Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
  About Paizo     Messageboards     News     Paizo Blog     Help/FAQ  




Pathfinder Society
SEARCH


BROWSE
Shop

Messageboards

Only You Can Prevent Gamerspeak (Kill Colloquialisms Before They Strike Again), 18 seconds ago by Professor Higgins

Suggestions for a girl baby name., 1 minute ago by Mairkurion {tm}

Age of Darkness, 2 minutes ago by Nicolai Auf derMaur

Pinpoint targeting of area spells, 2 minutes ago by Maezer

Lord T's Ptolus Pbp OOC Thread, 5 minutes ago by Lord Thasmudyan

Tarlane's Crypt of the Everflame, 5 minutes ago by Velios

Pathfinder Goblins vs. Ewoks--FIGHT!!!, 6 minutes ago by zylphryx

New Pathfinder Campaign starting in Baltimore MD, 8 minutes ago by Billy Carter

The Adventures of Stabby Blast, Gish-at-Large, 9 minutes ago by Isari of the Frost

What do you want past Adv. Player's Guide ?, 9 minutes ago by Red-Assassin

Greater Medusa from 2E conversion, 9 minutes ago by KnightErrantJR

Delirium's Dragon Delve Discussion, 9 minutes ago by Delirium

Heathy's Isle of Dread Thread, 10 minutes ago by Elgan Dreadwood

Cavalier and Oracle Playtest, 12 minutes ago by Skizzy

Seeking interest in Dungeon a Day PBP, 13 minutes ago by Delirium

Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / General Discussion / Archives / Today's Art Filled Blog     Recent Posts
1 to 50 of 202 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Today's Art Filled Blog
Cheliax baron arem heshvaun (Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Companion Subscriber),

42-attic Whisperer Final H avatar

Will you look at that!

Sweet !!

As a grognard, it is quite plain as day, I know a Dark Stalker when I see one !!

The Medusa is 'rocks out' amazing, even the Tiger is 'Grrreat' !

And that Basidirond is just a little (shop of) horror.

Andoran Misery,

A 10-Kwava Final avatar

baron arem heshvaun wrote:

Will you look at that!

Sweet !!


Medusa's can turn you to stone with a glance.

... so it looks like everyone needs to carry blindfolds to use on HER.

(Also, bring a hair net >_>)

Man I might be MORE excited to see all the art in the Bestiary then I am to get the Pathfinder Core book itself.

Yamazakana,

Bronze-Dragon avatar

What a wonderful Medusa!
I don't mind petrified.

Cheliax KaeYoss (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Planet Stories Subscriber),

Jester avatar

Hooray for medusae that aren't ugly any more.

Andoran Misery,

A 10-Kwava Final avatar

Yamazakana wrote:
What a wonderful Medusa!
I don't mind petrified.

... I wonder who's going to make the first "hard/stone/petrified" joke in reference to ... well ... ya know.

Cheliax Asgetrion,

Ghostmonkdwarf avatar

All of these look very, very good! :)

Matthew Morris (RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32),

Blue-Dragon avatar

I was hoping the Medusae would look more like Shambleau

The tiger confuses me, do some tigers have spots? The pigs running for there lives makes me laugh though. "Run Pumba Run!" We just needed a meerkat somewhere.

I do want a 'Monstrous Humanoids Revisited' now moreso with the art. Medusae, Dopplegangers, Dark Creepers/Stalkers... what else?

Thraxus (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber),

Minotaur 2 avatar

Matthew Morris wrote:
The tiger confuses me, do some tigers have spots? The pigs running for there lives makes me laugh though. "Run Pumba Run!" We just needed a meerkat somewhere.

It is a dire tiger/smilodon. I suspect the coat pattern it to change it from a jungle predator (or to just make it different from the tiger itself). The saber-toothed tiger was not closely related to the tiger, so the there is no need to keep the stripe pattern.

Matthew Morris (RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32),

Blue-Dragon avatar

Ah, OK.

The tag just said 'Tiger' I think I like the Primeval Smilodons though. :-)

And I just looked again. Am I an evil man that the one little pig, eyes wide open, running flat out makes me laugh?

Andoran Dragnmoon (Pathfinder Chronicles Charter Superscriber; GameMastery Superscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber),

Dervish avatar

Yamazakana wrote:
What a wonderful Medusa!
I don't mind petrified.

Looks like the got the art from

Pathfinder Society Scenario #21: The Eternal Obelisk

Osirion flash_cxxi (RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32),

Calistria Final avatar

Dragnmoon wrote:
Yamazakana wrote:
What a wonderful Medusa!
I don't mind petrified.

Looks like the got the art from

Pathfinder Society Scenario #21: The Eternal Obelisk


Yeah I think ther is a lot of art commisioned for either the Bestiary or another publication that will get used vice versa...

Oh and the Medusa is frickin' awesome! Love me some girls with giant albino snakes!

Osirion yoda8myhead (Pathfinder Chronicles Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber),

R 1-Rakshasa-Opener Redo 1 avatar

With cleavage like that, the medusa's gaze attack might not work so well. She's just asking for adventurer's to not look her in the eyes.

vagrant-poet (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

DA 150 Base 1 avatar

She's a feminist's nightmare, looking at her chest is the right thing to do!

aeglos,

King Ezelgar avatar

Thraxus wrote:
It is a dire tiger/smilodon.

thanks you, now I like the pic :-)

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

So here's this thread. I was looking for it under website, I guess.

What a great day!

They're all good, but I love the tiger and the medusa. So...glad to see I wasn't the only one who was affected by the medusa. My guess is she'll turn plenty of adventures into stone, yet leave them most of their mobility...

EDIT: OK, my reference was predicted.
Yeah, Matthew, the little pigs crack me up.

Cheddar Bearer,

5 Tungsten-Dragon avatar

Dragnmoon wrote:
Yamazakana wrote:
What a wonderful Medusa!
I don't mind petrified.

Looks like the got the art from

Pathfinder Society Scenario #21: The Eternal Obelisk


I Suspect that many of the society scenarios were developed so that the monster art from them could be used in the final bestiary. On the plus side there has been some great monster art in the scenarios. Hopefully the remorhaz will make it into the final bestiary.

Osirion yoda8myhead (Pathfinder Chronicles Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber),

R 1-Rakshasa-Opener Redo 1 avatar

Cheddar Bearer wrote:
I Suspect that many of the society scenarios were developed so that the monster art from them could be used in the final bestiary. On the plus side there has been some great monster art in the scenarios. Hopefully the remorhaz will make it into the final bestiary.

I imagine we'll see the reverse in season one as well, with art that first appeared in the Bestiary serving again as cover art for new PFS scenarios. Or they might start ordering art for Bestiary II.

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

I wonder if we'll ever see any Planet Stories art in Pathfinder products, now that they will be doing more than covers?

Osirion yoda8myhead (Pathfinder Chronicles Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber),

R 1-Rakshasa-Opener Redo 1 avatar

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
I wonder if we'll ever see any Planet Stories art in Pathfinder products, now that they will be doing more than covers?

My understanding is that they will be trying to get the rights to the artwork which originally appeared with the PS material. In these cases, I don't think it would, but if they have to commission new art and it's both quality (which I'm sure it will be) and is topical, I would love to see some crossover.

Taldor Zootcat (Pathfinder Chronicles Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Planet Stories Subscriber),

A 10-Glorio-Arkona avatar

Misery wrote:
... I wonder who's going to make the first "hard/stone/petrified" joke in reference to ... well ... ya know.

That would be you.

Osirion Majuba (Paizo Charter Superscriber),

DR 325 Wizard Cover avatar

It is nice shots! I'm not even that fond of Dark Stalkers but I recognized it just about instantly.

I actually *do* think that's a Tiger, and those are Guinea Pigs! :)

Permanent Link to the Blog for those checking this in the future.

Cheliax KaeYoss (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Planet Stories Subscriber),

Jester avatar

Matthew Morris wrote:
Ah, OK.

The tag just said 'Tiger' I think I like the Primeval Smilodons though. :-)


I think they won't have an Animals Appendix or a "Dire Animals" entry. So if you go to T, you'll find an entry with Tiger and Dire Tiger.

Matthew Morris wrote:

And I just looked again. Am I an evil man that the one little pig, eyes wide open, running flat out makes me laugh?

Yes, you are. Become a vegetarian right now.

Paizo Employee James Jacobs (Editor-in-Chief, Pathfinder),

Go L 68 Fiendish Tyrannosauru avatar

flash_cxxi wrote:
Yeah I think ther is a lot of art commisioned for either the Bestiary or another publication that will get used vice versa...

Oh and the Medusa is frickin' awesome! Love me some girls with giant albino snakes!


I made a count to satisfy my curiosity, and the results of my highly-nonscientific investigation seems to indicate that about 60% of the art in the Bestiary is new an 40% is reprinted from other sources (such as is the medusa's case). (Unless I reversed my maths and it's 40% new and 60% reprints.)

Paizo Employee James Jacobs (Editor-in-Chief, Pathfinder),

Go L 68 Fiendish Tyrannosauru avatar

KaeYoss wrote:
I think they won't have an Animals Appendix or a "Dire Animals" entry. So if you go to T, you'll find an entry with Tiger and Dire Tiger.

Correct.

Dark Psion,

19 Boss-Lamia avatar

Matthew Morris wrote:

I do want a 'Monstrous Humanoids Revisited' now moreso with the art. Medusae, Dopplegangers, Dark Creepers/Stalkers... what else?


I would like to see a book on the "Semi-Human" creatures, those just just human enough to be disturbing.

Lamia, Sphinx, Manticore, Harpy, Saytr, Mermen, Naga, Tabaxi, etc,..

Thraxus (Pathfinder Adventure Path Charter Subscriber),

Minotaur 2 avatar

Majuba wrote:
I actually *do* think that's a Tiger, and those are Guinea Pigs! :)

Maybe, but those top canines are near saber-tooth in size. Also, the smallest smilodon was the same size as the siberian tiger.

Still, let's just call it a dire tiger.

Cheliax brent norton,

Wild Watcher Finish avatar

Is it me or does the Medusa remind you of Britney Spears at the MTV awards. Love the art work.

Paizo Employee James Jacobs (Editor-in-Chief, Pathfinder),

Go L 68 Fiendish Tyrannosauru avatar

Thraxus wrote:
Majuba wrote:
I actually *do* think that's a Tiger, and those are Guinea Pigs! :)

Maybe, but those top canines are near saber-tooth in size. Also, the smallest smilodon was the same size as the siberian tiger.

Still, let's just call it a dire tiger.


I guess I can spoil this: In the PFRPG, smilodon = dire tiger. For most of the dire animals, while they're still listed as "dire" animals for compatibility issues, we are presenting them with their real-world megafauna prehistoric analogies as well. And in most cases, the art is going to reflect that.

As to why it has an unusual striping/spotted pattern to its fur... that's mostly artistic license and an implication about where the smilodon/dire tiger does its hiding.

Either way, those little piggies are hosed.

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

James Jacobs wrote:
For most of the dire animals, while they're still listed as "dire" animals for compatibility issues, we are presenting them with their real-world megafauna prehistoric analogies as well. And in most cases, the art is going to reflect that.

Yay! Yay! And yay!
I was really hoping for this and I thought there were hints, but this spoiler makes my day. Well, okay, after the preview pics...it gives the afternoon a boost!

Andoran Gene,

A 18 Devargo Final avatar

James Jacobs wrote:
I guess I can spoil this: In the PFRPG, smilodon = dire tiger. For most of the dire animals, while they're still listed as "dire" animals for compatibility issues, we are presenting them with their real-world megafauna prehistoric analogies as well. And in most cases, the art is going to reflect that.

Out of curiosity, how will you be noting their real-world counterparts? Something akin to Dire Tiger (Smilodon)?

EDIT: Nevermind, you covered it in your next post. Thankies! :D

Paizo Employee James Jacobs (Editor-in-Chief, Pathfinder),

Go L 68 Fiendish Tyrannosauru avatar

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
For most of the dire animals, while they're still listed as "dire" animals for compatibility issues, we are presenting them with their real-world megafauna prehistoric analogies as well. And in most cases, the art is going to reflect that.

Yay! Yay! And yay!
I was really hoping for this and I thought there were hints, but this spoiler makes my day. Well, okay, after the preview pics...it gives the afternoon a boost!

It's a bit frustrating that most of those prehistoric monster names are SUPER LONG. Which means they often don't fit well alongside "Dire Crocodile" in the statblock title or the top of the page. So in order to find out that it's also called a sarcosuchus or whatever, you'll need to actually read the monster's flavor text. But it's there!

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

Begins filing extraneous bone spikes off of his dire minis...

So long EXTREME! dire animals.

Andoran taig (Paizo Superscriber),

Deschamps-10 Werewolverines avatar

What is the prehistoric equivalent of a dire badger?

Qadira Fake Healer,

283 avatar

taig wrote:
What is the prehistoric equivalent of a dire badger?

Badgers! BADGERS!!! We don' need no stinkin' badgers!!!!

Andoran Gorbacz (Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion Subscriber),

15-blue-dragon-FINAL 2 avatar

Good riddance, the 90s-style EXXXTREME OVERLOAD dire animals were silly...

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

OK, still love the little CDBs. Repenomamus giganticus? Chamitataxus avitus? Sorry, not finding illustrations.

Gorbacz -- good point! How could I forget that EXXXTREME can't be spelled with one "x"?

Paizo Employee Ross Byers (Assistant Software Developer),

Kyuss Spawnling avatar

taig wrote:
What is the prehistoric equivalent of a dire badger?

A wolverine?

Disclaimer: The above is a joke. I have no idea what the folks back in the editorial pit are up to. Sean chases me out with a paintbrush and hobby knife whenever I go back there.

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

Ross, don't you know anything about mammalogy? I can tell a wolverine from a badger. The miniatures are COMPLETELY different....

Andoran Gene,

A 18 Devargo Final avatar

!!!Dire Badger!!!

Paizo Employee James Jacobs (Editor-in-Chief, Pathfinder),

Go L 68 Fiendish Tyrannosauru avatar

In cases where there's not really a clear or obvious real-world primeval critter (such as the case with the dire bat) we generally just call it a dire bat. There might be a few exceptions, but none come to mind.

As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

NOTE: Just because an animal doesn't show up in the Bestiary doesn't mean it can't be an animal companion supported by the Core Rulebook... the animal companion rules are actually pretty awesome that way!

Dhampir984 (Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Companion, GameMastery Maps Subscriber),

TSR 95053-50 avatar

James Jacobs wrote:
As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

Not even a celestial one?

Andoran taig (Paizo Superscriber),

Deschamps-10 Werewolverines avatar

James Jacobs wrote:
In cases where there's not really a clear or obvious real-world primeval critter (such as the case with the dire bat) we generally just call it a dire bat. There might be a few exceptions, but none come to mind.

As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

NOTE: Just because an animal doesn't show up in the Bestiary doesn't mean it can't be an animal companion supported by the Core Rulebook... the animal companion rules are actually pretty awesome that way!


That's it! I'm cancelling all my subscriptions!

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

We do need badgers! Scent attack optional.

Andoran taig (Paizo Superscriber),

Deschamps-10 Werewolverines avatar

Gene wrote:
!!!Dire Badger!!!

That link "cannot be found" on my internets. :(

Edit: There it is. Thanks for the link!

Osirion yoda8myhead (Pathfinder Chronicles Charter Superscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber),

R 1-Rakshasa-Opener Redo 1 avatar

taig wrote:
That's it! I'm cancelling all my subscriptions!

Badgers are just fat weasels anyway. Just add the obese template to it and there you go.

Mairkurion {tm} (Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber),

Carlisle Pathfinder PZO 111 D avatar

All this hatin' on badgers just breaks my heart. Didn't any of you badgtards grow up on Wind in the Willows?

Andoran Gene,

A 18 Devargo Final avatar

taig wrote:
That link "cannot be found" on my internets. :(

Here's a copy/paste:
Spoiler:
Prehistoric badger had dinosaurs for breakfast
by Michael Hopkin

Palaeontologists have dug up a new species of mammal that roamed China during the reign of the dinosaurs. The creature was large enough to feast on young dinosaurs, exploding the myth that all of the mammals living back then were relatively tiny.

Repenomamus giganticus, as the creature has been christened, was more than a metre long, about the size of a large dog. However, it would have more closely resembled a badger, says Yaoming Hu of the American Museum of Natural History in New York, who led the examination of the fossil.

The fossil, which dates back 130 million years and was found in Liaoning in northern China, has a skull that is double the size of that of its closest relative, R. robustus, Hu and his colleagues report in this week's Nature.

This makes it a startling addition to the ranks of Mesozoic mammals, who lived with the dinosaurs more than 65 million years ago. "We were totally surprised," Hu told news@nature.com. "The idea about Mesozoic mammals is that they were small. These ones are totally different."

So big, in fact, was R. giganticus that it may well have had some dinosaurs for breakfast, literally. At the same site, the researchers uncovered a R. robustus skeleton with the bones of a baby Psittacosaurus in just the spot where its stomach would have been.

If R. robustus could manage to eat a dinosaur, then its big brother almost certainly could, Hu and his colleagues suggest. They add, however, that it may well have fed on plants and insects too.

"If this is not the largest Mesozoic mammal, it must be approaching it," comments Jerry Hooker, who studies prehistoric mammals at the Natural History Museum in London. "Its jaw length is about that of a fox."

The idea that Repenomamus ate young dinosaurs is very plausible, he adds. The dinosaur bones found with R. robustus are from a single individual and some are still articulated, making it unlikely that they were washed there from elsewhere after death.

The bones' articulation also suggests that Repenomamus tore its prey limb from limb before gulping it down in large chunks, Hooker argues. This theory is bolstered by the fact that the mammals' teeth are sharp, with no molars.

One way to confirm that the Psittacosaurus was eaten would be to look for corrosion on its bones from digestive acids, Hooker suggests. "Mammalian carnivores today have very strong digestive juices," he says. Hyenas' stomach acid, for example, can make holes in bones and teeth.

Hooker rejects the suggestion, however, that Repenomamus supplemented its diet with vegetarian options. "I would have thought it unlikely that they were eating plants," he says. "With these teeth you wouldn't expect them to do a lot of grinding or crushing, and that's what you would need, like a pestle and mortar."

Andoran taig (Paizo Superscriber),

Deschamps-10 Werewolverines avatar

Gene wrote:
taig wrote:
That link "cannot be found" on my internets. :(

Here's a copy/paste:
** spoiler omitted **...

Thanks! So, the dire badger would be capable of killing and eating, say, the dinosaur pictured for James "No Badgers" Jacobs.

Andoran Gene,

A 18 Devargo Final avatar

I give him one round at the most... assuming he sees it coming! :D

Andoran taig (Paizo Superscriber),

Deschamps-10 Werewolverines avatar

yoda8myhead wrote:
taig wrote:
That's it! I'm cancelling all my subscriptions!

Badgers are just fat weasels anyway. Just add the obese template to it and there you go.

And where would I find the obese template? Is that in the SRD somewhere?

1 to 50 of 202 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Pathfinder® / General Discussion / Archives / Today's Art Filled Blog All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in, or create a new account.



©2002–2009 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, the Paizo golem logo, GameMastery, Pathfinder, Planet Stories, and Undefeated are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Chronicles, Pathfinder Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Society, PAIZOCON, RPG Superstar, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Amazing Stories is a trademark of, and Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and are used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.