Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Power Word Spells: Lore of the First Language (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Endzeitgeist

Wicked Fantasy—Humans: The Reign of Men (PFRPG) PDF
***( )( ) by Endzeitgeist

A Necromancer's Grimoire: Masters of the Gun (PFRPG) PDF
*( )( )( )( ) by Endzeitgeist

GameMastery Flip-Mat: Dragon's Lair
***** by danmasucci

GameMastery Flip-Mat: Haunted Dungeon
***** by danmasucci

   RSS Posts    RSS Reviews    RSS Wishlists
Chris Self

Chris Self's page

Master of Coin. Pathfinder Society Member. 511 posts (512 including aliases). No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 1 Pathfinder Society character. 1 alias.

Posts

Search Posts
Search Chris Self's posts:
RSS Recent Posts
401 to 450 of 511 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | next > last >>

F. Wesley Schneider wrote:
Art directors MIGHT be working on mock-up covers as we speak.

But you didn't hear that from me.


Vic Wertz wrote:
Paul Ackerman 70 wrote:

Will this be available at GenCon?

I'm looking ahead for items to spend my voucher on. I know I have to wait until Sunday but I'd really like on of these. If not... I'll preorder.

We will have them at Gen Con... but I can't guarantee we won't sell out of our convention allotment by Sunday.

*cough*getitthursdaymorning*cough*


JoelF847 wrote:
Chris Self wrote:


Never! Bad puns and leaving yoda8myhead in the dark forever!
How about you tell everyone BUT yoda8myhead...I promise we won't spill the beans and let him in on anything!

Hmmm...tempting.

How about I just tell him that our deadline is the 23rd, and we're late if he doesn't know by then?


Sebastian wrote:


(I was actually trying to be silly with that comment - particularly given that gold prices have gone up so much in the past year or two).

Oh, I figured (mostly). But then that got me thinking of what the conversion rate would be... (What do you mean, there's no forex listing for gp?!)

(Also reminds me of the time I tried to determined which was richer, my EQ2 character or my WoW character. I ended up looking up how much gold sold for in each game in dollars and used that as my conversion guide.)

Moderately off-topic Chris is going to go send out some bills now. /nod


Callous Jack wrote:


I think he and Chris were feeling the heat.
;-)

Heh. It was more, "Hey Josh, what the heck are you referring to in this thread? Oh, that. Yeah, here's what the deadlines are."

And then he beat me to actually telling you when we would tell you. :)


No, no, no...that's assuming that gold is valued at the same rate between the two worlds.

What you really need to look at are economic benchmarks. How much is a loaf of bread, a gallon of milk? Look at the trade goods section, compare a pound of flour or iron (PHB 112). That'll get you a much more accurate conversion rate.


yoda8myhead wrote:
Chris Self wrote:
yoda8myhead wrote:
Stop making bad puns and announce new products, Self!
Amazing how often I hear that...
There's a very easy way to make it stop...

Never! Bad puns and leaving yoda8myhead in the dark forever!


spamhammer wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
He shifted the burden to Chris Self, get him!
From now on, I'm saying, "He shifted the burden to Chris Self, get him!" before I start a fracas.

Yes...he shifted the burden. Get HIM! (That is, not me. Remember, I'm not the tease.)

(:


Ahhh! I'm being defamed without warning in a thread that I haven't read!

What's this now? New products? Announcements? My...perhaps I should find out what this is all about.

(Maybe I should have Josh post the product codes. That would tell me exactly what they are, tell those who are really paying attention what category they're in, and just be more teasing to most.)


yoda8myhead wrote:
Stop making bad puns and announce new products, Self!

Amazing how often I hear that...


Mike McArtor wrote:


It's true. I still flit around like a butterfly.

I've found that ninja butterflies are very hard to pin down.


GentleGiant wrote:


Unfortunately, the two of you (well, include me in the ranks too) are not representatives of the general automotive buying public.

Probably true of most of us who watch this thread. :)


Callous Jack wrote:
I'd be perfectly happy driving the ugliest electric car ever made if it meant I could use it to drive the 5 miles to work everyday.

Second that. But bump it up to ugliest car of any sort, ever, if it got me there safely and more economically. And bump it up to 30mi round trip. :)


Blood stained Sunday's best wrote:
A french company has developed a car that runs on compressed air....top speed 70 mph....has a 150 mile range...takes 4 hours to refill at home with a small compressor or only a few minutes with an industrial compressor at the cost of 2-3 dollars. Zero emissions. They also have a gas/fuel hybrid that pushes 600 miles on a tank of fuel. Who knows how long it will take to see these advancements become main stream.... or how long it will take before Big Oil slaps some money down on the table and makes the technology go poof....

Do you have a link to this, BsSb?


Just FYI, Vic, I'm totally using most of this text for the solicitation. :)


JasonKain wrote:

I'm going to chime in with something I've been advocating for a while: Changing flavor, not mechanics. The core of 3rd edition, and by expansion 3.5, is solid. In fact, it had the fighter/mage class built right into it and nobody has noticed it.

It's called a cleric.

And many other interesting things. :)

That is...interesting.

Starts mentally going over cleric spell lists.

Now, just a tweak here and there....


Vic Wertz wrote:
SirUrza wrote:
It is indeed the Military pack. Diamond sent it to us. It's the only version we can order at store level, and funnily enough whoever entered it into the system named it "Patherfinder."
Quite a lot of those went missing last year, and we didn't even get paid for some of them; your post has helped us place an inquiry. Thanks much!

In fact, I was in the process of writing that inquiry email when Vic had to go and post on this thread, thus making my RSS reader light up, making me check the new feed, and delaying said inquiry.

So...I blame Vic. /nod


Hey MarkusTay. Kvantum has it pretty much correct.

The philosophy behind what we're doing goes something like this: in order for a game system and its supplemental material to survive, let alone thrive, the core books need to be in print. Since WotC has discontinued the core 3.5 books, Paizo is stepping up to the plate. We're making books that are fully compatible with 3.5, but also better.

No, we are not putting any new races or classes in the initial core books. We are tying to keep it very close to the original 3.5 books just for compatibility's sake. With this book, we're keeping the game alive as we know it.

However, we have every intention of continuing on with books, much like the splatbooks. There will definitely be new classes and races and such in upcoming expansions. But you'll have to be patient. Those won't be for a few years yet.


I pre-ordered my full version yesterday. :)


Ken Marable wrote:

As restrictive and disappointing as this license is, I keep seeing references to WotC being able to take your content and reprint it in their books without compensation. Where are people getting that from?

I know there's some standard "if there's some coincidental parallel design, you can't sue us" stuff in there, but that's in pretty much every license pertaining to creative properties. It always smells like it strongly favors the big company, but really it looks like the same standard legal text that's on every submission form any freelancer will ever sign, but I don't see what the freak out is over that.

So, is there another passage that people are interpreting as signing over ownership of all intellectual property to WotC that I'm missing? Otherwise, this is like the fear someone posted at EN World about it forcing you to only sell PDFs on CD rather than online because a PDF can't have a URL - freaking out over a non-issue when there are plenty of other valid issues to freak out about. Yet I've seen this pop up several times in several threads and I'm confused where it's coming from.

vance and MarkusTay touched on some points of this, but I wanted to make some more clarification. From what I've been able to gather from my reading of the GSL, the problem is this: the GSL allows WotC to redefine the SRD at will. The SRD tells you what is protected content (content that you cannot use except by referencing it in the SRD). The protection is also retroactive to already existing products.

So...Let's play the possible future scenario game. Let's say that Game Company signs the GSL agreement, waits their two weeks after sending in their agreement, and assumes that WotC has received it.

They publish a book that creates two new classes, the Monster Slayer and the Magic User, as well as three new monsters, the Uber Rat, Pointy Thing, and Monstrous Humanoid.

The Uber Rat and the Magic User are big hits! The fans love them. Game Company puts out a couple more books that have the Uber Rat and Magic User in them.

WotC puts the Uber Rat in the SRD.

Game Company is no longer allowed to produce any product that has the Uber Rat in it (anything more than the name of the Uber Rat. They are allowed to reference it, but they cannot stat it or fluff it, even though they created its stats and fluff to begin with). They are also no longer allowed to sell any existing product that has the Uber Rat in it. It is also vaguely possible that WotC could go after them for GSL violation for even having sold a product that has the Uber Rat in it (though that's unlikely and not likely to hold up in any court).

Let's say that Game Company manages to recover from that. The instantly stop selling anything that has the Uber Rat in it, including their next two books that are on the presses that they have not yet sold any copies of at all. They go on to develop their wildly popular Magic User even further, and base a couple more books on him.

WotC, for reasons unrelated to any of the above and as a good business decision for themselves, terminates Game Company's license.

Game Company is no longer able to sell any of the products that they have made under the GSL, nor any products related to their GSL products that they made under the OGL.

This is the scenario that people are coming up with when they talk about "references to WotC being able to take your content and reprint it in their books without compensation."


James Jacobs wrote:

The cake is a lie.

Your vile slandering of the cake is the lie!

...it's the grief counseling that's the real lie.


James Jacobs wrote:


In my mind, being stabbed in the brain by a crossbow bolt = killed, despite the fact that the damage done wouldn't technically kill a high hit point target.

That, right there, is my entire basis for my "coup de grace=instant death" house rule.

"I slit his throat."

"Ok, he gets a fort save."

"...huh?"

Yeah. No.


Most of the time, I really dislike Lore Sjöberg's articles (in fact, most of them make me wonder why in the name of the powers that be Wired keeps him on staff). But that one was funny as hell.


Jason Bulmahn wrote:


This could be a bit more clear, you do need to meet certain level requirements to craft magic items. The arcane bond simply lets you do it without the feat.

Jason Bulmahn
Lead Designer
Paizo Publishing

Huh...I was misreading it too. I read it as the only thing keeping you from making it an uber-staff (or ring or amulet) was the caster level limit of crafting it and the amount of gp and time you had available.


Gary Teter wrote:
Spooky the Mighty Hunter is out of the hospital!!

Gary...my heart goes out to you and Spooky. Just reading your story made me cry a little.

Hang in there Spooky!


...you've lain in wait for Jason in the hallways of the Paizo office to waylay him with your playtest notes from the previous evening's game.

...you have to keep telling your friends "Not quite yet." when they ask, "So, is the Beta ready yet?"


Rhothaerill wrote:
Mike McArtor wrote:
Cosmo wrote:
:)

Cosmo, as long as you keep that avatar you should make all your emoticons with periods instead of colons.

.)

.D

.(

,)

(That last one is for winking, of course.)

Would that make Chris's emoticons as follows:

)

D

(

)

Well played, sir!

)


Vic Wertz wrote:
Kruelaid wrote:
By the way, how did a used pair of XL Fruit of the Loom briefs get into my package?
Hey, man, we don't question what you order, you don't question what we ship.

Come on now, Vic. I saw that letter you slipped into Kruelaid's box of one of each Bella Sara product. Now that was a questioning letter.


graywulfe wrote:
Vic Wertz wrote:


And folks of you who aren't paizo.com employees... well... we're hiring!

Hey if you ever have a Full time accounting position open I fully intend to convince my wife to apply.

graywulfe

Sorry graywulfe, I snatched that one up about a year ago. :)


ASEO wrote:

(although only the Pathfinder Charter Subscriber shows up in my sig header)

Hey ASEO,

I would just like to point out that your tag isn't SUBscriber, it's SUPERscriber. You will also note the cool border around your avatar.

We're all about the subtle, here. But for those in the know, that means we know you subscribe to...well, nearly everything.


Thoth-Amon the Mindflayerian wrote:

An interesting article: Oil Executives Try to Educate Senate Democrats, But Democrats Appear Hopeless

*spoiler omitted*

Source and date, please. Some of the figures in that article appear...suspect, depending on when it was written.


Erik Mona wrote:

I am looking forward to playing the game.

Given how much effort WotC put into making sure we couldn't see it early, I'm guessing it's really something!

I'm looking forward to seeing the books. :)


Andrew Turner wrote:
Lots of depressing things about his energy expenditures.

Andrew, are there wood pellet stoves available up there? Would that be feasible for your situation?

Back home, my dad installed one when I was a wee lad. Essentially just fit right into the normal fireplace. Each fall, we got a shipment of about a ton of pellets (for Alaska, you would probably want two or three tons) and that easily lasted us through the winter.


Lately, as I drive around, I find myself watching my fuel gauge very closely. I'll see where it is when I start and where it is when I end, and think to myself, "That trip cost me $X in gas."

Certainly helps me keep in perspective what a particular trip anywhere is worth to me.


Joe Kushner wrote:
Might want to check on them as well. One of my buddies has had a preorder in for a while and it's not even listed on the website as having an expected date now. He's a little annoyed but it is what it is when you order online.

Diamond lists Amazon's copies as "Invoice Pending". That should mean that they went out of the Diamond warehouse recently, and are on their way to Amazon now. So they should be getting them fairly soon.


Kvantum wrote:
Chris Self wrote:
SirUrza wrote:


As in May 21st during normal working hours at Paizo.
...we have normal working hours? Oh my...
Given that we've seen posts from the CEO herself at 2:30 AM Paizo Time, I've come to expect about anything from Paizo at any time, except maybe between 6 AM and 10 AM Pacific.

...that's scarily accurate. Do you have cameras in the office or what?


Tequila Sunrise wrote:

Go on, I dare you. Brand and/or retailer. Gimme your best shot.

TS

I would recommend the GameMastery Flip-Mat.

One side of it is a square grid, the other is hexes. And it's permanent marker erasable! Oooo!

(Beside the fact that we make it, I honestly do use mine every session. Granted, I don't use the hex side, but I use the product all the time.)


Mike McArtor wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
Now the question is, will Mike tell anyone else in the department when the cookies arrive?

Not if I can help it.

I mean! Yes, of course.

;)

Ah, but you could instead address it to Accounting. We are known for our fairness in apportioning all things.

Mmmm...cookies for accounting...


...doesn't eat, so uses the little liches' room just to mess it up and then yell at the janitor about it not being pristine.


Tom Baumbach wrote:


But this is the real reason for my post. Please, forgive my ignorance, but someone explain to me why monk's can't already have enhancement bonuses to unarmed attacks (without gauntlet's, etc.).

Pathfinder RPG Alpha3, page 29 and SRD wrote:
A monk’s unarmed strike is treated both as a manufactured weapon and a natural weapon for the purpose of spells and effects that enhance or improve either manufactured weapons or natural weapons.
Why doesn't this mean monks can have their unarmed strike enchanted with magic fang and permanency, or even the traditional Craft Magic Arms and Armor feat? I suspect there is a simple, "No, here's why," but it is beyond me. Even after this question is answered, wouldn't the simplest fix be to change the answer to yes, somehow?

There is absolutely nothing preventing a monk from having a Magic Fang with Permanency (in fact, I recommend it!).

However, you may not apply Craft feats to monk fists because...*drumroll*...they're not masterwork. That's the only barrier.

One of the problems that people are seeing is that you can buff just straight + to hit and + damage through Magic Fang and associated spells, but there's no way to replicate the types of things you can get with Craft.


David Jackson 60 wrote:


Yea, I'm more thinking along the lines of those bonuses being put towards something like bane or ghost touch which is what I really want to see out of the wraps idea...that or adjust the amulet to do it (but I like the wraps flavor better than the pimp-medallion :P).

Aha!

Now, that is an idea that I can get behind.

David Jackson 60 wrote:


The monk already loses out on some weapon tricks the rest of the party gets...two handing, two weapon, and shield stuff doesn't mesh that well with the monk. I'm not sure what the cost would be but I think something could be hit on that was the right mark.

Yes, but no one else gets as many attacks as them. That's a pretty neat trick, if you ask me. And, essentially, if you squeak it right, they both dual wield and two-hand for free, as long as they're flurrying. (You can have a staff in hand, use both ends, then use each fist, and throw in a foot for good measure, all with no penalites. Alternately, you can use that kukri in one hand, then a fist, then that kukri again, then headbutt him, then kukri him. Free two hand and free dual wield.)

And even if they're not flurrying, they can always use their unarmed as a free off-hand with no penalty.

Remember: "This means
that a monk may make unarmed strikes with his hands full.
There is no such thing as an off-hand attack for a monk
striking unarmed."

Granted, you don't get the extra attack...but that's exactly what flurry is. You're dual wielding your fists with decreasing penalties.


David Jackson 60 wrote:

yea, but wouldn't the averages be 35/40 and 55/40 respectively?

That makes the difference -5 & +15. Also as I said the wraps wouldn't need to be weapons. They could be wonderous items that effectively give a bonus or an ability like ghost-touch which the monk loses out on with his unarmed...but I suppose he might as well pick up a ghost touch weapon and use it seeing is his damage with a magical weapon will be higher given the same bonus.

I think the best choice would be such an item with a reasonable cost...but of course that's more space in your book.

So, a +3 amulet and a +5 weapon have about the same price, within a few thousand gold (a small percentage when you're at those levels). The +3 fists will hit a bit less often, but will hit for more.

I think that the amulet versus the weapon is already correctly balanced.

IMHO, no new item, enchant, etc is needed. The current one seems to work well. (Again, with the caveat that I have not playtested this. This is just mathematical, and shooting from the hip.)


The Pathfinder RPG Alpha 3 wrote:


Flurry of Blows

[The monk] may attack with unarmed strikes and special monk
weapons interchangeably as desired. When using weapons
as part of a flurry of blows, a monk applies his full Strength
bonus to his damage rolls for all successful attacks, whether
he wields a weapon in one or both hands. The monk can’t
use any weapon other than a special monk weapon as part
of a flurry of blows.

I don't see that monks need to be able to enchant their fists. The monk has access to enchanted weapons just as anyone else and is fully allowed to use them in his key damage dealing ability.

Yes, flurry of blows completely unarmed has flavor. However, is there not just as much flavor with a monk taking his quarterstaff and smacking a baddie five times in a row with it in quick succession? Or taking a set of rapid stabs with a siangham? And with nunchaku...that's awesome flavor, right there.

Part of the point of the increasing damage of the unarmed strike is to keep up with the increased damage of enchanted weapons. So, enchanted fists may very well be overpowered for the monk's role when compared to the same attacks with enchanted weapons.

So...let's take a lvl 15 monk. He has the choice of using 26d unarmed strike damage or a +5 nunchaku. Let's say that he has the horridly expensive +1 Amulet of Mighty Fists that makes his attacks magical, same as the nunchaku.

So, level 15 monk, flurry of blows, unarmed with amulet vs armed with enchanted weapon

2d6+1 x 5 or 1d6+5 x 5.
Max 65 vs max 55

Note, however, that they are hitting a lot more often with that +5, so they average damage is probably the same or higher than with the unarmed at +1.

If the monk is allowed to enchant his fists at the same rate and cost as a weapon, that turns into:

2d6+5 x 5 vs 1d6+5 x 5.
Max 85 vs max 55

The unarmed attack here is hitting just as often as the enchanted weapon and it's hitting a LOT harder.

So...when you let the monk enchant his fists, there seems to be a balance issue. Of course, I haven't had time to playtest that, but that's my feeling.

Also, this just explained to me why that amulet costs so much. Guess I get to explain that to my monk player now. :)


SirUrza wrote:


As in May 21st during normal working hours at Paizo.

...we have normal working hours? Oh my...


David Marks wrote:


... what would an Air Skeleton be like?

The guy on the right.

T'Ranchule wrote:
...and the last one... I don't know what the hell that is!

An air skeleton!


Mike McArtor wrote:
Molech wrote:
In fact, it's always wrong if any Chaotic Power is better than any Lawful Power. It's just wrong.

I totally agree!!!

I totally disagree!!!

Entropy rules!


Lazaro wrote:

Skeletons

The image makes me think they're planning elemental varieties.


GentleGiant wrote:
Bill Lumberg wrote:
GentleGiant wrote:
Today diesel prices passed gas prices...

Diesel has been more expensive than gasoline for about 2 years in NJ. Of course, in the style of the state, I get gas for free. All it requires is a gun.

In all seriousness, despite NJ being a pit of corruption and userous taxes gas can be found here at under $3.60 as of yesterday.

I don't recall a time here in Denmark when the price of diesel has ever topped the price of gasoline. It's always been the "benefit" of buying a diesel car that you could get the fuel cheaper, but then the car itself had a higher vehicle excise duty.

On the drive in today, diesel was $4.72 a gallon with regular gas at $3.85. Diesel has consistently been substantially higher than gas for quite a while now, as far as I recall. I was actually quite happy to see the $3.85, as it had been $3.99 the day before.


Mike McArtor wrote:
Gnome catgirl ninja schoolgirls. With pigtails. Riding dragons.

I'm really looking forward to the chapters on karaoke and evisceration.


...encourages American high schools not to teach students how to balance a check book.

...lobbies for higher gas taxes.

...moves your recyclables from the recycling bin to the trash bin just before the truck gets there.

...locks up the wheels on shopping carts.

401 to 450 of 511 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | next > last >>



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online,PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.