You need more moderators and Cut the number of pages down to 10 per thread, then start new thread plz! Most of the comments are 1 liners and the threads go all over the place I know these forums are young and under funded but 551 pages on one topic is insanity!

Issac

Not.

Going.

To.

Happen.

Well, we've beaten that one to death.

Well, we've beaten that one to death.

...551 pages on one topic is insanity!

Issac

Until then, please stroll around the grounds until you feel at home.

Regards,
-Pax-

Are you wanting things to sound more like most messageboards? If so, then let me just greet you with the traditional "STFU n00b!!!1!two!!! LURK MOAR!"

I don't mind all of the pages, I just wish when I scroll all the way to the freakin' bottom of the threads, choose one, and then go back, that the page would automatically flip back where I left off. Instead, it starts at the TOP of the thread list again and I have to scroll all the way back to the bottom to where I started.
Does that make sense?

I don't mind all of the pages, I just wish when I scroll all the way to the freakin' bottom of the threads, choose one, and then go back, that the page would automatically flip back where I left off. Instead, it starts at the TOP of the thread list again and I have to scroll all the way back to the bottom to where I started.
Does that make sense?

I don't mind all of the pages, I just wish when I scroll all the way to the freakin' bottom of the threads, choose one, and then go back, that the page would automatically flip back where I left off. Instead, it starts at the TOP of the thread list again and I have to scroll all the way back to the bottom to where I started.
Does that make sense?

hedgeknight wrote:

I don't mind all of the pages, I just wish when I scroll all the way to the freakin' bottom of the threads, choose one, and then go back, that the page would automatically flip back where I left off. Instead, it starts at the TOP of the thread list again and I have to scroll all the way back to the bottom to where I started.
Does that make sense?

I'll verify that I'm getting the same problem with Firefox.

You need more moderators and Cut the number of pages down to 10 per thread, then start new thread plz! Most of the comments are 1 liners and the threads go all over the place I know these forums are young and under funded but 551 pages on one topic is insanity!

Issac

Few things are more annoying than an arbitrary thread length limitations. Trust me, I've seen it done, and it never turns out well...

Kruelaid wrote:

Well, we've beaten that one to death.

I'm not opposing your statement, but for Isaac's benefit (and mine, since I haven't seen those threads), could you at least hint were to look?

I meant that ironically, that Kaeyoss had beaten it to death with his little spam.

Irony, such a weak device online... sigh. When will I learn?

Well, when a thread gets to 8,000 posts in length it starts doing weird things to the website.

"DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER!!!"

So rest assured that the Good Lord Raptor Jesus' natural creation itsself takes care of it.

Interesting. I am on FireFox myself and when I come back to a thread it takes me to the newest thread. I usually click the "43 seconds ago" part of the link, though I have no idea if that matters. Also I'd guess you should make sure you're logged in.

Hehe.

I meant that ironically, that Kaeyoss had beaten it to death with his little spam.

Irony, such a weak device online... sigh. When will I learn?

I'd suggest quoting his posts in your post something like this:

KaeYoss wrote:

Not.

KaeYoss wrote:

Going.

KaeYoss wrote:

To.

KaeYoss wrote:

Happen.

Well, we've beaten that one to death.

It also does it in an individual thread. For example, if I scroll all the way to the bottom of this thread, then hit back, then forward, it'll reload this thread, but it moves me back to the top of the page.

It is a bit more work though.

Interesting. I am on FireFox myself and when I come back to a thread it takes me to the newest thread. I usually click the "43 seconds ago" part of the link, though I have no idea if that matters. Also I'd guess you should make sure you're logged in.

You can also click 'X new posts' in a thread you've been to and it will take you right to the first one posted since you were last here.

Honestly considering all the above I really can't see what the fuss is about. If you want to cut back on the clutter you can focus things down to just the sections of the forum your interested in as well.

All 1 minute and 32 seconds worth of experimentation was done in Firefox...YMMV.

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

Interesting. I am on FireFox myself and when I come back to a thread it takes me to the newest thread. I usually click the "43 seconds ago" part of the link, though I have no idea if that matters. Also I'd guess you should make sure you're logged in.

I think they're talking about refreshing and back paging. When you use IE, if you refresh, you stay at the same point on the page, which makes looking at the "Recently Posted" column more convenient. When you use Firefox, it goes to the top of the page when you refresh.

It may be the only thing I've noticed IE does better.

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

KaeYoss wrote:

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

How much you charge for that service?

Like "happy endings" are now, apparently.

Lucky Canuckleheads...

Tarren Dei wrote:

KaeYoss wrote:

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

How much you charge for that service?

You're lucky you're in Canada. It's probably legal there.

Like "happy endings" are now, apparently.

Lucky Canuckleheads...

houstonderek wrote:

Tarren Dei wrote:

KaeYoss wrote:

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

How much you charge for that service?

You're lucky you're in Canada. It's probably legal there.

Like "happy endings" are now, apparently.

Lucky Canuckleheads...

Are they really?

Threadjack

hedgeknight wrote:

I don't mind all of the pages, I just wish when I scroll all the way to the freakin' bottom of the threads, choose one, and then go back, that the page would automatically flip back where I left off. Instead, it starts at the TOP of the thread list again and I have to scroll all the way back to the bottom to where I started.
Does that make sense?

I'll verify that I'm getting the same problem with Firefox.

Tarren Dei wrote:

KaeYoss wrote:

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

How much you charge for that service?

You're lucky you're in Canada. It's probably legal there.

Like "happy endings" are now, apparently.

Lucky Canuckleheads...

"I don't even know what street Canada is on." - -- Al Capone

Just kidding. Yep. I'm in Canada.

Hadn't heard about the happy endings though. Guess I just read the wrong magazines.

I like cheese!

I just did a check on Opera: if you move back and forth, Opera remembers where you were.

KaeYoss wrote:

I don't beat to death. I gently flog to death with scented shoelaces.

Oh, I guarantee I'll be repeating this at some point this week. What a marvelous image.

Admirable - the way the forums managed to turn this from a (in my opinion pointless) request to arbitrarily limit tread length to the fine points of the law regarding happy endings.

Ah-Hah! More evidence that what this place needs is fewer posters. And, the best way to achieve that goal remains, as always, to give me the unfettered, absolute, non-appealable power to ban anyone any time I please.

I respectfully suggest that these powers be granted to me immediately.

I don't mind all of the pages, I just wish when I scroll all the way to the freakin' bottom of the threads, choose one, and then go back, that the page would automatically flip back where I left off. Instead, it starts at the TOP of the thread list again and I have to scroll all the way back to the bottom to where I started.
Does that make sense?

This is what I was referring to, btw.

Ah-Hah! More evidence that what this place needs is fewer posters. And, the best way to achieve that goal remains, as always, to give me the unfettered, absolute, non-appealable power to ban anyone any time I please.

I respectfully suggest that these powers be granted to me immediately.

Ah-Hah! More evidence that what this place needs is fewer posters. And, the best way to achieve that goal remains, as always, to give me the unfettered, absolute, non-appealable power to ban anyone any time I please.

I respectfully suggest that these powers be granted to me immediately.

--
So, where did I put this blasted key?

...an island which carefully selects its inhabitants out of the best humanity has to offer in all other lands ...

Lanx wrote:

...an island which carefully selects its inhabitants out of the best humanity has to offer in all other lands ...

So, in other words, I'd be the only inhabitant....

Ah-Hah! More evidence that what this place needs is fewer posters. And, the best way to achieve that goal remains, as always, to give me the unfettered, absolute, non-appealable power to ban anyone any time I please.

I respectfully suggest that these powers be granted to me immediately.

You need more moderators and Cut the number of pages down to 10 per thread, then start new thread plz! Most of the comments are 1 liners and the threads go all over the place I know these forums are young and under funded but 551 pages on one topic is insanity!

Issac

And leave the insanity alone! we like it. Oh stop by off topic some time we will show you insanity

I think this thread is getting unfocused. Theses nonsense posts need to be cleaned up.

GARY, Vic, Josh! Chop, chop!

This is what I was referring to, btw.

On the other hand there is currently something of a movement to legalize Bawdy Houses, which are defined as anyplace you have sex for the purposes of prostitution more then once - a Car for example or an alley way (as was pointed out above, in Canada prostitution is legal - as long as you communicate the transaction via telepathy or astrological card reading and consummate the transaction in an alternate dimension). That said there is a significant move toward legalizing Bawdy Houses. The middle class benefits as the prostitutes are taken out of sight and out of mind. The state benefits because its easier to keep tabs on the practitioners. The prostitutes themselves benefit because they are safer and can more easily organize. The downside is it makes the whole life style easier and potentially increases the number of people that choose to become prostitutes.

I think this thread is getting unfocused. Theses nonsense posts need to be cleaned up.

GARY, Vic, Josh! Chop, chop!

You need more moderators and Cut the number of pages down to 10 per thread, then start new thread plz! Most of the comments are 1 liners and the threads go all over the place I know these forums are young and under funded but 551 pages on one topic is insanity!

Issac

I'm disappointed in my fellow Paizonians. I figured this thread would have hit 1000 posts of off topic weirdness by now...

I guess it just doesn't have that je ne sais quoi that drives us wild.

Kruelaid wrote:

I think this thread is getting unfocused. Theses nonsense posts need to be cleaned up.

GARY, Vic, Josh! Chop, chop!

Oops. In my rush to do your bidding, I seem to have accidentally clicked the "Permaban Kruelaid" button.

But hey, between you and me, don't tell Sebastian about that button.

I guess it just doesn't have that je ne sais quoi that drives us wild.