Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

How could I release Rovagug, or even a spawn of Rovagug?, by Tels

[HHG] Languages in Pathfinder, by Brekkil

Can an Ogre Mage be Decapitated (Please answer your opinion even if you agree with everyone or no one), by Quantum Steve

Slaughterhound, by Chad Bartlett

We Don't Need No Epic Content, by Squeatus

Homebrewed Weapon Properties, by Silent Saturn

Hushfoot Bocan, by Chad Bartlett

PFS#3-13 Defenders of Nesting Swallow [SPOILERS], by Muser

Necrotic Reef, by Chad Bartlett

Removing Perception as a Skill, by Irontruth

Pyrebloom, by Chad Bartlett

Aquatic pets on land, by Snorter

Ring of Sustanance: Gimmick or Awesome Sauce?, by Neo2151

Extra Evolution Feat, by joeyfixit

Sidhe Lord, by Chad Bartlett

Online Campaigns

Kyrademon's Transnational PBP -- Discussion, Description, and Preparation, by Alaric Graff

Dm Zyren's Heart of Runes, by DM Zyren/ Heart of Runes

DM Scarogoth's Carrion Crown Adventure Gameplay, by Xavian Graves

Jörmungandr's Carrion Crown, by Madeline Peshtussle

Zyren's luxurious campfire... this time with marshmallows..., by Zyren Zemerys

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Myriana Bayden

Tora no Senaka - The Back of the Tiger - Jade Regent IC Thread, by Raith Shadar

Darksun - Under A Bleeding Sun!! Kill A Sorcerer King, by Shady_Motives

Goblins 2: The Wreckin'-ing!, by Klepy

Hunger and Darkness - Reclaiming Tar-Urkatha, by DM - Voice of the Voiceless

The Tomb of Horrors Part 1 (4e) - Group 1, by Rev DM

Star Wars - The Covenant of Shadows, by Darth Camris

Space Between II, by Ravarath

Chapter 1: Just Beneath the Surface, by Roshan

Against the Dark Tower Gameplay, by stardust

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email

Paizo Publishing will be closed in observance of Presidents Day Monday, February 20.
We will reopen on Tuesday, February 21.


Note: Please use a spoiler tag when discussing specific plot points or events in a scenario.

Search
Search this Thread:


If I have the Dervish Dance feat from the Qadira PFCom (which allows you to use your DEX modifier instead of your STR modifier for both attack and damage with a scimitar) and I wield a Flame Blade (which says that your STR modifier does not apply to the damage because the Flame Blade is immaterial), can I apply my DEX mod to the damage done by the Flame Blade ?

I am looking for an official ruling on this because I am planning on using this combo, if allowed, for my PFS character and I would not want to make him illegal through my ignorance.


In this instance, neither your STR modifier or DEX modifier would apply to the damage dealt from a flame blade.

Paizo Employee (Creative Director)

Yarp; what Josh said.

Basically, when you cast flame blade, you're swapping out the physical weapon damage (which can be modified by Strength, or in the case of this feat, Dexterity) for fire damage instead. Which is a pretty good deal if you're fighting yetis, but not so much if you're fighting fire elementals, of course...


Thanks a lot for the clarification, guys.

James Jacobs wrote:
Which is a pretty good deal if you're fighting yetis, but not so much if you're fighting fire elementals, of course...

Unless you are also an Elemental Bloodline Sorcerer of the Water variety. In fact, I am coming to love this idea of switching between opposite energy types.


James Jacobs wrote:

Yarp; what Josh said.

Basically, when you cast flame blade, you're swapping out the physical weapon damage (which can be modified by Strength, or in the case of this feat, Dexterity) for fire damage instead. Which is a pretty good deal if you're fighting yetis, but not so much if you're fighting fire elementals, of course...

And what about the "to hit" part? would Dervish Dance allow the DEX modifier to apply to the melee touch attack of a flame blade?

Or in a more general sense, is a flame blade treated as a wielded weapon, a scimitar, for all purposes? Feats? Critical range?

I ask because the official ruling on this would help to settle this discussion:

flameblade and wildshape

and this one by the way:

how is a flame blade like a scimitar


nidho wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:

Yarp; what Josh said.

Basically, when you cast flame blade, you're swapping out the physical weapon damage (which can be modified by Strength, or in the case of this feat, Dexterity) for fire damage instead. Which is a pretty good deal if you're fighting yetis, but not so much if you're fighting fire elementals, of course...

And what about the "to hit" part? would Dervish Dance allow the DEX modifier to apply to the melee touch attack of a flame blade?

Or in a more general sense, is a flame blade treated as a wielded weapon, a scimitar, for all purposes? Feats? Critical range?

I ask because the official ruling on this would help to settle this discussion:

flameblade and wildshape

and this one by the way:

how is a flame blade like a scimitar

Well, it would help settle the first if we can get a ruling saying that a Flame Blade follows all the rules and restrictions of a scimitar except as noted in the spell description (ie, Fire damage, cannot be Disarmed or Sundered (presumably), no STR mod to damage), even though it is an immaterial blade-like beam of fire.


The black raven wrote:
nidho wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:

Yarp; what Josh said.

Basically, when you cast flame blade, you're swapping out the physical weapon damage (which can be modified by Strength, or in the case of this feat, Dexterity) for fire damage instead. Which is a pretty good deal if you're fighting yetis, but not so much if you're fighting fire elementals, of course...

And what about the "to hit" part? would Dervish Dance allow the DEX modifier to apply to the melee touch attack of a flame blade?

Or in a more general sense, is a flame blade treated as a wielded weapon, a scimitar, for all purposes? Feats? Critical range?

I ask because the official ruling on this would help to settle this discussion:

flameblade and wildshape

and this one by the way:

how is a flame blade like a scimitar

Well, it would help settle the first if we can get a ruling saying that a Flame Blade follows all the rules and restrictions of a scimitar except as noted in the spell description (ie, Fire damage, cannot be Disarmed or Sundered (presumably), no STR mod to damage), even though it is an immaterial blade-like beam of fire.

Well summarized.

Tha would be the exact ruling we need, yes.


nidho wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:

Yarp; what Josh said.

Basically, when you cast flame blade, you're swapping out the physical weapon damage (which can be modified by Strength, or in the case of this feat, Dexterity) for fire damage instead. Which is a pretty good deal if you're fighting yetis, but not so much if you're fighting fire elementals, of course...

And what about the "to hit" part? would Dervish Dance allow the DEX modifier to apply to the melee touch attack of a flame blade?

Or in a more general sense, is a flame blade treated as a wielded weapon, a scimitar, for all purposes? Feats? Critical range?

I ask because the official ruling on this would help to settle this discussion:

flameblade and wildshape

and this one by the way:

how is a flame blade like a scimitar

1. For the purpose of the "to hit" part of this discussion, you can use your Dex. Flame Blade only specifically prevents Str damage (or Dex damage in the case of Weapon Finesse or Dervish Dance) and does not prevent Dex being used to hit.

2. Flame Blade specifically says, "...as if it were a scimitar." So, yes, it's a scimitar.


Joshua J. Frost wrote:

2. Flame Blade specifically says, "...as if it were a scimitar." So, yes, it's a scimitar.

I mean no disrespect, but the above answer seems insufficient to me, because it can be construed as justifying Disarming or Sundering a Flame Blade.


The black raven wrote:
Joshua J. Frost wrote:

2. Flame Blade specifically says, "...as if it were a scimitar." So, yes, it's a scimitar.

I mean no disrespect, but the above answer seems insufficient to me, because it can be construed as justifying Disarming or Sundering a Flame Blade.

The spell description also specifically says that "you" wield the spell as a scimitar, it's a fire spell to others. No one can wield it but you, no one can interact with it but taking damage or dispelling it.

I'd say it's unsunderable and undisarmable.


The flame blade is an "immaterial" melee touch attack. Though you, the druid caster, are wielding it "as a scimitar" it's a spell.

Additionally sunder reads, "You can attempt to sunder an item held or worn by your opponent ..."

And disarm reads, "If your attack is successful, your target drops one item it is carrying ..."

Flame Blade is not an item. It's a spell.

You can't sunder or disarm a flame blade just like you can't disarm a shocking grasp or sunder mage armor.


Joshua J. Frost wrote:

The flame blade is an "immaterial" melee touch attack. Though you, the druid caster, are wielding it "as a scimitar" it's a spell.

Additionally sunder reads, "You can attempt to sunder an item held or worn by your opponent ..."

And disarm reads, "If your attack is successful, your target drops one item it is carrying ..."

Flame Blade is not an item. It's a spell.

You can't sunder or disarm a flame blade just like you can't disarm a shocking grasp or sunder mage armor.

Perfect answer. Thank you.


what about in the case of using a wand of flame blade, using UMD as a rogue? Is it considered a one handed weapon I am not proficient with? Do they say "You wield it as a scimitar" to prevent a druid suffering penalties for a weapon they are not proficient with? Could it be construed as a light weapon for the purposes of two weapon style since it is immaterial? I would think it doesn't get any lighter than Immaterial. Lastly, could I use a wand of Flameblade and wield the falmeblade in the same hand as the wand? Any Further Clarifications where Rogues with UMD/weapon finesse/two weapon style would be greatly appreciated.


It's an immaterial touch attack delivered via spell. It functions "as a scimitar" but is not a scimitar. It is one-handed and you are considered to be casting a spell, not wielding a weapon and therefor proficiencies don't enter into it. It is not a light weapon--it is an immaterial touch attack. You cannot hold anything in the hand that is wielding a flameblade.


Joshua J. Frost wrote:
It's an immaterial touch attack delivered via spell. It functions "as a scimitar" but is not a scimitar. It is one-handed and you are considered to be casting a spell, not wielding a weapon and therefor proficiencies don't enter into it. It is not a light weapon--it is an immaterial touch attack. You cannot hold anything in the hand that is wielding a flameblade.

Should be ok for weapon focus, yes?


Since it functions "as a scimitar,", yes. :-)


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder Society / General Discussion / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.