Krensky, I got SR3, its not bad, and great human facial details and body sliders.
That Metal Gear game looks promising.
I was looking for a decent straight up character creator. I miss this more than anything from City of Heroes, and don't care if it is even technically a game. Preferably no subscription costs, not online always, and just a straight up buy and be done with it.
As for the other games, I am looking for a good action beat-em-up, like a customization Devil May Cry, or an action version of City of Heroes type game play, not turn based/world clock, MMO type games. I am looking for PC games here please. I don't have any console here.
Any help would be great, I am going insane here.
Thank you!
The katana girl segment was horrendous. Ruined the entire episode for me. Most every power in the game usually revolved around physical mutations, or somehow breaking a law of physics. Turning yourself into code just seems beyond Sci-Fi and straight fantasy and fiction. It was also cheese as all hell. I just couldn't stand it, and almost put it on mute.
Diminuendo wrote: I really wish Paizo would introduce a standard action double strike as a feat. Sorry to say, but the last thing TWF needs is more feat. We need this added to another feat.
So with the trend of hybrid classes getting around the large amount of multi-classing deterrents I got an idea. How about going to the customization even further, perhaps to ludicrous levels, and make an entire class for just one specific character.
Has anyone done this yet? I would love to see some if you have.
-Hexen
Vincent Takeda wrote: I'd be back to FFXIV in a heartbeat if it went free to play... Don't think that is ever going to happen.
FFXIV, really enjoy it. Diabolos server.
Charon's Little Helper wrote: Also - if you wanted to go Dex-to-Dmg, you'd need to dip into Swash & wield a pair of Sawtoothed Sabres. (Not a bad plan really.) Said plan doesn't work with kukri. No, the idea was to do Slayer so I would do Strength TWF, thus cutting down on feat use drastically.
Sorry clicked the wrong link while posting. Thanks
Was just wondering. When I asked for TWF advice a while ago, I was given the suggestion of the Sawtooth Sabre. I was wondering, why this over Kukri in a Slayer build. Power Attack was suggested, but I am not seeing a benefit from using a one handed versus a light weapon there. So when dealing with a strength build with a slayer, I was thinking the slightly higher critical range and saving yourself a feat seemed like the better idea. So could someone please enlighten me?
Orignial Post: Best way to do TWF now.
Crosswind wrote: For a full example of a slayer/horizon walker build:
Half Orc Slayer
Sacred Tattoo, Shaman's Apprentice (endurance)
1.) Slayer 1: Power Attack
2.) Slayer 2: Slayer Talent: TWF
3.) Slayer 3: Two-weapon Rend, Sneak Attack: 1d6
4.) Slayer 4: Slayer Talent: Trapfinding
5.) Slayer 5: Double Slice
6.) Slayer 6: Slayer Talent: Improved TWF, Sneak attack: 2d6
7.) Horizon Walker 1, Favored Terrain: Urban, Feat: Outflank
8.) Horizon Walker 2, Favored Terrain: Astral, Terrain Mastery: Astral
9.) Horizon Walker 3, Terrain Dominance: Astral, Feat: Dimensional Agility
10.) Slayer 7
11.) Slayer 8: Combat Trick (Improved Critical), Feat: Dimensional Assault
12: Slayer 9: Sneak Attack 3d6
13.) Slayer 10:Slayer Talent: Greater TWF, Feat: Dimensional Dervish
14.) Slayer 11:
15.) Slayer 12: Sneak Attack 4d6, Feat: Dimensional Savant
I am thinking of using a modified variant of this, but had to go human with my GM not using traits.
Thanks
-Hexen
Okay, I know that in a recent statement Paizo okay-ed using spell like abilities for meet prerequisite, specifically Dimensional Agility feat. I have not been in the loop, but is this still the case? Reference links please for my GM.
Thanks!
Nefreet wrote: Do you play nothing but Tieflings?
EDIT: specifically, what did you think of this comment earlier?
No, just had an idea for a few recently. I have played a lot of standard races, but the small races, in my long career in DnD/PF playing. I think I just need a game that is more open to creativity than this ATM. I am not bashing on the PFS, its just a personal preference atm.
I was referring to comments like this.
I wasn't thinking of coming back here but I got board. So, hey guys its a game, and I want to play my game the way I want to play it. If I can't not play what I want to play, then what is the point?
Well thanks Nefreet. I guess that is a no go on PFS then.
I was looking at getting into PFS and I heard you can play as a tiefling with some sort of special voucher. I have looked over the rules but I am missing something. Can someone please give me the 411? Is there a particular way to do this, perhaps earn the voucher the quickest.
Thanks
Hexen
Jaelithe wrote:
You have no right to say that. He has every right to "Say" that.
Kudaku wrote: I think the new story line is a nice change of pace and I welcome the opportunity for the authors to explore "the next stage" of the post-apocalypse narrative. So far the fifth season feels like a breath of fresh air.
It's interesting to see the characters in contrast to 'normal' people and realize how much their experiences have hardened them.
I really enjoyed Carol's acting in the last episode. The scenes where she's 'struggling' to remove the assault rifle and describing herself as a den mother were hilarious! It'll be interesting to see if the congressperson picks up on that, if her people reading skills are as good as she thinks they are.
You know.... It just didn't hit me that hard till you pointed it out, but then I get distracted easily; oh hey look flowers.
Freehold DM, this is a surprisingly long game. This is build-up.
ShinHakkaider wrote: The New Ultimates
I will most definitely be supporting this book. As I've just dropped both Bendis X-titles and one of Hickman's Avengers books there's room on my pull list for this.
I don't mind the diversity at all, but I wonder why the title of this thread isn't banded for sexist/racist comments.
Caineach wrote:
2. It is only sexism if it is a pattern that is shown to favor one group over another. As I pointed out when I commented on the...
Women are sexist. Too many men are going to strip bars and hooters. Women in comparison need to start going to strip bars to even the percentage out....
Media can be gender specific. Capitalism goes where the money is. There is no more brutally honest thing than a capitalist market. We are talking about a market that still is getting caught selling lead based pain in baby toys for the love of @$%.
LazarX wrote: Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Supply and demand maybe? It is a stereo type that has not been denied or refuted that women on average like to buy more clothing. Unisex clothing has a flat price and does not discriminate. So its only women's clothing then? I would like to see evidence of this statement though. Go shopping in a variety of big stores in a decent sized mall or two. You'll find plenty.. You made a statement with no evidence and thus can be dismissed with out evidence. I never said you were wrong either; so your saying I am right? that there are reasonable and logical reasons why in a capitalist society women's cloths would cost more? I also see no reason why, with your provided statement, why women just couldn't use the cheaper men's versions if they are the same. If they are not the same, then perhaps there is more effort in making the women's versions? Fitted shirts for women cost more to make because it requires more effort/money to make due to having more shapes put into the cuts of a shirt, rather than a standard square shirt that men tend to wear. To say that a fitted shirt for women should cost the same as a standard a-sexual non-fitted shirt simply because women like to wear the fitted versions is asking for special treatment or privilege.
This ever getting put into active practice would say a few things. One that women are inferior, handicapped, and need special support, or two that they are of a higher class and others are inferior not deserving such a treatment. In either case it is unfair discrimination.
LazarX wrote: Mephron wrote: Sissyl wrote: So bigger people should just suck it up and pay more for clothes, shoes, food, etc etc etc? You mean like I do? Hoping that a store carries my 12 extra wide shoes? Having to either mail-order or go out of my way to a place that's harder to get to so I can buy clothes, and where I'm going to pay more for them than someone else?
Take a look at http://paizo.com/products/btpy97yo?Pathfinder-Society-Year-of-the-Sky-Key-T Shirt and tell me what you see for the prices. Because me, at 3X (down from my height of 5x) will pay 15% more than someone who's a large. And that's just one I found here.
We're big and we pay more. I accept that. That doesn't mean I need to like it. If you think that's bad, remember that typically women pay more for getting less in the areas of clothing. My spouse used to complain about that frequently before he transitioned to wearing male clothing. Supply and demand maybe? It is a stereo type that has not been denied or refuted that women on average like to buy more clothing. Unisex clothing has a flat price and does not discriminate. So its only women's clothing then? I would like to see evidence of this statement though.
Sissyl wrote: So bigger people should just suck it up and pay more for clothes, shoes, food, etc etc etc? A good number of shirts that are XXL or bigger do have a higher charge. So yes, and it is already happening.
Wall of force blocking dug in grab holes for climbing. Just to tick them off. :P
CapeCodRPGer wrote: It should have ended with Sherlock and Watson waking up and saying how they had the same dream. ;) So your saying Watson was chasing the dragon to?
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Oh SG:U so under-rated. I loved how it got away from the Star Trek formula SG1 got into. Yeah they were lost in space, it has been done before, but wow, language was an issue again, sense of hopelessness, constant threat and fight for resources, and the insecurity. Loved how it used existing content in the show, like the communication stones.
Just totally underrated.
I am always a fan of the arcane dualist. The ability to do semantic components of spells with you weapon is very good, especially paired with the ability of it being your arcane bond item, wow. I am also partial to the musical aspect of the class to. So I am totally bias here. Singing off heavy metal and creepy funny songs lyrics; oh the fun.
Mythic wrote: Power Attack (Mythic)
Your attacks are truly devastating.
Prerequisite: Power Attack.
Benefit: When you use Power Attack, you gain a +3 bonus on melee damage rolls instead of +2. When your base attack bonus reaches +4 and every 4 points thereafter, the amount of bonus damage increases by +3 instead of +2. In addition, the bonus damage from this feat is doubled on a critical hit, before it's multiplied by the weapon's critical multiplier.
You can expend one use of mythic power when you activate Power Attack to ignore the penalties on melee attack rolls and combat maneuver checks for 1 minute.
Power Attack (Mythic)
Your attacks are truly a force to be dealt with.
Prerequisite: Power Attack.
Benefit: When you use Power Attack, you can now chose what minus to hit you want to use. The minus can not be greater than you base attack bonus normally allow.
You can also use a mythic point as a non-action to reduce the minus to hit by half for 1 round for ever point of base attack you posses. This ability can only be used once per encounter and/or encounter.
wraithstrike wrote: I always thought it had to be a potion you had tasted before, but after checking the book I see I was wrong. That was one I didn't know either.
Purple Dragon Knight wrote: Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote: Purple Dragon Knight wrote: the latest story arc when Deadpool went to North Korea is not for the faint of heart... there's no way Deadpool should be less than R rated. Parents who bring their kids to bloodbath movies: shame on you. Once sold GTO 3 (Before censoring) to a grandmother for her 9 year old grandson. Some parents and grandparents are incredibly stupid, and it is their fault. You Sir, are an opportunist. Did you get lots for it or just its fair used condition price? Did you warn that grandmother what she was buying? Oh I told her twice what she was buying, and even got in trouble with my boss for it. She didn't listen, gave me a nasty look, and said "This is what he wanted." Snatched the game out from my hands and stormed out the store.
wraithstrike wrote: Go swashbuckler to get Swashbuckler's finesse. Pick up slashing grace. Take EWP(sawtooth sabre). You now get your full dex damage to both your main and off hand weapon.
I would also suggesting going into another class because you only need one level of Swashbuckler to pull this off.
Just too much effort and feats working around dex. If I can, I just want to go straight to strength.
The only stat that a dragon is deficient with is Dex.
ZaGstrike wrote: Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote: Personally with the quality of the ACG was released as; I think it is past due to calm and reduce the amount of releases. Once is an anomaly, twice is a pattern. I think it's too early to judge if the rate of class-books is actually degrading.
They deserve a chance to learn from the mistakes in the last book. There has been spells listed in previous books but with no descriptions. Also, my ACG, had "Adventure Path" subtitle under the Pathfinder logo. That is a hefty unprofessional mistake.
Personally with the quality of the ACG was released as; I think it is past due to calm and reduce the amount of releases.
Pendagast wrote: Str 13(15) Dex 14(16) Con 13 Int 12 Wis 12 cha 10
1st level Slayer: EWP Sawtooth Sabre
2nd level Slayer: Talent TWF
3rd level Slayer: Sneak attack +1d6, Endurance
4th level Slayer: +1 to dex, Slayer Talent, Double slice
Thought the point to doing slayer was that you didn't need Dex any more? So you could put the 2nd stat into Wisdom. Plus there is always items to up your wisdom.
Matt2VK wrote: How would you go about building a Slayer / Horizon Walker *BAMF* character? I am not one to power game too badly. I was thinking about making a truly unstoppable threat melee combatant. I was thinking Qlippoth-Spawn Tiefling (+2 Str, +2 Wis, -2 Int). The Blur SA really would help too. This goes with the multiplaner nature of this suggested build.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Pendagast wrote: OUCH! I have to hand it to you, I had completely discounted that PrC, and all PrCs entirely before. Jumping into this PrC, with many classes, really helps things out.
Pendagast wrote: Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote: I really like the idea of slayer. Now, how about trying to move in fast and getting full BaB at the same time. What about trying to get the dimensional agility feat tree? Maybe get into Eldritch Knight somehow, to keep the full BaB going?
Alternatives are welcomed.
Horizon walker is FULL Bab, it's meant to be taken off of ranger really, but slayer could do it.
Requires endurance as a feat tax, needs a semi decent wisdom to work, but take levels 7, 8, and 9 as a horizon walker, and take astral as your terrain dominance pick (3rd level HW, 9th character level)
now you can being your dimensional dervish feat tree because this gives you dimension door as an SLA (wis based)
all while remaining full BAB.
it's seriously a fun character concept…
someone will cry broken, which it probably is…but HW was made long before there was a slayer…. keep in mind with that feat tree, you can *BAMF* as many times as you can attack, AND you will eventually be able to flank *with yourself*
OUCH! HOLLY CRAP! That is an awesome suggestion!!! Works perfectly with my character concept too.
I really like the idea of slayer. Now, how about trying to move in fast and getting full BaB at the same time. What about trying to get the dimensional agility feat tree? Maybe get into Eldritch Knight somehow, to keep the full BaB going?
Alternatives are welcomed.
I am always a fan of TWF concept, but with full BaB. Does anyone have any suggestions with all the recent additions? Sort of thinking Blood Rager, but I am sure there are better.
I agree with everything said thus far. I think it is an incredible game. My only complaint I had was the up close detail on the alien could have been better. From afar it looks great, but up close, when its about to take you out... it just looks a tad too cartoon-y. There is no we glimmer of slime, and with such detail to make it feel like the 1st alien movie, I would have hoped they put as much effort into the
alien's iconic killing appearance.
Perhaps my graphic settings are too low, or my video card has gotten old. Will mess with things later on.
Cyrad wrote:
1) They do get iterative attacks, right? You gave them a full BAB without the iterative attacks listed. Also, if he has a full BAB, he should also have a d10 hit dice.
Hit and run here, but I never liked this associations at all personally, and personally I would love to break it.
Paladins don't exactly have a lot of feats.
While you may create a great new personality for each one, the mechanics are too restrictive and limited, as you get board with it eventually. It is just too simple for a wider audience. I get the feeling that there is too much at times, because even I think we have gotten to the breaking point, but I love some of the concepts in the ACG and have been waiting for the bloodrager since day one; I find it a good replacement for the hexblade.
|