Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Blodeuwedd

AlgaeNymph's page

Goblin Squad Member. 579 posts (755 including aliases). No reviews. 3 lists. No wishlists. 4 aliases.


RSS

1 to 50 of 579 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

James Jacobs wrote:
xavier c wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Misroi wrote:
Harkening back to last page's discussion of gods from Earth on Golarion, what is it about Earth that makes it inhospitable to divine beings? They all seem to have left for one reason or another.
Us.
What do you mean?
We get the gods we deserve. And I'm not sure we as a race currently deserve any of them.

1. What did we do that was so awful compared to humans elsewhere?

2. Oh, and about what time did the gods leave earth?

3. What relation do gods who're judges of the dead have with Pharasma?

4. When high-level adventurers die, do they become petitioners or are they fast tracked into outsiders of a similar power level? If not, then why?

5. Anyone who shares Arshea’s alignment (neutral good) will likely end up in Nirvana…where petitioners turn into animals. Given Arshea’s interests (freedom, physical beauty, and sexuality) wouldn’t this be awkward?

6. Given how innocent souls ending up in the lower planes is a problem (what with night hags, astradaemons, cacodaemons, succubi, and human sacrifice, and so on), How is Cthulhu supposed to be horrific compared to that? Sure, he scares people to death, causes massive property damage, and likely ends civilizations, but then the victims are on their way to a better place in the Great Beyond.

7. Why’s the wendigo have such a high Int score? Specifically, what’s a jumped-up cannibalism spirit need with all those skills?

8. Why in-setting (we all know the out-of-setting reason) aren't there any male nymphs? Fey Revisited never explained that.


Steve Geddes wrote:
You should do less editor-in-chiefing and more writing, I say.

Seconded, someone needs to make sure empyreal lords get some love (and decent stats).

Say, would your Tumblr be a better place to ask these questions? You update that frequently.


The poor stats for the empyreal lords still makes me rage. (Why's the wendigo, a jumped-up cannibalism spirit, get to have a better Int then celestial demigods?)

However, the Technology Guide's up so that should improve my mood. :)


The moment I saw her name I knew she was from Nirmathas. Nothing says generic fantasyland quite like gratuitous Welsh.

(Don't worry, there's not much depth or passion to my mini-rant.)


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
JaC381 wrote:

If someone with age bonuses/penalties drinks Sun Orchid Elixir, they keep the bonuses and lose the penalties. Does this also apply to someone restored to youth with the Reincarnate spell?

Let's say someone Old drinks the elixir. Do they get the bonuses from being Venerable at the same number of years alive, or do they actually have to become Venerable, meaning someone who keeps drinking the elixir before becoming Venerable never gets the bonuses?

You actually have to become Venerable.
Why's that?
Because becoming venerable is the only way to get the bonuses for becoming venerable.
So even if I'm a venerable chronological age for my race I still have to let my body deteriorate first? How does that make sense?

It makes sense because "magic."

It's how the elixir works and interacts with age.

...

Seriously? You're going with "It's magic!"? That's right up there with prophecy. From this and other answers you’ve given, I get the impression you seem to care about Story! more than plausibility. Don’t you think plausibility is important for a story to be appreciated? I can accept alternate physical laws being modded onto a primary baseline (i.e., magic), but there has to be a reason besides “we’re scared of the min-maxers!” for a venerable-aged human to not get attribute bonuses because they didn’t tough out their senescence.

Though admittedly, waiting until venerable age is more economical…


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
JaC381 wrote:

If someone with age bonuses/penalties drinks Sun Orchid Elixir, they keep the bonuses and lose the penalties. Does this also apply to someone restored to youth with the Reincarnate spell?

Let's say someone Old drinks the elixir. Do they get the bonuses from being Venerable at the same number of years alive, or do they actually have to become Venerable, meaning someone who keeps drinking the elixir before becoming Venerable never gets the bonuses?

You actually have to become Venerable.
Why's that?
Because becoming venerable is the only way to get the bonuses for becoming venerable.

So even if I'm a venerable chronological age for my race I still have to let my body deteriorate first? How does that make sense?


41) A recursive crystal sphere. No, not that kind, more like this.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Jeven wrote:
aceDiamond wrote:
This is why I think things on the outer planes and in Chronicle of the Righteous is messed up. With these products, everything is common knowledge, there aught to be a bit more mystery to the Great Beyond. I could see knowing a little on each of the afterlife planes, but not to the point where we get maps.
Maps are important. A savvy person would visit each afterlife location before investing in a retirement condo there. - You might think being LG is cool, but then visit Heaven and find its pretty dull and boring place. That way you can choose a different god/alignment before you drop dead

Worship Lymnieris, problem solved. :3


James Jacobs wrote:
JaC381 wrote:

If someone with age bonuses/penalties drinks Sun Orchid Elixir, they keep the bonuses and lose the penalties. Does this also apply to someone restored to youth with the Reincarnate spell?

Let's say someone Old drinks the elixir. Do they get the bonuses from being Venerable at the same number of years alive, or do they actually have to become Venerable, meaning someone who keeps drinking the elixir before becoming Venerable never gets the bonuses?

You actually have to become Venerable.

Why's that?


Demiurge, given your interest in yokai, would you by any chance have read of Touhou?


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Speaking of looks, ZUN’s art style isn’t putting you off, is it?
It kinda is, alas. I don't hate it, but it's not my preferred style of anime art.

Damnit, ZUN, stop making women look like Play-Doh!

Don't mind the stuff on the wiki, the characters are much better drawn outside of the actual shooters. There're the beat-em-up games, the official manga, the doujinshi, the fan games, the fan art, the porn...

Trust me, do a search for Touhou works and you won't find any dough-girls.


Glad you like it! :) Here’s some characters you might be interested in:

Marisa Kirisame: Think of everything fun about CN and you get her, complete with kleptomania and energy blasts.

Nue Houjuu: Arueshalae's missing twin sister, except she’s not a succubus…or even a nue...

Miko Toyosatomimi: Transsexual machine politician with a retinue right out of Game of Thrones.

Look interesting?

Speaking of looks, ZUN’s art style isn’t putting you off, is it?


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Would you be interested in a fantasy setting where almost all the named characters were women?
Yes. It'd be a breath of fresh air to see a setting like this, frankly. Or a setting where all of the main characters were women.

Then would you be interested in giving this a look?

Oh, and I looked at Rat Queens on TV Tropes. Has that comic had any influence on Merisiel's personality?


Would you be interested in a fantasy setting where almost all the named characters were women?


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:

1. If I use telekinesis to disarm, can I grab what the victim was holding?

2. If not, does the item fly off or drop to the ground (as with a disarm)?

1) Nope, but you can telekineticly pick it up later!

2) The item flies out of the user's hands and lands on the ground just like a normal successful disarm attempt.

1. But how far from the user? Right next to her? 10 feet/level?

2. Oh, and you forgot this question:
In WotR, Minagho fobs off guarding the Wardstone to a glabrezu, who fobs it off to one of his minions and so on down to Jeslyn (p.50). What sort of demons would most likely have been between the glabrezu and Jeslyn?


1. If I use telekinesis to disarm, can I grab what the victim was holding?

2. If not, does the item fly off or drop to the ground (as with a disarm)?

3. In WotR...:
Minagho fobs off guarding the Wardstone to a glabrezu, who fobs it off to one of his minions and so on down to Jeslyn (p.50). What sort of demons would most likely have been between the glabrezu and Jeslyn?


I guess I have more free time. Also, I found your ask thread.


Looks like you have your own ask thread now. :)

1. What can you tell us about the Brimstone Den that you didn’t have the space to in Wayfinder 11?

2. Do you plan on developing it, or Senara, further?

3. How would you feel about fans developing it further?

4. What are your thoughts on Arshea and Lymnieris?


You: Unless the rules specifically state, all choices and options of that nature are left to the player to control. It's your character, after all!

Yay! :)

You: I'd say no. You're specifically giving that up as part of your archetype, after all.

Boo... :(

1. What about taking persistent mutagen at a later level?

2. What about being able to prolong the cosmetic effects?

You: Disagree. An alchemist's flavor, in my mind, clashes with that of an archer. If you're changing that much about a class to make your idea work, you're probably not working with the right class.

3. Well what about for NPCs who're alchemists? Eirin doesn't strike me as a bomb thrower. (Also, not every alchemist needs to be dark fantasy.)


*reads*

The Brimstone Den (p.12), tiefling brothel and de-facto Arshean temple. Well done, Rogue Eidolon! :) I wanna see Senara developed further now!


1. Regarding the beastmorph alchemist, how much cosmetic control does she have over her animalistic features? Not just what appropriate features show up but how they look (e.g., beastial, Geigeresque, etc).

2. Also, could she take persistent mutagen (normally a class feature) as a discovery?

3. I'm looking to create an alchemist who uses arrows instead of bombs. Poison instead of fire damage, increased range & precision making up for lack of splash damage, and replacing Throw Anything with an archery feat seems the way to go (though the bomb discoveries will need reworking at best). Agree or disagree?


As many have said, toning the sexuality down in a Paizo product is akin to Saturday Morning Watchmen, or Disney's Game of Thrones, or the 4Kids dub of Kill la Kill. Still, while anything involving Sorshen or Mammy Graul would be a problem, transwomen and gay couples shouldn't be.

However, some advice more important than sex politics. If you're running WotR for kiddos, for the love of Arshea make sure that Iomedae doesn't bully them!


James Jacobs wrote:
Tels wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
xavier c wrote:

1)How does Desna view Iomedae?

2) How does Iomedae view Desna?

1) As a control freak and an upstart more interested in glory than in what's good for her worshipers.

2) As a hippie and weird old goddess more interested in making decisions without thinking through the consequences than planning for the long term.

1. How do you view Iomedae?

2. How would Iomedae view you?

Kinda the same way, I suspect.
Iomedae views you as a weird hippie goddess? o.0

HA

No. I should have clarified a bit more, I guess... but it's kind of a silly question in the first place so maybe a silly answer is okay.

Half silly. My feeling is that you may be prone to reinforce the negative stereotypes of lawful good, not unlike how others negatively portray elves. Don't you think that alignment deserves better? Given that (for example) I keep seeing paladins of Arshea pop up on these boards, I feel that Paizo's audience'll be receptive to lawful good being portrayed as something other than mean, stupid, or both.


James Jacobs wrote:
xavier c wrote:

1)How does Desna view Iomedae?

2) How does Iomedae view Desna?

1) As a control freak and an upstart more interested in glory than in what's good for her worshipers.

2) As a hippie and weird old goddess more interested in making decisions without thinking through the consequences than planning for the long term.

1. How do you view Iomedae?

2. How would Iomedae view you?


1. What do you dislike about Eberron, and why?

2. What do you like about Eberrron, and why?


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Alaushinyrra is supposed to be one of the largest cities in the outer planes, and that means there's not many more its size or larger.
Why's that? If the population of the outer planes is in the trillions I think it is, particularly since outsiders come from the souls of material plane inhabitants, why would there be so little urbanization?
Because Alaushinyrra is one of the only places in the entire Abyss that isn't entirely immediately hostile to trade and visitors, for one. And because it caters to a lot of what other cities can't or don't cater to for another.

What about the celestial planes? Any reason they don't have much urbanization?


James Jacobs wrote:
Alaushinyrra is supposed to be one of the largest cities in the outer planes, and that means there's not many more its size or larger.

Why's that? If the population of the outer planes is in the trillions I think it is, particularly since outsiders come from the souls of material plane inhabitants, why would there be so little urbanization?


James Jacobs wrote:
I brought [Romance of the Inner Sea] up in a meeting as a possible book, and it was kinda not well received by other folks and management.

Well foo.

So why didn't they like it?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Cernunnos.


You: If by "not boring" you mean "Interesting to play roleplaying game campaigns in," then the answer is, "By making sure there are LOTS of adventure opportunities and conflicts available."

Yeah, that’s what I meant. Also, by “pleasant place to live” I’m referring to a kingdom or country or such.

Me: How would you make an Arshean theocracy not boring?

You: By reading up on Arshea first (which I have not done) so I know where to start.

There’s not much to read yet. Besides p.7 of Chronicles of the Righteous there’s a paragraph in p.21 of Faiths of Purity, a sentence in the Inner Sea World Guide (p.234), and Blood of Angels mentioning that Arshea’s a common choice to worship among Varisian aasimar.

1. By the way, did you know you can do a text search of .pdfs on a Mac?

You: And if you're asking for me to design you an Arshea-themed campaign setting... sorry. I try to avoid doing free design work here on the boards!

Understandable, especially since I wasn’t asking you to do so. Though now that you mention it…

2. How would I got about making an adventure path myself?

3. What suggestions do you have for "By making sure there are LOTS of adventure opportunities and conflicts available?”


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James, how would you make a utopian kingdom not be boring?
I wouldn't make a utopian kingdom in the first place BECAUSE perfection is boring. Conflict is more interesting to story, and conflict doesn't exist in a utopian setting. If it does, then the setting isn't actually utopian.

1. Let me rephrase that; how would make a pleasant place to live not boring?

2. Beside the in-general example, how would you make an Arshean theocracy not boring?


James, how would you make a utopian kingdom not be boring?


1. Would at-will alter self be viable for an arcane discovery?

2. If so, would the minimum level be 5 or 7? I'd choose 6 since that's when the urban druid gets it but feats don't come on even levels.

In the last part of Kingmaker…:
There are eight broken soul advanced nymphs (Pathfinder #36, p.47-48). Rather than kill them I’d prefer to heal them. According to Pathfinder #28 (p.34) the Broken Soul template can be removed via wish or miracle.

3. If I use miracle would it cost 25K gp per spell?

4. Would I have to use 25K gp diamonds or would a sacrifice of equivalent value be sufficient?

5. What would happen if I used build points to pay for the spells?

6. Given the dramatic nature of what I’m wishing for, is there a way I could cast them all at once? Doing it piecemeal doesn’t seem like it’d make for a good story.

7. Would the spellcaster being devout make any rule-bending possible?


I want to design a spell that'll take away someone's spellcasting abilities while leaving their mind intact. A modified feeblemind, basically. What level would it be?


What do you think of this [uyrl=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DyRxlvM9VM]critique of Cthulhu in games[/url]?

"H.P. Lovecraft and the Call of Cthulhu have inspired many horror games, but the power fantasy that drives most games conflicts with the unfathomable, unreachable terror of Cthulhu."


I should've replied to these long ago...

Squeakmaan wrote:
psionichamster wrote:

I'm just gonna leave this here...

...of course, who wants to be a plumber/welder/garbage truck driver nowadays, huh?

The biggest problem with what Mike Rowe talks about is that it's 90% fantasy. They claim there's a massive skills shortage and nobody willing to work these jobs, it's untrue with only a few exceptions, ones that are for highly skilled tradesmen only, 10+ yrs experience welders in North Dakota for example. Now I'm not going to knock trades, we need people to do that, but you can see there's very little actual shortage by looking at the wages of most skilled labor, flat or receding. What's happening is you have companies who have openings, but they're not willing to pay people what those jobs are worth, so the people with skills aren't taking them, and they're also not willing to pay to train people for those jobs.

There is also the ever present threat of automation, some of the more dire predictions are that 47% of jobs are at risk of automation within 20 years, not just low skill crap jobs either; look at the advances in 3d printing, houses and air plane manufacturing are just two ares they're showing interest in.

But this all aside from the basic fact that there are more people who want jobs than there are jobs. The most common estimate I've seen is that there is 1 job for every 4 job seekers. So that means that if every single skill shortage and location mismatch were magically fixed and those jobs were filled, 3/4 of job seekers would still be out of work.

Well that's sad to see, Mike Rowe was my main hope too. What articles is your claim based on?

Alex Smith 908 wrote:
He is also David Wong a man who is never ever right. There are many points about college that are unfair, however for the most part they were far far less of an issue than for people without college degrees. Additionally most degrees are very broad in what jobs they qualify you for. The idea that you need a specific degree for a specific job is completely wrong. In fact most of the time just having any degree is enough.

That's god to see, Wong's a total downer. What articles is your claim based on?


kadance wrote:
Please, proof-read, critique, and make suggestions! This is all first-draft material.

This biggest thing I can think of immediately is that kingdom-wide improvements should cost way more than 95 BP, and should probably only be obtainable through quests rather than spending (if at all). The supplement Ultimate Rulership gives some suggested magical improvements on p.26-27 that I'd use as pricing guides.

While the titles and flavor text is descriptive, and therefore objectively serving their functions, I'd personally prefer them less jokey. I've heard that humor is the easiest thing to write and the hardest to write well, and fantasy seems to attract a lot of drollness.

So I can better determine how to price your improvements, I'd like to know how you came up with the BP costs for each improvement. Is it based on the gp cost for magic items translated into BP?

All that said, I think your ideas are an interesting start. :)


You're still here? Thanks. :)

Something else I've been thinking about is the feasibility of either building across the rivers, which are hundreds of feet wide and dozens deep, or making sharp turns at the fords.

So, how shallow does a river have to be before I can build an aqueduct across it? How sharp a bend can an aqueduct have?

Also, good to see that snowpack is viable after all since that'll mean more water to go around. There's only so much in frozen tarns, and they could also be infested with linnorms.


1. In Kingmaker, how would I be able to promote a culture? For example, say I have my nation be an Arshean theocracy.

1a. Wouldn’t promotion be difficult given how front-and-center Erastil-worship is?

1b. Sex outside of marriage aside, how would I promote such things as hair removal and daily bathing? The locals seem, to paraphrase Merisial, backwoodsy if the inside covers are anything to go by.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

While I’m one of the lucky ones, this depressing article hit close to home.

tl;dr version:
• There’s only a 1-in-4 chance of getting a career matching a degree. Yes, this even applies to respectable degrees.

• College degrees are required for any decent job, and are now so expensive they require going into debt.

• Each specific job requires its own degree, making changing jobs extremely difficult.

• Picking the right major is impossible since what’s booming now could bust by graduation.

• Even if we do get a job, we’re required to work for free at first. This is fine for the affluent who don’t have to worry about expenses or debt.

• People need to know potential employers on a personal level if they want a job since 80% are unlisted. Looks like a perfect opportunity to abuse power.

• You can be fired for no good reason. At least being replaced by a computer makes economic sense.

• Allegedly, you’ll stop caring about this unfairness if you ever manage to be successful.

That’s the problem. How do we solve it?


Sorry about the late reply.

Anyway, I didn't know I could get glacier water from mountains but that's a better idea than mine! I am curious as to why you'd question snowpack water though. Not being oppositional, just curious.

By "cascade the water down most of the mountain" I hope you mean in a specialized stepped channel aqueduct like what you mentioned. I don't wanna get my shower water dirty.

The length of a aqueduct from a river source in the Nomen Heights to Tuskwater Lake would be ~73mi/~116km at the shortest. Like I said, however, I don't think length will be a problem.


One thing I’d like to do for my nation is to connect the main city to each water source in the Nomen Heights (the mountain range in the eastern part of the Stolen Lands). While possible in purely game-mechanical terms, I have a fetish for verisimilitude and thus the following questions:

• Would the water be of better quality? If so, would it merit any ad-hoc bonuses to my nation’s stats in addition to the +1-per-hex Loyalty and Stability bonus? Yes, I know there’s “perfectly good” river water in the hills, but hill water is for country bumpkins*. No, I don’t care that most of the populace are country bumpkins who’d think that daily bathing is “‘fer them thar sissy nobles.”

• Would building straight from the mountains be possible? From my cursory research on Roman aqueducts they got their water from nearby hill springs rather than all the way from the Alps. It’s not length I’m concerned with; I want to know if it’s possible to build an aqueduct on a mountain. I also want to know what this would do to the water pressure.

I look forward to your answers and suggestions. :)

* Apologies to rural folks and fans of the Ring of Fire series. Let’s just say the quest givers in Kingmaker…weren’t the most presentable. They’d make Amiri look like a Rostlandic noble in comparison.


1. Do you ever find yourself having more fun designing games (drawing maps, statting NPCs, etc) than playing them?

2. What would a Cathedral devoted to all the empyreal lords be like? They're a diverse lot, and their faiths seem to value personal devotion more than number of followers.


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
You have three good-aligned fleshwarpers; one lawful, one neutral, and one chaotic. How do their creations differ?
Alignment doesn't really impact fleshwarping much. I suppose the lawful one would look more symmetrical than the chaotic one. Maybe.

Lemme try a different approach. How would the silthilar in general, and their experiments in particular, be different if they were...

1. ...lawful good?

2. ...neutral good?

Haven't thought about them in about a decade or so, so off the top of my head, I'm not sure. Frankly... I was never super satisfied with how they came out; the design challenge there was to design a good aberration, and my mind doesn't really think that way.

1. How does your mind think (in this specific context)?

2. Why do you think the silthilar shouldn't have been good aligned?


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
You have three good-aligned fleshwarpers; one lawful, one neutral, and one chaotic. How do their creations differ?
Alignment doesn't really impact fleshwarping much. I suppose the lawful one would look more symmetrical than the chaotic one. Maybe.

Lemme try a different approach. How would the silthilar in general, and their experiments in particular, be different if they were...

1. ...lawful good?

2. ...neutral good?


You have three good-aligned fleshwarpers; one lawful, one neutral, and one chaotic. How do their creations differ?


thejeff wrote:
See, that's just far too much extrapolation for me. Once you've got Osama captured and Afghanistan far more under control I can't see anything else playing out anywhere near the same way as they actually did.

Truth to be told, I agree. I still think Iraq would've been used as a distraction but it'd be more like what Clinton did in the late 90's. I totally agree with you about Palin, now that I think about it. My feeling is that she was put on the ticket to appeal to the disgruntled Hilliary voters.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I doubt a Gore presidency would be all good or all bad. Below is my very crude hypothesis of what would happen.

* * *

Point of Divergence: Gore doesn’t distance himself from Clinton during the 2000 Election, nor does he have to with all the PDAs he has with Tipper.

• Gore gets elected, brief news about possible voter fraud in Florida.

• Gore gets CIA Daily Brief telling him about 9/11, but does nothing for realpolitik reasons. Acting preemptively could get him seen as an oil-greedy warmonger, while doing nothing means either nothing happens or he can come in and be a hero.

• 9/11 happens. US focuses on Afganistan and Osama is captured in a few years.

• Election 2004: Gore v McCain. Gore Wins.

• Hurricane Katrina. FEMA helps some but Wal-Mart is true savior.

• Katrina coverage discusses the mishandling that led to the New Orleans disaster, the racism that made it worse, and Hillary Clinton buying up now-cheap real estate.

• On the pretext of WMDs, US invades Iraq to head off scandal.

• US and coalition quickly crush Iraq. US leaves just as quickly and lets experienced peacekeepers handle the mess.

• Republican pundits go on and on about how the US should have done more in Iraq, or attacked earlier, or for different reasons, or… Some Democrats agree given how messy the situation is.

• Election 2008: McCain v Obama. McCain wins due to hawkish rhetoric and low voter turnout.

• McCain dies due to stress. Palin becomes president, focuses on social conservatism and oil drilling.

• Obama acts as constant gadfly to Palin, hitching his career to the Occupy movement.

• Election 2012: Obama v Palin. Palin wins due to her handling of the economy.

• Due to mounting pressure from Occupy movement, Palin signs into law an environmental protection bill. She shifts her focus from oil to social conservatism.

• Election 2016. Obama wins promising “hope” and “change.” High voter turnout among disenfranchised demographics gets him in office.

• Obama turns out to be better at campaigning that administration. His accomplishments amount to little more than a compromise healthcare bill that nobody likes.

* * *

Main differences from our timeline:

• Iraq war happens later. My hypothesis is that Bush was fervent about it due to his father losing the 1992 election because he didn’t park the army in Baghdad. His motives were either “not be seen as a wimp” or “avenge daddy.”

• Occupy Wall Street has both an enemy (Palin) and messiah (Obama) to focus on, thus focusing their goals and making them more successful than in our timeline.

• Real estate collapse still happens, but Palin’s focus on oil drilling alleviates this somewhat due to job creation.


James Jacobs wrote:
AlgaeNymph wrote:
Not a question but you might like this. A T-Rex needs to eat a person every two days.
Yup; sounds about right.

Glad you like it, here's some more dinosaurs. :)


Not a question but you might like this. A T-Rex needs to eat a person every two days.

1 to 50 of 579 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2014 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.