Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ

Arbane the Terrible's page

644 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 644 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

CampinCarl9127 wrote:
A good thing to include in the statblock of your critters is "Morale". What will make them flee? 7hp or less? 15hp or less if their leader is dead? If more than half of their numbers fall? If a cleric presents a holy symbol? And why are they fighting? For a lot of critters it's ok to have the simple "Fight to the death because they want to kill the party and take their stuff", but a large amount of creatures aren't suicidal levels of greedy like that.

Fun fact: Basic D&D (You remember, the simplified version of AD&D, for kids) HAD a Morale stat, so it was possible to send enemies running, or negotiate or bribe them. Meanwhile, 3.x players often assume everything should fight to the death. Go figure...


Try to have enemy goals for the fight scene beyond 'kill everyone on the other side'. Get away with loot, get someone away safely, set off the trap, etc.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

What things can be better done by mundane means than through magic?

Just about the only things I can think of are building long-term relationships and (possibly) architecture.


Derek Dalton wrote:
Almost all the archtypes for Arcanist are not worth taking. Same with the Wizard.

Most archetypes aren't worth taking (unless you have a very specific character concept), period.


Orfamay Quest wrote:
Mudfoot wrote:
Nothing called a "Daevic" is ever going to hit the mainstream, at least not for an English-speaking public. WTF is that word from? Google is no help.
It's from an obscure Indo-Iranian language that died out long before the birth of Christ (or the establishment of the Roman Empire, if you prefer secular epoch markers). Unlike "magus," which is was actually borrowed into English from Latin, which in turn borrowed it from Greek, it has no real history of English usage.

*cough* devasprobablycomefromthesamerootword. *cough*


3 people marked this as a favorite.
KenderKin wrote:
Martials are mundane, highly trained and skilled, but mundane...

And therefore, they SHOULD NOT BE IN THE GAME past level 6 or so, because after that, you've left 'mundane' bleeding in the dirt and every opponent worth mentioning has magic powers of one sort or another.

Jack of Dust wrote:


For me, I don't care if a caster can do the impossible but I would like martials to be able to achieve things in the same ballpark.

But that's ANIME!!1!@! You know, like the Ramayana or the Táin bó Cúailnge!


Broken Zenith wrote:

Added Elementary, but we already had N. Jolly's and RPG BOT as a note at the bottom. Make sure you aren't looking at the front page of this thread, but rather at:

Guide to the Guides

Guide to the Builds

I was looking at the first page, so thanks. Bookmarked.


It's nothing like Darkest Dungeon's, but Unknown Armies has a really good sanity system, too. (To sum up: PCs can take different types of mental trauma, which are tracked separately. Either they get Failed notches, which means they're hypersensitive to that kind of trauma, or Hardened, which makes them ignore weaker traumas of that type. The bad news is that too many Hardened notches make you lose connection to your own emotions, which penalizes you in-game.)


There don't seem to be any Investigator guides listed. Here's a few I found:

The Investigator's Grand Turnabout: N. Jolly's guide-addendum to the Pathfinder Investigator

Elementary! A Handbook to the Pathfinder Investigator

RPG BOT Pathfinder - Investigator Handbook

I don't know how good they are, but it's a start.


baja1000 wrote:
I still don't even get why one HAS to be better than the other. How does it have to be a "myth" to say this is a team game? It is. Its about the story. This whole thread in and of itself is kind of a way to stir the pot. Wizards can do great and powerful s%@+ when their stuff works. Fighters can do some amazing s%#~ when their combo's go off. Does it really have to matter which one can do it better?

It kind of does matter, because the game claims to be balanced, and the higher-level it gets, the more it obviously isn't. At higher levels, the unfortunate non-casters get increasingly sidelined except when it's time for them to catch some battle-axes with their faces and/or play Goblin Roulette with some trap.


Don't forget that SOMETIMES, the heroes react to too much stress by becoming heroic instead of cracking up. (Nowhere nearly often enough...)

Also remember that some characters should have ways to mitigate or remove stress - anything that gives bravery or morale bonuses might have that as an extra effect, for example.


CWheezy wrote:


This doesn't actually fix it imo. What it does is turns wizards into a binary system:

You don't have the good spells and you suck

You have the good spells and are now a god

Isn't that how wizards work now?


Jockston wrote:

If you want to fix the disparity then all that needs doing is making spell acquisition more difficult instead of automatic.

"From spell levels 5+ you can only achieve spells by hunting them down and adding them to your book. The fm decides how this is achieved."

Add that line, or something similar in the crb, the disparity is nullified. Now having access to any spell is not guaranteed.

That might help balance things, but I could see that getting frustrating for the wizards fairly quickly, unless they were very good sports. (And it has zero effect on the Cleric, Druid, or Sorcerer.) Maybe make it the other way around - they can still get new spells at level-up, but scrolls of such powerful spells are ultra-rare, and most wizards who know them don't want to share. (Instant plot-hooks!)

(To be fair, I was in a game where my Witch was having problems finding scrolls & such of high-level spells - mostly because at that point, she was one of the highest level casters around...)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Chess Pwn wrote:
But I'm curious what "critical role" the martial are filling for a party that a caster couldn't.

"If we're playing the Avengers, someone has to be Hawkeye."

Semi-seriously, I understand that some people do want to play the Conan-type: a normal human being (or dwarf, or whatever) that can stand up alongside all the spell-flingers and supernatural weirdoes and what-not, with just their trusty sword and armor. The problem is that high-level PF is NOT a good game for this.

This has obvious problems around the time the wizard learns how to fly, and fails completely around the time Plane Shift is available.

They either go from Hawkeye to War Machine, or Hawkeye to dead.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Jiggy wrote:
Second, this isn't something that appears in tabletop RPGs in general (as you suggest), but rather something that's mostly present in 3.X and PF systems. D&D 5E has much less of a C/MD issue, I've gotten the impression that it was very differently balanced in AD&D and 2E, and many non-D&D-style tabletop RPGs don't have the issue at all.

As an old-timey AD&D player, I can attest to that.

For one thing, magic items were rare and random - nobody could depend on getting any item. But magic swords (which only the fighty-types could use) were relatively common. Scrolls and wands were rare and valuable, not for sale, and making them was such a massive undertaking that going into monster-infested ruins in hope of finding one sounded sensible by comparison.

Fighters had VASTLY better saving throws. A high-level Fighter had the best saves against EVERYTHING except Spells - which Magic-Users beat them at by one point.

Everyone had much lower hit points, which is why blaster mages were expected and effective. (And here again, Fighters got more benefit from high Con scores than anyone else.)

Magic-Users had to beg, buy, trade, research, or steal new spells. And there were some (extremely random) limits on their ability to learn any given spell.

Spellcasting in mid-fight was risky - spells took time to cast, enemies could react, and all it took as one hit to ruin them.

So, yeah - 3rd ed removed a LOT of limitations Magic-Users had in the Olden Days.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Drahliana Moonrunner wrote:
Milo v3 wrote:
Drahliana Moonrunner wrote:
by......... What will meet that standard for the folks who are complaining about what wizards can do?

Have you ever seen the mythos classes like Teramach by Xefas? They are attempts at making tier 1/2 martial classes and inspired by the Exalted game... and he succeed. Teramach for example is his barbarian, and they can tear apart obstacles (even walls of force) just by walking through them with enough strength and determination, leap ridiculous distances, you can kill creatures so thourghly that when they arrive in the afterlife they are effectively dead inside and it's pointless to resurrect them, you can destroy a castle or a mountain in a single attack or you could lift the mountain out of the earth, you can eat the top of a tower or an armies worth of weapons or a collection of storm clouds, they can eat the bloody sun.

Or you can just give them tier 3 reasonable stuff like manipulating nations, being able to be useful in investigations, being able to socialize and stuff rather than going full tier 1... People would be fine with that too.

So how would you stat such abilities then?

Here's the Teramach, see for yourself.


Anguish wrote:


I'd love to hear the other side of the story, though. It's always a hoot. It'll turn out the OP had sex with the other three guys' girlfriends accidentally, or something, like the last thread. <Grin>

O_o

Where can I find THAT story?


Alex Mack wrote:

One thing oracles with the warsighted archetype get is access to move action speed favored enemy of their choice. So at level 1 you can spend a full round to buff yourself by +4 to hit and damage.

How do you do that? I'm playing a Warsighted, so this is relevant to my interests.

(Edit: I think I found it: Fate's Favored + Divine Favor + Dedicated Adversary = +4 hit/damage in one turn. Niiiice. :D)


cavernshark wrote:


From Rogue Talents:
Spoiler:
If a talent requires her to expend points from her ki pool, she can instead expend a spell slot with a spell level equal to the number of ki points she would normally expend

Does that mean the Eldritch Scoundrel has (effectively) MORE Ki points than an actual ninja?


Benchak the Nightstalker wrote:
As the guy who wrote blistering invective, I thought I'd chime in and mention that this is how I run it as well.

I'm glad you did, as I find this spell utterly hilarious.


Chengar Qordath wrote:
I think a lot of it has to do with folks wanting to emulate the feel of popular Low Fantasy works like A Song of Ice and Fire, The Witcher, The Black Company, Conan the Barbarian, and so on. But like you said, Pathfinder just isn't built to work that way.

Agreed on everything except the Black Company being low fantasy - it's Epic Fantasy, just from the point of view of a bunch of grunts working for the Evil Overlord. (And it grows out of that as the series progresses.)

I like the series, if you couldn't tell.


Several hand-assembled books containing placatory prayers to the dead from various local faiths.


Lord Twitchiopolis wrote:

Organic Character Development

Easily one of the coolest things you can do with the stock fighter.

(SNIP)
Now, most classes can do this, but simply not to the degree of the fighter.
The fighter is a blank page.
Other classes have formating coded in.

Yeah, the problem with this is when you make a character who's mediocre at a half-dozen things, and not great at any of them. (and Hiro won't have those abilities when he needs them, he'll have them a level or two too late.)

Possibly a Martial Master Fighter? They can fake knowing a bit of EVERY type of combat.


You might want to pick up the Fly spell, or some item that lets you fly. (Although you do have Dimension Door, that might do the trick.)

If the summoner has Haste, you're probably OK without it.

A Mnemonic Vestment is STUPIDLY good for sorcerers.


Make up tables of your own!


ColossalApostle wrote:

A question about Wolf Savage fluff:

** spoiler omitted **

The wording of this feat is rather harsh - do you think a character could obtain and use this feat if they are a Lawful Neutral monk? A Lawful Good monk?

I'm trying to wiggle this feat thematically into my LN flowing monk who is non-aggressive and only believes in fighting to restore order. I like the idea of subduing an aggressive/chaotic opponent, but not so much permanently disfiguring them.

Thoughts?

Breaking someone's legs will not kill them. And (in reality, at least,) it'll heal eventually.

Hm... how ARE you supposed to get rid of the effects of a savaging? It's not a spell, so it seems to me Remove Curse wouldn't make sense, but it's not stat damage, so Restoration won't work...


You need a BIG conspiracy. Like Illuminati Wizards, or a cult dedicated to an active Elder God that will send Byakhee to chew investigators' faces off.

Or ninjas. Ninjas are always good.


Devilkiller wrote:
Speak with Bread might be a joke spell, but there's a 2nd level Ranger spell in the APG called Allfood which makes an object of up to 5lbs per level edible (or a collection of similar objects like a pile of rocks). That's not useless, but it could obviously lead to a lot of silly antics.

I heard of one group that used that to get an Intimidate bonus on an interrogation. Normally, they had the Rogue standing off to the side picking his teeth with a dagger while they grilled the prisoner, but this time, he just nonchalantly took a bite out of the dagger.

The prisoner talked.


DM_Blake wrote:

Don't read this if you're planning to read or have just started reading the Sword of Truth books:

** spoiler omitted **

Well, yeah, but then you have to be within one step of Lawful Evil.

(I am not a fan of that series.)


Goth Guru wrote:
If sorcerers you are fighting have the fly spell, you should have wings of flying.

Wings of Flying cost 54,000 gp. That's half the Wealth By Level of a level 12 character.

A Sorcerer can get Fly at level 6. Plenty of monsters can fly well before that.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

This plus the 'Game Breaking Spells' thread makes me want to make a set of cartoons about the CMD problem: Goofus and Gandalf.

"GOOFUS spent three skill points every level on Climb, Swim, and Acrobatics.
GANDALF casts Overland Flight."


The Sword wrote:

I wouldn't count Conan as a superhero, nor most of the basic characters. Magic is magic not superheoism and magic users in many works of fantasy fiction can throw to fireballs.

Aside from the Wicked Witch of the West, what fictional wizards (pre-D&D, preferrably), threw fireballs?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
HWalsh wrote:


I'm just saying, people don't want low key Asian-themed things when they go Anime. They want Martials that can leap 900 feet in the air, run at speeds that can break the sound barrier, and cut through trees in a single blow... All without using a hint of magic or magical items.

That just doesn't fit in the world of Pathfinder.

You want super mundanes look in games that cater to it.

[sarcasm]

But it's okay if all those things are do-able via magic, because Magic Can Do Anything.
[/sarcasm]

N. Jolly wrote:
Not everyone wants to cut skyscrapers with one swing at first level, but once you're 20th level and you have problems cutting a tree due to hardness, we're not in a great place.

What he said. At 20th level, (or even at 10th level!) the player characters have left 'low-key' and 'realistic' bleeding in the dirt miles behind them, no matter how had the game tries to pretend otherwise.


Mudfoot wrote:
Transcendent is indeed impossible to price as a single value. On a +1 buckler, it gives +2 which is less than amazing. On +1 full plate it's +9 which is awesome.

Good point. Maybe it's +1 for light armor, +2 for medium, and +3 for heavy? (And similar for shields.)


1 person marked this as a favorite.

581. The Infernal Peerage
Written in Cheliaxian with some passages in Infernal (with a pronounciation guide in the front cover), this thick, iron-bound book is a guide to the ranks, hierarchies, protocols and correct modes of address of the Nine Hells. It also contains useful information on the personalities of many high-ranking devils, especially the ones associated with Cheliax, and many tieflings in Cheliax of devilish descent.
This edition was published 100 years ago, but most of the information on devils is still current, and it provides a +2 on knowledge(Planes) rolls when dealing with higher-ranking devils, and a +2 on Charisma rolls when trying to use Planar Binding on them.


Devastating: (Weapon enhancement)
When added to a weapon or ammo, it increases the critical multiplier by one.

Transcendent: (Armor or shield enhancement)
This armor or shield's AC bonus is added to touch AC.


[SARCASM]
That'll teach those filthy PCs not to accidentally win fights when they're not supposed to.
[/SARCASM]


Arachnofiend wrote:
I actually can't think of any temporary luck bonuses other than Divine Favor. Would be kind of odd to make a trait that is fantastic for low level divine casters but underwhelming to useless for anyone else.

Prayer spell. +1 luck bonus to attack, damage, skills, and saves.


If you go half-elf you can use Paragon Surge. (It's been nerfed to be LESS ridiculous, but it could still be useful.)


Arachnofiend wrote:
It always surprises me when I double check the Aboleth statblock and see that they are CR 7. Even if they were tuned down to not be as deadly as they are that wouldn't feel right; I mean, it's an Aboleth! It's supposed to be a potential Big Bad! Why the hell is it rated as being as tough an encounter as a Dire Bear?

Newsflash! CR system still borked, Major Image at 11.

(Consider your average level 7 Fighter - poor will save, base of +2. Even with a decent 14 Wisdom (another +2) and Iron Will (another +2) and maybe a +1 from a trait and +2 from a Cloak of Resistance, they'll still fail that DC 22 save 65% of the time.)


Jodokai wrote:
When people talk about the multiple will saves, don't dramatize it. It's two. Two will saves and you're destroying the party. It's not hard to get two crappy saves in a row.

I can top that - in a recent adventure, in a party of five characters, ALL FIVE managed to blow their will saves vs a monster that can spam Charm Person. Of those 5, FOUR had good will saves, and two of those had good Wisdom scores to boot. AND the GM gives us one free reroll a session, which we all preceded to ALSO blow.

But that fiasco gives me the chance to write something nobody else has ever had a reason to say: "Fortunately, then the Xill showed up." (Which gave my character the excuse to cast Protection from Evil, SOMEHOW actually roll higher than a 6 on my re-re-rolled will save, and start snapping my allies out of it.)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
thejeff wrote:
Play Feng Shui instead. :)

Or Legends of the Wulin.

But yeah, Monk's existence aside, PF does not handle wuxia very well.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
The 20 STR Aristocrat wrote:
If professor Lorrimor sent letters to 3 fighters Carrion Crown would be the hardest adventure ever.

What's the big deal? Sounds like a typical setup for an adventure.

In Call of Cthulhu.


hector212121 wrote:
Unless there's something of vital importance in the dungeon, it's totally in character for them to turn around and leave. A goblin rogue could murder all of them. Easily. With a sling.

See this? It is entirely correct.

Telling your players 'Play at least part-humans' and then springing this on them as seriously uncool.

There ARE potential workarounds, sure, but if your players want to go look for an easier source of loot, I can't blame them even slightly.


Natan Linggod 327 wrote:

If they couldn't handle mere darkness as a bunch of humans, how the heck did they think humanity survived up to this point?

A marvelous technological breakthrough called 'fire', which appears to be ineffective in that situation.

(My current GM loooooves darkness, and I'm playing a human. GOOD TIMES.)


I'd recommend just finding some of Lovecraft's stories and reading them. (The Call of Cthulhu is the most applicable for your campaign, but I like At The Mountains of Madness the best personally.) But it's worth noting that what is Cosmic Horror to an early 20th Century writer is going to be 'a really tough encounter' to a bunch of high-level Pathfinder characters.

Fun fact: Robert E. Howard (who wrote Conan) was a pen-pal of Lovecraft's, and there's some crossover between their stories.

(Small warning: Lovecraft was kinda racist. Kinda really racist. Kinda so racist that a guy who grew up in 1920s Texas called him on how racist he was.)


Ask the GM how the guards would have reacted to a travelling merchant approaching the fort...


SirPeter wrote:

Hi!

I'll start to play a campaign and I desire to make an Angelkin Oracle. It is 25-pt buy for ability scores and I want him to have some support abilities and be a decent melee combatant.

Any advice about which mystery choose? Ability scores? Feats? Archetype?

Thank you!

High Strength and Constitution, like any meleer. As much in Charisma as you can manage. Decent Dex if possible.

Something like:
STR 16 (+2 as angelblooded)
DEX 12
CON 14
INT 10
WIS 10
CHA 13 (+2 angelblooded)

What level are you starting at?

Mysteries: Battle's unsurprisingly good at, well, battling. Metal, too. Ancestors is supposed to be decent, I haven't really looked at most of the others.

Archetypes: look at the Warsighted archetype to make a character that is an abomination - fixed spells and reassignable feats. :D You have to give up a painful number of Revelations at low levels, though.

Feats: Power attack, of course. I personally like Furious Focus, but a lot of people say it's not worth it.

Good luck!


Nox Aeterna wrote:

We can start to list a vast , vast number of classes , that using Aelryinth logic should all start losing their skill points , everyone back to 2+INT mod.

No, no. 4 and NO Int mod.

The int-mod-to-skills thing makes a little sense when talking about book-learning, but it's idiotic that a low-Int fighty-type won't have enough skill points to be good at things like climbing, acrobatics, riding.... you know, the stuff they'd teach in the fantasy version of boot camp.


Beg your group's cleric to take and cast Prayer frequently. +1 luck bonus to all sorts of good stuff.

1 to 50 of 644 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.