Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Dispute with DM over a unfair trap, by concerro

Breaking out of your focus, by Ravingdork

Wondrous Item: Continuous Summoned Monster / `Nature's Ally` legal?, by Midnight_Angel

[Frog God Games] LAST CHANCE TO ORDER SLUMBERING TSAR SUBSCRIPTION, by silverhair2008

Pathfinder Player Companion: Pirates of the Inner Sea (PFRPG), by The Thing from Beyond the Edge

Kingmaker Obituaries, by Diego Rossi

Fight: how to speed things up, by Mike J

[Fire Mountain Games] Way of the Wicked—Book One: Knot of Thorns (PFRPG) PDF, by Fire Mountain Games

Can an Ogre Mage be Decapitated (Please answer your opinion even if you agree with everyone or no one), by Talonhawke

Spontaneous Casters vs. Prepared Casters, by wraithstrike

Feat prerequisites for the monk, by jupistar

My feelings about 5E D&D, by Steve Geddes

Adjective for "from Kyonin", by gang

Removing Perception as a Skill, by gnomersy

[Android APP] PFRPG RD, by Takilian Rueshin

Online Campaigns

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Kyrademon

Star Wars- The Covenant of Shadows, by Darth Camris

DM Sinvel's A Pound of Flesh in Freeport! discussion, by Kazmir "Bloody Flag" Voltiss

Star Wars - The Covenant of Shadows, by Bolt

Navior's We Be Goblins / Jade Regent OOC, by Dax Thura

Black Tom's Serpent Skull, by Aerys D Mavato

Ryuko's Way of the Wicked: A Knot of Thorns, by Slevin Wraith

Navior's Jade Regent, by Malan

Black Tom's Whispering Cairn, by Vulcan Stormwrath

Dm Zyren's Heart of Runes, by Kanyk

Nevis Lodge: First Steps, Part 2 - To Delve the Dungeon Deep, by Kernsten

Tom - Second Darkness, by Corvax Schultheiss

Jormungandr's Jade Regent, by Asira Nurami

Kyrademon's Transnational PBP -- Discussion, Description, and Preparation, by Kyrademon

Team Dwarf / Gnome in Elves vs Dwarves -- ELVES KEEP OUT Discussion, by OberonViking

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email

Paizo Publishing will be closed in observance of Presidents Day Monday, February 20.
We will reopen on Tuesday, February 21.


Search
Search this Thread:


Somehow I got embedded in my thinking that a natural attack set, such as 2 claw attacks, are done as a combination attack.

Example:

Animal has bite and 2 claw attacks. The animal can take a standard action to make an attack and either attack with the bite, or with the two claws.

If it was a full attack then it would be the bite + 2 claws.

But this is wrong... correct?

Andoran (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

AFAIK there is no mechanic that allows someone to get more than one attack as a standard action. At least not core.

Qadira (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Modules, Tales Subscriber)

I always played it that the standard action would be only a single bite or a single claw.

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16)

StabbityDoom, what about two-weapon fighting? In Pathfinder, the text reads: "If you wield a second weapon in your off hand, you can get one extra attack per round with that weapon." It doesn't specify full-attack actions, and it's not under that section of the combat rules.

Mok, the two-claws combination is how I've run the fight.


StabbittyDoom wrote:
AFAIK there is no mechanic that allows someone to get more than one attack as a standard action. At least not core.

Cleave?

Taldor (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Chris Mortika wrote:

StabbityDoom, what about two-weapon fighting? In Pathfinder, the text reads: "If you wield a second weapon in your off hand, you can get one extra attack per round with that weapon." It doesn't specify full-attack actions, and it's not under that section of the combat rules.

Mok, the two-claws combination is how I've run the fight.

The difference is specifically covered in thethe combat section

PRD wrote:
Multiple Attacks: A character who can make more than one attack per round must use the full-attack action (see Full-Round Actions) in order to get more than one attack.

That covers two weapon fighting and multiple natural attacks, because both count as more than one attack in a round.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

StabbittyDoom wrote:
AFAIK there is no mechanic that allows someone to get more than one attack as a standard action. At least not core.

Except for Cleave and Great Cleave. They do but with conditions that you have to hit with the preceding attack, that you can not attack the same target twice, and they have to adjacent. But as standard action you could in theory make up to 8 attacks while tumbling into the center of mass bad guys.

I just that happen with rogue who had Great Cleave. There this 8 guards in a room surrounding a table taking up on 5 foot square. The rogue using stealth get to 10 feet from the guards a secret door covered by a curtain. He launches out in 15 foot move gaining surprise tumbling through the squares onto the table where he Great cleaves from an elevated position against flat footed fighters. Missing only 1 with 8 sneak attacks the fighters died.

Now as DM this was expected to happen and it made the rogue feel great but they really were a bunch mooks waiting die. The key was if any escaped to sound the alarm things go bad. The alarm was bell in the next room. Needless to say none got the chance to move let alone ring the bell.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

Rithralas wrote:
I always played it that the standard action would be only a single bite or a single claw.

I always did too, but now I'm not so sure. So if a creature's option is 2 claws, the first one is run normally and the second at -5 as a single standard action? A 4 tentacle example is given in the PRD. Are all 4 allowed to attack as a standard?

Now I'm confused.

Andoran (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

*DOH* I was thinking as a standard attack action, which meant I ignored Cleave. Oh well.

Cleave is the only exception I can think of, sans pulling in 3.5e material.

Oh! Hydra is an exception too, since each of their attacks comes from a different head, which is a pseudo-different entity.


Treppa wrote:
Rithralas wrote:
I always played it that the standard action would be only a single bite or a single claw.

I always did too, but now I'm not so sure. So if a creature's option is 2 claws, the first one is run normally and the second at -5 as a single standard action? A 4 tentacle example is given in the PRD. Are all 4 allowed to attack as a standard?

Now I'm confused.

That's a great point.

So if I have a Stone Golem at 2 Slam Attacks (at +22 from pathfinder beastiary (from memory, maybe be off)), and he moves more than 5 feet and makes a standard attack action, does he get 1 slam attack at a higher bonus? If so what is the bonus (or penalty for using 2 slam attacks)

I've never done this, I'd just read out of the book and gave him a single +22 for a standard attack action, or 2 +22's if he used a full round action.

Andoran (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

Natural attacks are not iterative attacks. If the attacks are primary natural attacks they take no penalty no matter how many there are. If the attacks are secondary natural attacks they take a -5 penalty (-2 with multiattack) whether or not there is a primary and regardless of the number.

A horse is a good example of the second point, because they get a -5 on to-hit rolls with their hooves unless they are wartrained.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

StabbittyDoom wrote:

Natural attacks are not iterative attacks. If the attacks are primary natural attacks they take no penalty no matter how many there are. If the attacks are secondary natural attacks they take a -5 penalty (-2 with multiattack) whether or not there is a primary and regardless of the number.

A horse is a good example of the second point, because they get a -5 on to-hit rolls with their hooves unless they are wartrained.

Thank you! This makes it very clear.


Of course if you had the 'pounce' ability, from say, Lion Totem 1st lvl Barbarian Alternate Class Feature (give up fast movement) in the surprise round you could charge as a standard action (up to your movement) and get a full attack.

but that's just cheeky ;)


Mok wrote:

Somehow I got embedded in my thinking that a natural attack set, such as 2 claw attacks, are done as a combination attack.

Example:

Animal has bite and 2 claw attacks. The animal can take a standard action to make an attack and either attack with the bite, or with the two claws.

If it was a full attack then it would be the bite + 2 claws.

But this is wrong... correct?

I second the question! Is the 2 claw attacks a single primary attack that can be used as a standard action? If the creature has more then 2 claws do those count as a standard action as well? If this is yes then can a creature who has multiple claws make all their claw attacks on an attack of opportunity or readied action?


shavol wrote:
Is the 2 claw attacks a single primary attack that can be used as a standard action?

No. As was quoted above, in order to get more than one attack, you must use the full-attack action. When it says "2 claws", that means you have 2 separate claw-attacks.

Andoran (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Tales, Battles Case Subscriber)

shavol wrote:
Mok wrote:

Somehow I got embedded in my thinking that a natural attack set, such as 2 claw attacks, are done as a combination attack.

Example:

Animal has bite and 2 claw attacks. The animal can take a standard action to make an attack and either attack with the bite, or with the two claws.

If it was a full attack then it would be the bite + 2 claws.

But this is wrong... correct?

I second the question! Is the 2 claw attacks a single primary attack that can be used as a standard action? If the creature has more then 2 claws do those count as a standard action as well? If this is yes then can a creature who has multiple claws make all their claw attacks on an attack of opportunity or readied action?

NO.

A standard action is ONE attack, not "one set" of attacks. A standard action can also be a combat maneuver, such as a Grapple, or a Feat / Special Ability use, such as Cleave or Pounce, which can allow you to preform more than one attack as a result of using the ability, not because the attacks are "paired" up in the stat block to save space and indicate that they are identical mechanically.

But when using a Standard Action to preform an Attack, you get one attack, unless specifically noted in the monsters description (like the Hyda, Ettin, and the 100-handed epic monster).


BobChuck wrote:
shavol wrote:
Mok wrote:

Somehow I got embedded in my thinking that a natural attack set, such as 2 claw attacks, are done as a combination attack.

Example:

Animal has bite and 2 claw attacks. The animal can take a standard action to make an attack and either attack with the bite, or with the two claws.

If it was a full attack then it would be the bite + 2 claws.

But this is wrong... correct?

I second the question! Is the 2 claw attacks a single primary attack that can be used as a standard action? If the creature has more then 2 claws do those count as a standard action as well? If this is yes then can a creature who has multiple claws make all their claw attacks on an attack of opportunity or readied action?

NO.

A standard action is ONE attack, not "one set" of attacks. A standard action can also be a combat maneuver, such as a Grapple, or a Feat / Special Ability use, such as Cleave or Pounce, which can allow you to preform more than one attack as a result of using the ability, not because the attacks are "paired" up in the stat block to save space and indicate that they are identical mechanically.

But when using a Standard Action to preform an Attack, you get one attack, unless specifically noted in the monsters description (like the Hyda, Ettin, and the 100-handed epic monster).

Wow- OK thanks helped a lot.

So combat maneuver as a standard action would be able to be used as an attack of opportunity from say standing or moving out of a threatened square?


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Rules Questions

Breaking out of your focus
Wondrous Item: Continuous Summoned Monster / `Nature's Ally` legal?
Can an Ogre Mage be Decapitated (Please answer your opinion even if you agree with everyone or no one)
Feat prerequisites for the monk
Shield spell - clarification
Wall Spell, Reflex save and attacks of opportunity
Wall of Stone and Reflexes
Invisibility Clarifications
Can the Shadowdancer or Horizon Walker qualify for the Dimensional Agility feat?
Sin Magic: How does it work?
Sneak attack from Stealth RAW
Pirates of the Inner Sea
Extra Evolution Feat
Item Creation Problems
Spring Attack / Shot on the Run and Acrobatics
Skin for the Synthesist
Augmented Eidelon Synthesist
Increasing intelligence retroactively grant bonus languages?
Can an alchemist prepare bombs and extracts underwater?
How many targets when a Single-Instance Cantrip is used as a wand?



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.