
|
|
|
Cavalier and Oracle Playtest,
8 seconds ago
by
Richard McAteer
Playtest arises questions,
55 seconds ago
by
A Man In Black
Zombies!,
3 minutes ago
by
Robby the Robot
Fall of nations Chapter 1 - Refuge,
4 minutes ago
by
Pietro Blanco
Best Gish Class?,
7 minutes ago
by
Mairkurion {tm}
Falling Damage house rule,
7 minutes ago
by
Shinmizu
Wardens and marking targets - confused,
10 minutes ago
by
drowranger80
Tomb of the Emperor Gods -- PbP,
11 minutes ago
by
Asim Hassona
We All Want To Change The World - Bastards of Erebus PbP,
13 minutes ago
by
Loba
Dear Paizo, please give us a gish base class!,
13 minutes ago
by
insaneogeddon
Killing your players.,
15 minutes ago
by
Shuriken Nekogami
Entering Partial Squares,
16 minutes ago
by
Jason Nelson
Seeking interest in Dungeon a Day PBP,
18 minutes ago
by
Davi The Eccentric
French Wolf's Howl of the Carrion King,
18 minutes ago
by
AinvarG
New PDF once the Golarion Campaign Setting is revised?,
19 minutes ago
by
The_Minstrel_Wyrm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Paizo tackles Classic Monsters 2, what critters would you like to see in it?
My top three:
Medusae. Divorce them from the mythical 'mortal torqued off goddess' roots and you have a weird monster. How do they function as a society? Being vulnerable to their own and others gaze attacks, how do they trust? Can they readily undo the effects of their gaze? Do they use petrification as a punishment?
Arenea. So much potential. Why can they shape change? Why do they infiltrate? Are they looking at humaoids as food, friends or foes?
Blink Dogs. I mean, yes, the Blink Dog nation was 'gonzo' but it did highlight that they're intelligent and social. How do they work? I'm all for some kind of aboriginal/dreamtime vibe for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I thought Paizo was already doing that. I mean they've got Dragons Revisited and Dungeon Denzians Revisited on the lineup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll be releasing Dungeon Denizens Revisited in a few months, and Dragons Revisited should be on shelves in a few weeks. So yeah; we'll certainly be keeping this line going.
What other monsters are folks interested in?
As for the medusa, if we do a book that has a medusa chapter, I guarentee that we'll go the opposite direction; we'll embrace her mythological roots and develop her using those myths as inspiration. That's what she is, after all... it makes no sense to keep the name "Medusa" and then ignore thousands of years of tradition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I misspoke, James,
I meant she's unique. With multiple medusae, how do you explain them? That's what I want to see. kind of like the multitude of minotaurs vs the one big guy on Minos.
Morbid thought. If a medusae can't turn its gaze off, childbirth must be a bear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to see the Outer Planes Revisited, personally. Let's see Paizo's take on the infernal societies of demons and devils as well as their re-envisioning of the Upper Planes and their heirarchies!
Other than that, I'd really like to see some love for displacer beasts. Still probably my favorite "monster" type critter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Morris wrote:
Maybe I misspoke, James,
I meant she's unique. With multiple medusae, how do you explain them? That's what I want to see. kind of like the multitude of minotaurs vs the one big guy on Minos.
Morbid thought. If a medusae can't turn its gaze off, childbirth must be a bear.
Ah; that makes more sense. But still; the game's had medusae as a monster type from the start, and the point of revisiting these things isn't to redefine as much as it is to revitalize. We want to expand on them; take what exists in the game in the form of stats and to extrapolate from there to put flavor on the skeleton that is the game rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Morris wrote:
Morbid thought. If a medusae can't turn its gaze off, childbirth must be a bear.
*envisions creepy medusae spawning rooms filled with petrified medusa children*
That brings something else to mind... if they're all female, do they reproduce asexually? Or are they the product of normal humanoids who are cursed to become medusae?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's actually a cool idea Matt. It reminds me of some of the monsters in the Birthright campaign setting. There was THE Gorgon or THE Medusa which made them terrifying and great threats for the players. I'd like to see how Paizo would reimagine some classic monsters as unique creatures.
In addition, I'd love to see yugoloths done by Paizo. I was so disappointed that WotC didn't offer us a Fiendish Codex III for them. I'm not sure how Paizo plans to fit them into their cosmology though. Also, please provide a reworking of elementals. I have never liked the "lump of element" idea, as fighting it with weapons seems silly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although they've certainly been covered heavily in other books by other companies, I'd like to see the Paizo treatment of undead in Classic Undead Revisited. Off the top of my head, I'm thinking the mummy, vampire, lich, ghoul, wraith, wight, ghost, shadow, etc. You could also do lycanthropes in the same book, which would be consistent with theme if not type.
CR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fatespinner wrote:
I'd like to see the Outer Planes Revisited, personally. Let's see Paizo's take on the infernal societies of demons and devils as well as their re-envisioning of the Upper Planes and their heirarchies!
On the schedule! Coming soon in the form of "The Great Beyond: A Guide to the Multiverse" and later in the year with the first volume of the Book of the Damned, "Princes of Darkness."
Fatespinner wrote:
Other than that, I'd really like to see some love for displacer beasts. Still probably my favorite "monster" type critter.
Not on the schedule. Displacer beasts are one of the dozen or so monsters WotC identified as product identity with the OGL, and they retain all rights to the displacer beast: They're not open content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrosive Rabbit wrote:
Although they've certainly been covered heavily in other books by other companies, I'd like to see the Paizo treatment of undead in Classic Undead Revisited. Off the top of my head, I'm thinking the mummy, vampire, lich, ghoul, wraith, wight, ghost, shadow, etc. You could also do lycanthropes in the same book, which would be consistent with theme if not type.
CR
I'd love to see that too. I'm a little concerned that it would be PFRPG content if it were announced at this point though, and I'm not sure I'll be buying the PFRPG stuff. Classic Monsters Revisited was pretty mechanics light though (with just the single page with the OGL stats on it) so I might still go for an Undead Revisited book in PFRPG if it didn't tie itself up in being PFRPG content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuff I would like to see 'jazzed up' goes into two categories, although I would strongly prefer that they not be just handed off as writing assignments to writers who don't already chomp at the bit to make them special. The Pathfinder Goblin was amazing, and, IMO, not only did none of the other CMR write-ups reach that level of amazing, but some of them felt (to me) like 'filler' that added little to previous incarnations of Hobgoblin, Lizardfolk, Gnoll, etc. I'd rather wait for inspiration to strike, than have yet another book with a five page section that tells me that Troglodytes live a primitive existence underground and smell real bad...
1) Critters that just scream 'iconic' (and remain in the SRD);
Bulette, Chimera, Gorgon, Griffon, Hydra, Manticore, Otyugh, Owlbear, Pseudodragon, Roper, Shambling Mound, Treant, Will O Wisp, Wyvern
2) Critters that have always interested me;
Aranea, Azer, Derro, Doppleganger, Giant Eagles (I would *also* like to see species of Dire Eagle and Owl, who aren't intelligent and friendly, although they could even be the same species, with one chick in a dozen having human level intelligence and generally ending up in charge of it's animal intelligence brethren), Aquatic Elves, Gargoyles (which might be quite different in flavor, for Golarion, with their own Demon Lord patron), Giberring Mouther (always seemed to have a grab-bag of strange abilities, I'd love to see a writeup that somehow made sense of this hodgepodge creature! I believe that Wolfgang Bauer hinted in Scimitars Against the Dark that Gibbering Mouthers are the remains of wizards who studied into forbidden magics and were warped into their current form, which is an awesome hook, IMO.), Annis, Green Hag, Rakshasa, Sprites (no, not Nixies, Pixies or Grigs, the actual 'Sprites' that started it all, without irresistable dance and stuff!)
Between Aranea, Dopplegangers, Hags and Rakshasa, it's probably no surprise that I have a special place in my heart for critters that can appear to be human, but aren't.
I flat-out excluded critters that would get their own books anyway, like Giants, Dragons and Undead. (I would have excluded Aquatic Elves as well, as they would have most likely been detailed in Elves of Golarion, but it appears they got passed over.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I second gargoyles, but I would like for them to be broadened out beyond evil earth spirits trapped in stone, in light of their historic meanings and uses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
I second gargoyles, but I would like for them to be broadened out beyond evil earth spirits trapped in stone, in light of their historic meanings and uses.
A nod to Disney would be nice too :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another theme that I'd love to see done is giants. Again, they've been covered in other works, but usually depicted as "Rawr! Smash!" brutes, or examined as separate species with no indication as to how they interact or how their cultures mesh or differ. Basically I want Paizo to give me a punch line for "A fire giant, a frost giant, and a stone giant walk into a bar and ..."
If it was a book of relatively unrelated monsters, I'd definitely like to see gargoyles, treants, manticores, hags, hydras, and chimeras done up. That said, there are only a few OGL creatures that I wouldn't be interested in seeing written up, so regardless of what is in future installments, I'll be purchasing them.
CR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrosive Rabbit wrote:
Another theme that I'd love to see done is giants. Again, they've been covered in other works, but usually depicted as "Rawr! Smash!" brutes, or examined as separate species with no indication as to how they interact or how their cultures mesh or differ.
Did you check out the article in PF #4? Its been a while since i read it, and I think it was mostly on Stone giants, but I know it mentioned how they interact with some other types of giants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cpt_kirstov wrote:
Did you check out the article in PF #4? Its been a while since i read it, and I think it was mostly on Stone giants, but I know it mentioned how they interact with some other types of giants
You can extrapolate a bit about their relationships from the giant pantheon in Gods & Magic too (gotta love creation myths)...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Jacobs wrote:
Fatespinner wrote:
Other than that, I'd really like to see some love for displacer beasts. Still probably my favorite "monster" type critter.
Not on the schedule. Displacer beasts are one of the dozen or so monsters WotC identified as product identity with the OGL, and they retain all rights to the displacer beast: They're not open content.
I'm going to go hunting to find the answer, but is there a specific place where they listed these hands off mobs? I'd love to have a listing of those, just to see what they're hoarding as their own ... so I know what to start playing with to make new ones :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think the fey need their own book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are my suggestions:
1. Gargoyles
2. Worgs
3. Griffons
4. Treants
5. Manticores
6. Sphinx
7. Umber hulk
8. Salamanders
9. Bulette
10. Naga
11. Basilisk
12. Medusa
13. Barghests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will second undead. There is a lot I would like to see though.
Another though not sure if would be a classics in the DnD sense but more of classic monsters from Grimm Tales and other old legends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Baron wrote:
7. Umber hulk
WotC IP :-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fatespinner wrote:
That brings something else to mind... if they're all female, do they reproduce asexually? Or are they the product of normal humanoids who are cursed to become medusae?
IIRC, the male version is a maedar...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sigil wrote:
Fatespinner wrote:
That brings something else to mind... if they're all female, do they reproduce asexually? Or are they the product of normal humanoids who are cursed to become medusae?
IIRC, the male version is a maedar...
Originally FR only, closed content regardless, sorry.
Though how Medeusae and Greater Medeusae (ToH Rev) are connected would be a nice point to develop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I would like to see eladrian, centaurs, and dopplegangers given the Pathfinder treatment. Maybe an Undead Revisited book as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Fryer wrote:
Okay, I would like to see eladrian, centaurs, and dopplegangers given the Pathfinder treatment.
Ooh, good choices!
Dopplegangers (and perhaps some less uber changeling folk, if that wouldn't be treading on Eberron IP too much) would be cool. Perhaps some sort of 'cuckoo in the nest' origin like that of Supernatural's shapeshifters, would be neat, born apparently human and only discovering their true nature upon the development of their powers around puberty / late teens.
And I've always liked Centaurs, although they've gone back and forth from burly man-horses to sylvan elf-stags, depending on the edition, and I wouldn't mind seeing both options, for that matter. For all the myriad of interesting adaptations of Kobolds, Hobgoblins, etc. the Centaur has gone pretty much untouched.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yoda8myhead wrote:
Mr Baron wrote:
7. Umber hulk
WotC IP :-(
Crap!
ok, replace umber hulk with centaurs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I really don't have a list. But I would really like to see the basic; Angels, Celestials, Demons, Devils, and Elementals covered in ONE book Classic Monsters style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SirUrza wrote:
I really don't have a list. But I would really like to see the basic; Angels, Celestials, Demons, Devils, and Elementals covered in ONE book Classic Monsters style.
I think those are more types of monsters than specific monsters. In other words, that's very broad. Paizo already announced a book on devils that is coming out in August as the first Pathfinder Chronicles book written for the PFRPG.
That having been said, a book specifically on elementals and outsiders of the elemental planes (genies and mephits come immediately to mind) might work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Baron wrote:
yoda8myhead wrote:
Mr Baron wrote:
7. Umber hulk
WotC IP :-(
Crap!
ok, replace umber hulk with centaurs.
That's a great list I'd be on board with, although I am less excited about the worg than the others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
That's a great list I'd be on board with, although I am less excited about the worg than the others.
I don't know, I'm curious about the worg after reading how the worg in Hollow's Last Hope had a harem of female wolves. (Well two anyway.) That's not natural. Damn unnatural worgs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celestials need a reboot. I always felt like they were total weaksauce in regards to flavor when compared to all of the evil outsiders. Celestials are largely pretty boring, and monotonous. How many different kinds of angel can you create until they all start seeming the same?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would love to see Undead book.
I would like to see a Giant and/or Giantkin book and a Lycanthrope book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My list of beasties I'd like to see covered would include worgs, winter wolves, lycanthropes (of all breeds), barghests, and hags, though they might go better in a book devoted to the Fey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolf Munroe wrote:
I don't know, I'm curious about the worg after reading how the worg in Hollow's Last Hope had a harem of female wolves. (Well two anyway.) That's not natural. Damn unnatural worgs.
That's only because Graypelt is too much man for one woman to satisfy. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sannos wrote:
I would love to see Undead book.
Might get your wish, I think this would be awesome too.
As for lycanthropes, we had to make some hard choices. While we weren't especially interested in doing a lycanthrope book - which would end up being more than 50% wereboar, wereshark, werecapybara, weresnail - we cherry picked the werewolf and included him in the upcoming Classic Horrors Revisted. This does not mean that another book on lycanthropes is impossible down the line, but it's just not something that rose to the top of the pile. Fortunately, you get the iconic lycanthrope in just a month or so here, so... yay!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Hinkle wrote:
My list of beasties I'd like to see covered would include worgs, winter wolves, lycanthropes (of all breeds), barghests,
Classic Canines Revisted!
1) Worg
2) Winter Wolves
3) Blink Dogs
4) Barghests
5) Hound Archon
6) Hell Hound
7) Yeth Hound
8) Shadow Mastiff
9) Jackalwere
10) Cooshee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SirUrza wrote:
I really don't have a list. But I would really like to see the basic; Angels, Celestials, Demons, Devils, and Elementals covered in ONE book Classic Monsters style.
I could see a book for Devils and one for Daemons/Demons.
But I have no interest in Celestials and Angels. Especially Angels (OK, I HATE Angels). I never use either in any of my games.
Elementals would be cool though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Giants. Giants would be nice...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gigglestick wrote:
SirUrza wrote:
I really don't have a list. But I would really like to see the basic; Angels, Celestials, Demons, Devils, and Elementals covered in ONE book Classic Monsters style.
I could see a book for Devils and one for Daemons/Demons.
But I have no interest in Celestials and Angels. Especially Angels (OK, I HATE Angels). I never use either in any of my games.
But you might use them in your game were you to realize how freakin' awesome they are! It's about time outsiders on the good planes get some love. Just because they're good doesn't mean they shouldn't or can't be used to great effect in a game as an ally, benefactor, or even enemy if the situation is right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yoda8myhead wrote:
gigglestick wrote:
SirUrza wrote:
I really don't have a list. But I would really like to see the basic; Angels, Celestials, Demons, Devils, and Elementals covered in ONE book Classic Monsters style.
I could see a book for Devils and one for Daemons/Demons.
But I have no interest in Celestials and Angels. Especially Angels (OK, I HATE Angels). I never use either in any of my games.
But you might use them in your game were you to realize how freakin' awesome they are!
/will be after Paizo get their hands on them...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Wesley Schneider wrote:
Sannos wrote:
I would love to see Undead book.
Might get your wish, I think this would be awesome too.
As for lycanthropes, we had to make some hard choices. While we weren't especially interested in doing a lycanthrope book - which would end up being more than 50% wereboar, wereshark, werecapybara, weresnail - we cherry picked the werewolf and included him in the upcoming Classic Horrors Revisted. This does not mean that another book on lycanthropes is impossible down the line, but it's just not something that rose to the top of the pile. Fortunately, you get the iconic lycanthrope in just a month or so here, so... yay!
How about simply a lycanthrope article in the back of an AP issue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coridan wrote:
How about simply a lycanthrope article in the back of an AP issue?
Classic Therianthropes Revisited!
1. Werebear (first appearance 1974)
2. Wereboar (first appearance 1974)
3. Weretiger (first appearance 1974)
4. Wererat (first appearance 1975)
5. Foxwoman (first appearance 1983)
6. Devil Swine (first appearance 1981)
7. Werebadger (first appearance 1980)
8. Werejaguar (first appearance 1980)
9. Weredire (first appearance 1980)
10. Wereshark (first appearance 1983)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sigil wrote:
IIRC, the male version (EDIT: of a Medusa) is a maedar...
Yes, that was one take (and one that I used, in fact, when I ran The Petrifying Priestess from Dungeon magazine #66.)
But a different approach was taken in the first Eberron novel, The City of Towers, by Keith Baker, in which the party meets a male medusa. Though he wore a mask to block his gaze, it seemed conclusive that his head looked much the same as that of a female Medusa.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Want to post a reply?
Sign in, or
create a new account.
|
|