a lot of it has to do with low-magic. Do you have house rules addressing what your players will do when they encounter higer level monsters that basically require magic to defeat? Even a weak swarm at low-level is hellish.
Fighting Multiple Opponents
Heavy Armor / Prone
Gotta go to work. Maybe I'll drop in again later.
I get distracted by all kinds of things. Various home projects, BBQing, daughters, Archer, chores, Fallout Shelter... the list morphs over time (especially since I always get bored with any video game I play). However, no one effs with my RPG time - there are no distractions. Not for this and not for GoT. It doesn't take a back seat to anything except the periodic holiday family get-together, and others in my group usually have the same thing going anyways. My non-gaming friends don't ask why I'm busy on a Sunday, the kids don't complain (much) anymore, I even go to gaming while I'm on-call. Yes, I will schedule ahead and cancel myself for something important, but generally I do everything I can to make it to every session.
There was a time in my 20s during which I didn't have a gaming group, but to be fair I was in a metal band that had all kinds of D&D undertones... and overtones.
It's all good. You don't have to use my ideas. We've worked on a bunch of stuff and I just enjoy the brainstorming.
I didn't get the size bonus during the first time, months ago, but when I imagine have giant hands to grab someone, throw them to the ground, or move them from one spot to another, it makes sense. For a CM like steal it makes a little less sense, but thats OK. One question though, does "treated as one size larger" give him even more of a boost to CMB? Might want to clarify. Maybe you just increase the guy's size and drop the size bonus? Or you keep it as is an word it very carefully. Or did you intend for two bonuses?
I definitely think there Intelligence limits should be dropped. It will be quite rare for anyone to reach those limits, and if they do then they are exceptional PCs and NPCs who extraordinary compared to the rest of the world.
The word is spelled Profession.
Instead of saying "any tools assocaited with their profession", you might as well say "one martial weapon of choice". You don't need proficiency in tools of any kind - they simply grant a bonus to a skill. And why in the name of Gozreh's beard would a doctor use a punching dagger at work?!
For the Rave feature, based on personal experience, I think a bonus to Strength and Charisma would be more fitting, coupled with a penalty to AC and Wisdom-based skill checks, and a bonus on mind-affecting saves. An inability to use certain skills (wisdom for example) would not be entirely accurate, but it would be more in line with the Rage ability that is is based on. I'm not sure that risking failure to cast spells is fitting, because (if I understand the concept) the maniac is supposed to use this ability to becomes a stronger spellcaster - not an unreliable one.
Manic is an adjective, maniac is a noun, but they are closely related. Basically a maniac is a manic person. Maniac is probably the more offensive of the two because it is actually a label you could apply to a person, whereas manic would be used to describe a person's behavior. All of that aside though, I just think manic sounds cooler as a class name.
You are confusing hysteria with "female hysteria" - a medical diagnosis no longer recognized by the medical community. Hysteria is simply a state of strong, unconrolled emotions and has absolutely no gender connotation.
"Rave" has to do excitement and enthusiasm - emotions that are less intense than the love and hate emotions you cite in the heading to your class.
At higher level, a magus gets to add wizard spells to his spell book. It would be cool if the alchemist could do the same.
Ranger and paladin spell DCs could gain a nice boost when used against a favored enemy, or against the target of a smite evil.
I agree about the sorcerer's bloodline spell. An oracle gains his bonus spells at even levels and even then only choosing one spell is tough. My oracle rarely has use for his bonus spells, and its a bit of a joke at the table when I finally get to do so.
I am in no way opposed to the idea of this because I have also worked on something similar (a class called bomber), but have the following concerns:
1) Bombs are resolved as touch attacks, and as the gunslinger has shown, a full BAB and touch attacks ends up being boring. You basically always score hits. Little risk, no suspense.
2) No class in the game gets a free bonus to an ability score, and certainly not at 1st level. A fighter who wants this archetype will just have to suck it up and be of greater than mediocre intelligence.
3) You make no mention of what level this fighter gains his bombs. He trades all Armor Training for it, so does that mean he gains bombs at 3rd level?
4) Full BAB is too much, and an extra +1 to attack on top of that from Throw Anything is just unneccessary. Its probably unneccessary for the alchemist too.
4) In exchange for Weapon Training 1, this bomber gains a total of 8 discoveries and is still able to trade Weapon Training 2 & 3 for something else. I see a problem there. What happened to Weapon Training 4?
5) You give an ability at 17th level in exchange for Armor Mastery, but Armor Mastery is gained at 19th level.