Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

You need a ship, and she better be a good one!, by Stockvillain

Can you cast `Surmount Affliction` whlie confused, dazed, or paralyzed?, by Zahariel

Can I get a volunteer? Elemental Bending Monk, by zerzix

My feelings about 5E D&D, by Steve Geddes

Experience of new classes, how do they play out?, by LazarX

How should a party handle loot distribution?, by Karek Kogan

FAWTL Radio., by Mothman

Increasing intelligence retroactively grant bonus languages?, by Humphey Boggard

Deep 6 FaWtL, by Solnes

Pathfinder Tales Subscription, by Joana

BANNED!, by gran rey de los mono

Combat Manager application, by hida_jiremi

What are you listening to as you browse the message boards?, by Mothman

KILLER GM's 2011 Return to the Tomb of Horrors Pathfinder Campaign!, by Killer_GM

How I blew it., by Clark Peterson

Online Campaigns

Shackled City AP Discussion, by Wareagle

The Academae, by Hathin De'Lark

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by liothonae cromvathar

SMG's Kingmaker PbP, by Oomlowt Schwaa

Amgir's "Curse of the Crimson Throne", by Razule Yrrum

GM alientude's Shackled City Discussion, by Sir Adolphus Ministhrien

Orlok Jr's Carrion Crown - Game Thread, by Rigor Rictus

SdF's Kingmaker PbP, by Kalsgrim Lodovka

We-Be-Halflings: Ringtail's Council of Thieves OOC, by Lyle "SkyCaller" Highhill

Gm Blood's AoW in Golarion, by Quintus of Taldor

Hungry Voodoo's Mines of Zolurket, by Chitleen Shudra

Sean's Master of the Fallen Fortress, by Filios Philandril

DM Aron Marczylo's Curse of the Crimson Throne - Part 3, by DM Aron Marczylo

DM Bloodgargler Serpent's Skull Gameplay, by DM Bloodgargler

The Temple of Elemental Evil, by Gnobby the Gnome

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:

* (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Grench Teppish is wearing heavy armor without the Heavy Armor Proficiency feat (seems to be a trend for clerics of Groetus).

His aura of madness needs to go away on Tier 1-2 as well.

Cheliax ***** (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber)

Derek Poppink wrote:
His aura of madness needs to go away on Tier 1-2 as well.

Why would you say that? That's one of the things that gives that encounter a bit of character.

Andoran *** (Paizo Charter Superscriber, Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber)

Kyle Baird wrote:
Derek Poppink wrote:
His aura of madness needs to go away on Tier 1-2 as well.
Why would you say that? That's one of the things that gives that encounter a bit of character.

in the Errata for PFRPG Aura of Madness is an 8th level ability, so it was an error for him to have it at lower levels.


Yeah, that's an errata issue that didn't come to my attention until after Gen Con. After the September scenarios are out, I plan to make a number of additional changes to #29 and #30.


A couple of things. I have both #29 & #30. I also need to share I'm new to GM'ing and even newer to org play as a whole.

First is the chests found in them. I'm not sure if I am supposed to award the gold in them seperate from the gold given for the encounter. As far as I understand it is included in the reward, but I don't want to cheat my players out of gold.

Second is the mistakes in the scenarios. I have repersonalized them and redownloaded them (within the last few days) all the mistakes are still there. My question regarding this is how do I get the updated information for the scenarios? I've already stated what I tried to do to get them updated, did I do something wrong? The mistakes for #30 Cassomir's Locker are as follows. The information for Grench in Act 1-A2. Not only does he still have the aura of madness but Touch of Madness should be Vision of Madness. As well as half-plate and full plate being heavy armor. He also has half-plate for Teir 1-2 & Tier 3-4 and full plate for Tier 6-7; all without the appropriate feat.

Third is a little more general. Regarding consumables. I know you can use whatever you find during the scenario (i.e. weapons & armor) without paying. I'm unsure about consumables (i.e. potions) if you use them during the scenario do the players still need to "purchase" them according to the chronicle sheets. If I understand it correctly they don't have to "purchase" them, but I would like to be certain.

As I stated I'm very new to all of this, but having a lot of fun too! I appreciate any help and I've already gotten a lot of my questions answered by looking at other boards. I also love how much this community helps each other out with questions and the like.


LtlBtyRam wrote:
As far as I understand it is included in the reward...

All found items are included in the rewards and the only way you can exceed the max gold for a scenario (listed on its chronicle sheet) is with the Day Job roll.

LtlBtyRam wrote:
The information for Grench in Act 1-A2.

Yup, those mistakes are still there. I have not had any opportunities to get back and correct them. In the mean time, make the following changes:

Spoiler:

Remove Grench's Toughness feat (thus reducing his hit points by -3 up to 3rd level and then an additional -1 for each level after 3rd) and replace it with Heavy Armor Proficiency.

Aura of Madness needs to be removed from all but the Tier 6-7 Grench. That's an errata issue and is an 8th level ability.

Touch of Madness should be called Vision of Madness.

LtlBtyRam wrote:
I'm unsure about consumables (i.e. potions) if you use them during the scenario do the players still need to "purchase" them according to the chronicle sheets.

Found consumables may be consumed and do not have to be purchased. If the players wish to keep any found consumables into the next scenario, however, they must purchase them.


Thanks a lot for the the input Joshua, I really appreciate it. I just wanted to make sure I'm doing right by the PFS rules and my players. And I've made the changes already, that part was the easy part. GM'ing for a bunch of guys (I'm the only female player) who have been playing PRPG and 3.5 since its debut is the hard part, but they seem to be having a good time with it. ;-)


Joshua J. Frost wrote:

Found consumables may be consumed and do not have to be purchased. If the players wish to keep any found consumables into the next scenario, however, they must purchase them.

Ok I am very glad to report the 2nd game I ran went {i}way[/i] smoother than the first. Whew. But I came across 2 issues while running the scenario.

1. Again regarding comsumables. They found 2 in the scenario.

Movie plot spoiler:
Potions of Cure Moderate Wounds (level two poitions)
Since these are not on the "always available" list and they were drank during the scenario are they available for purchase. I would say no, but alas I want to make sure (yet again I know) I'm not misunderstanding PFS rules or cheating my players.

2. On one of the foe the party had to fight they found

Movie plot spoiler:
repeating crossbow w/ 10 poisoned bolts

There is no price in the PRPG Core Rulebook for this, yet they found it during the scenario. Is this available for purchase, as I have a player who would like to do so.

Again thanks for any help from anyone out there! This community is great!

Sczarni * (RPG Superstar 2012 Top 16)

In response to 2:

Spoiler:

The repeating light crossbow is in the core rulebook- it's just listed in the table under "Crossbow, repeating light" (250 GP)

The scenario says the bolts are poisoned with "medium spider venom"-- there's been some discussion on these boards before about the difficulty of buying poisons in pathfinder society, so I bet certain characters should be pretty excited to find those bolts. A dose of medium spider venom apparently costs 150 gold per page 559 of the core rulebook.

Sczarni * (RPG Superstar 2012 Top 16)

I'd also like to add how much fun I had running this scenario, in particular the Cult of Nature's Cataclysm. I've only run it for tier 3-4 so far.

Encounter A2:

I noticed there wasn't anything written for Grench's "brother Rackutio", so I made some stuff up and it worked out pretty well. For Rackutio I used the same stats as Grench but I changed his prepared spells and tactics. Instead of the fear and confusion spells, I just gave him cure light wounds and rolled a d4 to see what he would do each round; Heal Grench, spontaneously inflict light wounds on a PC, attack with his flail or do "something completely crazy."

(Tactically speaking, I also gave Grench a potion of bull's strength, which he drank when he heard the party yelling to each other in the tunnels.)

For flavor, I decided that Rackutio would be Grench's barely tolerated half-insane half-brother. While I had Grench dressed rather nicely, Rackutio was wearing commoner style clothes under his half plate.

I had Grench and Rackutio engage in some crazy banter so the players could get to know them at the start of the fight-
G: "Look Rackutio, we have guests."
R: "LOVELY Grench, I'll put on some TEA!"

My party tore through the mites blocking the doorway fairly quickly, and decided to attack Grench because he looked like the leader. This played into my "Rackutio as combat healing support" plan, but after one cure spell they were dishing out a lot of damage. And so I began my final tactic, the "Team Teppish Coordinated Channel."

Rackutio held his action to channel energy on Grench's turn and said "Ready, BROTHER?" to which Grench replied "Don't call me that!"

Luckily for them, my party took Grench down before his next turn came up, so Rackutio channelled negative energy by himself.

The bard then demanded he surrender. Rackutio protested- "You killed my BROTHER!" then after a moment's consideration "Wait, I can make a new brother... out of your skin! Yes, I'll fill it with RATS!" and after that there was just no negotiating with him.

When one of the PCs hit Rackutio extra hard after that, he pointed and yelled "NO TEA FOR YOU!"

Encounter A3:

The summary says the corpses were beaten to death, and the text in the scenario says their throats were cut. I wasn't sure how this would pertain to the later episodes in the devil we know series, so I indicated the gaping neck wounds and mentioned they looked like they'd been beaten too.

Encounter A4:

I also allowed my party (after a short fight and triggering the trap) to interrogate one of the cultist fighters guarding the trapdoor, who I decided was also half crazed, disturbed by the Derro and rats, and had nearly given up on the whole apocalyptic cult thing even before the PCs told him they'd killed Grench.

Two highlights-
1) He asked "Can I go now?" after every question he answered for the PCs
2) He described the giant rats, and then the party bard thoughtfully said something about R.O.U.S. (Rodents of Unusual Size). The NPC shrugged and said "I know, I thought they were a myth too!"


LtlBtyRam wrote:


1. Again regarding comsumables. They found 2 in the scenario. ** spoiler omitted ** Since these are not on the "always available" list and they were drank during the scenario are they available for purchase. I would say no, but alas I want to make sure (yet again I know) I'm not misunderstanding PFS rules or cheating my players.

I don't think it matters that the consumables were used during the scenario. They are still available for purchase at the end if they are on the record sheet. In fact, you can buy as many of those potions as you want if they are on the sheet unless it specifically has a limit mentioned.


Yup. Finding them, even if they are consumed/destroyed/teleported to Mendev, means you can buy them at the end of the scenario.

As for the poison bolts, I wanted them to be available for PCs to use during the scenario as they found them, but since we still haven't really formulated a good "poison policy" for the Society (outside of Alchemists, that is) I did not add them to the chronicle sheet so, quite technically, they are not available for purchase.


Joshua J. Frost wrote:


As for the poison bolts, I wanted them to be available for PCs to use during the scenario as they found them, but since we still haven't really formulated a good "poison policy" for the Society (outside of Alchemists, that is) I did not add them to the chronicle sheet so, quite technically, they are not available for purchase.

I was leaning toward that answer, thanks for the clarification.

One other thing. One of my PC's has decided he needs a mule and cart. How do I account for stabling and feed for the duration of the scenarios (and/or between them)?


Pathfinder Society is unconcerned about such issues. :-)

Andoran * (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Battles Case Subscriber)

Joshua J. Frost wrote:
Pathfinder Society is unconcerned about such issues. :-)

Guido from the NPC Stablers Union would like to have a few words with you around back.


It'll be a short conversation.

NPC Stablers Union Rep: "Hey, why don't you allow us to make some money?"

Joshua Frost: "Well, we don't care about that aspect of the game, so you can imagine yourself having as much money as you want."

NPC Stablers Union Rep: "So I can imagine myself getting paid for stabling every animal companion, pet, mount, or pack animal the PCs have and that money will be mine?"

Joshua Frost: "Yup."

NPC Stablers Union Rep: "I'm rich, #$@!$!"

Taldor *** (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber)

I didn't realize that the aura of Madness was not supposed to be listed for the 1-2 level. I had him use it. the players had a hoot with it, as most failed there save. They said it was the toughest, but most fun fight of the scenario. (And it only lasted for 2 rounds anyway.)


Did anyone have a problem with the Taldor mission?
In short I ran through it as a player and the mission said to obtain something. When I did, the GM said it was supposed to be something else.

Spoiler:
I obtained poison bolts from the duro, but the GM said it MUST come from the spider. The mission read (paraphrased) obtain natural or non-natural poison. I would think the bolts fit the bill. Is this an error in the game?


Spoiler:
The bolts aren't a "source of poison" they just have some small amounts of poison on them. If I were the GM, I would've given you the hint that the spider likely contains what you're looking for.


Encounter A1: Not an error, but an amusing observation.

Spoiler:
I ran it for Tier Tier 6-7 which meant the spider was huge in size. I checked the tactics for the beastie and it said 'Same as Tier 1-2' which states 'The giant spider is 20 feet off the ground in the northwest corner of the room. She’s hiding when the PCs enter the room'. The players laughed their heads off when I informed them that the 20ft wide spider was hiding in the 30' by 30' room. :)

Encounter A2

Spoiler:
Anyone else notice that Grench Teppish was NE in alignment. Since Groetus is CN deity, I decided to change his alignment to CE instead. Minor issue.

The encounter at A4 had one notable error.

Spoiler:
The Nature's Cataclysm Fighters have Combat Expertise as a feat, which is impossible since their intelligence is only 10, thus not high enough.


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder Society / Pathfinder Society GM Discussion / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Pathfinder Society GM Discussion

Question re: noble titles for PCs
Ruby Phoenix Tournament Chronicle Sheet Questions
PFS#3-11 On Hostile Waters [SPOILERS]



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.