Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Baron Hannis Drelev

Black Dougal's page

841 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


1 to 50 of 841 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.
MMCJawa wrote:
Hitdice wrote:

All I can say at this point is, I'm very curious to see what a high budget name brand D&D movie ends up looking like. If we get something on the same level as other Hasbro properties such as Battleship, G.I.Joe and Transformers, I'll be psyched.

Oh god those are my worst case scenario.

My biggest concern though is that the directors last work was Goosebumps. Which was less about adapting Goosebumps into a kid friendly horror movie, but rather a meta comedy referencing the books. I don't mind some Guardians of the Galaxy level humor but please oh god please don't let it become a portal fantasy with a group of gamers being put into the Forgotten Realms....

Come on, 6 young teenagers at an amusement park get on a roller coaster that starts going through a tunnel with the sign Yawning Portal at the entrance. They emerge to find themselves in a fantasy land being chased by 5 headed dragon that is actually a lesser deity, but for some reason can never catch them. Every 15 minutes they think they are about to go home when something happens and they have to start a new quest.

Its such a great idea it will spawn TV spinoffs, maybe even a cartoon series.

From what I can tell, a squadron of YT-1300 freighters would have just am impressive kill ratio. Those things are indestructible despite losing radar dishes, belly crashing landings etc

Iron man 1
Captain America 2
Guardians of the Galaxy
Avengers 1
Ant Man
Avengers 2
Cap 1
Iron man 2
Thor 2
Iron man 3
Not Incredible Hulk

baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Exhibit A


It's really funny how books can influence you. After reading Cryoburn, my interest in frozen pizzas fell and I only now eat Pizza when I get delivery. bizarre, but somehow a comment from a character in the book made me realize I hate frozen pizza.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, here' s some new developments"

Dungeons & Dragons’ Movie Gets ‘Goosebumps’ Director

Back in August, Warner Bros., Hasbro and Sweetpea Entertainment finally resolved a long-running legal battle swirling around the rights to Dungeons & Dragons, announcing that a live-action theatrical movie is finally moving forward. We haven't heard much about the project since then, but today The Tracking Board reports that the project has brought on Goosebumps director Rob Letterman to take the helm. The filmmaker will be working from a script by David Leslie Johnson (Wrath of the Titans), who was attached when the project was announced last year.

Dungeons & Dragons was created by E. Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson in 1974 as a fantasy roleplaying game and since then has amassed millions of players and fans worldwide. The hugely popular property has also influenced numerous writers, directors, game designers, and other creative professionals throughout its four decades. The game previously spawned the 2000 adaptation Dungeons & Dragons, which famously flopped at the box office, earning just $33.8 million worldwide from a $45 million budget.

The Tracking Board reports that the adaptation will center on a warrior and a group of creatures who embark on a perilous journey to find a legendary treasure. Some of the creatures joining this warrior include a "half-dragon" and a "cunning gnome." It isn't known if any of these roles will be based on specific characters from the original game.

Back in September, Vin Diesel, a longtime D&D player, claimed that the game's late creator E. Gary Gygax wanted the actor to "tell his story," shortly before he died in 2013. It isn't known if this means E. Gary Gygax wanted Vin Diesel involved in a biopic of some sort, but there are reports that the producers want a "Vin Diesel-type" for the lead character. No cast members have been attached at this time, but now that a director has come aboard, we may hear about casting in the near future.

Hasbro's Brian Goldner and Stephen Davis are producing with Courtney Solomon of Sweetpea Entertainment and Vertigo Entertainment's Roy Lee and Stephen Davis. Allan Zeman will executive producer for Sweetpea, with John Powers Middleton executive producing for Vertigo. Rob Letterman most recently directed Goosebumps, and his other credits include Shark Tale, Monsters Vs. Aliens and Gulliver's Travels

"I suspect whatever minor financial penalties his publishers might impose (beyond not getting money when the book came out) may have been dwarfed by the decision to sell to HBO resulting in the books selling approximately ten times what they had one prior to the TV deal"

Absolutely true! I remember reading GOT in 1998 and no one was talking about it. Only after clash of kings came out did the series have any kind of internet awareness, and only after storm of swords did the internet actually start asking when the next book would come out. But even then, the crowd that got upset at the long wait for feast of crows was still a small subset of the geekverse (i.e. geeks who like fantasy vs scifi etc). It was only after the first season of GOT aired that I noticed my non geek friends and associates would talk about it, and yes, I admit I was one of those obnoxious people who felt superior over the TV crowd because I knew what would happen..until now.

But absolutely, we all know people who decided to read the series after watching the show..hell, if I hadn't already read them I would have. Its a great adaption for the most part and it helped sell more of the books. I would guess the publishers are disappointed but the flip side is that is that they know as long as the books get done before the Tv show is over or soon after they will still sell well.

baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Steve Geddes wrote:
Forgotten Realms “Grey Box” (the original, 1st edition AD&D version)
Exceptionally well made, I can not say how much I loved this work. Its a collectors item for sure and can stand up to material even by today's standards.

Yes, I agree, currently mine is 2 feet away from my keyboard as I was reading it last night contemplating a 2nd edition campaign starting in 1356.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Here's my take on the things..

as we know the force is linked to life force

as we all know, there is a circle of life, as demonstrated in the Lion King

and as we learned in Mass Effect, History repeats itself

So is it any surprise that the Force awakens echoes New Hope?

question is, does Rey pull a Sheppard and press the Red Button (my game, my cannon) and stop the Reapers er Empire from reappearing in 40 years

1 person marked this as a favorite.

"No Mrs Mclean, I am an exceptional thief!"

after that line, I worshipped whatever role Mr. Rickman played

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I saw it for the second time tonight. Without being super pumped up I actually found I enjoyed much more.

It still has flaws, but being relaxed about them allows me to soak up the fun

1 person marked this as a favorite.
baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Krensky wrote:
And yet armor was quite popular with Jedi before the Ruusan Reformation.


There's always one. I am literally, respectfully face palming.

My issue with the Ruusan Reformation was it was introduced in the Star Wars timeline in order to explain several differences between the Old Republic as presented in the comics, and the Republic which appeared in the Prequel Trilogy which by definition was canon.

In brief, the Ruusan Reformation in which the Republic is reorganized following the already established defeat of the Sith a thousand years prior to the films at the Seventh Battle of Ruusan was invented by writers to give an alternate explanation of a SINGLE line Supreme Chancellor Palpatine made.

Some of it is jarring, and some of it could have been much better thought out, almost all of it was unnecessary.

gah, it was such a throw away line I didn't even remember it. On the other hand, I don't remember my Jedi in Kotor running around in armour either.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

The Sword and The sorcerer

General Talon

Fighter 7/Rogue 7 AL CG leads a band of mercenaries (lv 3-7 fighters and rogues AL N,CN, NG, CG)

against the evil lord Cromwell (LE Fighter 13) and the evil Lich Zusia (sorcerer 18)

Despite having no wizards or priests in the party to counter the lich, the hero triumphs with the use of a unique +4 Bastard sword of piercing (can launch 2 javelins/1day that auto crit for 10d60 points each of piercing damage)

Freehold DM wrote:

I truly cannot wait for this movie. I have wanted this since I was a kid, even more when the rogue squadron books and comics came out, even more when I had a computer that could RUN X WING VS TIE FIGHTER OMGGGGGGGGG.

There better be y wings in this movie.

I hope to see some T-16's in it, maybe some womprats getting pasted as well

1 person marked this as a favorite.

"I have never seen such devotion in a droid before"

1 person marked this as a favorite.
baron arem heshvaun wrote:
The Empire Strikes Back

I loved that! A real sense of brilliance there as to what to put in and where.

That's why I prefer Jim Butcher. he always delivers when expected. I waited 5 years for Feast for crows and what 6-7 years for dance, as much as I hoped for a 2016 winds I knew it wasn't likely.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, I am confused why anyone thinks Han I coming back, given the planet exploded shortly after he plummeted of the bridge. what there was some unknown resistance agent on the scene but unseen that went down the pit at the same time the place is exploding..followed soon after by the entire planet exploding.

Sigh, give it up ..

And no, Admiral Piet did not have time to get off the Executors bridge before the a-wing took out the place.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

All I can add is that if Tarkin and the Empire hadn't seen Yoda in 20 years, and that no reports of Yoda doing anything had been noted since he fled the senate building, than if Yoda wasn't dead he migh as well been in terms of the Empires thinking. After all, what consequence could Yoda's fate have been to Tarkin after 20 years of The Empire having its own way.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I have been reviewing the evidence and it is somewhat shocking to admit that Lucas may have indeed had a more sinister role for Jar Jar Binks. It could all be conjecture based on incorrect evaluation of events in the prequels, but by all rights the physical abilities Jar Jar displays at the battle of Naboo are extraordinary, such as those a sith might have.

I am still treating this as pure fun speculation but there seems to growing mass of people on the net that actually think Snoke is a disguised Jar Jar.

Irontruth wrote:
Mark Moreland wrote:
JoelF847 wrote:
Mark Moreland wrote:
JoelF847 wrote:

Another thought just occurred to me. Why is it The Force Awakens?

** spoiler omitted **

** spoiler omitted **
** spoiler omitted **
** spoiler omitted **

And there's some evidence that Palpatine wasn't actually intended to be the "phantom menace". There are comments from both Lucas and actors that point to a different character playing a greater role, but that the story line was scrapped after fan backlash.

I am also not using spoilers for movies that would be nearly old enough to drive.

Seriously, are you suggesting there's some validity to the Darth Binks theory?

My ranking prior to VII:

With VII:
VI (the Executor blowing up scene push it above)

I'm with Werthead on this one, the new Treks had so many logic holes it drove me crazy. The limitless transporter is a good example. Even a through away line that stated the tech wasn't stable and could put you in the void or in another quadrant would have be fine, but they don't. They introduce events that should have huge ripple effects and pretend that everything is self contained within the current story. Who cares about canon at that point?

I saw it tonight. Entertaining, hell yes. some minor issues, yes. Overall B+. Certainly better than the prequels, not quite as good a Return of the Jedi. (but come on, nothing is better than the Executor crashing into Death star 2, so JJ had too high a hurdle to cross). I think I need to see it a few more times to really judge, may revise my opinion upward.

Harrison Ford really knocked it out of the park with his performance. A little hammy at times, but solidly entertaining.

Seeing it tomorrow night. I am stoked

"are you ready for this?"

"hell yes!"

Has it really ben 20 years? ugh.

All I want now is for the Will Smith replacement to shoot down an alien over orange county and then slug him when he tries to leave the ship.

"welcome to the O.C.!"

ALL I can say is that Chewie looks like something has really pissed him off when he activates that remote

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Its a trap ACKBAR "concentrate all power on that super star destroyer!"

Admiral Piet : concentrate all fire power on the forward batteries, I don't want anything getting through!

Admiral Piet ' I said concentrate all fire power!:

Kamakazie A wing pilot "AAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!"

Doomed Imp officer "Too late"

Bridge goes bye bye.

Favorite part of entire movie for me.

If the Imperials were so paranoid of TRD, they certainly didn't act on it enough to stop a few snub fighters from (a) taking out their most important shield generators or (b) put enough AA batteries in the trenchs that was the Executors topside.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Even if Starkiller base was vulnerable to TRD, its not like there are any Jedi's around who can hit Vomp rats in their crappy 2000 credit T-16's back home.

You would need the force to awaken in some unknown kid for that to happen.

It's worth watching just to see how horrifying a mind controller can be, especially with amp up powers.

JJ struggles with her conscience, but there was only one logical way to end the threat. Mr Spock would have dealt with him by the 2nd episode, but then it wouldn't have been much of a series.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Seriously, just who else would Luke have been talking to in the trailer?

forget spoilers, just based on the trailers so far I can guess the outline for the movie.

Its like when JJ said the big bad in ST2 wasn't Khan, but we knew it had to be cause no other canon villain would fit the profile.


Is anyone else disappointed that Jessica never said "you failed Hells kitchen" when beating someone up?

Hey, just wanted to say that Keanu Reaves wasn't bad in Point Break..or maybe it was Patrick Swayze that elevated it..have to rewatch

I was really hoping for spider-man. In my opinion, his arc was the best part of civil war.

1 person marked this as a favorite.

"Chewie, Get off my plane!"

"BB8, hold on!"

The whole "passing the torch to the next generation" would usually imply a death of a original trilogy character, if only to exploit the dramatic effect.

In that regard, I think Han's death would carry the most heft, followed by Luke or Leia.

As much as I would prefer C3P) blasted to atoms I know it ain't happening.

Killing off Chewie, possible, but there's no little wookies taking up the fight, so suspect if anyone is dying is a parental figure.

"Are you ready for this?"

"Hell No!"

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Don't believe the trailer, its a trap!

"hope is not lost today, it is found"

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Yeah, kinda suspicious that they all have the same exact pose

I own all the star wars dvd's aside from phantom menance. There is a reason for that. PM is a craptastic movie that has about 10-15 minutes of watchable scenes. The rest of it feels like it was meant for a 7 year old, specifically Lucas own children.

Now some people are saying they got sucked in by the trailers for the PM and so feel very wary of being sucked in again.

The first Force awakens trailer had me a little dubious, but the second one this summer dispelled all doubts. The third one is stellar. I have a lot of trouble understanding people saying they think this will stink like PM after seeing these trailers. I almost suspect some of trolling. This is not fanboy nostalgia talking, from a purely visual presentation it looks like a kick ass action adventure movie.

However, it does help that I am a makes it all sweeter.

With Lawrence Kasdan writing, you can be sure there will be less "I hate sand" and more "Apology accepted Captain Needa" moments.

"just let it in"

1 person marked this as a favorite.

So we were tossing around numbers..apparently wookiepedia says 25,000 IMP1 star destroyers were built and who knows how many IMP2's, let alone escort craft like the Nebula's.

So that being said, how many Imperial ships were at Endor? I know the movie doesn't show more than 30 capital ships simply because of screen limitations, but I would think they would have needed more than that to prevent any rebel ships from escaping?

baron arem heshvaun wrote:
baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Randarak wrote:
I got 13. And the two I got wrong, I didn't know those things had names. I guess I should have read the book.
I'm not sure which you refer to, was it the Star Destroyer Devastator which was named after a World War II bomber on the Allies side?
The Purity of Violence wrote:
Douglas TBD Devastators were mid-WW2 USN torpedo bombers (well they first flew in 1935, which doesn't portent well for an '42 combat aircraft). They were withdrawn from service after 35 out of 41 present at the battle of Midway were shot down.

There are very few Cliff Claven facts I know in this world that come close to Star Wars. World War II history is one of the few.

I was asking Randarak if he meant he missed the Star Destroyer Devastator which was named after Douglas TBD Devastators of the US Navy. I know their history well.

You are definitively correct. Sadly after their woeful performance and severe losses at the Battle of Midway (considered the turning point of the Pacific theater) there were pulled from active service.

Interestingly enough they were replaced by the newer Grumman TBF Avenger, which gave its name to the Star Destroyer Avenger, which Han later tricked and used to make their escape from the Hoth System asteroid belt and served as the lead communications ship at the Battle of Endor.

Further all films in the OT start with a scene showcasing a Star Destroyer.

It is the Devastator we see in the Star Wars A New Hope and gets the distinction of being the ship we all thought would never end as it gave chase to Leia's Corellian Corvette, so it's the first Star Destroyer we ever see in the OT. The Avenger is the Star Destroyer we see bringing Darth Vader to the Death Star II, in the opening scene of Return of the Jedi.

While for many years the Avenger was considered the ship seen in the opening scene of The Empire Strikes Back, and has the distinction of...

I always thought he was on the Executor when travelling to Death Star 2.

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Freehold DM wrote:
CapeCodRPGer wrote:
baron arem heshvaun wrote:

There are very few Cliff Claven facts I know in this world that come close to Star Wars.

Its a little known fact that the actor that played Cliff was in Empire Strikes Back
beat me to it!

Its also a little known fact John R has a one line quote in a Bridge To far. When he was a Calgary expo last year I got him to sign an autographed Empire pic. And then he blew me away by quoting exactly the line from a bridge to far. Great actor, great dude.

Just to be clear, Relg and the Marag woman were not nice to each other at all, until Relg was told to wise up by Ul and then he stopped being a jerk and go procreate.

As a rule, I like High fantasy like Tolkien, but I also like more "realistic" fantasy..that sounds weird..anyway, like Ice and fire or the Dragonbone throne trilogy.

When I was younger, my favorite popcorn fantasy was the Riftwar and follow ups by Fiest..but then he got divorced, and his writing went into the toilet and he kept writing more and more crappy books to pay alimony presumably.

Actually, right now my total favorite writer is Jim Butler. The Dresden files is the perfect mix of light and grimdark.

Martin I still enjoy but concur the story has been mired in to many sideplots.

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I got 14..couldnt remember the name of the game R2 and Chewie played.

I got the number of rebel spacecraft attacking because it was an obsession of mine as a kid..

lets see Red squadron and Gold had 12 fighters, gold had 3 or 6 .

only reading the book helped me understand there were 4 squadrons if I am correct, or was that Lucas screwing around and changing Blue squadron in the book to Red in the movie. Now I am going to have to look that up again. But the number 30 always stuck with me..we certainly don't see 30 on the way to the station..

and we have 3 returning..90% casualities..Han was right, it was a suicide mission

I disliked fifth element and hated Hudson Hawk ..I hadn't felt that kind of loathing after leaving a theatre since Bonfire of the Vanities..which also was a Willis stinker.

Cylyria wrote:
Shifty wrote:
Mate, I just watched Hell comes to Frogtown.
That movie is awesome!

Roddy Rodney pipers moment in the sun

1 to 50 of 841 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.