Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Beginner Box

PaizoCon 2012!
Pathfinder Online Technology Demo by Goblinworks Inc. — Kickstarter
1,689
BACKERS
$107,897
PLEDGED
8
DAYS TO GO

Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Builder Games!, by Randomdays

Stone Firearms?, by blackbloodtroll

GameMastery Map Pack: Lost Island, by Vic Wertz

Who really controls the familiar / animal companion?, by Glendwyr

Paizo Blog: A Tomb of Winter's Plunder--Chapter One: Taking the Waters, by Cheapy

The Brinewall Legacy (GM Reference), by Mort the Cleverly Named

>>Ask *James Jacobs* ALL your Questions Here!<<, by Tels

PF players really like Descent idea?, by blackbloodtroll

Spell combat+spell strike, by Ravingdork

Revamping the Crafting and Financial Rules, by Gauss

Variant Channeling and Terrain Domains, by blackbloodtroll

Give the person above you a nickname., by Mark Hoover

Bard with Heighten Spell (Metamagic) no need of Preferred Spell feat?, by Cheapy

Gestalt?, by Gauss

Summoned creatures inside summoning circles and even using them... as... a food source >.>, by Chdmann

Online Campaigns

SeanDM's Leverage, by Orla

GM Nayr's Second Darkness Discussion, by Eris Kallisti

DM Dan E's Legacy of Fire OOC Thread, by Talomyr

Last Rites (IC), by Arasmes Kemnebi

Baldwin the Merciful's, CoT Campaign, by John Deos

The voyage begins!, by Bosun Moon

Mists of War OOC - DM Downrightamazed, by Sir Damian Lamorak

Gamethread : CoT, by John Deos

DM Devon's RotRL aka "The Heroes of Sandpoint", by Toshio Kaijitsu

Steel Wolves - Mercenary Campaign Game Thread, by Drannigan "Doc" Piper

GM Blood's Age Of Worms (Group 2), by Ingrid Anika Nina Jones

Tales of Agartha: the Avalon Chronicles, by Khassar Blackadder

Frostfur Captives, by Strat Spineshank

Black Tom's Whispering Cairn, by Friar Feres

Rites of Passage:Chapter 0 Legacy Discussion, by Varian

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:


13 people marked this as FAQ candidate. 1 person marked this as a favorite.
Quote:
Confusion Bomb* (Su): The alchemist’s bombs twist the target’s perception of friend and foe. A creature that takes a direct hit from a confusion bomb takes damage from the bomb and is under the effect of a confusion spell for 1 round per caster level of the alchemist. Reduce the amount of normal damage dealt by the bomb by 2d6 (so a bomb that would normally deal 6d6+4 points of damage deals 4d6+4 points of damage instead). An alchemist must be at least 8th level before selecting this discovery.

I think the phrase "unless they succeed at a Will save." was omitted somewhere. This seems pretty nasty otherwise.


I'm not sure that needs a save, since it requires you to hit the target with the bomb.


Are wrote:

I'm not sure that needs a save, since it requires you to hit the target with the bomb.

Needing to succeed at a ranged touch attack, particularly at higher levels, is no substitute for a saving throw.

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

Are wrote:

I'm not sure that needs a save, since it requires you to hit the target with the bomb.

True, but hitting with a bomb is all but automatic. I think in two adventure path installments (parts 1 and 2 of CotCT), I've missed with a grand total of 2 alchemist bombs other than on a natural 1 (18 Dex, Dex mutagen, Point Blank Shot give a +7 to hit even at 1st-level).


DMingNicholas wrote:
Are wrote:

I'm not sure that needs a save, since it requires you to hit the target with the bomb.

Needing to succeed at a ranged touch attack, particularly at higher levels, is no substitute for a saving throw.

Yeah, I missed the part where bombs were touch attacks. I'm going to use "I haven't had an Alchemist in my games yet" as my feeble excuse, even though it isn't really an excuse :)

In light of that, I agree it should have a saving throw.

Grand Lodge (Paizo Superscriber, Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber)

-scribbles note to house rule this one for his party alchemist-


0gre wrote:


I think the phrase "unless they succeed at a Will save." was omitted somewhere. This seems pretty nasty otherwise.

Why? It's confusion for a single round, not for multiple rounds. There is no necessity for a will save.


Hama wrote:
0gre wrote:


I think the phrase "unless they succeed at a Will save." was omitted somewhere. This seems pretty nasty otherwise.
Why? It's confusion for a single round, not for multiple rounds. There is no necessity for a will save.

A creature that takes a direct hit from a confusion bomb takes damage from the bomb and is under the effect of a confusion spell for 1 round per caster level of the alchemist.


Hama wrote:
0gre wrote:


I think the phrase "unless they succeed at a Will save." was omitted somewhere. This seems pretty nasty otherwise.
Why? It's confusion for a single round, not for multiple rounds. There is no necessity for a will save.
0gre wrote:
Confusion Bomb* (Su): The alchemist’s bombs twist the target’s perception of friend and foe. A creature that takes a direct hit from a confusion bomb takes damage from the bomb and is under the effect of a confusion spell for 1 round per caster level of the alchemist. Reduce the amount of normal damage dealt by the bomb by 2d6 (so a bomb that would normally deal 6d6+4 points of damage deals 4d6+4 points of damage instead). An alchemist must be at least 8th level before selecting this discovery.

Emphasis mine.

EDIT: Ninja'd

Osirion (Paizo Charter Superscriber)

If it is not a mistake, it's a great example of how "oh the wizardy guy has to *touch* something? Let's make it better" goes so horribly wrong.


Question: where is this from? I can't find it in the alchemist's description. . .

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

I'd say a GM is well within the bounds of the discovery to house-rule a save, because it says they're under the effect of a confusion spell, and the spell DOES allow a save. But yeah, I think it needs to be clarified, because that's almost bad-ass enough for me to change my Discovery for my just-recently acquired 8th Alch level.


6 people marked this as FAQ candidate. 2 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm looking into this. It probably is something like "if they fail a Will save" or "if they fail to save against the bomb...."

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path Subscriber)

Sean K Reynolds wrote:
I'm looking into this. It probably is something like "if they fail a Will save" or "if they fail to save against the bomb...."

Awesome, you may want to look into Terrible Remorse as well. Jason Nelson and I had some ideas about the intent of the spell in another thread further down in this forum, but it currently disables the target for 1 round per level regardless of saves.

(Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber)

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. 1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sean K Reynolds wrote:
I'm looking into this. It probably is something like "if they fail a Will save" or "if they fail to save against the bomb...."

Digging up an old post, but the issue is still there. Any updates on this?


The way I read this is: "and is under the effect of a confusion spell". Now, under the Confusion spell you have an entry for Effect we have: Range, Targets, Duration, Saving Throw. Sucks for my new awesome bomb, but I defaulted to saving throw myself. It's what's intended clearly.


It doesn't need fixing. Not only does it require the ranged touch, it's also only single target. The power of the Confusion spell is that it's multitarget. Because ultimately you're using it to try and get some schmuck to attack his friend and set off a chain reaction of "bad guys killing each other." Alchemist would need to lob several bombs in order to replicate that.

On a more bizzare note, strictly as written...I'm not sure Confusion Bombs actually does anything meaningful. Yeah, it confuses. But confusion says if someone attacks you, instead of rolling d%, the victim just goes after whoever attacked him. Just to use Confusion Bombs in the first place requires attacking someone...


Stream, the Alchemist I was playing with was able to toss about 6 bombs in a single attack, if this was placed on all 6 bombs that could be 6 possible targets, so a clarification "might" not be a bad idea.


I don't think it needs fixed -- confusion as a penalty sucks and you are taking a penalty on your damage too. What's more you can't combine it with other asterisked discoveries either so it has to be your normal damage.


Dolanar wrote:
Stream, the Alchemist I was playing with was able to toss about 6 bombs in a single attack, if this was placed on all 6 bombs that could be 6 possible targets, so a clarification "might" not be a bad idea.

I (fortunately) avoid games where the PCs are allowed to nova all their resources in a single encounter then take a nap. *shrug*

6 attacks... so, you had fast bombs, TWF, Rapid Shot, ITWF and...ok no, that's still not enough. How were you getting 6 attacks? Hastened, or just in the mid to high teens for level? An unhastened alchemist w/ all those feats/discoveries would need to be level 15 to have that many attacks. And he'd need to be level 15 to grab GTWF, so that's not an option, either. With haste you could pull this off by level 9, I suppose.

Qadira (RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor)

It doesn't really matter because with just Rapid Shot and haste you can get four bombs per round at 8th level which is enough for confusion bomb to be pretty nasty.

As for novaing... *shrug* it's not any worse or more likely than the wizard burning all his highest level spells in the first encounter. People are either good at managing resources or they aren't.


Why are we arguing this again?

Yes it requires no save and does 1 level per caster level. But if you allow a save its in every way worse than the confusion spell the wizard gets at the same level.

They need a ranged touch attack to affect one creature with 1 round / caster level with an 8th level requirement to take it.

Wizards get 100 + 10 ft/level range within a 15 ft radius where their enemies get a save.

You're trading out the ability to make a save on a single target ability for the ability to affect a 30 foot diameter aoe of the same effect at multiple times the distance.

It's clearly a trade off and one I don't consider too bad seeing as how an 8th level wizard could use this spell and turn an entire encounter instead of just one monster into a cake walk


The exact number of attacks could be one less, I don't recall & it wasn't my character, so I'm not 100% sure, but I know he did have all of those feats & we were around level 12 or so.


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Rules Questions

Stone Firearms?
Spell combat+spell strike
Variant Channeling and Terrain Domains
Bard with Heighten Spell (Metamagic) no need of Preferred Spell feat?
Gestalt?
Quick clarification on Overhand Chop
Druid Natural Attacks
What is the state of FOB
Can you hollow out an apple, pour a Cure Light Wounds Potion into it for your Horse to eat?
Dual quickened spells
Wizard Arcane Spell Failure and 'Mage Bullets'
Use of the Appraise Skill
Tripping Strike clarification
A few questions about Haunts
Stupid question on CR
Shadow with multiple attacks. Str Damage when?
Need some help please ... looking for items / feats / etc that function like Robes of Arcane Heritage
Power attack and natural weapons
Need arrow / bow information
Questions on phantom steed



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online,PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.