Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
  About Paizo     Messageboards     News     Paizo Blog     Help/FAQ  




Pathfinder Society
SEARCH


BROWSE
Shop

Messageboards

Roman Pilum, 10 seconds ago by kyrt-ryder

Wholeness of Body: Am I missing something or does this suck?, 1 minute ago by TriOmegaZero

List of Errata in Pathfinder Core Rulebook, 7 minutes ago by mdt

Playtest arises questions, 9 minutes ago by A Man In Black

Probably a repeated question, 11 minutes ago by Scott Betts

Worst class changes poll categories inquiry, 12 minutes ago by A Man In Black

Xaaon's Curse of the Crimson Throne - Act III, 14 minutes ago by LoreKeeper

Fun usages of the Silent Image spell, 14 minutes ago by xiN.

Valgrymr's Homebrew., 21 minutes ago by Kosan Silveraxe

Killing your players., 25 minutes ago by Kor - Orc Scrollkeeper

Just starting out, and I have a few questions., 40 minutes ago by Studpuffin

Blackjack (spoilers), 43 minutes ago by Studpuffin

2 possible core erratas: Siege Weapon Ammo Cost and UMD, 44 minutes ago by James Risner

Share your Shingles chase descriptions, 46 minutes ago by Studpuffin

Dervish Dance and Flame Blade - official ruling sought, 47 minutes ago by nidho

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / General Discussion / Archives / Update Domains for Non-Core Deities     Recent Posts
Update Domains for Non-Core Deities
Kyle A. Ashcraft,

I myself really like how Pathfinder made domains a little more interesting than just a simple spell list, but these new domains have only been applied to the Core Deities like Torag, Erastil, Gorum, and the rest but there are some other gods I would like to see updated.

Back in 3.5 and the now rare times I play 4E I always liked Bahamut since I love dragons, and I would like to create a cleric to the PF version of Bahamut which is Apsu. Would anyone here disagree that his clerics should have access to the Law, Good, Travel, Earth, and Artifice domains...yet under his portfolio they also include glory which is another available domain. What to do?

Paizo Employee James Jacobs (Editor-in-Chief, Pathfinder),

Go L 68 Fiendish Tyrannosauru avatar

Kyle A. Ashcraft wrote:
I myself really like how Pathfinder made domains a little more interesting than just a simple spell list, but these new domains have only been applied to the Core Deities like Torag, Erastil, Gorum, and the rest but there are some other gods I would like to see updated.

Back in 3.5 and the now rare times I play 4E I always liked Bahamut since I love dragons, and I would like to create a cleric to the PF version of Bahamut which is Apsu. Would anyone here disagree that his clerics should have access to the Law, Good, Travel, Earth, and Artifice domains...yet under his portfolio they also include glory which is another available domain. What to do?


Updated domains are very very very likely to be in the Advanced Player's Guide. But that's still many months away alas...

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / General Discussion / Archives / Update Domains for Non-Core Deities All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in, or create a new account.



©2002–2009 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Society, PAIZOCON, RPG Superstar, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Amazing Stories is a trademark of, and Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.