
|
|
|
Everyone can cast spells.,
43 seconds ago
by
Krillnar
Oracle, what's in a name...,
45 seconds ago
by
Charles Evans 25
Wizard dragon disciples are now possible?,
1 minute ago
by
James Jacobs
Favorite Spell, and why?,
1 minute ago
by
Tyler
Wholeness of Body: Am I missing something or does this suck?,
2 minutes ago
by
Zurai
A Few Brave Souls -- PbP,
4 minutes ago
by
Galadar
List of Errata in Pathfinder Core Rulebook,
5 minutes ago
by
Barry MacInnis
Playtest arises questions,
5 minutes ago
by
Zurai
Drawing from a deck of many things...,
5 minutes ago
by
QOShea
Darkmeer's Shackled City PBP,
6 minutes ago
by
Dreav Mistcaller
Gith Advice? Looking to play a Warrior / Mage,
7 minutes ago
by
Laurefindel
Favorite races,
7 minutes ago
by
Weylin
Burning magic and spell level,
8 minutes ago
by
taeko
Son of Forums are Way Too Long!!!,
9 minutes ago
by
Mairkurion {tm}
Burning magic does it stack? multiple hits and multiple oracles,
10 minutes ago
by
taeko
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I couldn't help but notice one small thing in the Bestiary about the half dragons.
PRD wrote:
“Half-dragon” is an inherited or acquired template that can be added to any living, corporeal creature (referred to hereafter as the base creature).
Is this a left over from 3.5, or is this, as I hope, a sign of things to come?
I personally miss the PRC that allows obtaining the template, so I hope this might come in time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would guess a left over text. Pretty cut and paste standard templet wording it seems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just about any template could be theoretically 'acquired' by Miracle or Wish or something. For the Scarred Lands setting, there were True Rituals that allowed one to become a Vampire, for instance, without ever meeting another Vampire, by just performing a difficult ritual (using rules similar to the SRD Incantation rules), and I'd be completely in support of rituals / Incantations that allow someone to grant someone a half-elemental, celestial, fiendish or draconic template by taking out their heart and replacing it with fire or whatever.
Thoughts to that effect.
I should probably work the Heart of Power true ritual up as an Incantation, instead. Some day...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.
Does Dragon Disciple (PathfinerRPG p. 380) do this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Fyre wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.
Does Dragon Disciple (PathfinerRPG p. 380) do this?
No, that was gone from the DD sense their version came out.
I was rather pissed as that was always the entire original point of the PrC, mechanically speaking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Lord Fyre wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something.
Does Dragon Disciple (PathfinerRPG p. 380) do this?
No, that was gone from the DD sense their version came out.
I was rather pissed as that was always the entire original point of the PrC, mechanically speaking.
Personally, I like the new PrC much better. Yes, you miss out on some of the stat bonuses. However, the fact that it continues to advance your spellcasting is FAR better. What would you rather have at 20th level? A bunch of stat increases and always-on claws? Or 6th, 7th and 8th level spells? Me, I'll take the spells thanks. Also note that previously you had to be large-size to get wings, now all Draconic Bloodline sorcerers get them, and Draconic Disciples get them a level early (probably).
Edit to add: The flight speed is far superior to the old DD (90' rather than base land speed), and you get a total of +7 natural armor (instead of just +4). Your breath weapon is going to be doing much more damage too (d6 per level, instead of max 6d8). In fact, the only things you're losing as far as I can see are +4 STR, +4 CON and +2 CHA. With belts of physical perfection now in the game, those attribute bonuses are not nearly as significant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got to agree with Zappo
As a 3/4 BAB PrC that required spontaneous casting ability to enter, for a pure combat build, it left something to be desired (unless you were playing Neverwinter Nights - then it rocked).
giving it spellcasting progression has made it a decent gish prestige class, an interesting choice for a Fighter/Sorcerer or a Bard.
Also, importantly, it still gives the female sorceress claws *RAWRRRR*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry if this is snarky, but I could care less which is better. You are going off topic, seems trollish, please stop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.
If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.
If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that
He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.
If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that
He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".
This seems rather sensitiveish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZappoHisbane wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.
If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that
He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".
This seems rather sensitiveish.
I did think it might, thus the sorry.
I apologize again.
P.S. I guess I should have added that I still was sort of pissed about it. Or maybe my blood sugar is getting low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back in 3.5, I always wanted to create a Warforged Barbarian 5/Sorcerer 1 going into Dragon Disciple. The very idea of a Warforged transforming into a draconic monster just screamed "awesome" to me. I had visions of him first getting his bite attack, and his mouth tearing open like Eva Unit 01. It would have been sweet.
Sadly, I can't really do this now. Kind of a bummer. But I'm sure I could persuade a DM to allow it, if I ever got the chance to play a Warforged...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
I couldn't help but notice one small thing in the Bestiary about the half dragons.
PRD wrote:
“Half-dragon” is an inherited or acquired template that can be added to any living, corporeal creature (referred to hereafter as the base creature).
Is this a left over from 3.5, or is this, as I hope, a sign of things to come?
Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.
Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tejón wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
I couldn't help but notice one small thing in the Bestiary about the half dragons.
PRD wrote:
“Half-dragon” is an inherited or acquired template that can be added to any living, corporeal creature (referred to hereafter as the base creature).
Is this a left over from 3.5, or is this, as I hope, a sign of things to come?
Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.
Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)
OOOH cool. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.
If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that
He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".
You. Brought. It. Up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tejón wrote:
Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.
Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)
This explains why my breakfast omelette tasted funny. And the wings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciple of Sakura wrote:
Back in 3.5, I always wanted to create a Warforged Barbarian 5/Sorcerer 1 going into Dragon Disciple. The very idea of a Warforged transforming into a draconic monster just screamed "awesome" to me. I had visions of him first getting his bite attack, and his mouth tearing open like Eva Unit 01. It would have been sweet.
Sadly, I can't really do this now. Kind of a bummer. But I'm sure I could persuade a DM to allow it, if I ever got the chance to play a Warforged...
If you're playing a warforged, you're already playing with rules outside of the core Pathfinder rules set. So why shouldn't you be able to use a prestige class or effect that grants a half dragon template?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KaeYoss wrote:
tejón wrote:
Bestiary, p.170 wrote:
Half-dragons are only rarely the result of dragons mating with other creatures--most are the result of strange magical experiments.
Being world-flavor, this is absent from the online PRD; but it explains the "acquired" bit quite clearly. :)
This explains why my breakfast omelette tasted funny. And the wings.
Oh, and I sneezed, and the desk caught fire.
Well, I think this is great. Inflammatory sneezes are useful in this swine-flu-stricken time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciple of Sakura wrote:
Back in 3.5, I always wanted to create a Warforged Barbarian 5/Sorcerer 1 going into Dragon Disciple. The very idea of a Warforged transforming into a draconic monster just screamed "awesome" to me. I had visions of him first getting his bite attack, and his mouth tearing open like Eva Unit 01. It would have been sweet.
Sadly, I can't really do this now. Kind of a bummer. But I'm sure I could persuade a DM to allow it, if I ever got the chance to play a Warforged...
Draconic warforged? So where do dragons order their sex toys?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KaeYoss wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage.
You. Brought. It. Up.
I. Am. Everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavily Armored Cleric wrote:
I. Am. Everywhere.
Even in the nest of rust monster over in that antimagic field?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Db3's Astral Projection wrote:
Which is better though, a half-dragon or a Dragon Disciple?
well, a dragon disciple gets half the benefits of the half-dragon templates, all the benefits of the draconic bloodline, and 3/4 the benefits of a full sorcerer
the half-dragon gets the full template. It depends on what you want, but typically higher level spells is more desireable for a spellcaster class than higher STR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poodle Jack Slaad wrote:
Heavily Armored Cleric wrote:
I. Am. Everywhere.
Even in the nest of rust monster over in that antimagic field?
Especially in the nest of rust monsters over in that antimagic field. 'Cause dragonhide plate mail ain't metal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KaeYoss wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.
If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that
He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".
You. Brought. It. Up.
No Lord Fyre did. I never brought up a PrC that has nothing to do with the half dragon template any more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
Captain Sir Hexen Ineptus wrote:
seekerofshadowlight wrote:
calling him troll is uncalled for as you brought up the subject. He was 100% on topic with what you said. If you did not wish anyone to comment on it , you should not have posted it.
If your wanting a templet applied well wish or miracle can do that
He went on a thread where we were talking about being able to acquire the the half dragon template and started talking about how grand the new DD was. The new DD does not let you acquire the half dragon template, so it is off topic by my perspective.
It would be like jumping into the discussion about clerics and mithral heavy armor proficiency thread, and blazing all about how much better the cleric was now, and that mithral is sooo much better now that it can deal silver type damage. That just seems "trollish" to me. I never called him a troll as it did not seem like an intentional act, but it seemed similar; thus the "ish".
You. Brought. It. Up.
No Lord Fyre did. I never brought up a PrC that has nothing to do with the half dragon template any more.
You really did bring it up, albeit in disguise (total disguise check result: -3). "Well I can only hope that we get an official way to get the template, like though a PrC or something." You don't have to name the devil to call it.
And then it was you who started to said he was pissed about the changes to the class, something that was not part of the discussion, and therefore off-topic. No one minded too much.
Someone replied to your complained and offered his opinion that he liked the new Dragon Disciple.
What was your reaction? Called the poor guy a troll out of thin air. Really not classy.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Want to post a reply?
Sign in, or
create a new account.
|
|