Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

Alchemist bombs and incorporeal things, by Writer

some quick alchemist queries., by blackbloodtroll

Sneak attack from Stealth RAW, by Sangalor

[d20pfsrd.com] Latest Updates, by Caedwyr

4th Edition Rise of the Runelords Conversion Blog, by Jeremy Mac Donald

BANNED!, by gran rey de los mono

My feelings about 5E D&D, by Beckett

Instant Fortress - The most powerful "weapon" in pathfinder?, by Adamantine Dragon

Bestiary 3: Ready for Release or needed rethinking?, by Gorbacz

Sin Magic: How does it work?, by Egoish

Paizo Blog: Pathfinder Battles Preview: Familiar Faces, by Qstor

What are you listening to as you browse the message boards?, by Mothman

How should a party handle loot distribution?, by Spinkler

Wondrous Item: Graceful Slippers, by harmor

Evocation optimization?, by Egoish

Online Campaigns

DM Aron Marczylo's Curse of the Crimson Throne - Part 3, by Krenn Weststone

SdF's Kingmaker PbP, by Davor Mason

Tales of Agartha: the Avalon Chronicles, by Lysander Sandwalker

The Story of the Stone: Kyrademon's Jade Regent PBP, Part III, by Kyrademon

Amgir's "Curse of the Crimson Throne", by Fealix

Black Tom's War of the Burning Sky II, by Hiro Protagonist

Dungeon Master Heathy's Carrion Crown, by dungeonmaster heathy

GM alientude's Shackled City Discussion, by Dorian Cavendish

GM Fnord's PFS First Steps Discussion, by GM Fnord

Heathy's Isle of Dread Thread, by dungeonmaster heathy

Scipion del Ferro's Kingmaker Discussion, by Davor Mason

Where the Fallen Jarls Sleep: The Rise of Mogens, by Wareagle

The Pact Stone Pyramid – Game Discussion Thread, by Pact Stone GM

The Screaming Sky - DM Downrightamazed, by John Mcnaught

cynarion's Carrion Crown PbP Discussion, by Lem Longbarrow

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:

(Pathfinder Superscriber; GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

The materiel costs for spell completion items seems to be wrong.

Staves and wands all have the following costs in the pathfinder SRD.

Quote:
material component costs sufficient to activate the spell 50 times (divide this amount by the number of charges one use of the spell expends)

This rule was taken directly from the OGL content. That was fine in the 3.5 SRD since each of these items had 50 charges but Pathfinder changed the base items.

A Staff now has 10 charges. If this is not a mistake it is a stealth increase in the cost of staff creation to material cost x charges x 5.

It looks like the charges were reduced on the staff but the item creation rule was never revisited.


dulsin wrote:

The materiel costs for spell completion items seems to be wrong.

Staves and wands all have the following costs in the pathfinder SRD.

Quote:
material component costs sufficient to activate the spell 50 times (divide this amount by the number of charges one use of the spell expends)

This rule was taken directly from the OGL content. That was fine in the 3.5 SRD since each of these items had 50 charges but Pathfinder changed the base items.

A Staff now has 10 charges. If this is not a mistake it is a stealth increase in the cost of staff creation to material cost x charges x 5.

It looks like the charges were reduced on the staff but the item creation rule was never revisited.

However Staves are now rechargable, an ability that doesn't exist in any other similar item. I imagine the discrepancy in price is to account for that, since over the lifetime of a staff you can now technically get infinite benefit from it.

(Pathfinder Superscriber; GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

ZappoHisbane wrote:
However Staves are now rechargable, an ability that doesn't exist in any other similar item. I imagine the discrepancy in price is to account for that, since over the lifetime of a staff you can now technically get infinite benefit from it.

When you recharge the item you should need to pay any material costs. If you can pass on materiel costs for recharge then I suppose it is fair to pay it up front. That would be worse letting the staff pay 5x material costs and then it is free from then on.

(Pathfinder Superscriber; GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

Is there a page where all Pathfinder errata has been posted? I would like to see if this has been reported before.

Cheliax (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Campaign Setting, Companion Subscriber)

Recharging a staff, as per raw, does not cost additional material components.

(Pathfinder Superscriber; GameMastery Maps Subscriber)

Draeke Raefel wrote:
Recharging a staff, as per raw, does not cost additional material components.

That does not make any sense. If someone makes a staff that casts a spell with a significant material cost ala Wish should not be recharged for free.


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / General Discussion / All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure PathPathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Society, Pathfinder Battles, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.