|1 person marked this as a favorite.|
Back to the OP and original posts/link
Outside of government everyone is on their own to determine the level that a culture/counter-culture, scene or in this case a hobby is inclusive.
If you are black and want to see more black Punk bands - start a punk band with black bandmates, want to see more black gamers - promote the game among the people of your race (if that's your desire or agenda).
Gaming doesn't owe you squat - if there's a predominantly white following it's because of the genesis of gaming back in the day (and continued interest) was primarily with white people - specifically geek culture, though that has been changing over the last decade.
You want to change it - become part of it, put your face on it. This isn't a special club or union.
The AA George complaints would be akin to a white guy going to a local inner city hip-hop concert/event and complaining about the racial makeup of the fans (lack of white representation, etc).
I could understand Mr. George's complaints if he was stopped at the doors at GenCon or was given looks but that wasn't the case. Also the symbolism he's complaining about in gaming isn't institutional, it's artistic - its the people who made the game stamping it with their faces and influences as human beings (not just white people) are known to do.
You are not owed representation beyond public institutions -
You decide your level of attraction and involvement and subsequently how that "X" is going to change over time if it doesn't look or act the way you want it to.
You want to see LGBTQ people represented in gaming, create that content (see Paizo.com) - the hobby doesn't owe it to you.
If AA George wants to see more Black people represented at GenCon maybe he should consider securing a booth/write a product/create a game.