|
|
|
|
|
Aristodeimos's page
Pathfinder Chronicles Superscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, GameMastery Maps, Planet Stories Subscriber. 119 posts. 1 review.
Profile
|
Recent Posts
|
Recent Reviews
|
Recent posts by
Aristodeimos:
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Andrew Murphy wrote:
And, as mentioned, Magic Aura and cheap enchantments can be used to cloak an area. Get a pot of library paste, cast Magic Aura on it, and paint unempowered Symbols of Death on every available surface. People without Detect Magic will pass right by, whereas the Detect Magic crew will be freaking out.
That. Is. Genius. However, wouldn't they get a Spellcraft roll to know the difference between a Symbol and a Magic Aura spell?
Kevin Andrew Murphy wrote:
Also, go back to 1st edition rulings and have it where illusions DO NOT radiate magic, because it would be a pretty piss poor illusion that did. You need Detect Illusion for that, and it's a 1st level spell.
Nice. Did that also include opponents using Invisibility, or was Detect Magic a poor-man's See Invisibility?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misery wrote:
I just had to point out the wording you used I found amusing :D
"Halfling MINI Rant" hehe ... get it, they're small?
Plus the "Ok, this is a SMALL point "
... underlying comic gold.
^_^
Also grats on finding decent minis to fit your character. Maybe you can find one "HALF" off.
... hehehe I could do this all day.
LOL - nice catch.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Masika wrote:
You are not looking too hard mate.
Lidda from 3.x D&D was a mini that WotC released. See here:
http://paizo.com/store/byCompany/w/wizardsOfTheCoast/byProductType/miniatur esGames/dungeonsAndDragons/dnd/singles/harbinger/v5748btpy7smm
That picture is so small, who could tell there's a crossbow in there?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beckett wrote:
Because traditionally, (Hobbits) have been good at throwing stones, and also using Slings by extension. It is more a racial backstory than a mechanical equalizor.
Both stones and slings are Strength Weapons, but they use Dex to Attack and already deal low damage. Your Crossbow has better Damage (about twice as good at least)and much better range.
I get the tradition thing, but again, all races can use a sling...it's a simple weapon. If they wish to single out the sling for halflings, then give all halflings "Weapon Focus: Slings" or perhaps a +1 damage bonus when using slings to counter their strength modifier.
Back on subject though: does anyone know of a company that makes a halfling mini armed with a crossbow?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, this is a small point but I feel a need to rant and have chosen the Paizo Forum to do so.
Why are there no halfling minis armed with crossbows?!? I'm one of those guys that feels the compulsion to have a mini that represents his character. I'm currently playing in a Pathfinder Beta campaign as a halfling rogue with STR 6. That strength pretty much guarantees the need to use a crossbow. However, every miniature I've found shows a halfling with either a shortbow or sling. Both weapons are modified by strength for damage purposes. Since halflings take a -2 to STR during character creation, I'm sure I'm not the only one with this problem.
In addition, the Pathfinder Beta states all Halflings are proficient with slings. Why? They are a strength weapon. Doesn't it make more sense for a weak race to use a weapon that plays down their weakness? Besides, slings are simple weapons...all the races can pretty much use it.
But I digress, bottom line: Paizo (or any other mini manufacturer reading this), please make a halfling mini armed with a crossbow.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hunterofthedusk wrote:
The first day I used DriveThruRPG I got a bunch of those PDF's for free, and I mean a bunch (Rules Compendium, Dungeonscape, Dragon Magic, Draconomicon, ect.). I'm not sure why, maybe that was a super special deal that just happened to be going on for that day, or what.
I'm green with envy.
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Hopefully at some point WotC will relent and drop the PDF price on 3.5E books down to a more reasonable level ..like $5 a pop. I know it would make me feel a warm fuzzy towards them, something which has been a bit of a rarity these past couple of years.
My sentiments exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a computer geek for the US Army. So its inevitable that I become intimate with Vista sometime in the near future. I'm also an MCSE for XP, so I've always been a Microsoft supporter. I bought the Mac to expand my skills. Though I have to admit...I like it.
BTW, Fractal Mapper just went on sale (20% off):
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/product_info.php?products_id=28465{1}8&it =1
I agree with you. If CC3 is working, you should stay with it since you've already made the investment.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, let me admit up front that I don't use Vista yet. I'm still using XP. The XP version has none of the problems you mention. In fact, there is an awesome tutorial that comes with the program that taught me how to use it in under 30 minutes. It was quite refreshing for a Help feature to actually help!
I can only hope it works as well with Vista. It claims it does, but I'm sure CC claims the same. Oh wait, I just remembered that NBOS has its own site:
http://www.nbos.com/
The site has a Forum, so I'm sure there are folks there that will tell you the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immora wrote:
I can see how some people would dislike fighters, but I think it's just a matter of taste. I can't stand playing Druids, even though they are arguably the most powerful class in the 3.5 PHB. I find the generic nature of the class excellent for turning the Fighter into any of a variety of archetypes.
While I agree that the Wizards starts out-pacing you for raw-damage-in-a-single-blow, it's very nice to not worry about running out of "swords" you can cast per day, get to attack three or four times versus the one spell most casters get in a round, and (by 16th level)you've got almost 20 feats, giving you a lot of options to customize what you can throw out, from extra damage to super mobility to status effects, and even boost up those weaker saves and pad out their skill points.
Admittedly, in a one-on-one fight, a high-level wizard will probably own a single fighter, but in any low-level fight the opposite is true. If you want a fighter-type that can effectively 'cast spells', then take a look at "The Book of Nine Swords" to bring in anime-style fighting maneuvers. I consider it unbalanced, but it might bring in the power level that you're looking for.
Well said! It's the fact that a 3.5 fighter is a Feat God that makes them so attractive to me. You can literally build any archetype fighter you wish. In fact, I usually have to play the wizard of the group because no one else wants to.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|