Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
  About Paizo     Messageboards     News     Paizo Blog     Help/FAQ  




Pathfinder Society
SEARCH


BROWSE
Shop

Messageboards

erian_7's Excel-based Character Sheet, 1 minute ago by Mike Dowd

Internet Meme timeline..., 5 minutes ago by Celestial Healer

Probably a repeated question, 10 minutes ago by Celestial Healer

Dragon Age, 11 minutes ago by BenS

Link to a few Burnt Offerings photos, 19 minutes ago by Kevin Mack

Playtest arises questions, 19 minutes ago by Tim4488

Roman Pilum, 21 minutes ago by meabolex

pathfinder/3.5 ogl Fire Shield spell (sun domain 4th level cleric spell), 21 minutes ago by David Hopper

Smallville, 24 minutes ago by Purple Dragon Knight

Getting GM character credit for running a session., 25 minutes ago by yoda8myhead

Pathfinder Chronicles: Classic Horrors Revisited (PFRPG) Print Edition, 26 minutes ago by Eric Hinkle

Gith Advice? Looking to play a Warrior / Mage, 27 minutes ago by Sigurd

Son of Forums are Way Too Long!!!, 28 minutes ago by Celestial Healer

Should Cavalier get Armor Training as Fighter have?, 28 minutes ago by Purple Dragon Knight

Warforged Gardener's Savage Tide (PFRPG), 33 minutes ago by Sneaky

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / Archives / Adepts and 0th Level Orisons     Recent Posts
Adepts and 0th Level Orisons
Hartbaine,

Pathfinder 1 Fighter avatar

Are Adepts allowed to cast a 0th level spell at will or are they used up upon casting? I'm curious what you think.

Personally I say 'yes' they are used up upon casting simply because they do not have the class ability 'Cantrips' or 'Orisons'.

That's right you dirty Adepts... you want unlimited 0th level power get a real job!

Weylin,

Hartbaine wrote:
Are Adepts allowed to cast a 0th level spell at will or are they used up upon casting? I'm curious what you think.

Personally I say 'yes' they are used up upon casting simply because they do not have the class ability 'Cantrips' or 'Orisons'.

That's right you dirty Adepts... you want unlimited 0th level power get a real job!


I see it as adepts use up their 0-level spells. They dont have any class feature that clearly states they dont and all of the PC spellcasters do have explciit mention of unlimited 0-level castings.

This puts the big gap between them and Cleric-Druid-Wiazard-Sorcerer. Much like the lack of class feats seperate Warriors from Fighter in a big way. And lack of Rogue Talents seperates a Expert thief from a Rogue.

But then I am a huge proponent of: most people in the game world are NPC Classes. The average soldier is a Warrior. The average thief is an Expert. The average temple priest is either an Adept or an Aristocrat.

-Weylin

Peebo,

14 -jeweled-life-hi-res avatar

yeppers, you are both right, the Adept NPC class still uses up its 0th level spells, as it does not have the class ability Orisons/Cantrips.

Peebo :D

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / Archives / Adepts and 0th Level Orisons All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in, or create a new account.



©2002–2009 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Society, PAIZOCON, RPG Superstar, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Amazing Stories is a trademark of, and Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.