Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
  About Paizo     Messageboards     News     Paizo Blog     Help/FAQ  




Pathfinder Society
SEARCH


BROWSE
Shop

Messageboards

An Attempt At A Definitive Gamer Lexicon, by M.D. Burnett, 27 seconds ago by Mikhaila Burnett

Killing your players., 6 minutes ago by Shuriken Nekogami

Maintaining Aggro??, 7 minutes ago by A Man In Black

Wholeness of Body: Am I missing something or does this suck?, 7 minutes ago by FireStorm005

Pathfinder Adventure Path #27: What Lies in Dust (Council of Thieves 3 of 6) (PFRPG) Print Edition, 12 minutes ago by Robert Hawkshaw

We All Want To Change The World - Bastards of Erebus PbP, 13 minutes ago by Loba

Sidhe (New race), 16 minutes ago by A Man In Black

Cavalier and Oracle Playtest, 18 minutes ago by Phil Renfroe

Using 3.5 stuff vs using Pathfinder only stuff, 19 minutes ago by A Man In Black

Question about DM rewards...., 19 minutes ago by Larcifer

P0L's Second Darkness Game Thread, 20 minutes ago by Galahd Riven

Realms of Agartha PbP, 23 minutes ago by Aananda

Are dragons overrated?, 23 minutes ago by houstonderek

Oracle tongues curse wackiness, 24 minutes ago by A Man In Black

The Crossbow Thread, 29 minutes ago by A Man In Black

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / General Discussion / Half-Dragons: Acquired Template?     Recent Posts
Half-Dragons: Acquired Template?
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

I couldn't help but notice one small thing in the Bestiary about the half dragons.

PRD wrote:
“Half-dragon” is an inherited or acquired template that can be added to any living, corporeal creature (referred to hereafter as the base creature).

Is this a left over from 3.5, or is this, as I hope, a sign of things to come?

I personally miss the PRC that allows obtaining the template, so I hope this might come in time.

Osirion seekerofshadowlight,

18 Undead-Fort-Commander C avatar

I would guess a left over text. Pretty cut and paste standard templet wording it seems.

Osirion Set,

Anubis avatar

Just about any template could be theoretically 'acquired' by Miracle or Wish or something. For the Scarred Lands setting, there were True Rituals that allowed one to become a Vampire, for instance, without ever meeting another Vampire, by just performing a difficult ritual (using rules similar to the SRD Incantation rules), and I'd be completely in support of rituals / Incantations that allow someone to grant someone a half-elemental, celestial, fiendish or draconic template by taking out their heart and replacing it with fire or whatever.

Thoughts to that effect.

I should probably work the Heart of Power true ritual up as an Incantation, instead. Some day...

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.

Lord Fyre (RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32),

Balor avatar

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.

Does Dragon Disciple (PathfinerRPG p. 380) do this?

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

Lord Fyre wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.

Does Dragon Disciple (PathfinerRPG p. 380) do this?

No, that was gone from the DD sense their version came out.

I was rather pissed as that was always the entire original point of the PrC, mechanically speaking.

ZappoHisbane,

48 Steel Predator avatar

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.

Does Dragon Disciple (PathfinerRPG p. 380) do this?

No, that was gone from the DD sense their version came out.

I was rather pissed as that was always the entire original point of the PrC, mechanically speaking.


Personally, I like the new PrC much better. Yes, you miss out on some of the stat bonuses. However, the fact that it continues to advance your spellcasting is FAR better. What would you rather have at 20th level? A bunch of stat increases and always-on claws? Or 6th, 7th and 8th level spells? Me, I'll take the spells thanks. Also note that previously you had to be large-size to get wings, now all Draconic Bloodline sorcerers get them, and Draconic Disciples get them a level early (probably).

Edit to add: The flight speed is far superior to the old DD (90' rather than base land speed), and you get a total of +7 natural armor (instead of just +4). Your breath weapon is going to be doing much more damage too (d6 per level, instead of max 6d8). In fact, the only things you're losing as far as I can see are +4 STR, +4 CON and +2 CHA. With belts of physical perfection now in the game, those attribute bonuses are not nearly as significant.

Treantmonk,

Dr-Lucky-expression-2 avatar

Got to agree with Zappo

As a 3/4 BAB PrC that required spontaneous casting ability to enter, for a pure combat build, it left something to be desired (unless you were playing Neverwinter Nights - then it rocked).

giving it spellcasting progression has made it a decent gish prestige class, an interesting choice for a Fighter/Sorcerer or a Bard.

Also, importantly, it still gives the female sorceress claws *RAWRRRR*

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

Sorry if this is snarky, but I could care less which is better. You are going off topic, seems trollish, please stop.

Osirion seekerofshadowlight,

18 Undead-Fort-Commander C avatar

calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.

If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.

If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that


He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.

It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".

ZappoHisbane,

48 Steel Predator avatar

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.

If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that


He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.

It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".


This seems rather sensitiveish.

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

ZappoHisbane wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.

If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that


He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.

It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".


This seems rather sensitiveish.

I did think it might, thus the sorry.

I apologize again.

P.S. I guess I should have added that I still was sort of pissed about it. Or maybe my blood sugar is getting low.

Disciple of Sakura,

Lamiaqueen avatar

Back in 3.5, I always wanted to create a Warforged Barbarian 5/Sorcerer 1 going into Dragon Disciple. The very idea of a Warforged transforming into a draconic monster just screamed "awesome" to me. I had visions of him first getting his bite attack, and his mouth tearing open like Eva Unit 01. It would have been sweet.

Sadly, I can't really do this now. Kind of a bummer. But I'm sure I could persuade a DM to allow it, if I ever got the chance to play a Warforged...

tejón (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Celestial Dire Badger avatar

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
I couldn't help but notice one small thing in the Bestiary about the half dragons.

PRD wrote:
“Half-dragon” is an inherited or acquired template that can be added to any living, corporeal creature (referred to hereafter as the base creature).

Is this a left over from 3.5, or is this, as I hope, a sign of things to come?

Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.

Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

tejón wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
I couldn't help but notice one small thing in the Bestiary about the half dragons.

PRD wrote:
“Half-dragon” is an inherited or acquired template that can be added to any living, corporeal creature (referred to hereafter as the base creature).

Is this a left over from 3.5, or is this, as I hope, a sign of things to come?

Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.

Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)

OOOH cool. thanks.

Cheliax KaeYoss (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Planet Stories Subscriber),

Jester avatar

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.

If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that


He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.

It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".


You. Brought. It. Up.

Cheliax KaeYoss (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Planet Stories Subscriber),

Jester avatar

tejón wrote:

Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.

Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)

This explains why my breakfast omelette tasted funny. And the wings.

Paizo Employee James Jacobs (Editor-in-Chief, Pathfinder),

Go L 68 Fiendish Tyrannosauru avatar

Disciple of Sakura wrote:
Back in 3.5, I always wanted to create a Warforged Barbarian 5/Sorcerer 1 going into Dragon Disciple. The very idea of a Warforged transforming into a draconic monster just screamed "awesome" to me. I had visions of him first getting his bite attack, and his mouth tearing open like Eva Unit 01. It would have been sweet.

Sadly, I can't really do this now. Kind of a bummer. But I'm sure I could persuade a DM to allow it, if I ever got the chance to play a Warforged...


If you're playing a warforged, you're already playing with rules outside of the core Pathfinder rules set. So why shouldn't you be able to use a prestige class or effect that grants a half dragon template?

Cheliax KaeYoss (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Planet Stories Subscriber),

Jester avatar

KaeYoss wrote:
tejón wrote:

Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.

Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)

This explains why my breakfast omelette tasted funny. And the wings.

Oh, and I sneezed, and the desk caught fire.

Well, I think this is great. Inflammatory sneezes are useful in this swine-flu-stricken time.

Cheliax KaeYoss (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Planet Stories Subscriber),

Jester avatar

Disciple of Sakura wrote:
Back in 3.5, I always wanted to create a Warforged Barbarian 5/Sorcerer 1 going into Dragon Disciple. The very idea of a Warforged transforming into a draconic monster just screamed "awesome" to me. I had visions of him first getting his bite attack, and his mouth tearing open like Eva Unit 01. It would have been sweet.

Sadly, I can't really do this now. Kind of a bummer. But I'm sure I could persuade a DM to allow it, if I ever got the chance to play a Warforged...


Draconic warforged? So where do dragons order their sex toys?

Heavily Armored Cleric,

B 4--Herald-of-Abadar avatar

KaeYoss wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage.

You. Brought. It. Up.

I. Am. Everywhere.

Poodle Jack Slaad,

A 5 Bullette-Attack avatar

Heavily Armored Cleric wrote:
I. Am. Everywhere.

Even in the nest of rust monster over in that antimagic field?

grasshopper_ea,

Gold avatar

Db3's Astral Projection wrote:
Which is better though, a half-dragon or a Dragon Disciple?

well, a dragon disciple gets half the benefits of the half-dragon templates, all the benefits of the draconic bloodline, and 3/4 the benefits of a full sorcerer

the half-dragon gets the full template. It depends on what you want, but typically higher level spells is more desireable for a spellcaster class than higher STR.

Heavily Armored Cleric,

B 4--Herald-of-Abadar avatar

Poodle Jack Slaad wrote:
Heavily Armored Cleric wrote:
I. Am. Everywhere.

Even in the nest of rust monster over in that antimagic field?

Especially in the nest of rust monsters over in that antimagic field. 'Cause dragonhide plate mail ain't metal.

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus,

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

KaeYoss wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.

If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that


He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.

It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".


You. Brought. It. Up.

No Lord Fyre did. I never brought up a PrC that has nothing to do with the half dragon template any more.

Cheliax KaeYoss (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Planet Stories Subscriber),

Jester avatar

Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.

If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that


He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.

It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".


You. Brought. It. Up.

No Lord Fyre did. I never brought up a PrC that has nothing to do with the half dragon template any more.

You really did bring it up, albeit in disguise (total disguise check result: -3). "Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something." You don't have to name the devil to call it.

And then it was you who started to said he was pissed about the changes to the class, something that was not part of the discussion, and therefore off-topic. No one minded too much.

Someone replied to your complained and offered his opinion that he liked the new Dragon Disciple.

What was your reaction? Called the poor guy a troll out of thin air. Really not classy.

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / Pathfinder RPG / General Discussion / Half-Dragons: Acquired Template? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in, or create a new account.



©2002–2009 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Society, PAIZOCON, RPG Superstar, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Amazing Stories is a trademark of, and Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.