Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
Paizo    Store    Pathfinder®    GameMastery®    Planet Stories®    Titanic Games™   
  About Paizo     Messageboards     News     Paizo Blog     Help/FAQ  


Pathfinder Society
SEARCH


BROWSE
  • Store
  • Pathfinder®
  • Pathfinder RPG
  • Pathfinder® Society™
  • GameMastery®
  • Planet Stories
  • Titanic Games
  • Dragon
  • Dungeon
    		•
    Shop

    Messageboards

    New to DnD, please help?, 1 minute ago by Mairkurion {tm}

    Son of Forums are Way Too Long!!!, 2 minutes ago by Spanky the Leprechaun

    Pathfinder Adventure Path #27: What Lies in Dust (Council of Thieves 3 of 6) (PFRPG) Print Edition, 7 minutes ago by Berselius

    HeroLab, 8 minutes ago by Robert Miller 55

    Abundant Step vs Dimension Door, 9 minutes ago by Tectorman

    [4 Winds Fantasy Gaming] Paths of Power: A Sourcebook of Base & Prestige Classes in late October, 10 minutes ago by BabaNabi

    What's easier to portray? Devils or demons?, 12 minutes ago by Talonne Hauk

    Appalachee Jihad discussion thread, 13 minutes ago by Maccoy

    Clerics, Shields and Somatic components, 15 minutes ago by Beckett

    Paladin mount options, 19 minutes ago by Thammuz

    Are dragons overrated?, 21 minutes ago by Heathansson

    Bestiary II Wish List, 23 minutes ago by Thammuz

    Mothman's Howl of the Carrion King, 24 minutes ago by DM Mothman

    Puns!, 26 minutes ago by taig

    Other Genre Setting for Pathfinder, 27 minutes ago by BabaNabi

    Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / Archives / Settle down geppetto, its just a misprint.     Recent Posts
    Settle down geppetto, its just a misprint.
    Fergie, Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 06:25 PM

    I assume that the wood golem does not indeed have a 20 Con?
    freduncio, Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 07:20 PM

    No, they have 25 CON. =]

    Well, don't think it's as misprint. I can imagine a "living" wood guardian with leaves and maybe flowers that whenever get cutted it bleeds sap.

    Or it's just as misprint.
    Osirion James Risner (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion Subscriber), Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 10:40 PM
    TSR 95053-38 avatar

    freduncio wrote:
    Or it's just as misprint.

    IIRC it is a misprint, because the Fort and HP don't take into account the additional CON.
    tejón (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber), Sat, Nov 7, 2009, 02:58 AM
    Celestial Dire Badger avatar

    Just think - a gang of them has a combined 600 Con!
    Lord Fyre (RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32), Sat, Nov 7, 2009, 05:42 AM
    Balor avatar

    freduncio wrote:
    No, they have 25 CON. =]

    Well, don't think it's as misprint. I can imagine a "living" wood guardian with leaves and maybe flowers that whenever get cutted it bleeds sap.


    Isn't that another name for a Treant?
    Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / Archives / Settle down geppetto, its just a misprint. All Messageboards

    Want to post a reply? Sign in, or create a new account.


    ©2002–2009 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Society, PAIZOCON, RPG Superstar, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Amazing Stories is a trademark of, and Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.