Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Guard

Callous Jack's page

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber. Pathfinder Society Member. 8,013 posts (8,840 including aliases). 8 reviews. No lists. 2 wishlists. 1 Pathfinder Society character. 30 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 8,013 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Great thread.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Set wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
no love for eric?

As always, if I don't specifically mention something, that means I hate it with the heat of a thousand exploding hyperboles.

So, since I didn't mention ice cream, or oxygen, or lactose-intolerant southpaws, or wombats, or garden gnomes, or the planet Neptune, or tantric sex rituals, just assume I have no love for any of those things.

I knew it. I knew you hated wombats. It all makes sense now.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Set wrote:

Woke up pondering the similarities between the MCU Vision and the 616 character of Adam Warlock, as created beings who carry Infinity Stones and could be leading into Vision taking on that sort of role in the Infinity Gauntlet movies, and then found out that the theory was already all over the internets anyway...

Didn't the Collector have the cocoon that Warlock was created in (my AW knowledge is fuzzy) in his collection in GotG?

Blayde MacRonan wrote:
Glad to see Thunderbolt Ross is returning.

Yay, me too.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Orthos wrote:

*shrug* I'll concede it's not always that, and that some people just simply don't enjoy the thing for one reason or another.

It's just... near impossible to actually discuss the subject when the primary reasons they give for disliking it are the primary reasons I enjoyed it. There's no common ground. Like for example Juda's post on the prior page - there's not a single word in that entire post I agreed with, but it's obviously a strongly-held personal view. How do you debate or discuss that? Everything s/he thought was bad, I thought was good; everything s/he thought was a flaw, I didn't notice or even approved of. The viewpoints are just so fundamentally opposite that the best you can do is just acknowledge the person's opinion exists and move on with discussion with people you see more eye-to-eye with.

Just as people come here to say how awesome the movie, I'm here to say how disappointing it was. I'm not trying to ruin it for anyone else (that's just plain silly), nor am I trying to change your mind. I even envy those who did love it, but it didn't make that grade for me. And it's just me sharing my opinion on that.

As for why did I see it? It's the flagship title of the MCU, the gathering of all the main heroes and the biggest advance on the overall plot. One has to see it just to know where the universe is going next.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Hama wrote:
Because?

Spoiler:
There were a ton of small things but my main issues were Ultron, Vision with the hammer and the Whedonisms in the story and dialogue. I hated Ultron's personality, I kept waiting for him to break into showtunes. He just didn't really convey any menace and never really backed his talk up up in battle. Vision with the hammer was a bummer because I thought they were going to do something cool with Cap since he had budged the hammer earlier. It ended up being a lazy plot device to show Vision is a good guy. Even that was spoiled further with the cheap joke where Vision just hands it to Thor at the HQ. And I don't care for Whedon's writing and sometimes his direction. Oh and why even put Von Strucker in if you're going to waste him like that. Stupid.
Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I saw it last night. I didn't hate it but was very disappointed overall.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I wasn't excited for this at all until that second trailer came out.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Cool, missed the initial release of this.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Damon Griffin wrote:
Bleah. I hope the costume ends up with more color than that photo suggests. Mostly B&W with a few pale gold touches...that doesn't say "Aquaman" to me, it says "Black Manta."

Yeah, not digging the the lack of colors either.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Kthulhu wrote:
Dunst was a dour, joyless version of MJ that was the complete antithesis of everything that MJ is supposed to be. If there was ever any life in a scene, it IMMEDIATELY got sucked out if MJ walked into the scene.

+1000

Dunst ruined those movies for me.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I'm bummed that it pushed all the other Marvel movies back, especially Black Panther.

Quote:
Now we just need the grim-dark Fantastic Four reboot to bomb, so Marvel can buy back that property (or at least Doctor Doom and the cosmic elements).

Yes, please.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Hey guys, thanks for your interest and sorry for the late response!

I took a break from paper minis due to a new job and a new baby. I do plan on starting a new one but I have not decided what the set will be.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Freehold DM wrote:
I will probably watch the film. I can't promise I won't groan at the whedonality of it all.

I cringe just thinking of all the stupid one-liners.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
ShinHakkaider wrote:
Artanthos wrote:
BPorter wrote:
Vibranium is what Cap's shield is made of.
Adamantium-Vibranium alloy.
I dont think so. I know, I know that's what what said in the Official handbook of the Marvel Universe back in the 80's. I remember that. But apparently it was a mistake made by the editors at the time. According to Marvel the Shield is actually made of Vibrainium.

I thought the term adamantium was owned by Fox Studios/X-Men so Marvel movies can't use it even if they wanted to.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Mr_Shed wrote:
Dang, lots more work for me then. Because tiny sized or smaller creatures (which is most of this set) only take up a space 1/4 the size of a small or medium creature, it means they should have 1/2" instead of 1" bases - which just means I'll end up cutting them all down to size like I have with the rest of the tiny minis I've had in the past.

Sorry about that. I debated that but I was concerned the mini would be so small that they wouldn't be really recognizable hence the 1" base was kept, and most of the minis are not truly tiny.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Mr_Shed wrote:
As a serious note, what size base are the minis on? Is it the 'standard' 1" or (hopefully) something smaller?

Same format as the other two sets you mentioned. :-)

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks Liz!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Sounds great!

Where is Trunau?

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

LASTWALL!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Okay, I checked and that is a typo.

The Summon Nature's Ally set is just an add-on to the Summon Monster set. Any monsters/animals not on the SM list were covered in the SNA set. The Giant Squid is in the SM set and should not have had a base in the SNA set.

Sorry for the confusion.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Hey guys,

Sorry for the delay, I'll look into this.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
HangarFlying wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
I still plan on doing paper minis but I may be taking a break for a bit. I just got a new job so my free time will be limited.
*jedi hand-wave* You don't need a new job. You need to make more paper minis.*/jedi hand-wave*

lol

Must...make...new...minis...

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
RuyanVe wrote:

Same here. Any idea when it'll be fixed?

Ruyan.

Sorry for the late response, I just sent Liz an updated file.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

And the fixed pdf is off and away! Liz will update it when she gets the chance next week.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks Danny Atwood, I'll look into it.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
sanwah68 wrote:
Now...off you go to start the Carrion Crown set, right? Right???

I still plan on doing paper minis but I may be taking a break for a bit. I just got a new job so my free time will be limited.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Zaister wrote:
Yeah it looks like its always two pages on each page.

Sorry guys, I will try to fix that and the Mites this weekend.

EDIT: I had the spread button checked when I exported the pdf. I'll make a new one and send it to Liz.

Thanks for the review, 1970Zombie!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
thenovalord wrote:
Used and reviewed!

Thanks thenovalord!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Yay, thanks Liz!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
RuyanVe wrote:

*dispels invisibility*

While at it could you enlarge the swarms, too?

Ruyan.

Yep, I'll check that out too. :)

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Sorry HF, I never saw your post. I'll look into this. :)

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

The shots that killed Kennedy came from the grassy gnoll.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks Liz!

Sovereign Court

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
yellowdingo wrote:
What the hell gang? Where did the f'ing tidalwave of spambots come from?

I sense another petition on the way...

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I always thought the dropbear was an Australian April Fool's by some museum.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks sanwah68! Those were the ones I noticed too (including the Horseu Dire Tiger which is clearly a cousin of the Dropbear).

As for extra bases, some like the Horse, might need multiple printings depending on the roll.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks sanwah68, glad you like them! I will look intot this and try to figure out which ones are missing.

sanwah68 wrote:
That said, to make the cutting out of bases easier, is it possible to line them all up in a 1-inch grid with shared sides, then one cut just divides the bases, and means a lot less cutting out.

Hm... if it's easier for folks to do that, sure. I'll put it in the next set.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Hm, sounds interesting... I hope EZG reviews this.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Interesting...
After reading about how much Rob likes Osirion in The Half-Dead City foreword, it makes sense that he's writing this.

EDIT: By the way, is that the final cover? Who are those two characters that are charging the mummy?

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Okay, I think I know what I'm going to do. Thanks guys.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Tamago wrote:
My vote on the Summon Monster vs. Summon Nature's Ally selection would be to produce a second, complete set for Summon Nature's Ally. When you organize the files, make sure to put the ones that appear on both lists on separate pages (probably at the back?) from the ones that appear only on one list or the other. That way, anyone who is only interested in one list would be able to buy it with a minimum of confusion, and people who buy both will only have to print out one set of the duplicates.

Just out of curiosity, would people prefer a complete set? Even if it used many of the same minis from the Summon Monster set?

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Ross Byers wrote:
The 'aligned critter' list might also work well as supplements. It would allow you to spread the stress of drawing so many creatures out over multiple products, and allows people to buy just the critters they're interested in (A player probably just wants one alignment, for instance, and a GM has more use for Fiendish than Celestial.)

That's an interesting idea although I'm not sure if people would pay more for a subset of Fiendish or Celestial if they could, as Dudemeister said, just draw on their own horns, halos, etc.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Snorter wrote:

These look good; your art has improved a lot with practice, since I last saw it.

Another way to base is to push flats into a scored piece of foamcore of the right base size.
That way they can be taken apart at the end of the session, and stored flat in less space.

Thanks Snorter! I've had a decent amount of practice doing these over the years.

The foamcore would work well for the larger pieces. I never thought of that.

Itchy wrote:

I like Sanwah68's idea: Copy all the SNA monsters out of this product, make new art for the SNA creatures that aren't on the SM spell list. Slap it all together, spank it on the bottom and sell it to me for another $10. I'll pay it, and be thankful for it!

I suppose they could even sell two different products:

1: Summon Nature's Ally - containing all of the Summon Nature's Ally monsters (as stated above)

2: Summon Nature's Ally supplement to Summon Monster - containing only the Animals that are not common to both spell sets. The idea is that if you have already bought THIS product, you can buy a lower priced SNA Supplement to get to you to the full complement of SNA creatures.

I suppose you could also sell a Third Product:

3: Summon Monster Supplement - containing only the Summon Monster creatures that are not also on the SNA list. Buy the Summon Monster Supplement if you already bought the full Summon Nature's Ally set, but now need the rest of the creatures for your Summon Monster Spell.

Hmmm... now I have too many options to choose from... ;) Good ideas!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Broggly wrote:
This is the first paper minis set I've downloaded, and I'm not sure how the gargantuan ones are supposed to be put together. Can anyone describe it, or at least link me to some pictures of what they're supposed to look like when assembled?

The link that Itchy posted should help although I don't remember it addressing Gargantuan minis specifically. Each mini takes up a full page so after printing them out, just glue the backs together. They should line up perfectly so then it just a matter of cutting out whatever amount of white space you don't want. The black bar beneath the mini's feet can fold so that you can either glue that to the base OR cut the base in half and glue it on top of the black bar.

I hope that made sense...

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
drumlord wrote:
Also, Callous Jack, I'm early in Skull and Shackles and your paper minis are doing a great job at filling in the many blanks left by the Wizkids minis. The players and I love them.

Hey thanks, drumlord! I'm glad to hear the paper minis are working out for you. I'm always interested in any battlemap pics if you have them! :)

Melissa Brown 482 wrote:

Definitely want to see Summon Nature's Ally. Will it be a complete new PDF or an update to the already existing one?

That is a very good question but I honestly don't have an answer to it just yet.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I hear 65% of the bear population want to return to Mother Russia too.

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Hayato Ken wrote:

Callous Jack do you have a Deviantart site?

Guess that with some examples like many other artists have could be a good "preview".

Hi Hayato Ken, I do have an old account that I haven't used in years. I avoid posting paper minis there so I don't have to worry about the artwork being saved and passed around. That's why I tried to cram as many on the cover as I could so folks can get an idea of what's inside.

drumlord wrote:
I like that there are multiples of many of the creatures as it will surely help out those folks that need to summon several critters at once. That said, for the most part I will only ever need one or two of each of these. Could we add pages at the end for the smaller ones that just has one of each for people like me so we don't have to waste lots of pages and ink to get one of each?

Hi drumlord,

If enough people were interested in that, I could see adding that on. :)

Ezaviel_Malakai wrote:

Hola Callous Jack!

What happened to the creative Callous Jack that made different poses for the minis that had multiples??? I've seen you do great work with that in other sets but was saddened when I did not see them with this set... I would have gladly paid more and waited longer for that. Where have you taken Callous Jack and what ransom are you demanding for his return!!!

Hola Ezaviel_Malakai,

I'm sorry to hear you are not happy with the paper minis. Normally I do like to do what you mentioned but this set was very difficult. It contains somewhere around 110 unique minis. So doubling or tripling that would have been an almost impossible task to accomplish as it already took about 5-6 months to finish. :)

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks Liz for the quick update. Sorry guys, I must have accidentally deleted the page with the two missing minis.

If people want to see Summon Nature's Ally as the next set, please let me know.

And a big thanks to 1970Zombie for the review.

Sovereign Court

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Thanks Liz! And thank you guys, I hope this set proves useful. :)

Itchy, the set does include a Viper, Goblin Dog, Hyena, Grizzly Bear and Ape. I'll talk to Liz about adding the ones that are missing. Thanks for the help!

Sovereign Court

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Yeah, I got one too.

1 to 50 of 8,013 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.