Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Guard

Callous Jack's page

Pathfinder Society Member. 8,021 posts (8,850 including aliases). 8 reviews. No lists. 2 wishlists. 1 Pathfinder Society character. 30 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 8,021 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Sovereign Court

Thanks!

Sovereign Court

Please cancel my Adventure Path subscription.

Thank you.

Sovereign Court

Wolfgang Baur wrote:

This is B&W; the color print version is only available at KoboldPress.com.

Though of course as previews of the PDF, they're perfectly accurate here.

Thank you very much, Wolfgang.

Sovereign Court

*pokes Liz*

Sovereign Court

Chemlak wrote:
On the other hand, more Kingdom rules tickles my fancy, so please don't take this as a negative response to the idea. I think it's a great suggestion.

YOU'LL RUE THE DAY YOU CROSSED ME!

Actually I didn't know about Ultimate Armies, so thanks!

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

So...when do we see Ultimate Rulership Part Deux?

Sovereign Court

On the Kobold Press site, there are color and black/white versions for print. I assume this is color based on the preview but wanted to be sure.

Sovereign Court

Great stuff. I really like the idea of the Hamlet and Knight Estate although I may redo the mechanics for my homebrew campaign.

Sovereign Court

Great thread.

Sovereign Court

Set wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
no love for eric?

As always, if I don't specifically mention something, that means I hate it with the heat of a thousand exploding hyperboles.

So, since I didn't mention ice cream, or oxygen, or lactose-intolerant southpaws, or wombats, or garden gnomes, or the planet Neptune, or tantric sex rituals, just assume I have no love for any of those things.

I knew it. I knew you hated wombats. It all makes sense now.

Sovereign Court

Set wrote:

Woke up pondering the similarities between the MCU Vision and the 616 character of Adam Warlock, as created beings who carry Infinity Stones and could be leading into Vision taking on that sort of role in the Infinity Gauntlet movies, and then found out that the theory was already all over the internets anyway...

Didn't the Collector have the cocoon that Warlock was created in (my AW knowledge is fuzzy) in his collection in GotG?

Blayde MacRonan wrote:
Glad to see Thunderbolt Ross is returning.

Yay, me too.

Sovereign Court

Orthos wrote:

*shrug* I'll concede it's not always that, and that some people just simply don't enjoy the thing for one reason or another.

It's just... near impossible to actually discuss the subject when the primary reasons they give for disliking it are the primary reasons I enjoyed it. There's no common ground. Like for example Juda's post on the prior page - there's not a single word in that entire post I agreed with, but it's obviously a strongly-held personal view. How do you debate or discuss that? Everything s/he thought was bad, I thought was good; everything s/he thought was a flaw, I didn't notice or even approved of. The viewpoints are just so fundamentally opposite that the best you can do is just acknowledge the person's opinion exists and move on with discussion with people you see more eye-to-eye with.

Just as people come here to say how awesome the movie, I'm here to say how disappointing it was. I'm not trying to ruin it for anyone else (that's just plain silly), nor am I trying to change your mind. I even envy those who did love it, but it didn't make that grade for me. And it's just me sharing my opinion on that.

As for why did I see it? It's the flagship title of the MCU, the gathering of all the main heroes and the biggest advance on the overall plot. One has to see it just to know where the universe is going next.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Hama wrote:
Because?

Spoiler:
There were a ton of small things but my main issues were Ultron, Vision with the hammer and the Whedonisms in the story and dialogue. I hated Ultron's personality, I kept waiting for him to break into showtunes. He just didn't really convey any menace and never really backed his talk up up in battle. Vision with the hammer was a bummer because I thought they were going to do something cool with Cap since he had budged the hammer earlier. It ended up being a lazy plot device to show Vision is a good guy. Even that was spoiled further with the cheap joke where Vision just hands it to Thor at the HQ. And I don't care for Whedon's writing and sometimes his direction. Oh and why even put Von Strucker in if you're going to waste him like that. Stupid.
Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I saw it last night. I didn't hate it but was very disappointed overall.

Sovereign Court

I wasn't excited for this at all until that second trailer came out.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Cool, missed the initial release of this.

Sovereign Court

Damon Griffin wrote:
Bleah. I hope the costume ends up with more color than that photo suggests. Mostly B&W with a few pale gold touches...that doesn't say "Aquaman" to me, it says "Black Manta."

Yeah, not digging the the lack of colors either.

Sovereign Court

Kthulhu wrote:
Dunst was a dour, joyless version of MJ that was the complete antithesis of everything that MJ is supposed to be. If there was ever any life in a scene, it IMMEDIATELY got sucked out if MJ walked into the scene.

+1000

Dunst ruined those movies for me.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm bummed that it pushed all the other Marvel movies back, especially Black Panther.

Quote:
Now we just need the grim-dark Fantastic Four reboot to bomb, so Marvel can buy back that property (or at least Doctor Doom and the cosmic elements).

Yes, please.

Sovereign Court

Hey guys, thanks for your interest and sorry for the late response!

I took a break from paper minis due to a new job and a new baby. I do plan on starting a new one but I have not decided what the set will be.

Sovereign Court

Freehold DM wrote:
I will probably watch the film. I can't promise I won't groan at the whedonality of it all.

I cringe just thinking of all the stupid one-liners.

Sovereign Court

ShinHakkaider wrote:
Artanthos wrote:
BPorter wrote:
Vibranium is what Cap's shield is made of.
Adamantium-Vibranium alloy.
I dont think so. I know, I know that's what what said in the Official handbook of the Marvel Universe back in the 80's. I remember that. But apparently it was a mistake made by the editors at the time. According to Marvel the Shield is actually made of Vibrainium.

I thought the term adamantium was owned by Fox Studios/X-Men so Marvel movies can't use it even if they wanted to.

Sovereign Court

Mr_Shed wrote:
Dang, lots more work for me then. Because tiny sized or smaller creatures (which is most of this set) only take up a space 1/4 the size of a small or medium creature, it means they should have 1/2" instead of 1" bases - which just means I'll end up cutting them all down to size like I have with the rest of the tiny minis I've had in the past.

Sorry about that. I debated that but I was concerned the mini would be so small that they wouldn't be really recognizable hence the 1" base was kept, and most of the minis are not truly tiny.

Sovereign Court

Mr_Shed wrote:
As a serious note, what size base are the minis on? Is it the 'standard' 1" or (hopefully) something smaller?

Same format as the other two sets you mentioned. :-)

Sovereign Court

Thanks Liz!

Sovereign Court

Sounds great!

Where is Trunau?

Sovereign Court

LASTWALL!

Sovereign Court

Okay, I checked and that is a typo.

The Summon Nature's Ally set is just an add-on to the Summon Monster set. Any monsters/animals not on the SM list were covered in the SNA set. The Giant Squid is in the SM set and should not have had a base in the SNA set.

Sorry for the confusion.

Sovereign Court

Hey guys,

Sorry for the delay, I'll look into this.

Sovereign Court

HangarFlying wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
I still plan on doing paper minis but I may be taking a break for a bit. I just got a new job so my free time will be limited.
*jedi hand-wave* You don't need a new job. You need to make more paper minis.*/jedi hand-wave*

lol

Must...make...new...minis...

Sovereign Court

RuyanVe wrote:

Same here. Any idea when it'll be fixed?

Ruyan.

Sorry for the late response, I just sent Liz an updated file.

Sovereign Court

And the fixed pdf is off and away! Liz will update it when she gets the chance next week.

Sovereign Court

Thanks Danny Atwood, I'll look into it.

Sovereign Court

sanwah68 wrote:
Now...off you go to start the Carrion Crown set, right? Right???

I still plan on doing paper minis but I may be taking a break for a bit. I just got a new job so my free time will be limited.

Sovereign Court

Zaister wrote:
Yeah it looks like its always two pages on each page.

Sorry guys, I will try to fix that and the Mites this weekend.

EDIT: I had the spread button checked when I exported the pdf. I'll make a new one and send it to Liz.

Thanks for the review, 1970Zombie!

Sovereign Court

thenovalord wrote:
Used and reviewed!

Thanks thenovalord!

Sovereign Court

Yay, thanks Liz!

Sovereign Court

RuyanVe wrote:

*dispels invisibility*

While at it could you enlarge the swarms, too?

Ruyan.

Yep, I'll check that out too. :)

Sovereign Court

Sorry HF, I never saw your post. I'll look into this. :)

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The shots that killed Kennedy came from the grassy gnoll.

Sovereign Court

Thanks Liz!

Sovereign Court

3 people marked this as a favorite.
yellowdingo wrote:
What the hell gang? Where did the f'ing tidalwave of spambots come from?

I sense another petition on the way...

Sovereign Court

I always thought the dropbear was an Australian April Fool's by some museum.

Sovereign Court

Thanks sanwah68! Those were the ones I noticed too (including the Horseu Dire Tiger which is clearly a cousin of the Dropbear).

As for extra bases, some like the Horse, might need multiple printings depending on the roll.

Sovereign Court

Thanks sanwah68, glad you like them! I will look intot this and try to figure out which ones are missing.

sanwah68 wrote:
That said, to make the cutting out of bases easier, is it possible to line them all up in a 1-inch grid with shared sides, then one cut just divides the bases, and means a lot less cutting out.

Hm... if it's easier for folks to do that, sure. I'll put it in the next set.

Sovereign Court

Hm, sounds interesting... I hope EZG reviews this.

Sovereign Court

Interesting...
After reading about how much Rob likes Osirion in The Half-Dead City foreword, it makes sense that he's writing this.

EDIT: By the way, is that the final cover? Who are those two characters that are charging the mummy?

Sovereign Court

Okay, I think I know what I'm going to do. Thanks guys.

Sovereign Court

Tamago wrote:
My vote on the Summon Monster vs. Summon Nature's Ally selection would be to produce a second, complete set for Summon Nature's Ally. When you organize the files, make sure to put the ones that appear on both lists on separate pages (probably at the back?) from the ones that appear only on one list or the other. That way, anyone who is only interested in one list would be able to buy it with a minimum of confusion, and people who buy both will only have to print out one set of the duplicates.

Just out of curiosity, would people prefer a complete set? Even if it used many of the same minis from the Summon Monster set?

Sovereign Court

Ross Byers wrote:
The 'aligned critter' list might also work well as supplements. It would allow you to spread the stress of drawing so many creatures out over multiple products, and allows people to buy just the critters they're interested in (A player probably just wants one alignment, for instance, and a GM has more use for Fiendish than Celestial.)

That's an interesting idea although I'm not sure if people would pay more for a subset of Fiendish or Celestial if they could, as Dudemeister said, just draw on their own horns, halos, etc.

1 to 50 of 8,021 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.