Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Please critique my build: The Blinding Serpent, by Michael Loy

CR 7 BBEG Solo Caster... Witch or Sorcerer?, by wraithstrike

Save or Die Spells: Keep Them Out of PvP Please, by Blaeringr

Separating Elemental Fire and Energy Fire, by Indagare

Lootable Items: Boars carrying +5 Vorpal Chain-Swords or something more realistic?, by Blaeringr

Multiclassing in PFO, by Probitas

Pathfinder Society Season Hardcover, by Fredrik

Faces of the Tarnished Souk: Khufusiris, the Crooked Sleuth of Unfathered Sin, by Rite Publishing

Level 20 and the Dragon Empires, by Thomas LeBlanc

Ghostrider 2, by pres man

Changes for Guide 4.2, by Chris Nehren

Practical experience with Paladin spells, by Wiggz

Ways to avoid AoO when within reach of a huge+ creature as a Cleric, by Rathendar

Ganging up on your foes-aren't these guys supposed to be heroes?, by robertness

Rules for creating large Extraplanar spaces?, by jjaamm

Online Campaigns

Worldwound Adventures Discussion, by GM_Arbiter

Voodoo's Caravanserai, by PirateDevon

Dain's King Maker Chronicles, by Ariarh Kane

Gob's Rise of the Runelords Gameplay, by Adanel

Elton's Curse of the Crimson Throne, by Thren'ody

DM Devon's RotRL aka "The Heroes of Sandpoint", by DM Devon

Dain's King Maker Chronicles - Combat Thread, by Khromm

DM Iron-Dice PFS Adventures (OOC), by DM Iron-Dice

ROTRL New Player Game Play Thread., by Jonas El 'Adan

DM AK's Sargavan Saga, by N'bellocq

Gm Blood's AoW in Golarion, by Lessien Nenmacil

Dungeon Master Heathy's Carrion Crown, by Rholf Kastigarr

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, by Spazmodeus

Sanosuke's Mormont's Gauntlet, by Jivaji Varesh

DM Heathy's Saltmarsh Discussion Thread, by dungeonmaster heathy

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:


While integrating the Enlarge Spell feat, I noticed an error in D&D3.5, and in the PRD (Core Rulebook page 122)

Consider the description:

Quote:
Benefit: You can alter a spell with a range of close, medium, or long to increase its range by 100%. An enlarged spell with a range of close now has a range of 50 ft. + 5 ft./level,...

This Feat doubles the ranges of spells (i.e. increase its range by 100%). This is not true for the Close range, when the caster level is an ODD number (because of the division rounding):

Example using a level 1 caster:
Close range = 25' +0' = 25'

Now, with this feat enabled (see bold formula highlighted above):
50' + 5' = 55'

As you can see, we were expecting an increase of 100% of the 25' range (expected value 50'). But the formula above gives us a bit more then a 100% increase (55')!

The Correct formula for Close range should be:
50 ft. + 10 ft./ 2 levels

I don't expect 3.5 to be fixed, but hopefully you guys can fix Pathfinder... :)

RiTz21
http://TheOnlySheet.com


RiTz21 wrote:

While integrating the Enlarge Spell feat, I noticed an error in D&D3.5, and in the PRD (Core Rulebook page 122)

Consider the description:

Quote:
Benefit: You can alter a spell with a range of close, medium, or long to increase its range by 100%. An enlarged spell with a range of close now has a range of 50 ft. + 5 ft./level,...

This Feat doubles the ranges of spells (i.e. increase its range by 100%). This is not true for the Close range, when the caster level is an ODD number (because of the division rounding):

Example using a level 1 caster:
Close range = 25' +0' = 25'

Now, with this feat enabled (see bold formula highlighted above):
50' + 5' = 55'

As you can see, we were expecting an increase of 100% of the 25' range (expected value 50'). But the formula above gives us a bit more then a 100% increase (55')!

The Correct formula for Close range should be:
50 ft. + 10 ft./ 2 levels

I don't expect 3.5 to be fixed, but hopefully you guys can fix Pathfinder... :)

RiTz21
http://TheOnlySheet.com

You are making the assumption that rounding is not already occurring. Instead, don't round Close range spells. Now, at 1st level, the close range spell is going 27.5 ft. Because of how squares work, that is 25 ft, not 27.5. 2.5 feet has no significance when each square is 5 feet. Therefore, it is 25 ft. + 5 ft. per two levels. Each level, 2.5 feet is added. When you double that, the 2.5 feet is significant, and the feat is correct as written.


tos_shai_hulud wrote:
You are making the assumption that rounding is not already occurring. Instead, don't round Close range spells. Now, at 1st level, the close range spell is going 27.5 ft. Because of how squares work, that is 25 ft, not 27.5. 2.5 feet has no significance when each square is 5 feet. Therefore, it is 25 ft. + 5 ft. per two levels. Each level, 2.5 feet is added. When you double that, the 2.5 feet is significant, and the feat is correct as written.

I don't think I am assuming anything.

On the contrary, you seem to assume that the rules would 'use' fractions of distances, then round them down to the nearest 5' step. Consider the rule for Close range:

Quote:
Close: The spell reaches as far as 25 feet away from you. The maximum range increases by 5 feet for every two full caster levels.

Where are you seeing that it would add 2.5' to the range? I do not see that in the above phrase. It is clear that you get a full 5' bonus for each two complete caster level you have.... No assumptions here, no 2.5' bonus...

RiTz21
http://TheOnlySheet.com

Andoran (Pathfinder Superscriber)

RiTz21,
I think it's correct.

Normally Close range is 25+5/2 levels. It's now 50+5/level. That's doubled. The static component is twice and the variable component occurs at twice as many levels.

EDIT: So it's doubled. For a given value of doubled.


Paul Watson wrote:

RiTz21,

I think it's correct.

Normally Close range is 25+5/2 levels. It's now 50+5/level. That's doubled. The static component is twice and the variable component occurs at twice as many levels.

EDIT: So it's doubled. For a given value of doubled.

No it's not 'doubled' as I explained in the 1st post (with mathematical proof to support this...doubling 25', should not give 55')

In fact, you give a good point why this is an error (and inconsistent one at that!)

A) They took the 25'+5' per 2 levels
B) They doubled the 25' range to 50' (double the basic range)
C) They then HALVED the level requirement from 'per 2 levels' to 'per level', instead of just DOUBLING the bonus range from 5' to 10' !!

(and when I say "they", I do not mean Paizo, as they are just using the same 3.5 rules - I mean Wizards of the Cost...)

So Wizard should really have doubled the basic range AND the bonus range to get 100%.

RiTz21
http://TheOnlySheet.com


Quote:
As you can see, we were expecting an increase of 100% of the 25' range (expected value 50'). But the formula above gives us a bit more then a 100% increase (55')!

But it's not a 100% increase in the value of 25 ft. It's a 100% increase in the value of 25 + floor(1/2). Normally, floor(1/2) * 2 would be zero, but in this case, the calculation is made floor(1/2 * 2), which is saying that the feat gives 100% more effect from caster levels toward range. This is not an incorrect statement.

Osirion (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

RiTz21 wrote:

While integrating the Enlarge Spell feat, I noticed an error in D&D3.5, and in the PRD (Core Rulebook page 122)

Example using a level 1 caster:
Close range = 25' +0' = 25'

Now, with this feat enabled (see bold formula highlighted above):
50' + 5' = 55'

The Correct formula for Close range should be:
50 ft. + 10 ft./ 2 levels

From 3.p:

Close: The spell reaches as far as 25 feet away from you.

Round down is a rule, and the range is doubled.

So you calculate the range using 25+x/2 then double the range.


James Risner wrote:

From 3.p:

Close: The spell reaches as far as 25 feet away from you.

Round down is a rule, and the range is doubled.

So you calculate the range using 25+x/2 then double the range.

Indeed, that is another way Wizards could have phrased the feat to avoid this Error (and it seems like a simpler way to phrase it, as it would not have required a formula in the first place!!!)

RiTz21
http://TheOnlySheet.com


RiTz21 wrote:
James Risner wrote:

From 3.p:

Close: The spell reaches as far as 25 feet away from you.

Round down is a rule, and the range is doubled.

So you calculate the range using 25+x/2 then double the range.

Indeed, that is another way Wizards could have phrased the feat to avoid this Error (and it seems like a simpler way to phrase it, as it would not have required a formula in the first place!!!)

RiTz21
http://TheOnlySheet.com

The feat does not tell you when to round down. In fact, nothing in the system suggests that you would round down before multiplying. So, your 1st level range would be 27.5 ft. (round down to 25). Your 1st level Extended spell would be 55 ft. (round down to 55).


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Rules Questions

Rules for creating large Extraplanar spaces?
Burrow and Large (or larger!) creature positioning.
Instant Fortress - The most powerful "weapon" in pathfinder?
Witches and Spells
Drow and Elf Prerequisites
Can the Shadowdancer or Horizon Walker qualify for the Dimensional Agility feat?
Sneak attack from Stealth RAW
Magus' Spellcombat
Defending Weapon
Awaken Questions
Synthesist saving throws
Flurry attack bonus question
Buckler + potion or buckler + scroll
Panicked creatures and the withdraw action
Archetypes that replace a proficiency gained and multi-classing
Acid Damage vs Objects
Snap Shot and Stabbing Shot?
Synthesist question
Teleporting from inside a `Rope Trick`?
Creating a Diversion to Hide - Feint, Bluff and Stealth



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.