Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Lord Soth

Beckett's page

RPG Superstar 6 Season Star Voter. FullStarFullStarFullStarFullStar Pathfinder Society GM. 4,825 posts (19,039 including aliases). 44 reviews. 1 list. 1 wishlist. 27 Pathfinder Society characters. 6 aliases.


1 to 50 of 717 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Zahariel wrote:

While I do understand where you're coming from, I've come to realize that a big part of the success of Pathfinder stemmed from the kitchen sink approach at launch.

Think about it, when Starfinder comes out, we'll only have one AP and no modules to flesh out the setting. Now consider that if you sit ten gamers at a table to play a sci-fi game, chances are that you'll get at least five different ideas of what a sci-fi game is. Maybe a lot of gaming groups won't be interested in the flavor of sci-fi that the first AP will offer.

Actually, I'd argue the evidence is the opposite, and the success of PF was that it was pretty generic, unexplored and not codified towards the reader/player/dm, and open to interpritation. That, to me is the settings golden age, and the more material that comes out, the more cool ideas about otherwise unclear topics, locations, orders, faiths, etc become wrong or false.

As PF/Golarion became more and more set in stone, it had really became more and more just like Forgotten Realms, though I would argue that at least FR's kitchen sink makes more logistical/geographical sense. Hopefully Starfinder can avoid that on both accounts, leaving plenty of room for exploration, interpretation, and also not having Disney cartoon princess lands boarding each other. The only real setting I've seen it done well is Ravenloft, where there is a reason most of the areas while physically connected, are not really open, allowing for a bronze age domain right next to a did main with modern technology, but they can't or will not just invade and destroy, (and not just because setting/writer fiat protects).

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

My initial feelings about the Warpriest are pretty online with my 2 years later view. Its playable, but not ideal. Its fa too dependant on Swift Actions, which is, or should be cool, but in play is really more annoying than anything. Fervor is really the one stand out ability, but without a way to increase it, and because it is a pool for multiple abilities rather than just Swift Casting, its something that looks a lot better on paper than it generally is in play.

Taking a look at how Battle Clerics/Oracles, Inquisitors, and the Magus play probably would have done a lot of good, as each tends to do the Warpriests job better overall except a few things, or rather except at a few levels, but also tend to have many more options besides just combat. The Battle Cleric "comes online" a tad later, but has a lot more staying power, wider range of play, better ability to fill more roles, (while being pretty close to on par in combat). Similarly with the Inquisitor, who is just built to work with itself so well, and do its combat job well AND everything else, too. I think Magus is the big one, mainly because, I think too many people compare it too incorrectly. The Magus did it right, allowing offense, buff, or whatever while the Warpriest is all about buffs, and specifically self only buffs. The two are really nothing alike, and the Warpriest just doesn't fill the "divine Magus" niche.

Sacred Weapon is good, but in play I tend to feel like Im doing it wrong by using a weapon that a "priest of war" would use. Instead it rewards the use of non-Warpriesty weapons, which just feels wrong. I really get the impression that there where a lot of hands in the pot for its class design, and everyone wanted to get their little baby or concept in, but didn't realize how it all worked in unison.

DESPITE both its parents being 2+Int, Int dumping classes, it really hurts here, as there are even more skills needed to do the classes basic job, and just no way to really handle that, which combined with the Classes overall lower spellcasting and fewer utility spells, tends to leave the class even worse off than the Fighter in non-combat situations.

Changing one or two things as the baseline for the class would have gone a long, long way here.
1.) Making it a straight up Full BaB class would make Fervor feel more like a boon than a pool for too many things. Some people seem to think its too good, but I just don't see it.
2.) Make Sacred Weapon Damage an either/or option, so weapons like the Greatsword get some benefit instead of increased damage dice, while the dagger is still viable. (It wasnt before???)
3.) Rather than having Fervor be a pool for swift casting, channel energy, and self healing, just have Swift casting ability be an unlimited, once per combat ability and reduce the book keeping significantly.
4.) Blessing are probably the most unevenly balanced mechanic I've seen, with some being basically must have (Good), while others are just junk, (usually unless you have a specific build such as Air working only on Ranged weapons, but the main deities with ranged Favored weapons don't have access to the Air Blessing).
5.) Pick one theme or goal for the baseline class and stick to it. Weapon specialist, Paladin of any Alignment, battle priest, divine magus, etc. . .

All that being said, its not a bad class, and there are some good ideas in there. Most of the time I'd probably go battle Cleric, Paladin, or Inquisitor, but not always. It stands out at level 2 and again at around 12-15+, and does offer some possibilities that are harder to pull off otherwise.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||
Tsuki Kurohige wrote:

I'm still really confused by some of the stuff post on here. Like it could say 5-9 but it's actually levels 3-7 or something. Not a clue, I want to sign up for something myself but im just so lost with most of it v.v Fortunately my brothers signed me up for the games I'm currently in, but I wanna be able to do it myself too. Level 1 Swashbuckler, not played him before.

So, each Scenario has a Level Range. That is the level all characters must fit in, in order to play that scenario. Period. If you are too high or too low level, you can not play with that character, but you might be able to play a Pregen and apply credit to your character. (There are special rules for Pregens, and it's a bit complicated)

Outside of the Level Range, there are also SubTiers, which are (usually two) smaller level ranges meant to balance that scenario's challenges around an overall party average level.

So, if a Scenario has a Level Range of 1st - 5th, any character that is 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, or 5th Level can play in that Scenario. However, within the 1-5 Range, there are two SubTiers, 1st - 2nd, and also 4th - 5th. The 4-5 Subtier will probably add in a few extra enemies, raise the DC's a few points, and/or swap out enemies for something a little stronger. Each Scenario comes with two versions, if you will, including monsters for both the higher and lower level, while the story remains mostly the same, (possibly accounting for a little that higher level characters might be able to do, such as Teleport).

The basic idea is that once everyone has picked their characters, you add all their levels together, then divide that number by the number of players, finding the average, and then use that average (or APL for Average Party Level), to see which SubTier they best fit into.

So, if we have a 5 person party, with four level 1 character and one level 3 character, they are all allowed to play in a 1-5 level range, because they are all level 1 or higher, but lower than level 6. From there, we get the APL, (1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 7) then (7 / 5 = 1.4) 1.4, regardless of which way it's rounded still fits into the (1-2) Subtier, which means that they would be playing the lower level version of that Scenario.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sissyl wrote:
Well, the comic version of Civil War was an awful travesty. It was what got me to stop reading Marvel comics. Let us just be glad they chose something entirely different.

???

Purely a matter of opinion, but I thought Civil War was an amazing series.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
wraithstrike wrote:
I see the problem with him trying to find loopholes and abuse the rules to be the issue.

The problem is that there is a fine line between "finding loopholes" and "rules abuse" and being experienced with the rules interactions and enjoying using the rules and different books to build things just right.

I've seen different DM's ban things "because they are cheese" that I'd consider perfectly fine. I myself have banned Improved Initiative and things like the Reactionary Trait because just about everyone at the table went straight for them. Not because I thought they where too strong as much as because I wanted to avoid a game where most of the combats where binary initiative orders/rocket tag.

I just mean that the implication of how bad or problematic a player is due to how much they find loopholes is very subjective. It could just as easily be an implication that they like heavier, more complex games while the others want lighter, more simple games.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

In a lot of ways you have already sort of answered yourself. Different people enjoy different things from the game. It's not wrong that he enjoys playing a more by the rules game than a DM Fiat one. Neither one is more intrinsic to telling a good story or better fun.

A lot of times that players/DMs min/max, it's because they enjoy the challenge of working within the rules to test themselves or because it helps tem to learn and experiment. From their perspective when GM's let anything go, throw out rules on a whim, or things like that, it ruins the game just like using cheat codes. It takes out the challenge and experimenting. The only reason I really mention all this is maybe seeing things from their perspective might help you (and others) to find some middle ground, or maybe by understanding what may be their goal or motivation in playing, might see things from their side a bit.

Now, as for suggestions and ideas, the biggest things I can think of would be to try to incorporate Role Playing with Combats, or threats. Most likely it isn't just straight up combat that one player likes as danger and challenge. Things like Chase Scenes, traps, and tactical set-ups are probably just as fun than just combat.

There could be a set up where an important NPC is locked up in a magic prison that requires certain steps to get out, and the NPC isn't really sure they want out, (needing a little convincing). But, while that's going on, there is a small horde trying to break in through the one door leading into the room, needing someone to defend it and the others who are trying to deal with the NPC.

You could also try something like 4E Skill Challenges, where rather than each player rolling for a single task, the entire group rolls multiple times over the course of a short time period working towards an overall goal. So, for example lets say they are piloting a ship that is suddenly ambushed, you could have one player focusing on piloting the ship, one or two fighting off pirates trying to board, and another casting spells to buff and fix the ship, and each round someone needs to dedicate their action to one of these important tasks). Or, for Skill Challenges, you can instead have everyone roll against a set DC, then describe, round by round how they are trying to contribute towards the overall goal of fighting off an ambush. The group, as a whole might need to attain a total of 10 successes, but it's less important what exactly they do as long as they can explain why their action is contributing in some way. There are two benefits to doing something like this. Firstly, if you want to, it is a "Rule Set", and while it's not really a Pathfinder Rule, it's something that that one player might find challenging and interesting to try out. And secondly, you do not have to tell that player that their Attack and Damage Rolls do not matter so much, but let them think that their combat actions are really combat actions rather than just part of the skill challenge. Let them do tactical movements, roll crits, and the like and enjoy it while everyone else finds their own way to contribute, because in the end, it really is just all the players contributing to a single pool of successes, and less important about ho exactly they do so, as long as it's reasonable overall.

Shadow Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Its been done before. Butterfly Sting was changed to a Desna only Feat. The problem with Dex to Damage Feats/Abilities is, (I believe), is that folks at Paizo have different ideas on its overall power level. Some think its way too strong, and in general I agree, while others see it as strong, but needed.

Going all the way back to PF 3.5 days, when they allowed Dervish Dance to be a limited/restricted version. The impression I get from Fencing/Slashing Grace is that someone was trying to push them through despite the other Paizo staff being against it, and the various nerfs are ways to correct them getting in print anyway. Being that it came from the ACG, (and Adv Class Origins), which was filled with similar problems all around, to me suggests that they slipped through unintended.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, first off, that's a pretty dick move. That's on par wit the Cleric spamming Bestow Curse (permanent) or Mark of Justice on you while you sleep. If I do this every night for a week, odds are he's going to fail at least once. If I target Wisdom first, then hit him with the -4 to all saves, within 2 weeks he is assured to be hit by every single version of Bestow Curse, and then I'll write on him while he's asleep, Mark of Justice has no save, so no more even holding a weapon or casting a spell for this guy. Ever. . . ."

Secondly, it's pretty stupid. They will get a DC 15 Will Save to negate the Alignment Shift, and that's if they don't recognize the helm for what it is.

Either of those things happening, (with one being pretty likely and the other more 50/50) is probably going to result in your Magus being killed, the entire party turning against them, and I wouldn't say it's unlikely that you, the player are just banned from the group outright.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

While I've never once actually seen this spell used, this bugs the crap out of me as it basically delegates this spell to be as useless as Zone of Truth.

Detect the Faithful was soft errata'd to include the following: "A creature’s personal interpretation of its beliefs determines whether or not it is of the same faith as you—hence heretics and splinter cultists of your deity still count as worshipers of that deity. Furthermore, since the spell picks up a creature’s current beliefs and feelings, a creature actively pretending to be a member of the same faith also appears to the spell to be a member. Thus, the spell is still useful in locating potential hidden members of the same faith among the general populace, but on its own, it doesn’t weed out spies."

Understanding that this is a minor issue, and probably more of a pet peeve than anything, Basically the introduction of that last part seems to be very inconsistent with the rest of the reading of the spell, but also basically specifically invalidates the one actual use and point of the spell completely. How are a target's personal beliefs and or feelings changed if they are outright lying?

In other words, you spend a spell slot to get a False Positive and the same exact Sense Motive/Perception check you where already entitled to, but well within reason at a penalty for believing false information your deity gave you?

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I really do not see much need for the Cardinal Archetype, who seems to give up far too much for so little.

The Roaming Exorcist from Undead Slayers Handbook gets 4+Int, (very arguably what the Standard Cleric SHOULD get anyway), and also has the Unseen Revealed and Curse Seeker abilities that could fit very easily into an "Intrigue" style game, with Dispossession and Curse Eater possibly coming up rarely as well.

As for the Cardinal, getting the ability to loose Spontaneous Cure Spells and 6+Int Skills just really doesn't seem to balance out against loosing BaB, medium armor, shields, and a Domain. Something that would have been pretty thematic, but also giving the Archetype that little extra oomph I think it needs could have been to add in the Vigilante's Celebrity Perks and/or Loyal Aid Social Talents. Kind of makes sense that a ranking political figure of a faith would get minor discounts and have the ability to call in a favor.

Ross Byers wrote:

You can't have everything

The 9-level casters generally don't have a lot of class features to play with. They have spellcasting, some type of customization suite (schools, patrons, bloodlines, domains), and a chassis (BAB, skill points, HD, saves).

The arcane casters are hardest: generally its easier to make a new school or bloodline than swap pieces of a wizard or sorcerer - they can't even really trade off bits of their chassis - already having minimum BAB, skill points, and HD.

This means that most cleric archetypes have a very small list of things to trade off - one or both domains, BAB, HD, maybe Channel Energy. One can't get upset with a downgrade to 1/2 BAB to get some other shinies - there just isn't much else to trade.

When it comes to the Cleric, both as a class and then also looking at it's options/archetypes, is to consider just how much the assumptions of the game have changed since the Core Book, or even since 3.5 had come out. Other inclusions that really fight hard to share space with the Cleric as well have really challenged the idea that the Cleric "has everything", such as the Shaman, Oracle, Warpriest, or Inquisitor. It's been a while since the Cleric had even had a single class feature that no one else couldn't grab, and in many cases, other classes can even do it better/easier.

And while it is technically true that the Cleric is a 9th level caster, in truth it's actually closer to a 6th level caster. Before 3E, the Cleric was a 7th Level caster, and all 3E/d20 did was stretch those spell levels out to make it's casting progression more compatible with the Wizards (getting 9 levels of spells over 17 levels of play). 3E even made an effort to spread out more of the Cleric's spell list amongst other classes as well, and Pathfinder has kind of continued that trend as well, particularly along the lines of healing/buffing/warding.

The end result is that the Cleric is kind of caught in this weird halfway point between a "full caster" and a secondary "martial" class. But, with a few exceptions, it's very difficult to build too adequately into either of those two basic styles, both because of lack of options, (like for instance Archetypes that basically every other class gets plenty of) and because inborn prereqs just do not really support it.

Even as a 9th level caster, Clerics just do not benefit overly much from the vast majority of Metamagic Feats, simply because their spell list is so small and so limited in potential. Even compared to other 6th and 9th level casters, their overall spell list is pretty small over all. It's for this reason that many Clerics, regardless of their deity, build, background, etc. . . will likely have very similar spells chosen on any given day. Often, metamagic just isn't worth it because unlike with most other casters, Cleric spells tend not to scale too well. Both because of the lack of too much variety overall and partially as a side effect of stretching out the class for an extra 3 spell levels (including Orisons).

In my opinion, Cleric was right there with the Rogue in most needing an Unchained update, (I personally didn't think the original version of the Rogue was bad), but probably more so simply because of the way it's been painted into a corner for design space and overlap with so many other classes.

Similarly, there just are not as many, or as useful and/or interesting gear to help boost Cleric Spellcasting, high or low level. Obviously, with exceptions, as with everything. A lot of the gear that Clerics go for (outside of the most universal things everyone does) is sort of second hand for the class, intended for other classes, but partially usable for the Cleric.

As a backup or secondary martial character, it's also very nastily restricted from far too many options, with no real way of overcoming those issues like other classes do. By this I'm talking about those essentially must have Feats, such as Power Attack or most of the Feat Chains for any particular "style". Not being able to take the first one, or the "bread and butter" one until at least 3rd level is a pretty significant hurdle for such a barebones class. For the most part, as it always is, Ranged combat is sort of the exception in that it's generally not too difficult to make choices in game to mitigate your own weaknesses, (picking an enemy that isn't threatened by an ally to avoid the penalty for firing into melee at early levels).

As a spellcaster, a Cleric can temporarily help mitigate this, but realistically this is only true in perhaps 1 to 2 combats per day, so it's feasibility is really dependent on individual groups normal playstyles.

Ross Byers" wrote:


Giving up somethingnothing

Sean K Reynolds touched on this when giving advice for designing archetypes:

Sean wrote:


4) Limiting an existing class ability to one already-available choice isn't cool, nor is it a limitation.
A rogue archetype that says "you have to take this rogue talent at level 4" isn't cool.
A fighter archetype that says "you have to take this weapon category at level 5" isn't cool.
And, assuming that choice is especially appropriate for that character, it's not really a limitation because the character would probably want that thing anyway. A character with a dagger-fighter archetype wants to take "light blades" for weapon training, so forcing him to do it isn't a limitation to the character at all, and you shouldn't treat it like it's a penalty or weakness to justify making another new class ability better (as in, "oh, the daggermaster has to take "light blades," so to compensate for that limitation I'll give the archetype this other cool thing...").

Now, something I did want to take a look at is an Archetype I've generally heard to be pretty notably balanced, liked, and well received, but in many ways does very close to the exact opposite of what had been pointed to for good design.

The Dawnflower Dervish Bard Archetype from Inner Sea Magic page 34. First off, I did want to point out, if it wasn't clear, that this example does not contradict any of the above specifically, but it is very, very close to doing so for nearly all of them, particularly the idea of taking away options the character probably wouldn't have wanted too much anyway in order to give them ones that they would probably have picked anyway.

It focuses on Perform Dance, for example, handing out the pretty amazing Dervish Dance Feat (and proficiency) 2 levels earlier than it could have otherwise been gotten in exchange for Bardic Knowledge and Loremaster abilities that they probably wouldn't care about, and dropping a type of Bardic Performance (Dirge of Doom) that notes it would need more than Perform Dance for (audible and visual component) for a free Quickened Spell on all self healings.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

Sorry, internet has been spotty from updates. The scenario does note that players (vs characters) can try to discover the puzzle, and as it turns out there is indeed a Free Trade Square district in the city.

Will update game when I'm able.

Shadow Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm curious where this idea about "must be main hand" is coming from?

If a TWF with a longsword and a dagger decides to more he and single attack, they could declair their dagger hand as their "main" hand attack that round. It does not automatically day fault to be the longsword or right hand or larger weapon (category).

It doesn't even really need to be a hand at all, such as armor spikes.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
HP: 10/10 || AC: 17 (15), T: 13 (11), FF 14 (13), CMD: 15 (16) || F: +3, R: +3 (+2), W: +4 || Growth Power 5/5 || Init +7, Perception: +2, Sense Motive: +6 || LG Male Shoanti Human Cleric of Eristal 1 || Longspear +3, 1d8+3 (2d6+4) 20/x3, CMB +2 (+4)

Actually, I had a little free time and just decided to do a Google Slides version Walkthrough.

HERE is the link.

Please let me know if I could be more clear anywhere, or something is missing, or there are any issues. I believe that the newer version of PDF24 (I still have the original version I liked better), is slightly different, for example, but it should be fairly compatible and similar.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

CryxAvril just murderfaced the Half-Orc. The Lance alone almost dropped her, but all of the follow ups left her beyond Neg Con DEAD. Feel free, Oyzar, to describe it if you wish.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

As the Half-Orc woman and her pet disappear into the warehouse, Bartholomäus gets to his stashed gear and begins to strap it back on and grab what e needs, then circles around the pathway to meet the rest of the group out front.

Just as you all come together and begin to explain what just happened, the door to the warehouse burst open, followed by the warrior woman's armored foot. She and the hyena both flood into the street, escaping the smoke and heat. Just as she comes out into the cool air, her hateful eyes lock onto yours, and she lets out a guttural growl before calling for the others guards to come to her aid.

Behind you, you can hear another door being unlocked from the inside, and it slides open, revealing a single guard at the ready, but surprised to see you so close.

INIT ROLLS:

Avril & Cryxial: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (6) + 4 = 10
Bartholomäus : 1d20 + 3 ⇒ (4) + 3 = 7
Caith: 1d20 + 0 ⇒ (3) + 0 = 3
Maldrek: 1d20 + 5 ⇒ (4) + 5 = 9 <Always act in Surprise>
Roderick: 1d20 + 9 ⇒ (9) + 9 = 18
Thoril: 1d20 + 2 ⇒ (16) + 2 = 18
=====================================
Half-Orc: 1d20 + 5 ⇒ (11) + 5 = 16
Hyena: 1d20 + 2 ⇒ (18) + 2 = 20
Guard 1: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (6) + 4 = 10
Guard 2: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (11) + 4 = 15

Bursting loose of it's tethers, and rushes at Barth, leaping up to bite the large Mawg in the shoulder (it was going for the neck), and then as Barth pushes it off, it attempts to go again for the leg tail, hoping to pull him off balance, but failing to get a good hold this time.

Random Target: Mal = 1, Avril = 2, Barth =3: 1d3 ⇒ 3

Charge Attack vs FF AC 16: 1d20 + 5 ⇒ (14) + 5 = 19 <HIT>
Damage: 1d6 + 3 ⇒ (2) + 3 = 5
Plus Trip vs CMD 20: 1d20 ⇒ 13 <fail>

ROUND 1

Hyenna (charged)
========================
Roderick () & Thoril ()
========================
Half-Orc () & Guard 1 ()
========================
Avril (), Cryxial (), Maldrek (), Barth (-5), & Caith ()

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Deadmanwalking wrote:
. This is not true. James Jacobs (in one of the links I did earlier) explicitly says as much. And that actually makes sense.

That's interesting, because I was going off of what J.J. mentioned on the subject as well, namely that in his opinion Witches would not be well received.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I wouldn't say that a non-priest Wizard/Sorcerer would be in any more trouble than anyone who wore armor or touched iron being mistaken for a follower of Gorum.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I understand what you are saying, I just disagree with your conclusion. Yes, some can tell the difference between Divine and Arcane magic, but that's not that relevant, as not all Divine Magic is received from being beholden to a god. As I said, Oracles, Paladins, and Druids do not receive their abilities by being beholden to a god. Of the three, only Oracles need to even have a link to one at all, and that could very literally have been something that affected their parents before they where even born and was passed onto them. I'd also say that Rahadoum is the most likely place that Divine Casters/priests would be hiding their spellcasting, or connection to a deity, as well.

Witches fall into a place that is, from the Rahadoumi point of view, no different than a priest.

APG wrote:
Some gain power through study, some through devotion, others through blood, but the witch gains power from her communion with the unknown. Generally feared and misunderstood, the witch draws her magic from a pact made with an otherworldly power. Communing with that source, using her familiar as a conduit, the witch gains not only a host of spells, but a number of strange abilities known as hexes. As a witch grows in power, she might learn about the source of her magic, but some remain blissfully unaware. Some are even afraid of that source, fearful of what it might be or where its true purposes lie.

It's also worth reiterating that it's not explicitly Divine Magic that is banned, but rather religion, faith, and being linked to a deity, or allowing a deity to gain influence in the nation. That's the disconnect I was speaking about earlier. Divine Magic is similar to, but not the same thing as religion and gods. A faithful <Wizard> priest of Nethys with no Divine Casting is still risking execution or exile in Rahadoum, for the exact same reason a Cleric would.

Although the Witch casts Arcane Spells, they are still violating that First Law of Man, because there is no real criteria of what a god is, (vs a powerful outsider), and there are also plenty of religions that do not venerate a deity, or a single deity that are likewise banned. So, for instance, there is no practical difference between a Cleric that worships Sarenrae <a goddess> vs a Cleric that worships Ragathiel <a powerful Outsider Entity, but NOT a god> vs The Old Ones <again, who are NOT gods>, vs an Oracle of The Whispering Way <a religious philosophy>. All of these are banned in Rahadoum.

ISWG wrote:
Since then, Rahadoum has charted a resolutely secular path. No one denies the existence or power of the gods, but their aegis comes at too high a price for the people of Rahadoum. The lack of religion has brought the region the peace it so desperately desired, though it has also brought its own costs. Plague has ravaged Azir and Botosani three times in the past 500 years, and the prospect of famine hovers over the fragile land like a shroud. A century ago, Manaket was among the lushest ports of the Inner Sea. Today, it is choked by encroaching desert sands, and its famous gardens are a memory of the distant past. While few dare speak it aloud, nervous whispers abound that the gods have finally decided to punish the people of Rahadoum for their insolence. Still, the Rahadoumi resolutely hold to their ancient laws and avoid any contact with religion.

Finally, once again, the entire point of Rahadoum is a mixture of "reaping what they have sown" and hypocritical fanaticism. They place the blame so easily on their scapegoat of religion (as a whole) and are blind to the fact that they have dug themselves into an even deeper hole in the process. They have murdered, humiliated, enslaved, and/or exiled all of the priests that could help them out, but would rather see their own people, families, and friends suffer or die because of the "cost". But, they had and continue to make that choice and the downside is that they lack methods of gaining enough food, allies, or methods to fight plague, disease, and the like.

Simply saying a Witch can do all that instead both defeats the point and the theme of the nation/setting, the exact same way that allowing an Oracle or a Druid to operate fine would. Neither of them are beholden to a god, <or would loose their powers if they swapped faiths or had no patron god>, and it isn't Divine Magic that is banned.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

It is within the context of the discussion. In the same way that Witches are not "beholden", neither are Oracles, Paladins, Rangers, Druids, etc, and they too are all banned, albeit because there is a disconnect between rules (divine magic) and setting (faith/religion/worship).

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I'd say witches probably have it worst of all, hitting both the worst suspicions if the "enlightened" people, but also because just like any priest, they are beholden to an outside, non-mortal entity.

No one is going to know (or care) about the differences between a "patron" and a Patron Deity, if there really even are any in a setting sense. A Witch would basically be no different than a religious Wizard, but probably viewed much more like how the rest of the world sees a cultist to a foul entity.

From the mechanics/story side, it kind of defeats the point of the nation to allow Witches to skirt the edicts as well, as one of the cooler aspects is how terrible Rahadoum has it because they have turned their backs on and blame religion, and having to deal with it.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||
Avril Axiel wrote:
Avril can charge him from her current position as long as noone else steps in between right? Or does the corner prevent it?

You can charge, but I'm going to say you can not Ready a Combat Action outside of combat. As long as you have a reach weapon and no one else steps in the way you are good.

Caith Skullcrusher wrote:
I'll admit I'm a bit influenced by the picture..in case he isn't wielding a crossbow I'd like to change to a preposition and move him north to me, so that the rest of the party can get easier access to him

Indeed, the guards, (at least the common ones), are walking around with a loaded crossbow, though you can also easily see they do have a scimitar at their belt as well.

CMB (DC 24): 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (14) + 4 = 18

The guard does his best to try to wiggle away from the dwarf that seemed to come out of nowhere, but has little luck.

ROUND 1
Caith (Grappling)
=============================
Guard 4 (Grappled)
=============================
Roderick () & Thoril ()
=============================
Hyena () & Orc Woman () [ooc](will be moving towards the doorway)
=============================
Maldrek ()
=============================
Guard 3 ()
=============================
Avril (), Cryxial (), Bartholomäus (), & Caith ()

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

Sorry everyone. I'm mostly done with all the RL issues here, but for the last week and a half or so, I have not been able to get on to Paizo boards at all, (I'm assuming its the sale that's been going on). Both the Forums and the My Campaigns where just blank, and I couldn't load any threads (or even see them). It looks like it's finally fixed, so I wanted to make sure I got on here and posted at least this. I've not been able to post in any game for a while now, and I'm trying right now to go back and catch back up on things. Sorry. There was really nothing I could do that I know of. Hopefully within the next hour or so I should have a new post up and the game going.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

OUTSIDE
Bartholomaus manages to sneak by just in time, just as he makes it up the dock and onto the ship, the large Half-Orc woman rounds the corner with her pet. The hyena stops for a moment to sniff the air, but then cocks a leg up and begins relieving itself. Able to duck down behind the railing and crawl over to the rudders, all that left to do is cause a little damage. And make it back out of here of course.

Crouching down and climbing out behind the ship to get at the rudders, he gets to work filing away at some of the small components, unscrewing a few bits here, damaging a piece there, all the while keeping an eye out for the patrols roaming the area.

INSIDE
Avrixial, Caith, Maldrek, Roderick, and Thoril, manage to crack one of the warehouse windows open as they spot a pair of guards doing rounds inside. Keeping as silent as they can, they, one by one begin to slide on inside. So far so goo, they get inside without being noticed, YET, but Roderick also spots a pair of locations the would do the most damage before the building's magical flame controls can be of too much assistance. Making certain to unlock the door from the inside, now it's time to make it happen.

Inside the warehouse, the rest of the Pathfinders make ready for battle, as Roderick hurls his first bomb into the closer pile of crates and goods. There is a loud explosion, and the pile of crates quickly begins to burn. Almost instantly, the building's magical wards begin to kick in, and a few spots in the ceiling begin to conjure small amounts of water from nothingness, which as soon as gravity takes hold, simply fall onto the ground and crates beneath them. It's clear, that this simple orison would normally be effective at putting out fire here, if the are where not so packed with good, but as it is, it is not going to be that effective.

As soon as the bomb lands, the guards within are alerted. They begin to rush around, unsure of what just happened, and call out loudly "Alert! We have a fire in the warehouse." The guard on the southern side of the warehouse begins to open the back door, not wanting to be caught in here without a way to escape, and again repeats the call. The other one inside the warehouse begins to head towards the north, and as he gets closer, spots Roderick and "Avrixial". "Thieves!"

INIT ROLLS:

Avril & Cryxial: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (5) + 4 = 9
Bartholomäus: 1d20 + 3 ⇒ (6) + 3 = 9
Caith: 1d20 + 0 ⇒ (18) + 0 = 18
Maldrek: 1d20 + 5 ⇒ (6) + 5 = 11 <Always act in Surprise>
Roderick: 1d20 + 9 ⇒ (7) + 9 = 16
Thoril: 1d20 + 2 ⇒ (13) + 2 = 15
=====================================
Guard 1*: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (13) + 4 = 17 (different building)
Guard 2*: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (19) + 4 = 23 (different building)
Guard 3: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (6) + 4 = 10
Guard 4: 1d20 + 4 ⇒ (13) + 4 = 17
Orc Guard: 1d20 + 5 ⇒ (7) + 5 = 12
Hyena: 1d20 + 2 ⇒ (12) + 2 = 14

ROUND 1
Caith ()
=============================
Guard 4 ()
=============================
Roderick () & Thoril ()
=============================
Hyena () & Orc Woman ()
=============================
Maldrek ()
=============================
Guard 3 ()
=============================
Avril (), Cryxial (), Bartholomäus (), & Caith ()
=============================

Bolded individuals are up.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

Hey everyone. I apologize for disappearing. I've had something pretty major happen and I'm trying really hard to deal with it and protect another soldier. I can't really go into much details, but it's pretty important. I've been dealing with that a lot recently and just have not had the time to get online much. I want to apologize to everyone, and I hope I can get back here soon.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Sorry, to clarify, they have not rebelled in the streets to overthrow the current government. Sections have broken away or been removed. However, its worth noting that many of the ones you mentioned rebelled against Cheliax rather than Taldor directly.

Galt - Cheliax at rise of House Thrune

Andoran & Cheliax - broke away after Qadira began invading, Cheliax abandon post and convinced what would become Andoran to follow offering protection to the outlying wilderness lands. Andoran then broke from the rest of Cheliax with the civil war and House Thrune.

Isger - Cheliax took Isger by force in the Even-Tongued Conquest as a means to show strength, but has not been able to free itself from oppression as many others have from Cheliax.

Molthune & Nirmathas - both broke with Cheliax from Taldor, only to be treated extremely poor by the nobility of Cheliax leading to a brutal civil war after the rise of House Thrune causing one nation to splint into two.

Last wall - When Cheliax broke away, Lastwall stuck to their sworn duty rather than take political sides.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Silver Surfer wrote:

I'm sorry we must be playing different games.....

This debate is purely based around the protective benefits in terms of survival.....not in the infinite number of variables and tangents surrounding it.

Maybe, but it looks like you are also not taking into account some of the more obvious things that strengthen the Wis to AC Cleric as well, to show it as weaker. Mage Armor is a long lasting buff and really only costs you either 750 (Wand) or 1,000 (Pearl of Power).

If we assume a +2 Dex, +3 Wis, Wis to AC Cleric, that's a pretty comfortable 19 AC at level 1, (NOT 12th). No other buffs used. Sure, the Armored Cleric is going to (possibly) have a higher AC, but they are also taking other penalties to compensate for that and that absolutely does matter.

Silver Surfer wrote:
- I didnt say that armoured cleric wouldnt self buff did I? What I did say he would be far less likely to need AC and HP buffs since he will be less likely to be hit. The maths dont lie.

Why do you say that? At best they are absolutely equal in their need/desire to buff for combat, but at worst the Wis to AC Cleric is going to already be prepared regardless of circumstances, (such as waking up or being in situations where the can't reasonably wear armor).

Silver Surfer wrote:


- Like I said a cleric with WIS-AC will still only have a max base AC20 AT 12th level. Without serious investments he gets chopped to pieces.

Sure, and if a Armored Cleric doesn't bother investing either, their AC is going to also be low. Keep in mind that Clerics need a Light Shield or Buckler to cast if they wield a weapon, and a fair comparison to a Wis to AC Cleric that doesn't invest in AC is a Chain Shirt and Light Shield, (utilizing the same stats as above).

Armored AC: AC 17, T 12, FF 15
Wis AC: AC 15, T 15, FF 13(assuming Wis to AC works exactly like the Monk's)

+1 Armor AC: AC 19, T 12, FF 17
Wis Mage Armor AC: AC 19, T 15, FF 17

No Armor/Shield AC: AC 12, T 12, FF 10
Wis AC: AC 15, T 15, FF 13

I guess the math really does show. :P Thing is, you keeps saying things like "over the life of the character", but then keep giving really iffy, one-sided examples as a single glimpse.

Silver Surfer wrote:
- Yes WIS-AC cleric can use magic vestment but armoured cleric can use it twice.... armour AND shield....3 times if your GM is lenient!

I'm not sure what you are getting at here. Sure, a Cleric could cast this once on armor and once on shield, but thy are using up resources to do so. They don't just get it for free, and honestly, Armor/Shield is pretty cheap over all. Not sure what you mean by 3 times?

Silver Surfer wrote:
- Yes the WIS-AC cleric can pump DEX but thats if he chooses to do so. And even if full tank you can still get +1 from DEX and in med this is +3. With a MAD class like the cleric, ability points can be put in all manner of places for all manner of reasons for all manner of builds.... this does not change anything.

Like I pointed out, but will make more clear below, you don't have to pump Dex, but not doing so is intentionally not playing to the strength of the new class and purposefully handicapping yourself. This isn't a good way to compare the two in a meaningful way.

Silver Surfer wrote:
- This debate is centred around a new D6 class, that is inherently more "caster". A class with full 9th level casting but also additional enhancements to their spellcasting ability vs the old D8 cleric. With this in mind having it so that it was still easily possible to have all this AND full armour in my view made it unbalanced. There is also the RP/thematic aspect of the 'Holy Man'. If you disagree.... brilliant.

But wait, if it's intended to be a squish, stay back class that doesn't worry about carrying armor and shield, why wouldn't it keep Str and Con fairly low (comparatively) and pump more into Dex, Wis, and Cha, the areas it's going to benefit most from. That's a lot less MAD then the basic d8 Cleric, right, so they can easily afford it, (comparatively). I'm not disagreeing with your view or desire for a "Holy Man", which is purely a matter of opinion. Just the idea that Wis to AC is significantly weaker than Light and Medium Armor, or is somehow a weakness. Not trying to be a jerk, but most of the reasons you present, (outside of those that are pretty specific to your personal gaming experience), just don't hold up.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Entryhazard wrote:
I don't get the obsession towards making it d6 1/2 BAB, the cleric can be a dedicated caster even with d8 3/4

I really don't either. Its a deal breaker to me, as the Cleric/Divine Cases job is to be closer closer to the action than the Arcane casters. There are also plenty of ways to basically do it on your own if that's what you want, like just dumping physical abilities a bit.

Alternatively, why not play a "divine" Wizard.

Divine spells generally just are not buff enough to make the class a real full caster.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
666bender wrote:

How can a battle Oracle be better than a battle cleric for example.

Oracle has the lowest saves in the game, no main stat for any of the saves, low fort and ref.
Cleric Can wear same armor with 1 feat, use decent weapons and have superior spell list.
The domain vs revelations even out.

Show me a medium better level of Oracle vs cleric plsease.

Spontaneous vs memorize even out. Both have up and down sided

Most of the Cleric's options, regardless of build, are focused on making others better at things. Most Domains are a Standard Action to use that lasts 1 round.

Another huge benefit that the Oracle has over the Sorcerer (in the Cleric/Wizard vs Sorcerer/Oracle sense) is that Cleric and Divine spells are very limited and there just are not that many good ones. So while it's true that the Cleric is a better generalist, it's also not. You do not build a Cleric to be a generalist, for one. They jut do not have the Feats needed for that to work. They get 2 Domains and each of them offers a whopping 2 powers and maybe 3 spells that are not on their Spell list. But, they can only cast them at most 1/day, regardless.

Oracles have enough built in options that they can actually afford to be a generalist by giving up some (not all) of their specialty, but the real trick is that because there are not really that many good choices of spells to go with, it's not nearly as difficult to do as it is with the Sorcerer vs Wizard.

Another huge benefit to the Oracle is that they are a very SAD class, where the Cleric (to do it's job fully) is the most MAD class in the game. So while the Oracle might have the "worst" saves in the game, they do not have to split between Wis & Cha for class features, and can afford to bump Con and Dex higher than the Cleric, actually evening out those saves a lot.

The Cleric does have three realistic strengths. It's a pretty simple class for new players. If an Oracle picks a poor spell option, while it will not be detrimental, the Cleric does have the option to "retrain" a lot faster. And on those rare occasions where a specific spell is needed, it's just as likely that the Cleric doesn't have it prepped as the Oracle doesn't know it, and neither have the scroll/wand, but the Cleric can get it tomorrow if the patient doesn't die by then.

The Oracle has, in my opinion a much better realistic strength in that on those rare occasions, you are probably going to need that spell more than once. So while it's just as likely that neither of them would have it, (Oracle doesn't know it, Cleric didn't prep it), if the Oracle does know it, they can cast it as much as needed and not just once like the Cleric most likely has it prepped. However, since wands and scrolls are pretty readily available, the restriction on Oracles needed to pick and choose spells is much less a weakness than it seems, and much less than it is for the Sorcerer vs Wizard. There just are not that many "must have" divine spells.

Shadow Lodge ****

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I tend to run games much more than play these days, and a lot of that is through Play by Post, so some of the aspects of playing through that medium skew my perspective. So much of this is also going to be for both. For example, a well organized and easy flowing scenario is much more important to me as a GM, but it's also going to show a lot more if I'm playing too, and the GM, (through no fault of their own) is having trouble understanding what's going on or answering basic questions, because the scenario doesn't think to include it.

From a GM's perspective, what makes a PFS scenario good?
* An interesting story that the players have a chance to learn and experience through play. Far too many scenarios are written with much of the explanation and history for DM's only.

* When a scenario is organized well. I shouldn't have to search (on page 19) what happens if the players answer no to something in the first encounter, and then go to page 12 for what happens instead.

* Riddles and puzzles that can both challenge the player an the character.

* Avoiding as much extra snowflake rules (or new books like Occult Adventures rules or the Technology Guide) as possible. If a story can not be told without relying on thee things as mandatory, it's probably not a good enough story, and adding these things does not help, it hurts.

* Scenarios that explore new places.

* Scenarios that make Factions matter. The single biggest selling point I had for PFS was the old Factions. When they where removed as extra side missions and being meaningful, the game lost something. This ties in a lot with the next point. . .

* When scenarios offer options and choices. Not binary ones, or ones that are just the illusion of choice. (Does the party side with person A or person B), but actual meaningful choices where either (or any) option has interesting rewards, penalties, and repercussions.

* Avoiding Sandbox style play. (specifically for online play)

* I'm not a fan of when Scenarios try to even the playing field with Social Skills (mainly), allowing things like a Craft Skill for players that do not have Diplomacy/Intimidate. Would you allow a Wizard to use Int + Caster Level for attack rolls on the chance that a party doesn't have a "tank"? No, then why reward groups/players for not being prepared for a social encounter? There is no difference.

* Avoiding highly social or roleplaying based scenarios. It bogs down play, and tends to make other players tune out and loose interest. Not just "I want to kill stuff" players/characters, but people in general. (specifically for online play)

* When the writer actually gives answers to "if the players ask this. . " that are actually pertinent and something an actual player might ask.

* Small and medium sized maps. A single large one is okay, when I have to draw it out or post it up and it's to the point that you have to zoom in 2 or 3 times (or more) just to see your figure, it's bad, and it can become impossible for some online players (using phones or tablets) to even utilize the map. Avoid!

From a player's perspective, what makes a PFS scenario good?
* I love how a lot of the earlier scenarios had a much more epic feel to play, and sometimes utilized unique rules. (A trap/lock that could be beaten by Intimidate or Channel Energy, a unique freezing curse, etc. . .)

* I enjoy puzzles and riddles. I find them rewarding. The exception being when the only possible way to answer or figure it out is based on something else within the scenario. (A coded note, but no matter what languages you speak or how great your Linguistics, it can only be deciphered with a special Code Key found later).

* I enjoy world exploration and introduction. Going to new locations, or uncommon ones like Ustalav. I'd rather this so much more than any overarching plot, mostly because so far, none of the major plots have been that interesting or engaging. I'm also now tending to find that a lot of those earlier overarching plots just do not hold up.

* When choices and actions matter.

* When I have a chance to find out what's actually going on, what led up to the current situation, etc. . . (even if I fail, the writers foresight into actually incorporating these things as a possibly is great when it happens).

* Scenarios that allow players to shine. Sometimes it's awesome to unleash a fireball that kills all enemies on the spot, or for the warrior to be able to use Cleave, etc. . . Scenarios where it goes out of the way to make classes or options fail or not be usable, (usually as a gimmick), just lead to frustration and feeling railroaded.

* Scenarios that utilize multiple decently powerful BBEG-type foes rather than one big one (and possibly a few minor ones).

* Scenarios that offer a variety of different encounters, challenges, and play-style options.

* Scenarios that anticipate and allow Diplomacy to avoid combat as an option, even if it's difficult.

* A cool Chronicle Sheet, with cool things for a lot of people, and some RP elements. If it's just XP/GP/PP, or more so if 90% of the rewards are there for basically one Class or Faction, it's disappointing.

For the most part, the best and most memorable scenarios in my opinion account for a great combination of much of these.

The Night Marches of Kalkamedes - Offered fun and interesting NPCs, both friendly and not, offered a lot of different challenge types, but also heavily tied them into a single, stand alone adventure that built upon itself. Had an amazing Chronicle Sheet. Had an epic feel, both in the sense of we accomplished something, but also that we where actually a part of something that mattered. Also utilized unique rules, but was not an attempt to shoehorn in a new subsystem book. In my opinion, this is the absolute single best scenario out there. Period.

The God's Market Gamble - An amazing BBEG build up with multiple interesting encounters. An investigation scenario done right (and there are so few of them done well, in my opinion). It also had a strong sense of the party's involvement mattering and some interesting was to learn what was really going on the whole time.

There are also a few Scenarios I outright hate and would avoid at all costs.

Rivalry's End - absolute worst scenario I've ever run/seen. The entire point of this scenario was for the writer to piss of fans that disagreed with them on a Faction or NPC, and it was abundantly clear that the writer ignored everything else involved to push this one through as the worst railroad I've ever seen, outright removing options and forcing events that the characters watch but can not change. It's primary takeaway is that players and DM's walk away actually feeling bad for playing it and disappointed that they where literally not even allowed to do obvious things that make perfect sense to alter what happens.

Scars of the Third Crusade - Too many subsystems, too little variation in encounters, and too many "DM Gottcha's" written into it. One of my main problems though is that it's specifically written to make certain characters NOT Shine just so it can present the very heavily railroaded, whole-filled plot as "meaningful". It was, in some ways, a nice attempt at certain things, but all in all just didn't play well, tended to leave players sitting there twiddling their thumbs, and ended with a less than climactic or memorable battle. I also felt that it really had a lot of challenges that where impossible to fail. No matter what, certain things just happen, just at different times.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
HP: 129/129 , Init +3, AC: 23, T: 12, FF: 21, CMB: 26, F: +17, R: +10, W: +17 <+2 vs Evil, Evasion, no Food/ Water, Native Outsider, Imune to Fog/Mist/Smoke and Evil Possesion or Mind-Control> Fly 30', Swim 30", Move 30', Perception +10 <Darkvision 60ft>, Channel: 2/7 DC 22 - 7d6, (DC 23 +21 vs Undead, +7 vs Evil Outsiders) NG Male Aasimar Cleric 14, Sunflare: +14/+9, 1d6+18+1d6 Acid (15/x2) S, 5,274-18

"You where the Chosen one. It was said you would destroy the DeSithverate, not join them. Adril, you where my brother!"

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

Just means things will be interesting. For me, I mean. You are all going to die.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

No, Krensky, you are incorrect. If nothing besides the movies/show was considered Canon, why was it such a big deal that Disney announced it would no longer be on 25Apr2014.

HERE

Shadow Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
At that level of rules lawyering shennanigans its not clarity they're looking for.

See, the thing is, based on the actual material, those that disagree with you see YOUR view as the one that jumping through all sorts of rules lawyering hoops and pulling shenanigans to push their own agenda.

There was already at least 1 massive thread about this subject, and while I appreciate you having made up your mind on what anyone that reads the same things you do and has a different view or ruling on what it says, some people would actually just like to not have table variation on this or similar things.

So, again, can we please stop trying to skew things with personal points of view and agenda and let it be decided upon based on it's own merits.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
phantom1592 wrote:
Also, those crystals that they use to make them... I heard they were really hard to find. Either naturally scarce or the Empire hid/destroyed them to prevent jedi from making new ones. So it's REALLY impractical to outfit entire armies with them.

They are very hard to find, but even harder to actually use correctly. Part of becoming a Jedi Knight was the construction of the Lightsaber. It was partially in creating a personal weapon, but the test itself was displaying enough mastery of the different types of the Force (Alter, Control, and Sense), needed to actually correctly create a working Lightsaber.

Another aspect to consider is that a Lightsaber is essentially a bomb, and even relatively minor damage to the components within the hilt would be enough to cause it to explode and kill everyone within a few yards. Part of the Force Mastery required to actually use one in combat is focusing on the Lightsaber itself not being damaged and blowing up.

The original concept was that they where simply lazar swords, but that was changed quickly to make them a partially mystical weapon and not a mundane one. So while one doesn't need to be a Jedi/Sith, they do need to have Force Sensitivity to use one as anything but a lethal taser. Well, until The Force Awakens botched that for us.

The other major aspect of using a Lightsaber is that it's a defensive weapon, not an offensive one. Simply using it like a sword is like using a loaded bazooka as a club.

Instead, with the Force, a user can block, deflect, and redirect blaster bolts, absorb energy, focus the force through the blade, and use the lightsaber as both a melee and ranged weapon/shield.

Shadow Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
TomG wrote:
Did a quick scan, and didn't see this one mentioned yet: Humans trying to take Racial Heritagae(kitsune) and Fox Shape feats.

That one is an absolute no for pfs. Fox shape is only available in the additional resources to kitsune, so whether you see it as a seperate ability or an add on to change shape is irrelevant, it doesn't work in PFS.

(see note above about racial heritage needing a BIG asterix)

Um, no. And can we please stop saying things like this unless it was actually ruled on somewhere.

If it was, then it's a great example of something that could be a lot more evident. If not, and to my knowledge it wasn't, then again, it's a pretty great example of very conflicting interpretations leading to table variation of the worst sort.

Shadow Lodge ****

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Nefreet wrote:

My idea isn't for 5-Star GMs to call the shots or make decisions, though.

It's a filter. We describe what we're doing already. Campaign Leadership decides what fits.

But that's exactly what your proposal would lead to. If a group (any group) controls what information is worthy of being looked at, they in all but name control what gets changed or ruled upon, and that is going to be heavily dictated by their own preferences and desires. Perhaps not universally, but enough.

It's also the exact opposite of the point of the blog, which was to open this up as a public forum, as opposed to the already existing VO and 5 Star hidden forums.

Ragoz wrote:
At some point Paizo decided that high star GMs know the game any better than anyone else and it just isn't true. 5 star GMs are organizers of the campaign not game developers.

I just want to point out that's not exactly what I said. Attaining 4 or 5 Stars, or even a Venture Officer title is a pretty big deal and it is something in my opinion that's worthy of some respect. And you are correct that some individuals could and do cheat the system, per se, by running a few scenarios (or modules/APs) a lot or by running for a "home group", BUT, that's not at all a bad thing or really "cheating" as PFS is designed to both account for and allow that.

And while those individuals may not get some of the same experience or face other potential errors, they instead face other potential errors and get different experiences, and that's something that PFS needs in order to survive, grow, and improve.

Shadow Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nefreet wrote:

This has become like the #1 thing on my mind as I'm driving around running errands today.

If I had a say in how to tackle this, I'd set up a Forum for all the 5-Star GMs to post in. We've played and GMed more than anyone else and we've encountered more table variation than anyone else. Who better to poll than the ones that've had to come up with their own rulings?

Have us make individual threads that bring up the issues one at a time. Have us present all sides of the argument, but not actually argue with one another.

After maybe like a week, Campaign Leadership reads through all the points and issues a ruling that aligns with the Campaign.

You said this document would be regularly updated, like the Weapon Groups listing. Well, as these threads get resolved the document gets updated with them.

Let our Stars count for more than just rerolls. Let us impact change and help guide the Campaign.

(did that sound like a Campaign speech?)

There are a few reasons I think this is a bad idea. Firstly, I do think it's often misleading to assume that 5 Star GMs are the most experienced or best qualified, even within just the PFS arena. Often I see, or get the impression that they (we?) tend to be the most set in our ways. I'm only a lowly 4 Star here :P, but I'll include myself in this as well, because the point isn't to point fingers. Being more set in our ways is not the same thing as being good/more experienced/better GM's and being a great GM, or even a PFS GM does not really mean an individual is in a better position to nudge things in the best direction for the campaign as a whole.

I can't think of the number of times I've heard something along the lines of "Well, I don't care <*>, at my table _______"

* What the guide says / what the rules are / what the actual ruling has been / etc. . .

A great deal of the time I see 5 Star GM's push to get something banned or changed, it seems that their is a personal motivation involved, or it seems like a very regional or local issue that they are trying to make a universal rules change to address when the issue doesn't seem to happen or be a problem anywhere else. I often get the impression that "for the campaign" is less important than what seems to be personal agendas. But, here is the thing. Regardless of if it is or not, it will appear that way to everyone else, and will also just lead to more issues late on as other experienced people will encounter the new ruling and poke holes right through it.

I'm also not keen on yet another issue and means of fixing and improving the Campaign as a whole being taken away from all to be handled off screen by a few. I'd actually say it would be a better idea for 4 and 5 Star GMs to have an absolute hands-off approach than to focus on their opinions or points exclusively.

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.
HP: 129/129 , Init +3, AC: 23, T: 12, FF: 21, CMB: 26, F: +17, R: +10, W: +17 <+2 vs Evil, Evasion, no Food/ Water, Native Outsider, Imune to Fog/Mist/Smoke and Evil Possesion or Mind-Control> Fly 30', Swim 30", Move 30', Perception +10 <Darkvision 60ft>, Channel: 2/7 DC 22 - 7d6, (DC 23 +21 vs Undead, +7 vs Evil Outsiders) NG Male Aasimar Cleric 14, Sunflare: +14/+9, 1d6+18+1d6 Acid (15/x2) S, 5,274-18
Roos Randermin wrote:
"What are you and Roak going on and on about?"

Just a warning, the following is true only from a certain point of view. There is another point of view that hated Grandmaster Torch and thus that he had his own faction that basically gave the Grand Lodge/Decemvirate the finger.

"I've been with the Society for a long time, and I can honestly say that in that time, I have few regrets. We are morning the best amongst us, a fall that shames us all."

"Some years ago, there was a group within the Pathfinder Society whose secret aim was to look out for the younger, newer, less experienced agents, and to keep them from being used and abused so often. The group, called the Shadow Lodge, had begun as a band of brothers and sisters that the Decemvirate, and more than a few of the Venture Officers had abandon, neglected to tell them pertinent information about a mission, or simply been ignorant themselves. Not all of them had perished, and as more and more survived, they banded together to avoid it from happening again."

"However, there where some within the Shadow Lodge who instead wanted, in reality a deserved revenge against the leaders of the Pathfinder Organization, and these "false" Shadow Lodge agents went to war with both the "true" Shadow Lodge, but primarily the Pathfinder Society itself, for it was they who had left them to die, or tried to have them killed. Or their friends. Or family."

"All of this was in the shadows. The Pathfinder Society had no idea who was destroying them, and so easily, so precisely. It's because the Shadow Lodge was inside the Pathfinder Society already. They new first hand who the bad apples where, and how to strike. They new first hand the Society's plan, strengths, weaknesses, and also had the same access to the same resources. It was then that the "true" Shadow Lodge came out to save the Pathfinder Society. Led b one Grandmaster Torch, the Shadow Lodge informed the Society of the true threat, and they joined forces to destroy the "false" Shadow Lodge, but only after the Decemvirate bowed to the Shadow Lodge's terms. No more would agent's simply be left to die. Or swept under the rug because of a Venture-Captain' ignorance or laziness. The Shadow Lodge also developed special strike teams that would deploy to find and retrieve missing agents, at least returning their bodies home for healing or burial."

"But as I had said, we honor the best of us, and that means they are no longer with us. Not really. There are rumors that they still exist. Out there, somewhere. But I've only hear of them once in passing, and it's been some long years now. With the threat of the "false" Shadow Lodge gone, and things truly beginning to look up, the Decemvirate pulled a nasty trick. Truly vile. Utilizing some sort of Doppelganger or some sort of magic, now on really knows for sure, they staged a public betrayal of both the Pathfinder Society and some of the Shadow Lodge's most loyal by "Grandmaster Torch", and in one simple stoke, tore it all down."

"Our shame, all of us, for we are all equally at fault here, is that we did not fight back. We did not support our brothers and sisters when they needed us the most. With the spectacle of Grandmaster Torch's betrayal, the Shadow Lodge, now the only Shadow Lodge was dissolved. After thrusting the knife into our brother's backs, they then repeated the efforts on our sisters, adding in an extra twist of the blade: the Decemvirate was even so gracious as to, "allow them to return to the fold". Yes, ponder that for a moment. The Pathfinder Society "allowed" the Shadow Lodge to "return to the fold". That is like saying that Cheliax, in all seriousness and honesty both offered to allow Andoran and the Liberty's Edge to return to their rightful place, and then fully expected them to drop to their knees and crawl back. It's outright ridiculous."

"We all allowed this to happen, and even now, whilst many are so eager to defile all that the Shadow Lodge had been and done, there are those who don't even have the competency to know that they do it. Such as the whore of Cheliax, whose own symbol is just a weak rerepresentation of a greatness that was. Look upon the whore's symbol, a burning book, and see that her agenda is one and the same. To destroy the truth. Not to find it and keep it."

"I apologize. I find it very irksome that someone so unworthy, and in fact an entire retinue of her slaves would dare to even claim some sort of kinship with the Shadow Lodge, even if it is simply through their associated symbol, and ignorance is no excuse. For Zarta, it never was. But the Shadow Lodge as somewhat similar in many ways to both your own and my own Factions. Perhaps most of all, but even Darius's friends have more than a few similarities. Like Darius's allies, the Shadow Lodge worked from behind the thrown, always seeking to make alliances with the most unexpected people, for one never knows when one, or one's friends, may need a favor. But they had a plan. A focus. Beyond power and influences, that is. Their efforts where to fix the broken Pathfinder Society, and for a time, they did."

"Like Liberty's Edge, or at the time, the followers and idealists of the nation of Andoran, the Shadow Lodge was perfectly willing to punch an idiot barking orders in the face if that idiot was, well an idiot. But I've heard many stories about Major Maldris, and while in the end, the Pathfinder Society turned Grandmaster Torch into the same hypocrite as those stories may indicate, both of the groups that followed them did so for the purposes they espoused. The Shadow Lodge was also similar to, and perhaps the most similar to my own alliance. They sought against all odds, to improve the world. While the Silver Crusade does so with the Society, the Shadow Lodge did so regardless of, or even in spite of the Society if need be. But they where also a group that believed the ends justified the means, for better or for worse."

"You may wonder why a group called that would be called the Shadow Lodge had a symbol of flame. I wondered this myself. But consider that they where more than willing to fight fire with fire, and it makes a bit more sense. Poetic, of sorts. While the Darkive hoards "darkness" and pretends to be of use, or even needed with their treasures, the Shadow Lodge took those same evils that others didn't want, but the Society was too weak to destroy, and used them for good. Or rather, used them against evil."

Roos Randermin wrote:
Roos listens to Iggys eulogy and explanation of events. "Many thanks. I joined the society soon after the closing of the two lodges and never really got filled in on what transpired. Any-who I'm gonna see what is around the corner here." and with that Roos walks over to the right "Oh look sofas. I am tired." he tells the others and then sits down.

Shadow Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Marc Radle wrote:

DM Becket - you're entitled to your opinion, but saying it was 'terribly written' and doesn't deserve to be Star Wars is just not true. Those claims *could* be leveled at the prequels, but NOT at the Force Awakens. You may personally dislike the film and that's fine, but making those sorts of claims are simply being disingenuous.

Of course, when something is super popular and super successful, there will still be some folks that don't like it, and that's fine. Heck, Avatar was certainly a very popular and successful film (clearly) but I didn't care for it. Of course, I didn't seek out people (or online forums) expressly for the purpose of complaining about how much I didn't like it.

Not liking something is fine. Trying to rain on the parade of people (and let's face it, from the money the film is making, and the sheer number of people seeing this movie multiple times) that DO like it just feels like ... kind of crappy to do

Well, personally I think continuously attempting to shut down opinions that do not agree with yours is a pretty crappy thing to do. A large part of why we are talking about what we don't like is so that it doesn't happen again if there are further movies.

Some people liked it, and some don't. A agree, it's fine that you do. But please, stop assuming that your opinion is the only one that matters. In retrospection, I think I like all the prequels more, and yes, I do think the Force Awakens was terribly written and doesn't deserve to be a Star Wars movie, not do I think getting rid of the Expanded Universe was close to a good trade-off.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
pres man wrote:

Some random thoughts ...

** spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
Honestly, the idea the Jedi cannot marry or have children only existed after the prequels. Somewhat irrelevant now, there was a lot of Expanded Universe material that stated otherwise, from Luke marrying later, to probably the most famous, Nomi Sunrider who only became a Jedi after her Jedi husband was cut down right in front of her, and later taught their daughter to become a Jedi as well. (Ironically, she also originally swore to never touch a Lightsaber as well).

There was some theory that this was also one of the things that Obi-Wan, Mace Windu, and Yoda where referring to in their discussion in Attack of the Clones about how these new generations of Jedi are arrogant and weak, because without the difficulties of close relationships with family, they did not have the risk of falling to the Dark Side or grounding that comes with those relationships.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Rey:
Now, one thing I think would be an interesting way to redeem the movie is to have Rey actually become the new BBEG, but unlike Darth Vader, no redemption. As I recall, the flashback of showing her being dropped off she was very, very young, and so I don't think it's very likely that she had been trained as a Jedi and mind-wiped. It's possible, but I still don't think so. The other major issue with that is that if she is that powerful, well the mind-wipe just isn't going to last. But, what does make sense is if she got so powerful so quickly because she was tapping straight into the dark side, and her own pride and fear which will quickly follow allow the Dark Side to grab hold and not let go. Playing up on both how everyone just seems to like and trust her, and the fact that she has personal knowledge of the Ex-Republic's and/or Resistance's entire leadership structure, defenses, capabilities, etc. . . goes on to restart the war (all out), forcing Luke to come out of exile and begin to train new apprentices.

Shadow Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Marc Radle wrote:
I absolutely respect the few in this thread who didn't love the movie, but it definitely seems that this opinion is *very* much in the minority.

Are we trying to have an honest discussion or win a popularity contest?

:P

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||
Eldon García wrote:
Kwnoledge Local+ 18[/ooc]

She is secretly a unique Elf called a Nightmare Creature. It's from a 3rd party book I don't own. <Yes, the scenario draws on a 3rd party book, I'm not adding it> That also means I have no idea about the fluff. But, amongst her more juicy natural abilities is a constant Protection from Good, Regeneration (Silver or Good), and two separate Fear Aura's.

Eldon García wrote:
Are they aggressive to us, or do we still have the opportunity to parley?

They are aggressive. I tried to give a little bi of time to chat, but there really is no way around the fight. It is the BBEG. You guys/gals skipped the majority of the first floor. :P

Shadow Lodge ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Muser wrote:
I'd smash for a Darkive storyline. I hope the it involves Darklands.

Sure that's the way you want to phrase that?

To be honest, I'd like for basically everyone else to get that. Scarab Sage already did, and Darkive already as some of the better scenarios attached to them. Be nice for some others to get some epic feeling scenarios or trilogy.

Shadow Lodge ****

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
Now the question is 'what boon would you feel properly rewards a GM?' since you have disparaged the current GM star boon.

Personally, I'd like it to be something that adds a bit more setting, or the idea of the GM being more well informed about the in game Society or the world as a whole. I tend to find, being that I mostly play Divine Casters, the rewards just not very useful except for at the higher end. Especially things like the aegis of recovery, is just basically one more thing I can already do, just a bit worse. It also kind of competes with the Dawnflower Sash.

I also tend to dislike temporary, or one off bonuses. So a few suggestions I would like is maybe

1 Star: You get a free extra Starting Language of your choice.

2 Star: During the introduction to a Scenario, you automatically make one Knowledge Check to find out more details about the scenario when speaking to a Venture Captain. You treat it as is you where Trained in the Skill, and had rolled a total of 15 + your GM Stars. This can only be used after each other player has attempted that specific check if they are able to.

3 Star: When applying GM Credit to a Character, you are treated as if you had a Down Time benefit. This does not allow you to make a Day Job Check, but it does allow you to mark off Boons, or utilize other Down Time Benefits. If the specific Scenario, Module, or Quest does not normally allow for a Day Job or Down Time Check, this does not grant you that ability.

3 Star Alternate: You can take a 3rd Trait <universal>.

4 and 5 Star rewards stay the same, more for simplicity than anything.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
24/24, AC: 17, T: 13, FF: 14, CMD: 16 Fort: +6, Refl: +5, Will: +7, (+1 vs Fear) Perception: +3 <Darkvision, Continual Flame, Sense Motive: +9, 3/3 Channel Positive Energy 3/Day, 2d6 Will DC 11, LG Aasimar Cleric 3, Longspear +4 +5 1d8+1 20/x3 [P]

Earlier

"You also said that if we did a good job, I could get a ride on your back, and you would help my friend Oloch here overcome his fear of drowning."

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
24/24, AC: 17, T: 13, FF: 14, CMD: 16 Fort: +6, Refl: +5, Will: +7, (+1 vs Fear) Perception: +3 <Darkvision, Continual Flame, Sense Motive: +9, 3/3 Channel Positive Energy 3/Day, 2d6 Will DC 11, LG Aasimar Cleric 3, Longspear +4 +5 1d8+1 20/x3 [P]

"Only if you continue to fight. Give us the final piece so we can help you solve it."

Enhanced Diplomacy: 1d20 + 8 ⇒ (1) + 8 = 9

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
24/24, AC: 17, T: 13, FF: 14, CMD: 16 Fort: +6, Refl: +5, Will: +7, (+1 vs Fear) Perception: +3 <Darkvision, Continual Flame, Sense Motive: +9, 3/3 Channel Positive Energy 3/Day, 2d6 Will DC 11, LG Aasimar Cleric 3, Longspear +4 +5 1d8+1 20/x3 [P]

Man, I bet my next roll was a "6". . .

1d20 ⇒ 3

Oh, even better. . . <groan>

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

That's a fantastic question. Need to hear from everyone on characters. I know that GM Lari and PW are in the Fane of Fangs game, and might be waiting on a Chronicle from that before proceeding. That game should be ending very soon. Depending on post rates, I'd expect today or tomorrow.

I'm mostly ready on my end.

I've also opened up the Recruitment thread. Please head over there and fill in the info.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|| ANIMATIONS || Bloodcove || Hell's Rebels || In Wrath's Shadow ||

So here is what it looks like we have so far.

Eldon García (DM Rutseg) <3>
(GM Lari)
Miaka Oinari (Dragon Reborn) <3>
Oloch (GM DevilDoc) <4>
(Pathetic Wretch)

Lets get things rolling and we can get started.

1 to 50 of 717 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2016 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.