Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Pathfinder Roleplaying Game

Pathfinder Society

Pathfinder Roleplaying Game: Beginner Box

PaizoCon 2012!
Pathfinder Online Technology Demo by Goblinworks Inc. — Kickstarter
1,754
BACKERS
$110,793
PLEDGED
8
DAYS TO GO

Search
Links
Shop

Messageboards

‘We Be Goblins’ sequel?, by Andrea1

Is this martial artist monk overpowered?, by Zimax

I'm bored: give me ideas for a new base class I can design!, by NecromanticNate

Magus Weapon selection, by ddgon

Was I guilty of being a bad guest?, by TriOmegaZero

Greater challenge to table busters anyone?, by Altus Lucrim

good candidtate for Spell Specialization / perfection?, by Interzone

Chartered Company: The Black Lotus Consortium, by Doctor Carrion

The Advantage / Disadvantage system is very good - what do others think?, by Diffan

. . . And Justice for Hobgoblins?, by hogarth

Gestalt?, by YawarFiesta

Paizo Blog: Pathfinder Society in the Netherlands (or Join the Crew of the Flying Dutchman), by Chef's Slaad

A Madman's CoT (and beyond) Campaign Journal, by Da Cultist

D&D next ... fate or doom ?, by Void Munchkin

Weather & Natural Disasters in KM, by PJ

Online Campaigns

Ironclaw: The Will to Power Discussion, by Quinn Hildring

Age of Darkness, by Laithe Greycoat

Campaign: Without Their Rangers (2nd Group Gameplay), by Nimt

WotW: A Knot of Thorns The Second Parchment, by Price

Zoomackulas's Legacy of Fire, by Hazreem Al'Shakar_1

The Shadows Turn - Chavamana's CoT, by Gravlax d'Antonio

DM Rennick's Jade Regent: The Prophecy of the Seal, by Lirrathan

Ironclaw: The Will To Power, by Quinn Hildring

ANIB OOC, by Alexei Yoren

Devil-spawn and Demon-taint: Ship-shape and Bristol Fashion, by Nachni Charan

Dain's Kingmaker Campaign: Provinces - Ka'etil, by Ka'etil Malas'rae

Waywayd Kings Reboot, by DM Nick

Eternal Horizons - Gameplay Thread 1, by Chuffy

GM Brayden's PFS First Steps: "In Service to Lore" - Group 1 Recruitment, by Brayden Green

The Brinewall Legacy, by Celestine8

   RSS Recent Posts Facebook Twitter Email
Search
Search this Thread:


The war category had stumped me a bit as to how to exactly do a wargame for Stonehenge. There have been abstractions of war done with Stonehenge. Well, thinking a bit. I am wondering if maybe some miniature rules could be done for Stonehenge, and the cards uses as a randomizer to resolve combat. You could use Stonehenge for the battlefield, with the trilithons, disks, and bars uses as terrain, complete with line of sight. As I see it, there are several possible initial scenarios that could be used to frame the combat (same base system):
1. You have a druidic wizard's battle. The figures represent wizards dueling it out, and can cast magic and so on. A bit like Wiz-war but freed of space constraints. Players cast spells and try to hit one another and so on.
2. First person shooter, complete with videogame themes. Think a Druid version of Unreal Tournament, complete with mods, such as capture the flag, and deathmatch.
3. Stonehenge paintball. Players try to nail each other with paintball.

Comments here? Anyone do work with miniature rules or want to?


Maybe :)
I'm currently spending all my spare time on one of my own games, but am easily distracted...

Some ideas-

Miniatures based games are usually free movement for the figures - so much of the board would likely be superfluous. That leads to two type of mini games - ones on the board and ones on an open flat surface just using the pieces of Stonehenge.

Personally I'm more interested in using Stonehenge board and pieces only than not using the board and using actual miniatures.

Ergo I propose a DBA type game.

Cards are used for units and placed face up horizontally on the board. A disk is placed in the centre of the long side of a card to show it's front and who it belongs to (and also to keep the card down. The colour of the card shows the type of unit it is.
White= Cavalry (including light chariots) cost= 9
Blue= Hordes cost= 3
Green= Bows cost= 5
Yellow= Warband (general pre-roman infantry) cost= 6
Red= Spears cost= 7
Black= Psiloi (skirmishers) cost= 4

The numbers on the card are only used for identifying the unit.

Measurements are done with the bars. One bar = 200 paces.

Set aside 6 cards for each player (one of each colour) to act as dice.

Breakup the trilithons to act as hills or as a river.
The card packet can be a village
Forest can be shown with bars of colours not used delineating the forest's edges.

The markings on the board are ignored.


Hmm, based on this list-
http://www.fanaticus.org/DBA/armiesofthefanatici/EdZwilling/Celts/index.htm l

Possibly the cards would be-

White= Light Horse
Blue= Hordes
Green= Light Chariot
Yellow= Warband
Red= Spears
Black= Psiloi


Paizo / Messageboards / Paizo Publishing / Paizo Games / Stonehenge: How about miniatures rules for war? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.

Recent threads in Paizo Games

What Is Titanic Games Doing?



©2002–2012 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online,PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.