Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Rogue buffs?, by Robespierre

Removing Perception as a Skill, by Ragnarok Aeon

[Spes Magna Games] Quid Novi? for 2012, by Bardess

Evocation optimization?, by ciretose

Creating a Bard (that doesn't suck), by Hayato Ken

Sneak attack from Stealth RAW, by Diego Rossi

Two weapon fighting unarmed, by Mathmuse

Ganging up on your foes-aren't these guys supposed to be heroes?, by Finn K

Tiny Toon Adventures, by Dragon78

Inquisitor build help, game tonight, by RedPorcupine

Bestiary 4 Wish List, by Dragon78

A Guide to Touch Spells, Spellstrike, and Spell Combat [Ver 0.1 Alpha], by Iced2k

Dispute with DM over a unfair trap, by leo1925

Changes for Guide 4.2 discussion, by Chot

Escape from Old Korvosa (GM Reference), by DM Aron Marczylo

Online Campaigns

The Academae Discussion Thread, by Shane Gifford

Megan's Carrion Crown OOC Thread, by Azoun The Sage

Den of the Slave Takers (4e), by Rev DM

Of Battle, Wolves and Winter., by Commander Nulner

DM Wellards RotRL chapter two... The Skinsaw Murders, by Muchorak "Windstriker"

DM Zyren's Heart of Madness, by Dm Zyren / Heart of Madness

Rev's Lost City (4e Paragon) - discussion thread, by Rev Rosey

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Kyrademon

The Academae, by Shane Gifford

Dm Zyren's Heart of Runes, by DM Zyren/ Heart of Runes

Chapter 1: Just Beneath the Surface, by Roshan

Hunger and Darkness - Reclaiming Tar-Urkatha, by DM - Voice of the Voiceless

Tora no Senaka - The Back of the Tiger - Jade Regent IC Thread, by The Celestial Bureaucracy

DM Stephens Serpents Skull Campaign - OOC Discussion, by Mihai Soarta

Legacy of Fire, by Sanket

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:

Qadira (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

There are several differences between Dimension Door and Abundant Step, such as the monk not being able to take anyone with them and that it is a move action to use it.

What would the point be to changing it to a move action if the monk could not also take a standard action afterward?

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber)

Why couldn't he use a standard action afterward?

Qadira (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

Dimension Door states that you cannot take any other actions until your next turn after using the spell.

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber)

Pathfinder Core wrote:
After using this spell, you can’t take any other actions until your next turn.

Oh, well I'll be darned, it does. I wonder why.

(Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber)

Well, to try and be a little helpful, as a GM I would waive this part of the spell for the purpose of Abundant Step. It seems to run counter to the spirit of the ability. On the other hand, though, the monk can still use it as a fleeing ability.

"I punch him in the nose and disappear!"

Sorry I can't help more.

Qadira (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

dthunder wrote:

Well, to try and be a little helpful, as a GM I would waive this part of the spell for the purpose of Abundant Step. It seems to run counter to the spirit of the ability. On the other hand, though, the monk can still use it as a fleeing ability.

"I punch him in the nose and disappear!"

Sorry I can't help more.

Tis why I am hoping that one of those marvelous staff members at Paizo take a look at this and provide some guidance/ruling.


From what I've heard, in 2E (some older edition of D&D, I think it was 2E), the two spells Haste and Dimension Door could interact in a particularly game-breaking fashion if you were allowed to take actions after you Dimension Doored. So in that edition, Dimension Door got the caveat that denied you further actions until the start of your next turn.

Which is fine for that edition, but when they made the transition to 3E, they changed Haste to where the game-breaking effect no longer took place. And forgot to allow Dimension Door to allow further actions. Then 3.5 came out, and they still kept the old caveat for no good reason. Then the playtesting for Pathfinder started and I made sure to post a thread or two about this specific problem (both in the Alpha and Beta playtests), and then the problem still wasn't addressed.

Osirion (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules Subscriber)

Mistwalker wrote:
What would the point be to changing it to a move action if the monk could not also take a standard action afterward ?

You can't take actions in 3.5 after DDing either, so why should you with Monk AS?

Qadira (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Adventure Path, Campaign Setting, Companion, Modules, GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

James Risner wrote:
Mistwalker wrote:
What would the point be to changing it to a move action if the monk could not also take a standard action afterward ?
You can't take actions in 3.5 after DDing either, so why should you with Monk AS?

Dimension Door is a standard action. Abundant Step is a move action. Why the difference if you can't do anything else after the monk takes the step?

I have a problem with the idea that the only reason is so that the monk can do a single attack and then flee.


Mistwalker wrote:
James Risner wrote:
Mistwalker wrote:
What would the point be to changing it to a move action if the monk could not also take a standard action afterward ?
You can't take actions in 3.5 after DDing either, so why should you with Monk AS?

Dimension Door is a standard action. Abundant Step is a move action. Why the difference if you can't do anything else after the monk takes the step?

I have a problem with the idea that the only reason is so that the monk can do a single attack and then flee.

Because you could take a Standard Action and then AS away. With the spell, casting is your standard action for that round.

What you can't do is perform any Swift, Immediate or Free actions until the start of your next turn after you AS or DD.


Tectorman wrote:

From what I've heard, in 2E (some older edition of D&D, I think it was 2E), the two spells Haste and Dimension Door could interact in a particularly game-breaking fashion if you were allowed to take actions after you Dimension Doored. So in that edition, Dimension Door got the caveat that denied you further actions until the start of your next turn.

Which is fine for that edition, but when they made the transition to 3E, they changed Haste to where the game-breaking effect no longer took place. And forgot to allow Dimension Door to allow further actions. Then 3.5 came out, and they still kept the old caveat for no good reason. Then the playtesting for Pathfinder started and I made sure to post a thread or two about this specific problem (both in the Alpha and Beta playtests), and then the problem still wasn't addressed.

QFT

I'd like to hear how the designers feel about this now. As in, if you were to write the spell from scratch as things are in Pathfinder, would you still have this added restriction?


My theory is that the designers forgot to change the description for Abundant Step to allow a standard attack :P

As-is, it's still a solid escape tool though.


1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.
Akalsaris wrote:

My theory is that the designers forgot to change the description for Abundant Step to allow a standard attack :P

As-is, it's still a solid escape tool though.

In 3.5 from the Complete Warrior there was a tactical feat - Sun School, which allowed the monk to make a single attack at his highest bonus (ie a Standard Action) after an Abundant Step. From what I have seen, much of the changes to Pathfinder have been to include much of the extra material from 3.5 that was in the additional books straight into the base classes. This seems to be precisely that, and it seems reasonable by intent that the goal of this change was to allow for a standard action after the ddoor. However, I too would want to see a more official post on this.


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / Rules Questions / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Rules Questions

Sneak attack from Stealth RAW
Two weapon fighting unarmed
Can the Shadowdancer or Horizon Walker qualify for the Dimensional Agility feat?
Splitting weapons bonuses.
When I grow up...
Wall Spell, Reflex save and attacks of opportunity
"Charm Person" and in-Group Fighting
Saving Shield
Item Creation Problems
Uncanny dodge: it help you if you are blinded?
Fear Aura - how does it work?
AC and how much it slows you down
Transmute Rock to Mud
Magic item creation help
Instant Fortress - The most powerful "weapon" in pathfinder?
Damage Reduction Question?
Rules for creating large Extraplanar spaces?
Burrow and Large (or larger!) creature positioning.
Witches and Spells
Drow and Elf Prerequisites



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.