Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Sufestra

Bwang's page

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber. 1,450 posts. 1 review. No lists. 1 wishlist.


RSS

1 to 50 of 1,450 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Before I wander off again: Thanks to the whole MCA team! Several of your innovations have been godsends in crafting several campaign archetypes. Te Rune scar spellbook has saved me massive amounts of balance problems just this week.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

What is the cost? I was in the middle of bringing Wizards into my archetype list when it tanked.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Mine were based on Robert Asprin's Myth series. Each file and section had a seemingly relevant blurb in italics. That said, Volo also influenced some headers. They also allow/serve to focus the mind on what is being written.

The first incarnation of my MU guild back in the 70s had a bit on my then-theory of magic, as espoused by the players' benefactor. It ran several hundred words and was way too long. Danged if the role players didn't take it to heart and force me to develop it more. One took it and 'codified' it for his world and still uses a much modified great grandchild.

My world uses a number of 'literary maps', telling the reader the way. The most notorious was in a blurb heading for the local Elf 'kingdom' and detailed how to get there, supposedly. When one of the players realized it was a map, they immediately checked it out and found it didn't lead to the Elves, but into the mountains beyond. And the next area of play.

A friend took a few rejected blurbs and put modified versions in a book he tried to publish. The publisher liked the blurbs but it was obvious the chapters didn't fit.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

My solution to in party fights is a CR+1 after round one, with surprise.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The political and territorial details would come to the fore. In ancient desert areas, holding the oasis/water was what mattered and control was only needed there. Out in the desert, was the equivalent of open sea.

More formal nations would extend control as far as they dared, natural boundaries being preferred. A mountain range might seem a good border, but D&D mountains are where all manner of things thrive! With access to flight and other transport, I fell back on the control of a point with influence beyond the walls.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Ascalaphus wrote:
An alternative way to end petrification is with Break Enchantment. Unlike Stone to Flesh, there's no save needed to survive recarnification. (Although depending on how the caster level check goes, you may have to try a few times.)

Just got access to level 5 and know where a Break Enchantment is. That Wizard even owes me a favor!

Unfortunately, I'm at 1/day.

Unexpected plus: If it takes multiple checks, we might deduce the caster's level (he's the Lich we're after). So far we know he's at least 15. And I'm betting he's boobytrapped the gallery. He's just that petty and mean.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The problem is the disparity between the starting (and subsequent) power levels of the characters. If I'm playing a powerful race like a centaur and you're a gnome, you will come to resent my mechanical superiority. Its just natural. Superman is all over the Bat in every mechanical function, but Bats makes up for it by being the (much) better roleplayer.

One group I'm in (Wizard 9) is dominated by our lowest level and one of our weakest players who serves as our leader, cheerleader, font of tactical insight and reminder of forgotten abilities. She plays an odd Wizard archetype (W 7) that gets Druid spells and keeps me on my toes. I am a better player when she is at the table.

Level 20s and level 1s are not to be in the same party. The Alfonce Carter will drop off the team that stars Eric Dickerson. Nobody wants to be second banana, though second violin is a very important position. The ARG system penalizes the weaker raced characters.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Oops.

Sorry about that.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

This past game, an ancient Sorcerer was found Stoned. Major league discussion on how long he had been there and could he be brought back to life, in the future. Easy, I'm a Wizard and I just need another 2 levels.

Questions posed included:

How long till a stoned person dies? This dude wears early version uniform of a militant Sorcerer group that died out about 800 years ago.

Can a stoned person be scryed?

What if parts are missing?

Can the stoned be aware of what is going on? (We think he was stoned as a punishment.)

What happens if the stone is reshaped? One of the statues seems to have been crudely cut down to dwarf proportions. No, we have no idea what to was originally.

Do things added become new parts of the stoned? A small trunk is in question.

On the nasty side, and I don't plan to harm him, but the spell calls for a Fort save to survive. What if someone jiggered the spell to make sure he died, and How? Also, the spell doesn't specifically 'say' his gear returns even if he dies. Purely academic interest, I would never seek to off an innocent for all his nifty toys!

Then again, that looks like an old style Staff of Wizardry...


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Basically, what is the nature of a Paladin's power?

1-Setting specific. If the writer sez, go with that.

2-Homebrew games are up for grabs. Mine has Orders for each 'sponsoring' deity, complete with their own code, favored weapon, duties and what not. I also have them all under 'Holy Warrior'. Archetypes vary by order with some heavily restricted to certain Orders.

Your game might have each P getting a Domain and benefits based on that Domain.

Fritz might homogenize all divine magic into nebulous concepts.

The only rule I would impose on all is consistency.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

A GM created a family of powerful arcane jerks that each sought lichdom. There were three ghosts and several other 'failures' our party dispatched, blissfully unaware of any further plots. Part of our problem was a heavy rotation of players and the evils of school. nearly 20 players with only a max of 7-8 a game means being handed every clue was a waste. Only when two of the girls were trying to get a friend to come for a game did the light go on. They had both killed a ghost on separate nights and reasoned where there are two, there might be more.

More high end undead, including a nasty vampire who let slip she was the agent of a BBEG. I was in finals when they went door kicking into the lich liar. The lich eventually fell back on faking as a vampire and they staked everything they could find.

Only when it all kicked off again did anyone suspect a lich. Clues we had in abundance, but we were buying stakes when we needed bazookas.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
deinol wrote:
But for every campaign that makes it to 20, there are 20 campaign that only make it to level 5.

And you a raving optimist! I wouldn't give a campaign better than a 1% chance of reaching 20 with half the original players.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Kirth's system is not perfect, but I hear less moans and groans since I added facets. Scaling feats works well in theory and somewhat in practice. I like personally prefer 'complementary' feats that use Kirth's philosophy of scaling up individually, but combine with others for greater effect.

A friend's game uses the number of particular types of feats possessed to effect outcomes, requiring more of a commitment to a 'theme', etc., like Elf feats, Crafting feats, Metamagic feats. E.G.: The feat 'Elven Dodge' is Elf only and scales on how many 'Elf' feats you have. It imitates Improved Evasion after 5 or 6 'Elf' feats.

I play a Eberron Changeling Transmuter that only has a few (3?) Changeling feats (familiar and two dealing with magic), meaning I can alter self 3 + 3 times a day. Next level It becomes 3 + 4 as I take another step in Alter Spell (energy), allowing me to shift a spell's energy once a day for every Changeling feat I have, though at -1 damage per die.

SKR, Kirth and several others have repeatedly pounded home the imperative need to go back and check the balance and complications of your work. It is beyond almost any other consideration. I cheat and give it to my most rules abusing player to test drive.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Dale McCoy Jr wrote:

Personally, I like Exalted's way of handling them: their androids (autocathonians, if you really want to know) have a soul gem. It is the captured soul of a person that is then used to be the living soul of the android. This slight modification may satisfy your fellow gamers.

In Book of Heroic Races: Advanced Androids, we didn't go the above route, instead staying true to Paizo's vision of androids. Be sure to check it out, it has a 5-star rating.

[/shameless plug]

Have read bits of it, excellent work.

Still, giving a page to alternatives (Soul Gems) would have been a lot of fun. A friend's pseudo-Traveller game employed 'slave androids' with debtors imprisoned in the android. The rebellion in his game was against the 'company store' economy. An Android could buy its freedom, but maintenance of the body was artificially high to create debt slaves. Totally inorganic with the consciousness transferred before death, they had a need for any of several expensive/rare substances as a control. That said, our pilot was all but incinerated and the autodoc had him up and running in no time.

Differing takes and campaign hooks would have been nice. One of 3.0/3.5's nicer asides.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

An Eberron campaign I was in allowed a similar stunt for Changeling Rangers. It was Medium animals at start and cost feats (based on level) to get nifty things like size changes and special abilities. I remember a healing feat that up to healed your character level HP/day when you shifted (max of Ranger/Changeling feats each time.

The GM was big on 'race-based' feats for Shifters, Warforged, Elves, etc., with the po' Humies getting the shaft. (lol) I played a Changeling Wizard that specialized in Transmutation. Fun, but I only had the mandatory starting Changling feat (actually a choice of 3-4). I took Changling Familiar!

Rule wise, your option is weak, but I don't think it is dangerously so. I can see a few minor problems requiring GM rulings, but grafting on the Druid version solves a lot of them. Of course, he would take the 'natural weapons' style. Having played in a game with a 'noble beast' from a 3pp, I enjoyed watching him struggle with being a wolf 24/7. The GM had serious personal issues with the wolf, but never really fed into the problems a 150 lb wolf would face in a medieval society.

Read 'the Dragon and the George' for a well done if subtle literary example.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Dot.

I am leery but intrigued. As a superhero game fan, special effects are not scary to me. Worse, I like most of what you have here. I think applying this would be an 'all or nothing' rule. My have to put this to my players.

Have you looked at the various Zelda/d20 websites? They have differing elemental effects, if I remember correctly.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Tried a nature focused Fey race of npcs (summon nature's ally) that were too wonky for a PC race. Calling seems balanced, kind of. at level 1, but it will grow. It is way too powerful and I see easy abuse potential.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The quintessential 'cursed' magic maguffins are Elric's Stormbringer and the one Ring. Both got possessors killed.

I had a similar toy get into PC hands decades back and it killed two party members before they realized it was cursed and another three before they could get rid of it. Figure out what powers, etc the captive has and use them maliciously. Mine was a captive Rakshasa with mind magics. Every encounter went bad, Illusions were a real threat and it 'called' to every potential foe. ESP allowed it to throw off 'detectives' and defeat every plan to get rid of it.

Also read Ransom of Red Chief.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Horrible reason: Bad dm. As the FTR, I take feats to keep him from screwing the party. Combat Reflexes, Blind Fight, cross class ranks in tumble, etc. Now that we're nearing 10, he's run out of the easy tricks. But I missed one 2-3 games ago and 3/5 characters DIED! Without me to protect them, very dangerous.

I really need to get this spear up to +3.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Otyugh sewage workers. Read it in a home published module 'back in the day' and in another more recently.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Kudos for belling the cat!

The whole Standard/Advanced/Monstrous bit is nonsense. Want more stuff, just go Monstrous and keep the points down. Party balance for exp/CR/etc is based on points, not Standard/Advanced/Monstrous status.

I disagree with a few of your adjustments, but I'll have to sleep on them before screaming at you. Might I get a reason for some of your changes:

Short-Winged and Winged Power seem cheap, why the low cost?

Reach and Extra Reach, ditto.

Arcane Sight is very powerful and a real threat to GM plotlines, 2 pts?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

One of my GMs has a campaign ruling that ALL eidolons are creations of the Summoner's Id (or is it Ego) manifesting in the world. Summon Monster works on the same line. Nature' ally can only get you the local terrain list. Apparently, someone kept summoning polar bears...


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Akharus wrote:
At least the consensus seems to be medium!

Oops! I have to point to the Centaur, Large for space, medium for weapons, etc.

I went with medium, too, but (weakness) serpentine body-takes up a Large area. This allowed me to give them Slither, may act as Small when moving. Mine were a desert race, so no swimming, but they had serious Stealth mods. And a limited Burrow ability. The players got paranoid about making sure they camped on rocks.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

I run a similar system from Sylven Trumpeter, but they had even more ranks in their framework. With about 12 languages represented at the current table, including an Inuit dialect, my players don't complain, often tossing in their own thoughts.

Characters get 'language points' based on Class and Intelligence each level and may add up to one point in a language each level (No instant wordsmiths in a newly discovered tongue). My languages have cost for each level in a language, several having prerequisites as well. Draconic is 'the' language for the current state of the Art, so most arcane Classes include level 3 so spells can be cast. The 'common' form of Elvish can be used in rituals, the Will being the key, not just some words being mumbled. I could 'read' a scroll, but unless I popped in some juice, nothing happens. Both are common enough for the base cost of 3 to get to the 'casting' level of the language. Auld Wyrmish takes an Int of 15 to merely understand and a 17 to speak, costing 2 points for just the first step. It takes a feat and a total of 5 Language Points to actually cast using the language, but grants the caster several benefits. I thought it was expensive, but both serious arcane casters are building towards it. High Elvish requires Perform (singing) to be properly spoken, the more ranks the better, is the creation of 2 of our players.

For the handwavers above, why have languages if they only matter at the start. Not saying you're wrong, every foreign movie has subtitles or Romans with British accents. Just delete the rule. The staged language levels can be an Abbot and Costello routine, as my players enjoy running the npcs. One came up with a variant Explosive runes keyed only to people who could read a specific language, in this case 'Ammuu-m-nysu', an ancient tongue, in order to boobytrap a Lich's philactry (sp) for his next incarnation. After the next session, it was bumped to a 'rare spell' status.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The one we sit here discussing is multiple prerequisite paths to a feat. X race gets a particular feat with a lower base attack required, for example.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Our GM has rulings allowing swap outs, but they are campaign specific.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Nice! I went with d100 ages back and foolishly left out relevance, as in everything is relevant! It only turned up a single 'fact', veracity took another roll based, as you have, on who/what/etc the source is and possession of relevant skill. This was made in the early 80s and mercifully lost.

Instead of the d10 for the skill, weight the roll by party level on a d20 with a die for how advanced the rumor is. A '1' being 'unicorns are REAL! and a '20' 'the unicorn is found only if it wants to be'.

I'm grabbing this for a fist full 'o' d20s set of my own (popular with my group), below:

Why should the party care?
Which party member?
What's the topic occurrence?
What's the topic?
How much do they find out?
When will it/did it?
True/False?

Results are: 7, 13, 2, 20, 5, 9, 1.
7-concerns a coming step of current line of story.
13-Two members of common interest, the Arcanist and Fighter.
2-Common knowledge,
20-Nobility and national politics
5-vague
9-recent to soon
1-seriously false!

Having the current group in mind: Someone has started a false rumor that either armor or weapons will be collected and housed by order of the Lord Mayor by King's command. You will only be allowed to check out your armor for defense of the city or when called into the King's service. The confiscation is set for tomorrow, the day before the party leaves for the Haunted Hills. Hmmm, I think I'll add it was started by a rival dungeon hunter whose 'armored people are already at a rendezvous point beyond the city gates.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
master_marshmallow wrote:

As a DM, I actually employ my players to keep track of certain things for me.

The party cleric is team treasurer, whose job is to keep track of loot (as it is encountered) and the money gained from it. The party bard keeps track of the logs, how many days are spent during adventuring/downtime, important (and sometimes unimportant) NPCs, and ongoing world events. Having them do the work lets me focus on making a better game.

Similar policy here, but I rotate positions and let my experienced players deal with proud nails.

I solve 'book looters' (Oh, I wish that were my creation!) by swapping out loot for hordes of little treasure, low CR nuisances. The 3rd or 5th po' loot encounter and the players catch on. It is not my baby, but it signals that someone is playing in 'god mode' and the better players deal with it.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Werewolf?

There wolf!

Young Frankenstien

That's Frankenstein!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
The Sideromancer wrote:

Lawrence, I have one minor issue with your list. You state that humanoids have organs in "standard positions."

Lawrence Dubois wrote wrote:
Does it have fairly standard organs in fairly standard locations?
If the anatomy of all humanoids are very similar, you wouldn't need multiple different Favoured Enemy effects for all of them. Also, in the original series of Star Trek, Spock often gets away without serious injury because his heart is not where a human heart is. I'm pretty sure Half-Vulcan as a race would still be humanoid.

Ah, but had the attacker known to adjust for Vulcan physiology, Spock would have been in trouble.

The other side of your point could be that very knowledge: I know via my rudimentary biology 101 based FE that removing a wing from an ostrich is not the reason he can not fly, but my students have never seen a bird that cannot fly, rendering that aspect of their FE useless. The basic differences between humanoid races getting differing FE includes social (Bluff, Sense Motive), Knowledge and other factors (Perception, Survival), not merely anatomical geography.

In my game, this includes knowing cultures, such as the differing tribes. The Black Spears are unusual and distinctive goblins, focusing on trade and less on raiding. They will not protect trading partners, unless a deal is underway. Yes, players have used this knowledge in lifesaving ways on several occasions.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
James Jacobs wrote:
When I design monsters, I try to give them types and subtypes that both make sense and fill gaps in the monster selection.

Awesomely un-enlightening, but brutally correct on the cosmic scale. I fully understand both points as to where you're coming from in overall game terms, but was hoping for some cosmic thoughts, I guess. Thanks for you point of view and your quick response.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

We're having a bit of a chat about creature Types and sub-Types. Other than the raw basics presented, is there anything resembling an actual design philosophy or 'spirit of...' guidelines involved?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Lawrence DuBois wrote:
Personally, ... better.

Alas, I agree with you in spirit, but am constrained by grimy mechanical issues. I have sought a original source document, but my search-fu is horrid.

If I get lucid for a day, I'll try to formalize my system, but I'm still working on a suitable response for the King to some upstart over in Normandy...

The actual rules do their best to skip over an actual definition: 'Each creature has one type, which broadly defines its abilities. Some creatures also have one or more subtypes. A creature cannot violate the rules of its subtype without a special ability or quality to explain the difference—templates can often change a creature's type drastically.' Or better put: 'we are so lost its scary'. The bestiaries are rife with exceptions.

And I hate your summary of Types above! A lot clearer than the chowder headed glop I'm trying to whip into shape all weekend.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Bwang wrote:
VRMH wrote:

But the spell only lasts for a few hours, so the best you might come home to is a few puddles of meltwater.

Simulacrum, Lesser wrote:
Duration 1 hour/level
Shhhh! The GM doesn't know that...yet.

Correction, he knows, but wasn't happy with it. That's why they're limited to npc classes and 1/4 HD. Campaign specific ruling.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
VRMH wrote:

But the spell only lasts for a few hours, so the best you might come home to is a few puddles of meltwater.

Simulacrum, Lesser wrote:
Duration 1 hour/level

Shhhh! The GM doesn't know that...yet.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Almost every experienced GM, and all good ones, trash race points, generally with better systems. It might be interesting to get other GM systems posted and justified via peer review.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Check Rite Publishing's offerings. They have nifty stuff that can help.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

A campaign I played in under 3.0 had a feat anyone could take called 'Clue'. I think it allowed the player to step out of game to 'buy a clue' from the GM. The particulars are 15 yrs ago, but I remember people groaning that no one had it (character creation only). The whole 'buy' mechanism was 'fetch me a beer' or such, except his wife got to barter it out post game.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Oops.

The above is my reasoning on T/sT and not canon that I have found anywhere. My T/sT guidelines are far more dicey and Campaign specific than detailed above or within CORE, containing a host of half defined terms and concepts. Most are written down in some form, but I'd not venture a authoritarian treatise for fear of being revealed the moron I find myself being on occasion.

The last said, I see these forums as a place to improve both the game and our games. If I should get this into a more coherent text and can figure out how to Google.doc, I want to put it forth for PEACH. If not, I'll like as not post it in bits, philosophy and base reasoning first.

As I see it, the effect of Magic is the first determinant factor, followed by Favored Enemy/Bane. If I am wrong or to stupid with this, please point me to where I can find enlightenment.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Types and sub-types are both collections of features common to that grouping. The big difference between Animals an Magical Beasts is how magic affects them. Special abilities, HD and the lot are fungible, its how they react to magic that matters.

Humanoids and monstrous humanoids both violate every minor difference (wings, extra limbs) and Darkvision is only the most common cross over. The effect of magic is what really sets them apart.

Remember to key it to your world in a way you feel comfortable. Fey in my game can't be hit with Banish and the like, but can be compelled to return to their Fey realm (we have 3), a major mechanical difference. A number of magical beasts are blatantly biological constructs (owlbears) created by...oops, Campaign secret! Depending, the creature could be dropped into one or more T/sT with complete confidence, but I run them as either magical beasts or Constructs, depending on who made them and when. The current Elves are the result of manipulation by one of the Ancient races by magic, breeding, DNA modification, etc. to a now lost race related to Fey, or so the hidden histories claim. They are common enough and lack truly odd abilities, qualifying as Humanoids of the Elf sub-Type. Enjoi are the remnants of failed experiments and count as Humanoids of the Fey sT but can upgrade to savage Elves. Their kin, the Ehinoi are very similar, but are pure Fey. Again, these are Campaign clarifications and meant only to guide your thoughts.

First figure out how magic is going to affect the race, then go looking at which T/sT fits best. As a poor example I used to disqualify for Shapechangers, is whether it is an 'alternate form (a Fey with a deer alt) or the Shapechange is modifiable by feats in the campaign. Doppelgangers, shifters and the like shapechange. Vampires have multiple alternate forms and are thus unaffected by shapechanger bane weapons.

As for magically created races, Raving Dork has a number if insights on the subject and his advice would be of use.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

A recent thought on feat eligibility that really helps Fighters is giving them a partial bonus for Fighter levels when looking at base attack bonus requirements. The GM in question currently allows a +1 bonus per 4 fighter levels. I'm not in that game, but it is an interesting tweak.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Darbius Maximus wrote:

I'll make a subtext under my race's stats to include notes for campaigns using this sort of schtick

A very nice solution! I went this way due to the number of eligible races in campaign.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

TPK cures a lot of that. A game ending at 7pm can be educational.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

One game I play in has nothing but GMs as players, heavy and excepted metagaming. Another, has a hard bias against, but both are fun. A dm sometime back kept metagaming against the chosen player (not character), hitting my Ftr with heat metal, the disguised mage with anti-arcane thingees, the Ranger never saw one favored enemy make a repeat appearance, etc. I broke Sunless Citadel by shucking my Breastplate and using a leather armor but moving at medium (encumbrance). When the druids started with heat metal, I closed so fast they were down by one. Their spells did but half damage to me and they were down by two. The dm whined that I was metagaming!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

In the interest of over complicating, I offer my game's solution.

Bestial Humanoid: A Bestial Humanoid usually has two arms, two legs, and one head, or a human-like torso, arms, and a head. Bestial Humanoids often have a few extraordinary abilities keyed to their 'source stock'. Most can speak and usually have societies, albeit primitive. They are usually Small or Medium. Every Bestial Humanoid also has a specific subtype to match its race, such as Riverkyn or Wulven. Bestial Humanoids are not subject to spells that affect Humanoids or Monstrous Humanoids. They are affected by spells that target either Animals or Magical Beasts. At this point, Bestial Humanoids include Beastmen, Gnolls, Riverkyn, Shifters, Ursine, Wulven


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

As mentioned above, my npc 'brother' is a glassworker, (expert 3) and has four of my early works as assistants. I have a cook, butler, maid and private secretary at home and a pair that run my arcane supply store. The last 2 pull an assortment of minor duties because I got carried away and made them while on a roll.

The GM limits the Lesser to npc classes. I could get real kinky or weird with them, but I like the idea of coming home to a warm fire, good food, no pressing correspondence, a bit of music (yes, I have a string quartet) and such comforts. The lab is always clean and stocked, my clothes clean and the flowers fresh plucked. I grant you its all background RP stuff, but I'm having fun with it.

When I get the REAL spell, I will start with Scroll-bots! The 500gp investment will pay itself off way too quickly. Might take up spell book publishing...


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

This GM's game has been lurching from edition to edition since the fabled '3 little pamphlets' of yore. We have a number of grandfathered rules, customs and thefts from other rules (hey, 3.0 looted Earthdawn!). Two I hate, as a Wizard, are the spell trees (think prerequisites) and spell acquisition when leveling up (Roll to gain a chosen spell or get bounced to the random spell chart). But I play socially, as long as the rules are consistent and known, I'll play rock/paper/scissors. The big 'S' question has just never come up. Having read you numerous posts on the subject, I welcome you insight and advice.

"Why would having fun be a problem?" For me, no problem, but Casters already have it over Martials at higher levels. Giving me a stable of 'eager apprentices to churn out lower end magic items would be almost too wrong. I already have an even dozen tireless servants of complete loyalty. An army of eternal and undieing 1HD functionaries with absolute obedience would scare me to death in our world, much less a world brimming with magic! I really doubt our GM is up to it. Heck, I'm 60+ and the notion is a cold non-starter!

"So you can make sims out of things other than snow in your games?" Legacy from the '70s, the DM put treasure in the 'cheapie golems', typically wands and rings. In this game, the actual sculpture can be of anything suitable, but not advantageous (like steel). With an npc 'brother' being a glass worker, I am looking at glass as a base. I hope his skill is capable of it when I get the spell. I've already provided him with 4 lesser S as assistants. Started seeing a weakness in the system about there! Who needs Leadership?

"Not sure why that would matter. Once the spell is complete, the starting material is, well, immaterial." AND "Also, sonic spells have no greater effect on sims, not even those created by porcelain, unless the base creature had vulnerability to sonic." Not sure if there was an 'immaterial pun' there, but its part of the casting requirement, combined with Special Effects legacy from Champions (Hero games), which 5 of us played way too much, back in the day. All S are required to have a 'flaw', original material qualifies, as does 'imperfect copy' for a stealth or impersonation S, and so on (almost 20, at last check). It is a limitation imposed to counter another 'legacy' quirk, one I am not privy to. All I know is no one feels at ease on the Shadow Planes.

"If the sims had valuable loot, then by all means loot their melted puddle corpses." We have disemboweled critters for swallowed coins and gone after fillings. The Acolyte of Skin tried to salvage a magical tattoo off a 'Red Wizard type'. I was more interested in the actual body retaining some of that 500gp/HD investment. That's a potential 16,000gp left on the ground! My share could be up to 2,000gp. If it counts for WBL, it should hold some residual value...


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Since a Simulacrum is a illusionary spell, 'technically', of a creature, does it suffer from mental attacks as the creature or not? Further, how does it react to sneak attacks? Finally, the big one, do they count under WBL? What happens to the S when the owner dies? Better put as: how long will the S continue its assigned task? Are they or can they become sentient? This is not a problem yet, but our loot last night included a scroll with this on it and I already have the lesser form and having oodles of fun with it.

With a summer to boost levels, etc., I might be eligible to take it by fall and really would like to add it to the arsenal, but want a bit more feel for what mischief I can get out of it. BTW, the GM has the following additions to the spell:

1) 3.5 requirement for a sample of the subject

2) sculpture can be of a range of 'lesser; materials. No steel or such.

3) sculpture must be MW, but you can have it made by a craftsman.

4) not that they have lasted long enough after the party encounters them, but the BBEG making the ones we fight hasn't seen fit to really use them as more than a mail service to his minions. Until last night. Imagine our surprise when the puny L4 mail-bot starts dropping spells of L3! My idjit self nearly died by blowing 3 straight saves! Fortunately 'he' was porcelain and my sonic spells were amped by our Bard. Other than monetary cost, is there a limit on how many one might have?

5) As we have been cheerfully removing S from the BBEG inventory, should we have been salvaging the 'dead'?

I am still wasted from a 9 hour backed up by another 5 today gaming session and am to tired to be sure I covered it all. If you see something I missed, volunteer!


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

What criteria do you use for what gets in your game? 'Simply CORE' is a cop out, since some awesome stuff has come out since, and 'no 3pp' implies that the very people who actually WROTE PF never had another worthy contribution. I just finished a series of games run by new dms using Rogue/Super Genius material (that I must now include in my game, darn it!) and enjoyed the experience. Yes, I survived the near TPK.

When is enough enough? As mentioned above, I have over 400 races in my minor leagues, but still allow some 37 (?) at present. Elves counts as but one, so there are scads from a lot of sources, including variations or rebuilds from 4 decades of running and playing.

I guess the criteria is my big interest, what drives this in and that out. A friend set his PF game in Gloratha from Runequest, starting this thought line. I must here admit I never really gave a thought to the 'how' that others used to assemble the game world, but now I'm interested.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Ciaran Barnes wrote:
I only got to 43 though.

You are correct, I made the error of counting 12 instead of 11 for CORE classes.

Not that it really matters in my game, I deep-sixed some and added a great deal of 3pp. I adjust for the 'feel' of the campaign and to avoid certain problem issues.

1 to 50 of 1,450 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.