Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Lem

Blackbot's page

FullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 474 posts. No reviews. 7 lists. No wishlists. 4 Pathfinder Society characters.


RSS

1 to 50 of 474 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Silver Crusade *

Blakmane wrote:
If you search for 'readying an action outside of combat' you will see a great deal of threads talking about it.

I will look those up, thanks. This was one of the few cases where I had no idea what to search for.

Silver Crusade *

So. The situation was this:
The party goes through a jungle and approaches a swarm.
The scenario is contradictory at this point - it states that the party can go around or wait for the swarm to calm down. The swarm tactics, however, say that " ...they attack the PCs as soon as they come near enough to witness the scene."
I decided that they see the swarm crawl around and that it doesn't immediatly attack.
They pull out some alchemist's fires and go closer to throw them. I ask them how close they want to go, deciding that if they approach closer than 4 squares the swarm attacks. They go far enough to reach that square and the swarm attacks.
Initiative gets rolled, the swarm wins, it moves first.

Long story short: No major damage, nobody poisoned, swarm gets killed farily quickly (partly because I messed up the splash weapon rules - I thought you only needed to hit the swarm's square instead of the swarm itself), a bit of healing required afterwards. The scenario overall was also well received, so this is not about some day-ruining argument or anything.

However. A few players were fairly unhappy about the swarm acting first because they clearly approached it with the intent of striking first once it reacts. In the end I called "even or odd?", they called even, I rolled odd, so the ruling stood and the swarm moved first. No hard feelings on either side. Though I got thinking: How would you have ruled in this instance?

My reasoning: You cannot decide that all of a sudden you're in combat. They inched nearer and nearer but were still surprised at how quickly and suddenly the swarm attacked them (displayed by initiative).
Their reasoning: "Implied" initative, they moved & readied their action to throw constantly. Thus they should've been able to throw once it was the swarm's turn.
I feel like this reasoning is a difficult one - it opens the door for things like "We approach the guys working at the docks. The fighter and the paladin ready an action: If they turn out to be aggressive we want to hit them as soon as they enter an adjacent square.", making initiative useless for fights where both combatants are aware of each other.

So...your thoughts?
(I'm not sure whether this should be in the rules question forum, but because it strongly interacts with some PFS scenarios [and because we're bound by the tactics noted] I feel like it should be here.)

Silver Crusade *

5 people marked this as a favorite.
godsDMit wrote:
Jared Thaler wrote:

No more "I check for a tea set" in every room.

Right. Now we have faction cards, so it's:

What country are we in?

Is this guy a slave or captive?

Do they allow slavery in this country?

Yeah. I hate players who want to know where they are. And those who want to know more about that country or even NPCs they interact with are the absolute WORST.

;)

Silver Crusade

Yes, that's something I wish I had done back when I started. It just seemed so...contrived that people from all over Ustalav (and in one case Lastwall) were invited to come to a funeral and all arrive JUST when the funeral begins.

Additional ideas: If they choose to wait and lack any direction some traveller could talk about "Some old fellow dyin' over in Ravengro, terrible thing, a Professor or something" in the tavern. That might get them going. Bonus points if Lorrimor mentioned that he thinks he's onto something and it might get dangerous in his letter.

Silver Crusade

Mr. Dodo wrote:
On the carriage thing: how should i justify it? Like, why are they on that carriage, instead of trying to reach the Ravengro on their own? Who paid the carriage? why did they meet in another town? Who introduced them? >_<

They could gather in a town because the Professor wanted to meet with them. He doesn't show, they take the carriage to Ravengro and arrive just in time for the Professors funeral.

Makes more sense than "You gather from all over Ustalav and arrive JUST in time!". ;)

Silver Crusade

Did they read the Player's Guide?

Also, how much do they know about the AP and Pathfinder in general?

If they know that CC is a horror adventure path and they are experienced, they can pretty much guess they will face undead first because most other horror creatures kill low level groups outright.

If they know the title of the module they can figure it out.
If they are experienced Pathfinder players they should be able to handle it.

On the other hand I feel like the module slowly introduces undead and if you buff up the shopping abilities in town they should be able to buy stuff to counter the undead.
Another idea I read was that the characters should start out on the carriage going towards Ravengro. This way they get to know each other and you can set up what they should expect without trapping them with the monsters (for example, you can throw in a broken down carriage with two zombies in it or a swarm which disbands naturally after a few rounds) - introducing them to the monsters and setting up the mood without actually endagering them too bad.

Silver Crusade

You couldn't have picked a wronger forum. Yes, that's not even a word, I know. ;)

Pathfinder Society is all about playing "by the rules", no homebrew-stuff there. You're looking for the Homebrew/Houserules forum. I flagged the thread so that it will be moved there. :)

From first sight, though: It seems as if the fighter loses very little (first feat is predetermined, no heavy armor) and gains very much (2 skill points, new (arguably better) class skills, more choice in bonus feats - he's not even forbidden from using his bonus feats the "normal" way but instead gains it as an option.
Honestly, as it is written I'd just choose it as an archetype for most of my fighters and just would not bother with picking up investigator talents. That's an indicator it's a little unbalanced. ;)

Suggestion: He's not proficient with heavy armor, perhaps he could lose some of his Armor Training class features?

Silver Crusade *

Thanks for answering and giving insight into the writing process of trilogy scenarios! :)

Silver Crusade *

I have decided that this happened:

Scions of the Sky Key I&III:

Before Scions I - Sharrowsmith destroyed part of the ruins. This not only majorly angered the kobolds but also awoke the Golden Guardian from his hibernation. He noticed that he kinda dropped the ball by letting all the kobolds into "his" city and proceeded to kick them out.
The kobolds decide that they have to appease their god and because obviously the miners are at fault they will be appropriate sacrifices.
During Scions I - The PCs come in, rescue the minors and slay some kobolds. Now they have no sacrifices and dare not kidnapping more miners. They decide to use their mining capabilities to get some gold.
Between Scions I and III - The Golden Guardian calmed down somewhat and decided that it's kinda cool to have his own tribe of worshippers as long as he doesn't have to do anything about it. It's beneath him to help them clean up their city, but as long as they present him with some gold he kinda likes his new life. Hey, he's CN - he can change his mind like that.
During Scions III - He still is not in the mood to clean up the caves. But as the PCs enter something changes - these are not primitive people like the kobolds but obviously people on a mission. These folks are usually bad news and he has to do SOMETHING to impress the tribe...so he attacks.

Thoughts?

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Mr. Bubbles wrote:
Taldor doesn't discriminate against Sarenrae anymore?

This is exactly why I wanted to start this thread. If most people (me included) read a thing once it will be "valid" in our heads until we read a contradiction.

Also, please not let this thread devolve into ANOTHER discussion about why Erastil's (or any other) change was good or bad. As James said, it was an error, plain and simple. An interesting one perhaps and nothing prohibits you from using him this way in your own campaign, but an error.

Silver Crusade

8 people marked this as a favorite.

It was not my intent bringing up content with a "We were robbed of this!" outcry. That's absolutly not what a retcon is for me.
I think it's more the different perception of crunch and flavour: Both things fix errors that have been made, but one thing seems to only exist in the present (as in "That's the rules now, they changed") whereas the other thing changes the world how it always has been - a retroactive change, thus retcon. The changes happen in subsequent books, not in an errata document attached to the original (Like "In Book X, change "All gnomes have green hair" to "All gnomes have green hair until adulthood" or something like this).
I'm not saying these changes are bad changes - in fact I think most changes fix errors or problems with the world.

I've seen time and time again people digging up older material as evidence for things that have been changed since then and nowhere to point them to and say "Yeah, but in official right-now Golarion this has been changed."

I thought it would be cool to point out these things as "Look at how much Golarion has changed, how it evolved, how the canon changed to remove errors that have been made."

It's something that is rarely seen - most worlds I know tend to sweep things under the rug but not really change them (Uberwizards who just don't get mentioned anymore, for example) whereas Golarion actively gets changed to a new, improved state with a blatant "Yes, we thought this was a cool idea, it didn't work, so now we changed it."
So quite the contrary, I believe some elements gain traction because they don't get mentioned and many game world tend to do that with content they'd rather forget, not with content that is deemed changed. So often times people will say "Yeah, it's this and that way, I read it in an old campaign setting book!".
I think it can be important pointing out that certain things have changed because that's part of what makes Golarion such a great world, that you guys tend to rethink aspects that don't work.

Silver Crusade

  • The Slohr - A ghost busters reference. Potentially legally actionable according to James Jacobs. Phased out.

  • Silver Crusade

    8 people marked this as a favorite.

    Hi there!

    While reading the Pathfinder TVTropes entry and looking up some stuff about Taldor I noticed some retcons in Golarion.
    Now, James Jacobs has said numerous times that if they decide to change something about Golarion they just "phase it out" and stop talking about it.
    I think this is confusing - if something is described in a source book but not in the next one, did it change or was it just ignored for space reasons?
    For that reason (and because I find it fascinating to see how Golarion changed over the years) I'd like to collect retcons, big and small ones.
    Sources would be appreciated.

    • Paladins of Asmodeus - Let's start with an error. As far as I can tell it was Mother of Flies, a module in the Council of Thieves AP that Asmodeus has paladins. Obviously kicked out because of alignment problems.
    • The Darklight Sisterhood - From what I can tell the Darklight Sisterhood were some kind of Chelaxian anti-pathfinders. The Aspis Consortium got the job.
    • The bearded/unbearded class structure in Taldor - Deemed needlessly complex and silly, thus removed (or it was in place once, but is not in modern times).
    • Erastil's misogyny - This seems to have been added when building Golarion on James Jacobs' original notes and has been retconned out later.
    • Tiefling/Aasimar ages - A minor one because this seems to have been an error, plain and simple. Aasimar and Tieflings are supposed to age at the same speed as humans do but have quite a long lifespan statted out in the ARG.

    This are some things I found.
    Please do add your own!

    Silver Crusade

    James Jacobs wrote:


    1) The whole bearded/unbearded thing has been retconned for some time now. It's not a thing in modern Taldor—like the church of Sarenrae being outlawed, it's now a part of Taldor's history that's been abandoned by the people of Taldor for the most part. The nation still has a class structure, though. It's just not mired in a silly beard/no beard thing.
    (...)
    4) We're not done talking about Taldor, but we have no Taldor-themed books announced at this time.

    Okay, one follow-up questions:

    Inner Sea World Guide doesn't mention anything about the bearded class structure, neither that it exists nor that it has been abolished.
    I cannot find information on Taldor besides The ISWG and Echoes of Glory.

    So, I assume there a list of all the retcons that happened so far. Does Paizo plan on releasing this at any time?

    (It's quite frustrating not finding information on a subject and the only mention of it being retconned is on TVTropes or buried in some forum thread. Also for the historic value. ;))

    Here's the leery-post. As I said, it's a bit old and I stumbled upon it while looking up some Taldor stuff.
    And I just noticed you elaborated on why you chose Andoran/Taldor as answers immediatly afterwards. I need to clean my glasses.

    (EDIT: If my post comes of as confrontational or annoyed, this is not the intention. It's just the way I write and you're awesome for answering all our questions.)

    Silver Crusade

    1 person marked this as a favorite.

    Hi James,

    some Taldor questions. Some referring year-old comments of yours I stumbled upon while looking stuff up.

    1. You said you want to retcon out the whole bearded/unbearded thing because it's too complex. Does this mean the whole "rigid class structure" is something you want to remove?

    2. If not, how exactly would one go about to raise to the bearded ranks? If a character joined the Taldan army trying to rise through the ranks, could he ever truly become a noble?

    3. You said you are getting leery of Taldor (though that was quite some time ago). Is this still the case and why is that?

    4. Is there another book on Taldor planned besides the now almost 7 year old "Echoes of Glory"?

    Silver Crusade *

    You might want to notify your players in advance or set up a few dummyaccounts so nobody is forced to create an account while at the table, though.

    Silver Crusade *

    To the best of my knowledge - no.

    You need to use miniatures of some kind, but if you decide to glue some chess boards together and use chess figurines as stand-ins for the characters that works.

    Silver Crusade *

    LorneGrey wrote:

    So there is no further possibility to uncurse the character, if I failed to do so during the session itself (for whatever reasons)?

    Regards,
    Jule

    Your GM was mistaken, it's that simple. I'd recommend writing to your VL or VC.

    Silver Crusade *

    That contradicts other parts of the Guide then:

    Season 7 guide, page 37 wrote:
    Step 8: Have the player note all items purchased or sold, including spellcasting services, in the notes section (V). If the character gained an ongoing condition like a curse or disease during the scenario, the player should note that here as well. See Dealing with Afflictions on page 38 for more information on noting conditions gained and cleared during a scenario or after its conclusion.
    Season 7 guide, page 38 wrote:

    At the end of a scenario, a PC may have been afflicted with any number of possible conditions, such as blindness, curses, deafness, diseases, and poison. Verify that the player recorded any conditions in the Items Sold/Conditions Gained box on his Chronicle sheet and initial next to what he wrote (see below). It’s specifically important that conditions be written legibly so the player and subsequent GMs can understand them. If the PC purchased the casting of a spell to clear the condition, you need to make sure the player recorded that information in the Items Bought/ Conditions Cleared box at the bottom of the Chronicle sheet. If another PC cleared the condition by casting a spell, this information should be listed in the Items Bought/ Conditions Cleared box, but with a 0 gp value and the casting character’s full Pathfinder Society Number (XXXXXX) written in next to the spell’s name. If a character resolved a condition gained during a previous scenario during this one, check that the condition is listed as cleared under Items Bought/Conditions Cleared on the Chronicle sheet for this scenario, and verify that the cost for resolving it or the PC who cleared it has been recorded.

    Note: Any affliction that would result in an unplayable character must be resolved at the table once the game ends as explained in Chapter 5 of this document.

    So while this is applicable here because the affliction would result in an unplayable character this is not the case for all curses, diseases and afflictions.

    Nevermind that the Conditions Cleared box was removed a long time ago, of course...
    I suggest stopping this discussion and to open another thread to not derail this thread further.

    Silver Crusade *

    andreww wrote:
    The alignment bit is irrelevant, a curse is a condition that must be cleared by the end of the scenario or you are reported dead. Also, this particular werebear is most definitely not good.

    This is incorrect. This particular curse would "result in an unplayable character" (at least I think so because werebears are not legal for play), so it has to be cleared. But curses do not have to be cleared at the end of the scenario as a general rule, only noted on the chronicle sheet if they are not broken.

    Silver Crusade *

    andreww wrote:
    In addition it is called Curse of Lycanthropy. As such normal means of removing curses should work regardless of the time taken. Neither Heal nor Remove Disease would normally be able to remove a curse and so I read the section as adding extra options rather than limiting existing means of dealing with a curse.

    That might be the case and lycanthropy is classified as a curse.

    There are however reasons why this shouldn't work.
    A cleric has to be 12th level and cast remove disease within three days to cure it. This would be pointless if any 5th level cleric could just throw out a remove curse and be done with it.

    The problem is that there is a line from 3.5 missing in Pathfinder:

    SRD wrote:

    The only other way to remove the affliction is to cast remove curse or break enchantment on the character during one of the three days of the full moon. After receiving the spell, the character must succeed on a DC 20 Will save to break the curse (the caster knows if the spell works). If the save fails, the process must be repeated.

    This is actually adressed in Classic Horrors Revisited. I only have the German version, so I'll try to translate it back into English as back as I can:

    "Almanach der klassischen Schrecken wrote:
    Magic effects such as remove curse can be used [to remove the affliction], but are only effective during the full moon when the werewolf is at its strongest.

    Seems to me like they only forgot to include that line in the bestiary. The same rule is also stated in Broken Moon.

    Silver Crusade *

    SterMe wrote:
    Generally speaking books like MTT, RTT, and WMH have kept the classic fighter / paladin up to snuff with the new kids.

    Books like whatnow? Multimate TombaT? RultimaTe Tombat? Wultimate Mombaht?

    Silver Crusade *

    Bearing in mind I GM mostly for newer players, my players tend to stick to the core classes. Exceptions are my girlfriend (witch) and one D&D 3.5 veteran and powergamer (magus kensai bladebound/fighter).

    When I GM in our FLGS the owner tends to play an inquisitor while the VL goes for an investigator.
    Most other players played core classes IIRC.

    Silver Crusade *

    Strictly speaking it's not.

    But the consensus on this boards has always been "If it was an honest mistake, fix it with as little changes as possible" - in this case I'd argue you'd have to remain a magus but are able to change feats and ability scores.

    Just ask the VC/VL.

    Silver Crusade *

    I feel like I missed something between scenarios.

    Scions I: The kobolds prayed to the guardian. He was hibernating until [INFO FROM Scions I REDACTED] woke him up and he kicked out the kobolds.

    Scions II: Irrelevant.

    Scions III: The kobolds are back downstairs and pray to the guardian, yet he starts attacking the PCs as soon as they enter...why, exactly? This part does not make sense to me. He turned back to tolerating/ignoring the kobolds (or even hibernating, this is not quite clear) but immediatly attacks the PCs?

    Silver Crusade

    BigNorseWolf wrote:

    20 foot move speed is the devil for melee. AVOID!

    Save up for the mithral breastplate.

    Never bothered me much. Let's agree to disagree!

    (It really is a tradeoff between AC and mobility. There will be situations where you curse your slowness and situations where you curse your lower AC. Guess it depends what you feel fits your character better.)

    Silver Crusade

    Just to be clear here: We're talking about the hybrid-class skald, not the bard archetype savage skald, right?

    Well then.
    If you go for oratory you don't need an instrument.
    Medium armor is a given.
    Your axe already deals slashing damage, so you should consider the "usual" problems:
    Bludgeoning, piercing, cold iron and silver.
    While you theoretically could make your greataxe a cold iron or silver weapon, I would not suggest doing that. Cold iron makes it expensive to enchant and silver lessens the damage.

    Give Painlord's What to Expect at a PFS table a quick read. You should not treat it as gospel obviously, but it give some good suggestions - a silver morning star is great because it's both bludgeoning and piercing, for example.

    Torches or (in my opinion better) sunrods are always a good investment - last time my party went into a dungeon they were surprised how little a light spell really illuminates. Not to mention the headache it generates if only one person has it prepped.

    Other than that - consider buying a few scrolls. For example, comprehend languages is something you rarely use, so you probably won't learn it. But if the need arises and you have a scroll handy you will be celebrated.

    As for throwing weapons...I hate those things and always go for a bow, sling or crossbow. But in my experience as a melee character you rarely need to go ranged in low levels (I know, blasphemy!) and if you do the fight is often over after five to ten rounds.

    Silver Crusade *

    This is the only time something other than "their loot" is mentioned:

    The Segang Expedition:

    The looters’ spoils consist of a sack containing [REDACTED].

    But I just noticed that the looters both use light shields, so they can carry something in their shield hand.
    Hooray, I can read! m(

    Silver Crusade *

    Minor thing (and unlikely because the temple is quite narrow), but is Asvika or one of her looter friends supposed to be carrying the sack of loot? Or is the sack inside a backpack (which would make little sense to me)?

    Theoretically it's possible for the three to sidestep the PCs and withdraw from combat, taking the loot with them. But all three need both hands to effectivly fight (the looters with their shields, Asvika with her dagger + her casting hand), so...they refuse to give up their loot, start combat, drop the sack and try to get out of there without their loot? Makes even less sense to me.

    I mean, there are sacks with backpack straps, but I imagine this is not meant here.

    Silver Crusade

    Hi,

    question is pretty much in the title:

    If a paladin smites an evil creature, does his attack count as good?

    Background of the question is a monster with regeneration 5 (good weapons, good spells).

    I think that RAW the paladin is not able to block the regeneration by merely smiting the monster, instead he'd need to cast bless weapon for the task or beat it to a pulp and suffocate it.
    If anybody here know that this is wrong please do correct me.

    Also note that while "at my table I'd allow it" is a valid and appreciated answer (because that's how I would rule it at my home game), this is intended for PFS play. So answers based on rules are very valuable. :)

    Silver Crusade *

    Come to think of it, I really like names in Discworld. While obviously a fantasy setting, most names are easy to remember, the weirdness often applies to last names and many characters have a nickname:
    Esmeralda "Granny" Weatherwax
    Gytha "Nanny" Ogg
    Moist von Lipwig
    Samuel Vimes
    Carort Ironfoundersson
    Susan Sto Helit

    Another thing you only find in Germay:
    The Dark Eye is the most popular pen&paper in Germany and most players I know started out with it. This leads to some TDE things bleeding over to other role playing games.
    EVERY SINGLE DWARF I've seen has a name littered with Xs. Xorbarosch, Xorotosch, Angrax, Xologrim...because that's the way it is in TDE. Which is weird because the Golarion dwarves don't even know the letter.

    Silver Crusade *

    My home group had Leonard , Fur, Besh, Nyssa, Olo (Yolo Olo if he did something extremly risky) and...Exelius. Guess which name took forever to memorize.

    My local lodge is also conservative with names so far, all quite short and nothing too weird. But now that I think about them, I can only remember Will the witch, and that's because I watched Buffy. And Wolfang, the brother of Leonard. I always hoped one of them would die so that I could deliver the tragic message to the other IC.

    LAST NAMES are quite a different matter. I keep getting weird looks for Bodo Mudfoot because his name is so thoroughly unassuming.

    Silver Crusade *

    1 person marked this as a favorite.
    SPOILER Kylo Ren wrote:
    captnchuck67 wrote:

    Or should i have the bad guys act with more than a 2 INT.

    Here is the deal. Have a vet player. He has a familiar. Celestial bird with a 2 INT that he basically sends out like a Predator drone. Now when the encounters are outside fine no problem but if we are in an enclosed space where you usually do not see something like that is it wrong for me to:
    a) Have the bad guys kill the bird
    b) Basically Han shooting the control panel and putting the entire cadre of bad guys on alert.
    I mean I know we are supposed to run as written but when I feel that a play is both gaming the system and not acting smart. I think the bad guys need to act?
    ** spoiler omitted **** spoiler omitted **[/spoiler]

    If you put spoiler marks around something, please note what it's a spoiler for.

    (Star Wars Spoiler, if anybody wants to know. Not a major one though, I suppose. Haven't seen it yet.)

    Silver Crusade *

    Google unveiled that the snake badge is the sign of the AC. I did not know that, might be a good idea to include this info in a scenario for GMs who did not play too many scenarios featuring the Aspis Consortium...

    Thanks, RealAlchemy!

    Silver Crusade *

    I may have missed it, but is there any way for the PCs to figure out that their enemies are Aspis agents? The can deduce from Jace's note that they are not very nice people and maybe even criminal, but that is hardly enough evidence to actively attack them; one of the first things they can do in the chase is to knock over their enemies to gain an advantage.
    Seems pretty evil to me - "These guys want the same thing we want, let's see if we can make the dinosaur eat them!"

    If they played the first part they know an Aspis agent left in the same direction they are going, but the Consortium shouldn't know about the "weapon" (though maybe this will be explained in Part 3, didn't buy it yet). So no reason to really suspect them involved in this.

    How Valacosti managed to call his allies to the village so quick - well, that's magic for you, but still...

    Silver Crusade *

    Ascalaphus wrote:


    Given the placement of the text, inside a paragraph that only discusses S0-3, it clearly doesn't apply to any other season.

    The real question is whether it's meant to be that way or if this is a textual oversight. FAQ'd.

    That's exactly what I mean and how I read it too. But you could make the argument that since Seasons 0-3 were written for 4 players in mind anyways it does not make any sense to handle them differently than Seasons 4-7 (the 4-player-adjustment is the "default" anyways, so to speak).

    Silver Crusade *

    So you say. Other VLs and VCs say it should apply to everything.
    I'm with you on this one, but the mere fact that this discussion comes up again and again should be reason enough to write it down into the FAQ or put it into the Guide itself.

    Silver Crusade *

    6 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

    Hi,

    Given the APL of a six-player-group is between two subtiers (e.g. APL 3 in a Tier 1-5) but no character is actually in the higher subtier (e.g. six level-3-characters), do they have to play in Subtier 4-5 with 4-player-adjustment or can they decide to play the lower subtier? (Rule is clear for seasons 0-3, no clarification needed there)

    Pathfinder Society Roleplaying Guild Guide, p. 33 wrote:
    In the fringe case where there are no players that are high enough to have reached the subtier level (such as a party of six 3rd level characters), the group may decide to play down to the lower subtier.

    It is unclear whether this statement applies only to seasons 0-3 (because it's located in the season 0-3 paragraph) or to all seasons.

    This has been discussed at length at several places, but to my knowledge no FAQ thread has been started yet. Feel free to mark this as an FAQ candidate.

    Silver Crusade *

    This is something that has been discussed at length and is still not clear even though it was mentioned in the suggestion-thread for the season 7 guide to organized play. Some think this rule only applies to season 0-3 scenarios (because it's placed in the paragraph adressing 0-3 scenarios), others that it applies to all scenarios (because it would seem fairer, I suppose).
    I think it's the former.
    Discussion 1
    Discussion 2
    Ignored suggestion for the guide

    Let's just agree that it is unclear and until someone official adresses it it will remain unclear.

    Silver Crusade *

    So...has the missing scaling for the Otyughs been adressed somewhere? I didn't find something and by the looks of it I will be GMing the scenario in a few days for a group with an APG of 2,6 (2,2,3,3,3,3). This means that they will play subtier 4-5 with adjustment for 4 players - something the first encounter lacks. I'm a bit worried this might result in a fair bit of trouble since I know this party quite well - two characters are quite triggerhappy...

    Silver Crusade

    Interesting question. I could see both arguments:

    1. No, that wouldn't do the trick. The statblock given for the possessed NPC mentions nowhere that he is undead, thus he's not affected by positive energy. His body "shields" the vilkacis within. Note how the vulnerability to silver specifically mentions that the possessed creature too gets dealt the bonus damage, implying that most things affecting the vilkacis do not affect the creature possessed.

    2. Yes, because the energy goes "through" the body and attempts to attack the vilkacis within.

    I probably would not allow it in my campaign because I feel like possession should be more difficult to overcome than just blasting cure moderate wounds, lay on hands and channel energy onto the possessed person. So just do what you feel appropriate. I feel like it is a great way for the players to get creative and not just fire everything they got. In our group the paladin immediatly critted the possessed person with his hammer (x3 damage) and splattered his brain across the floor. That guy will have some nightmares once they figure out how easy it is to overcome the possession...

    Silver Crusade *

    WillowtheWhisp wrote:

    Awhile back, someone made/posted this on the Pathfinder Subreddit. It's sort of a solo adventure that explains things pretty step by step. I haven't gone through all of it myself, but what I did see did seem very friendly to beginners.

    http://rpgbot.net/pathfinder/howtoplay/adventure/

    Linkified

    I'd warn the GM beforehand that a newbie is at the table - most GMs I know welcome them with open arms and will try to keep in mind to explain what's happening a bit more ("You rolled a 18 with your perception, that hit the necessary DC and so you find something...") or give some tips ("You know, instead of delaying your whole turn you could ready your action and hit the enemy as soon as he gets into range, if that's what you're planning to do.")

    Quite honestly, in my experience nobody (except for whackos like me) likes to read all the rules before playing. One of my players did, the rest picked it up during the first few games and read the rules once they had some context to put them in ("Now that I know how skills work in general I want to find out what EXACTLY I can do with bluff and how it works!").

    Few things are more intimidating than saying "You want to play? Great? Read this, this, this, oh, and this...you can skip this, except if you want to play a caster, but then you might want to read this..." followed by "What do you mean, you didn't know you had to roll concentration if you get hit during casting? I told you to read the rules for magic!"
    (Exaggerated, of course. But you know what I mean.)

    Silver Crusade *

    I think both The Confirmation and The Wounded Wisp are very strong evergreens, though with a different focus - The Confirmation is the classic "wilderness and dungeon" setup and a guide to bring them to where they need to be, whereas The Wounded Wisp is based in the city with a heavier focus on roleplay. If your friends have no experience with P&P The Wounded Wisp can drag on, I think, especially if they are insecure. I'd start with The Confirmation and go easy on them with some encounters (no swarms against newbies, for example).

    Silver Crusade *

    I think Beckett's point was that theoretically an oracle could run around claming to be a cleric of Aroden. If someone doubts it it could just whip out some devine spells and say "See? Aroden granted me my spells!"

    Doesn't really change the basic rule, however. Clerics, inquisitors, paladins etc. have to have a deity in Golarion. And since PFS takes place on Golarion (or at least all PCs live there)...

    Silver Crusade *

    As you technically apply the chronicle to your character when you GM the scenario (as you put in a specific character number, not just your PFS number in the GM slot) - yes, you need to apply in order.

    Silver Crusade *

    If you don't want to get spoiled, you should maybe not ask a question in a thread clearly marked with "[SPOILER]" and shutdown all potential spoilery discussions between GMs in the thread but instead make a new thread.

    That said, my group was adamant in telling Shaine about the book, but the one most vocal about not hiding it (Liberty's Edge IIRC) was also the one who in the end managed to help the DA players fulfill their goal by arguing on their behalf.

    Silver Crusade

    1 person marked this as a favorite.

    By adding ghost touch to their weapon they'll screw themselves over massively in every other department. Ghost touch isn't a flat "+x gp" amount, it raises the bonus by one. Meaning the next enchantment will be even more expensive. Spoiler for books 2 and 3 about the incorporeals:

    Spoiler:

    One little group of encounters in book 2 and one encounter (two if they are murderhobos) in book 3

    That does not justify a full ghost touch approach in my opinion. My group solved it by liberal use of magic weapons and cure X wounds spells. You don't have to be equipped to deal with everything perfectly, just to deal with it.

    Silver Crusade *

    The minotaur in question just happend to pass one of his weapon caches on the way to the battle to substitute his lost weapons. He's crazy prepared.
    He's not the villain Kortos needs, but the villain Kortos deserves or something like that.

    (Of course I'm making that up, but this is totally how it could've happened!)

    Silver Crusade

    2 people marked this as a favorite.

    There is a drop-down menu below the textbox where you enter the post. You can pick your alias there.

    Silver Crusade

    Simple:

    1. Double all the rewards written in the book.
    2. Throw in additional rewards not in the book if the PCs make an effort.
    3. Forget the whole trust system as soon as the PCs do something to derail it instead of desperatly clinging onto it.

    1 to 50 of 474 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

    ©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.