Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Pathfinder Tales: Prince of Wolves
****( ) by Saint_Meerkat

Pathfinder Chronicles: Dark Markets—A Guide to Katapesh (OGL)
***** by voodoo chili

Pathfinder Adventure Path #24: "The Final Wish" (Legacy of Fire 6 of 6) (OGL)
**( )( )( ) by voodoo chili

Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Distant Worlds (PFRPG)
****( ) by Chris Nehren

Mythic Menagerie: Faeries of the Fringe (PFRPG) PDF
***** by Kelsey MacAilbert

   RSS Posts
Devargo Barvasi

CKye's page

5 posts. Alias of KaeYoss.

Posts

Search Posts
Search CKye's posts:
RSS Recent Posts

Devargo Barvasi
KaeYoss wrote:

The Proteans did it.

And it was just the start.

Expect to click on the forums and end up in the sleazy part of craiglist, or 4chan.

Or whatever you write will be shouted by a train as it collides with a river of rice in mid-air.


Devargo Barvasi
King of the Crosstrade wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Words like "Baatezu" or "Tanar'ri" or "Yugoloth" seem awkward and silly to me, since they lack the tradition and real-world resonance of words like devil or daemon or demon.
Speak for yourself mortal! :P

He's right Foxface. ;P


Devargo Barvasi
Dogbert wrote:


Then again it wasn't Nethys who put that wall around his realm to protect himself from the maelstrom, it was -the maelstrom- who put it there to protect itself from Nethys. >=D

No kidding.

He's one of those people who joins a group, doesn't quite get it (the misunderstandings are deceptively small, but really fatal on the long run) and goes in with a fervour a regular member finds disturbing.

It's like some guy joining a bunch of people who are against slaughtering animals for food, who will start killing meat eaters and blow up farms with all their animals still in it (so no one can eat them).


Devargo Barvasi
James Jacobs wrote:


The other option would have been to put him in the Abyss, and since he's not a demon lord and not evil, that's even weirder to me. There's ample precedent for CN deities living in the CG plane, I guess, but not as much for CN deities in the Abyss.

We creatures from the Void really despise the Abyss.

Don't expect a completely sensible answer to this, because there is none (at least, nothing a non-protean would find sensible), but some reasons that might be true:

  • They give chaos a bad name. We've noticed that opposition on the law/chaos axis is a lot stronger if we talk about evil creatures, and that good creatures often work together. Thus, our Imenteshs thought it best to make a show of opposing the Abyss to be perceived as more good - and thus, worthy of cooperation - than evil.

    So far it worked out quite well.

  • Because


  • Devargo Barvasi

    Thinking hard about this didn't help, so I wrote here physically.

    We could do this a lot longer if we had a psi interface. A psinterface, so to speak.



    ©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.